Polymarket tightens rules on insider trading and manipulation across DeFi, U.S. platforms

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-03-23Última atualização em 2026-03-23

Polymarket has introduced updated market integrity rules across its DeFi platform and CFTC-regulated U.S. exchange. It tightens restrictions on insider trading and market manipulation as the prediction market continues to scale.

The changes, announced on 23 March, update the platform’s Terms of Use and U.S. rulebook. It is also launching new market integrity pages outlining enforcement mechanisms and reporting processes.

Polymarket sets clearer rules on insider trading

The updated framework defines three specific categories of prohibited insider trading activity.

Users are barred from trading on stolen confidential information, including non-public data that could influence the outcome of an event.

The rules also prohibit trading on illegally obtained tips, where users knowingly act on information shared in breach of trust or confidentiality.

Additionally, Polymarket bans trading by individuals who hold positions of influence over an outcome, such as those directly involved in events tied to prediction markets.

The company said the changes are designed to bring greater clarity to participants and reinforce expectations across both platforms.

Expanded crackdown on manipulation tactics

Beyond insider trading, the updated rules explicitly prohibit a range of manipulative behaviors.

These include spoofing and wash trading, front-running and self-dealing, fictitious transactions, and broader attempts to disrupt orderly market activity.

The framework also covers information misuse and any effort to influence contract outcomes artificially.

Multi-layered surveillance system introduced

Polymarket outlined separate enforcement approaches for its DeFi platform and its U.S. exchange.

On the DeFi side, the platform relies on blockchain transparency, with all trades recorded on the Polygon network and publicly accessible. Third-party surveillance tools and internal monitoring systems complement this.

If suspicious activity is detected, enforcement actions may include wallet bans, internal investigations, or referrals to law enforcement.

For its U.S. exchange, Polymarket said it operates a more structured compliance system, including real-time monitoring via a control desk and partnerships with surveillance providers.

Also, there is oversight through a Regulatory Services Agreement with the National Futures Association [NFA].

Violations on the U.S. platform may result in suspensions, financial penalties, or regulatory referrals.

Scrutiny grows over prediction market activity

The rule update follows earlier scrutiny of trading activity on the platform.

Early in the month, AMBCrypto reported a cluster of linked wallets that collectively earned over $1 million from bets predicting U.S. and Israeli military strikes involving Iran.

The timing of those trades raised questions about whether participants may have acted on non-public or privileged information.

While no formal wrongdoing was established, the findings added to broader concerns about insider trading risks in decentralized prediction markets.

Final Summary

Polymarket has tightened rules on insider trading and manipulation, introducing clearer definitions and stronger enforcement mechanisms.
The update follows earlier scrutiny of suspicious trading activity, highlighting ongoing integrity challenges in prediction markets.

Leituras Relacionadas

WeChat Agent Issues a 'Heroic Summons,' Half of the Internet Responds

WeChat AI Agent is on the horizon. The WeChat Open Platform has issued a guide for developers, offering them ways to integrate into the WeChat AI ecosystem. This will enable mini-programs to be discovered and invoked by the AI. Meituan has already announced its integration, allowing users to access services like food delivery through WeChat AI. Other platforms like Ctrip and Tongcheng have followed suit. Furthermore, WeChat is collaborating with major smartphone manufacturers to enable their native AI assistants to perform actions within WeChat, such as initiating calls or sending messages, through a controlled protocol called Agent-to-Agent (A2A). Reports indicate the WeChat AI Agent will be accessible by swiping right on the main interface. It aims to understand user intent within the rich context of chats, groups, and past interactions, then automatically call upon relevant mini-programs to complete tasks like ordering coffee or booking restaurants. This positions it as a potential "super app" with direct access to WeChat's vast ecosystem of services, social connections, and payment systems. Technically, this is a complex endeavor. It requires advanced natural language understanding, a "world model" to predict interactions within mini-programs (UI-Oceanus), multi-model orchestration for cost efficiency, and careful coordination with millions of third-party service providers. Tencent's development follows a "Co-Design" approach, where product teams and the Hunyuan model team collaborate closely, allowing capabilities honed in other AI products (like Yuanbao for chat, ima for search, WorkBuddy for office tasks) to be transferred to the WeChat Agent. Tencent is strategically opting for the A2A protocol over GUI-based automation (which it has blocked in the past), maintaining control over its ecosystem. To manage the immense scale and cost of serving 1.4 billion monthly active users, Tencent is deepening its ties with DeepSeek, known for its cost-effective training, to secure a low-cost inference backbone. The ultimate goal is to solve practical, everyday problems for users within the WeChat ecosystem, moving beyond technical benchmarks to deliver real utility, which Tencent sees as the key to winning in the long-term AI game.

marsbitHá 4m

WeChat Agent Issues a 'Heroic Summons,' Half of the Internet Responds

marsbitHá 4m

Strategy Erases Last Week’s Bitcoin Sale With 1,550 BTC Purchase

Strategy, a major Bitcoin treasury firm, has made a substantial purchase of 1,550 BTC for approximately $101 million. This acquisition completely offsets the company's sale of 32 BTC just one week prior, which had negatively impacted market sentiment. Following this buy, Strategy's total Bitcoin holdings have reached a new record of 845,256 BTC. The company's leadership, including Chairman Michael Saylor and CEO Phong Le, emphasized their ongoing strategy to accumulate Bitcoin over time. Concurrently, Strategy added $100 million to its USD reserve, bringing its total to $1 billion, to ensure dividend payments. The purchase was reportedly funded through sales of the company's stock. Meanwhile, U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs experienced a fourth consecutive week of net outflows, totaling $1.72 billion last week. Bitcoin's price is currently around $63,400, reflecting a nearly 12% decline over the past seven days.

bitcoinistHá 17m

Strategy Erases Last Week’s Bitcoin Sale With 1,550 BTC Purchase

bitcoinistHá 17m

Humanity Loses $31 Million in Attack, Token Price Plummets 90% Due to a Single Private Key

On June 9th, the digital identity project Humanity Protocol suffered a major security breach resulting in over $31 million in losses. According to on-chain analyst Specter, hundreds of wallets holding the project's H token were drained. The attack was confirmed by founder Terence Kwok to be caused by the compromise of a foundation member's private key. As a precaution, users are advised to avoid interacting with Humanity's cross-chain bridge or liquidity pools. The incident caused the H token price to crash over 90%, from around $0.70 to a low of $0.052, wiping its market cap from $2 billion to approximately $35.7 million. The attacker allegedly minted 100 million new H tokens and is selling them for BNB. This breach adds to existing controversies surrounding Humanity Protocol. Founded in 2024, it aimed to verify human users via palm-print biometrics and zero-knowledge proofs. However, a leaked conversation in 2025 revealed that only about 1 million of its 9 million claimed Human IDs had completed biometric verification, suggesting 88% might be bots. Furthermore, the project has faced allegations of being a repackaged product from a Chinese access control vendor, raising privacy and authenticity concerns. Founder Terence Kwok's previous venture, Tink Labs, a hotel smartphone startup that raised $170 million, failed and entered bankruptcy in 2020 after burning through its funding. The current attack highlights the persistent critical issue of private key management in crypto. Unlike smart contract exploits, a private key compromise bypasses all on-chain security mechanisms. With no user compensation plan announced yet, this $31 million breach may be a final blow to the project's credibility, already weakened by previous controversies and a heavily depreciated token.

marsbitHá 38m

Humanity Loses $31 Million in Attack, Token Price Plummets 90% Due to a Single Private Key

marsbitHá 38m

MicroStrategy Will Not Die in This Downturn: Reflexivity, STRC Anchoring Back to Par, and the Self-Rescue Logic of "Sell Stock, Not Bitcoin"

This article analyzes the recent sharp decline in Bitcoin and MicroStrategy (MSTR), framing it as a targeted "reflexivity" attack. The trigger was MSTR using its cash reserves to buy back convertible notes, raising market concerns about a liquidity crisis. The playbook follows George Soros's principle: market expectations can shape reality. Fears that MSTR might be forced to sell BTC caused panic selling, lowering BTC's price and worsening MSTR's financial ratios, thus reinforcing the negative narrative. The author argues that MSTR's Structured Convertible (STRC), while falling in price, is a floating-rate security that will eventually return to par value (100). The price drop reflects the market demanding a higher yield due to perceived risk, but as a floating-rate instrument, its coupon can adjust, naturally pulling the price back to par over time. This is crucial for MSTR's continued ability to raise funds. The core thesis is that MSTR's best move to counter the attack is to **issue new equity (sell shares)**, not sell its Bitcoin holdings. While selling BTC would solve the immediate cash crunch, it would destroy the company's core investment thesis and premium. It would dilute the BTC per share, likely erase the market premium over its net asset value (mNAV > 1), and worsen its debt-to-asset ratio. Issuing shares while mNAV is high (e.g., 1.25x) allows MSTR to raise cash for reserves without harming shareholder value or the "perpetual accumulation" narrative. It improves the debt ratio and reassures STRC holders, breaking the negative reflexivity cycle. In conclusion, while MSTR could survive this episode even by selling BTC, doing so would fundamentally alter its investment proposition and weaken it for future cycles. The optimal, value-preserving strategy is to sell equity to rebuild reserves and maintain the long-term growth flywheel.

marsbitHá 39m

MicroStrategy Will Not Die in This Downturn: Reflexivity, STRC Anchoring Back to Par, and the Self-Rescue Logic of "Sell Stock, Not Bitcoin"

marsbitHá 39m

Humanity Loses $31 Million, a Private Key Causes Token Price to Plunge 90%

On June 9th, the digital identity project Humanity Protocol suffered a major security breach resulting in over $31 million stolen from hundreds of wallets holding its H token. The attack was caused by the compromise of a private key belonging to a foundation member, leading the team to advise users against interacting with its bridge or liquidity pools. Following the incident, the price of the H token plummeted by over 90%, from around $0.70 to a low of $0.052, wiping out a significant portion of its market capitalization. The attacker allegedly minted 100 million new H tokens and began selling them for BNB. Humanity Protocol, founded in 2024, aimed to verify human users through palm-print biometrics and zero-knowledge proofs on Polygon CDK. Despite raising $50 million across two funding rounds and achieving a unicorn valuation, the project faced prior controversies. Shortly after its June 2025 token launch, reports emerged that only about 1 million of its 9 million registered IDs had completed biometric verification, suggesting 88% might be bots. Furthermore, allegations surfaced that the project might be a rebranded "shell" of a Chinese access control company, raising concerns about data privacy and authenticity. The project's founder, Terence Kwok, has a controversial business history. His previous venture, Tink Labs, burned through $170 million in funding before collapsing in 2020. The breach highlights the persistent critical risk of private key management in crypto. With no user compensation plan detailed in the initial response, the incident deals a severe blow to trust in a project already struggling with credibility issues.

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Humanity Loses $31 Million, a Private Key Causes Token Price to Plunge 90%