Polygon (POL) Reclaims Strength: Will This 6% Spike Spark a Larger Rally?

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-13Última atualização em 2026-02-13

Resumo

Amid a broader crypto market downturn, Polygon (POL) has defied the trend with a notable 6.11% price surge, reaching approximately $0.09585. While Bitcoin and Ethereum remain under bearish pressure, POL's trading volume increased by over 21%. Technical indicators present a mixed but cautiously optimistic outlook: the MACD shows mild bullish momentum, the RSI at 60.12 suggests room for further growth without being overbought, and the Bull-Bear Power indicates slight buying pressure. Key resistance lies at $0.096, with support near $0.094. The market sentiment is balanced but leans slightly bullish, though not signaling a strong trend reversal yet.

The crypto market stays strong within the bear market by losing over 1.02% instead of attempting a recovery. With extreme fear lingering across the digital assets, the largest and dominant, Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), are hovering on the downside. Meanwhile, Polygon (prev. MATIC) (POL) has recorded a steady surge of over 6.11% in value.

In the early hours, the token traded at a bottom level of $0.09066, and with the gradual rise of the bullish wave, the POL price mounted toward a high of $0.09877. At press time, Polygon traded at around $0.09585, with the market cap staying at $1.01 billion. Besides, the daily trading volume is up by over 21.90%, reaching the $104.62 million mark.

With the early bullish momentum on the 4-hour trading chart, the Polygon price could climb to the $0.096 resistance range. An extended upside pressure may initiate the emergence of the golden cross, and the bulls would take the price further higher. On the downside, if POL wakes its bears, the immediate support level might be around the $0.094 mark. A sturdy bearish correction could trigger the potential death cross to unfold, and likely pull the price lower, which delays the reversal.

Polygon Eyes Upside as Momentum Indicators Lean Bullish

The technical analysis of Polygon exhibits that the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line briefly crosses above the zero line. The short-term momentum has turned mildly bullish, and as the signal line falls below zero, the broader momentum remains bearish.

In addition, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator, which settled at -0.01, is almost neutral, showing a very mild selling pressure in the POL market. Significantly, there is no strong accumulation or distribution, and the market is likely balanced, leaning slightly to the bearish side.

Polygon’s active market sentiment is bullish, but not overbought, with the Relative Strength Index (RSI) at 60.12. Buyers have control, but not to an extreme. The asset has room to move up before hitting 70. It has a healthy bullish momentum. Moreover, the Bull-Bear Power (BBP) reading of POL at 0.0054 implies the bulls are slightly stronger than the bears. Also, as the value is very close to zero, it hints at mild buying pressure in the market, not a strong breakout signal.

Top Updated Crypto News

Magic Eden (ME) Rockets Higher: With a 50% Jump and 3,120% Volume Eruption, Can It Hold the Pace?

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the percentage increase in Polygon (POL) value mentioned in the article?

APolygon (POL) recorded a steady surge of over 6.11% in value.

QAt what price did Polygon (POL) trade at press time according to the article?

AAt press time, Polygon traded at around $0.09585.

QWhat technical indicator is described as having briefly crossed above the zero line, indicating a mild bullish short-term momentum?

AThe Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line briefly crossed above the zero line.

QWhat does the RSI value of 60.12 for Polygon (POL) suggest about its market condition?

AAn RSI of 60.12 suggests the active market sentiment is bullish but not overbought, with buyers in control but not to an extreme, leaving room for the price to move up.

QWhat is the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator value for POL, and what does it indicate?

AThe Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator is at -0.01, which is almost neutral, showing very mild selling pressure and a market that is balanced but leaning slightly bearish.

Leituras Relacionadas

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbitHá 44m

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbitHá 44m

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbitHá 48m

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbitHá 48m

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

The Nasdaq Composite plummeted 4.18% on June 5, its biggest single-day drop since April 2025, triggering widespread debate over whether the U.S. stock market has peaked. The sell-off was sparked by a stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm payrolls report, which fueled fears of economic overheating and pushed back market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, leading to a sharp rise in Treasury yields. The AI sector, the primary driver of the recent bull market, suffered severe losses, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashing over 10%. Stocks like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron led the decline. Concerns are mounting about the sustainability of AI capital expenditures and high valuations, with signs of order cuts for next-generation chips emerging. Analyses point to several warning signs: historically high market valuations (e.g., elevated Shiller CAPE ratio, Buffett Indicator), extreme bullish sentiment indicators, and significant insider selling. The sell-off also caused a key technical breakdown, with the S&P 500 breaking below its short-term moving average and testing its 200-day moving average. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears warn this could be the start of a bubble deflation or a "stagflation" scenario, while bulls view it as a healthy, overdue correction within a bull market driven by solid corporate earnings growth. A more moderate view suggests the easy liquidity-driven rally is over, and markets are entering a phase of fundamental stock-picking with potential for consolidation. The immediate future hinges on key upcoming events: the May CPI report and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will be critical in determining whether this is a temporary pullback or the beginning of a more significant trend reversal. The consensus is that the era of one-directional market gains may be ending, requiring increased investor caution.

Odaily星球日报Há 54m

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

Odaily星球日报Há 54m

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbitHá 59m

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbitHá 59m

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

In late 2020, Google AI researcher Timnit Gebru was effectively dismissed following a conflict over a 14-page, unpublished research paper she co-authored titled "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots." The paper, which has since been cited over 14,000 times, raised critical early warnings about the risks of large language models (LLMs). It argued that these models, trained on vast, biased internet data, are essentially "stochastic parrots" that mimic language without true understanding, potentially amplifying societal biases, generating plausible but false information (later termed "AI hallucination"), consuming massive energy, and obscuring their training data contents. Gebru's stance led to a clash with Google management, who requested the paper's withdrawal. Her subsequent internal criticism of the company's diversity efforts and handling of the matter culminated in her termination, which sparked protests from over 4,000 Google employees and researchers. Six years later, the paper's predictions have proven remarkably prescient. Issues like AI hallucination, embedded bias (evident in resume screening and healthcare algorithms), soaring energy consumption from AI data centers, unvetted training data containing harmful content, and the risk of "model collapse" from AI-generated internet content have become central industry challenges. The incident also highlighted concerns about AI development being driven primarily by commercial competition within a handful of powerful tech companies, often at the expense of ethical considerations. After leaving Google, Gebru founded the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) to explore these issues independently. The controversy underscores how her early, critical insights into the fundamental limitations and societal impacts of LLMs anticipated many of the most pressing dilemmas in today's AI era.

marsbitHá 1h

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar POL

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL)Depois de comprar o teu Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL)Transaciona facilmente Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

253 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de POL (POL) são apresentadas abaixo.