Pi Network Token Slides as Trade Tensions and Unlocks Pressure Price

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-01-19Última atualização em 2026-01-19

Resumo

Pi Network's native token, PI, declined sharply, approaching its October all-time low due to increased US-EU trade tensions and significant daily token unlocks. The price dropped roughly 8-9% in 24 hours to around $0.178. Geopolitical uncertainty escalated after the US announced new tariffs targeting eight countries, prompting an emergency EU meeting. Reports indicate French President Macron called for a "trade bazooka" against US market access. Additionally, over 4.6 million tokens are being released daily, creating substantial selling pressure as investors gain access to previously locked coins. The token, which missed the January crypto rally, remains highly volatile amid these combined pressures.

The PI token of Pi Network fell toward its October low as US-EU trade tensions increased and more than 4.6 million daily unlocks ignited increasing selling pressure. The native token has fallen heavily over a 12-hour period, going near its October all-time low after weeks of price inactivity, as per the market data.

At the time of writing, PI is hovering about 0.178 USD, down about 8-9% in the past 24 hours. The fall of the token coincides with wider market unpredictability ignited by increasing trade tensions between the United States and the European Union.

The President of the United States publicised a new set of tariffs against 8 countries as part of efforts to buy Greenland from Denmark, as per the official statements. The European Union replied by setting an emergency meeting.

The Volatility Faced by Pi Token

The President of France, Emmanuel Macron, asked for the union to position a “trade bazooka” that would substantially limit U.S. access to European markets, as per the report. In the beginning, the crypto market became stable as these geopolitical developments opened out but did not agree when Asian stock markets and futures opened, market data showed.

The Pi token, which had been influenced by volatility at the time of the last market fluctuations, faced potential losses at the time of this episode. The token was not a part of the January rally when the price of Bitcoin increased and a number of altcoins showed double-digit percentage gains, as per the price data.

The schedule of token unlock may show price instability, as per the industry analysts. The PiScanUnlock data reveals that the average number of daily token unlocks surpassed 4.6 million, which could create selling pressure as investors get access to the last locked coins. The Pi Network attained its previous all-time low in October, as per historical price records.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Canaan Risks Nasdaq Delisting as Shares Slip Below $1 Again

TagsCryptoPiPi Network

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the main factors contributing to the decline of Pi Network's token price?

AThe decline is attributed to increasing US-EU trade tensions and over 4.6 million daily token unlocks creating significant selling pressure.

QWhat was the price of PI token at the time of writing and how much did it drop in 24 hours?

AAt the time of writing, PI token was hovering around $0.178, down approximately 8-9% in the past 24 hours.

QHow did the European Union respond to the new US tariffs announced against 8 countries?

AThe European Union responded by setting an emergency meeting to address the new tariffs.

QWhat specific measure did French President Emmanuel Macron propose regarding US-European trade relations?

AEmmanuel Macron asked the European Union to position a 'trade bazooka' that would substantially limit U.S. access to European markets.

QHow many daily token unlocks were occurring according to PiScanUnlock data, and what concern does this raise?

APiScanUnlock data revealed that average daily token unlocks surpassed 4.6 million, which could create selling pressure as investors gain access to previously locked coins.

Leituras Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHá 31m

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHá 31m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHá 50m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHá 50m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHá 59m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHá 59m

Trading

Spot
活动图片