PI beats BTC and ETH, yet resistance rejection raises red flags

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-02-15Última atualização em 2026-02-15

Resumo

Despite a significant 43.1% rally that outperformed Bitcoin and Ethereum, Pi Network (PI) faces a critical resistance level at $0.20. The surge, fueled by a network upgrade and a breakout from a descending wedge, was met with rejection at this key supply zone. High trading volume during the rally is seen as a potential sign of buyer exhaustion rather than strong conviction, often indicating that smart money is selling. Analysts caution against FOMO, suggesting a breakout above $0.20 followed by a successful retest is needed to confirm a bullish trend. Until then, the broader bearish bias and longer-term downtrend advise caution for traders.

Pi Network [PI] was one of the altcoins in the spotlight. With a 43.1% rally from Thursday’s low at $0.132, PI traders and investors might be tempted to buy the token. The buying idea becomes even more tempting when the gains are compared to leading crypto assets.

Bitcoin [BTC] was up 8.3%, and Ethereum [ETH] was up by 9.2% in the same time period. Yet, traders should be cautious and not give in to FOMO or arguments of relative strength.

Assessing the bullish argument

The Pi Network upgrade was one of the reasons behind the token’s strong recent gains. AMBCrypto reported that the shift toward a decentralized mainnet was a step forward in transferring responsibility from the developers to the community.

A breakout from a long-term descending wedge was also demonstrated. This has the potential to send prices to $0.267-$0.28.

However, the picture remained bearishly biased at the time of writing. The local supply zone at $0.20 remained resolute in the face of a buying frenzy.

Why buyers should be wary of the PI rally

The volume indicators were neutral at best, despite the high trading volume. The OBV was a noticeable distance from making a new high, and the CMF on the daily timeframe

The 1-day chart reinforced the importance of the $0.2 resistance. The recent, swift gains reaching and facing rejection at this band of supply were not a good development.

This is because, counter-intuitively, the high-volume surge into a key resistance area is generally followed by buyer exhaustion and a retracement of all the gains made. In other words, smart money tends to use these moves to sell.

Traders can wait for a breakout past $0.2 and a retest of the same as support to buy. Given the wider market sentiment, this was a highly risky endeavor.

Instead, swing traders and investors can maintain their bearish bias, which is in agreement with the longer-term downtrend.

Final Summary

The Pi Network token prices saw a strong rally to break out of a descending wedge at the same time as the network upgrade announcement came out.
The quick move into the overhead supply zone on high trading volume, and the rejection in recent hours, has a good chance of turning out to be a sign of buyer exhaustion and not conviction.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the percentage gain of Pi Network (PI) from Thursday's low, and how does it compare to Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH)?

APi Network (PI) rallied 43.1% from Thursday's low. In the same time period, Bitcoin (BTC) was up 8.3% and Ethereum (ETH) was up 9.2%.

QWhat was one of the main reasons cited for Pi Network's recent strong price gains?

AOne of the main reasons for the strong recent gains was the Pi Network upgrade and the shift toward a decentralized mainnet, which transferred responsibility from the developers to the community.

QWhat key resistance level is highlighted as a significant obstacle for the PI price?

AThe key resistance level highlighted is the local supply zone at $0.20.

QAccording to the article, why should buyers be wary of the high-volume surge into the key resistance area?

ABuyers should be wary because a high-volume surge into a key resistance area is often followed by buyer exhaustion and a retracement of gains, as it can be a sign that smart money is using the move to sell.

QWhat cautious trading strategy does the article suggest for entering a long position in PI?

AThe article suggests traders wait for a breakout past the $0.20 resistance and then a successful retest of that level as support before considering a buy, noting that it is a highly risky endeavor given the market sentiment.

Leituras Relacionadas

A 'Overlooked' Market Event: Joint US-Japan-South Korea Intervention, Rare US Treasury Involvement, and Bessent's Quiet 'Market Rescue'?

Summary: The United States, Japan, and South Korea executed their largest coordinated foreign exchange intervention in nearly 30 years. The action targeted depreciation pressure on the Japanese yen and South Korean won. This move is seen as a significant effort by the US to stabilize the financial markets of its key allies and prevent the spillover of risks. Key details: * Japan reportedly intervened on July 30 using approximately 8.45 trillion yen (about $52.8 billion). South Korean authorities also intervened that day, selling dollars to support the won. * Notably, the US Treasury Department intervened directly in yen markets for the first time in roughly 30 years. The New York Fed, reportedly acting on behalf of the Treasury, sold euros to buy yen via Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley on July 31. Analysts view the use of the euro-yen pair as a way to alleviate yen pressure without adding selling pressure to the US dollar. * Prior to the action, the New York Fed conducted "rate checks" on both USD/JPY and EUR/JPY, a newer signaling tool that falls between verbal and physical intervention. The intervention is interpreted as going beyond traditional currency stabilization. Analysts, such as Michael Hartnett of Bank of America, suggest it resembles a "Price Keeping Operation" for the AI era. The core US objectives are perceived to be: 1. Preventing rapid yen depreciation from triggering a sharp rise in Japanese government bond yields. 2. Containing financial stress from spreading across Asian markets like South Korea and Japan. 3. Reducing the risk of disorderly capital flows impacting the US bond market. This coordinated action underscores the importance of Japan and South Korea as critical partners in the US semiconductor and AI supply chain. Stabilizing their financial markets is seen as vital to mitigating risks to the broader tech industry and the US market itself. The intervention coincides with market pressures, including the KOSDAQ index hitting a low since October 2022. While seen as a move to control volatility, some analysts caution it may not fundamentally reverse existing market trends.

marsbitHá 1m

A 'Overlooked' Market Event: Joint US-Japan-South Korea Intervention, Rare US Treasury Involvement, and Bessent's Quiet 'Market Rescue'?

marsbitHá 1m

Will the Federal Reserve Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Cryptocurrencies and US Stocks Bear the Pressure?

In early August 2024, market expectations for a September Federal Reserve rate hike surged dramatically, from below 50% to over 80%, driven by renewed inflation concerns. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed a growing hawkish faction advocating for an immediate hike, citing prolonged above-target inflation. The key catalyst is escalating conflict near the Strait of Hormuz, which has pushed oil prices up approximately 20% in July, threatening to reignite inflation. The next critical data point is the July CPI report on August 12th; a hot reading could solidify hike expectations. For crypto assets, particularly Bitcoin, this represents near-term pressure. Bitcoin continues to exhibit high-beta, risk-on characteristics, making it sensitive to tightening liquidity and higher opportunity costs. However, historical precedent suggests that if a hike is perceived as the cycle's end rather than its start, the negative impact may be brief, with markets quickly pivoting to anticipate future rate cuts. U.S. stocks, especially crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and high-valuation tech stocks, face amplified volatility. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, pressuring growth stocks. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditures to demonstrable revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flows and weak growth narratives could see severe pressure if a September hike materializes, as financing costs would rise. Key indicators to watch include oil prices, upcoming inflation data, and Fed commentary at events like the Jackson Hole symposium.

Odaily星球日报Há 1m

Will the Federal Reserve Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Cryptocurrencies and US Stocks Bear the Pressure?

Odaily星球日报Há 1m

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

The article analyzes the possibility of TradeXYZ, a dominant project on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 real-world asset (RWA) perpetual contracts market, splitting off to build its own independent trading platform. With TradeXYZ commanding over 90% of HIP-3 volume and over 35% of Hyperliquid's total open interest, its leverage and influence are significant. The primary motive for a split is seen as capturing the underlying protocol fees, of which TradeXYZ currently receives only half. However, several factors strongly discourage such a move. First, replicating Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure would be challenging and could degrade TradeXYZ's product quality. Second, Hyperliquid serves as a crucial distribution channel, with most users accessing TradeXYZ's liquidity through its frontend. Third, the close, trusting relationship between the founders of both projects makes a hostile "betrayal" unlikely. The conclusion is that a split would likely result in a lose-lose scenario. Hyperliquid would lose its main growth narrative and see its valuation impacted, while TradeXYZ would face immense technical hurdles, lose its primary user channel, and damage its reputation. Instead of a full separation, the more probable path is for TradeXYZ to negotiate better terms while deepening integration, focusing on enhancing its own brand and user ownership.

marsbitHá 52m

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

marsbitHá 52m

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

Anthropomorphic "Teletubby" robot offers cleaning services in San Francisco at $30/hour, but it's entirely remote-controlled. The robot, created by startup Tau Robotics, can perform household tasks like washing hands, mopping floors, and taking out trash. While the initial demo videos appear impressive and are notably shown at normal speed (unlike many sped-up robot demos), the company reveals the actions are performed via human teleoperation, not autonomous AI. Tau Robotics, founded in 2024, argues this "cheat" is a strategic way to bridge the current capability gap, ensure task completion, and collect real-world home data to eventually train autonomous systems. Their service features three robot models: Chelsea for kitchens/bathrooms, Elon for regular tidying with memory, and Tony for deep cleaning. Priced at $30 per hour, it's cheaper than average human cleaners in the US. The article discusses the broader challenge of deploying humanoid robots in homes, comparing Tau's approach to others like China's Ziliang and the US's 1X Neo, which also use teleoperation. A key reason for choosing a humanoid form is to make remote control more intuitive for human operators. The piece also notes the potential "emotional value" of having a humanoid servant. The service is currently invite-only in San Francisco.

marsbitHá 1h

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

marsbitHá 1h

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbitHá 1h