Phantom Secures CFTC Exemption Letter, Enabling Crypto Wallets to Directly Connect to Compliant Derivatives Markets for the First Time

marsbitPublicado em 2026-03-18Última atualização em 2026-03-18

Resumo

Phantom has secured a no-action relief letter from the CFTC, allowing its non-custodial crypto wallet to directly connect users to regulated derivatives and event contract markets—without requiring Phantom to register as an introducing broker. This marks the first global exemption of its kind. The approval enables Phantom to serve as a direct interface for users to submit orders to CFTC-registered exchanges, such as Designated Contract Markets (DCMs), while ensuring user funds are never held by Phantom. The exemption includes specific conditions to protect users and align with CFTC policy priorities. Phantom adopted a proactive compliance approach—engaging with regulators early and seeking clarity before launch, rather than building first and seeking forgiveness later. The company believes this sets a new precedent for constructive regulatory collaboration in crypto. The CFTC indicated it may develop future rules or guidance that could replace this exemption. Phantom hopes its efforts help establish a lasting framework benefiting the broader industry. The move reinforces Phantom’s commitment to offering secure, compliant, and user-centric financial access in crypto.

Author: Phantom

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide TechFlow Introduction: Phantom has obtained a profoundly significant exemption letter from the CFTC—crypto wallets no longer need to register as "introducing brokers" to directly connect users with compliant derivatives and event contract exchanges.

This is the world's first case of this model, and Phantom's approach itself is noteworthy:

Proactively engaging with regulators, ensuring compliance before launch, rather than building first and seeking forgiveness later—this approach may set a new precedent for the crypto industry's interactions with regulatory agencies.

Full Text Below:

We are thrilled to announce that the CFTC has confirmed via a no-action relief letter: Phantom, in collaboration with CFTC-registered partners, can directly provide users with access to regulated markets within the Phantom application without registering as an introducing broker.

This is a significant milestone and an achievement we are honored to have advanced together with the CFTC.

Content of the Exemption Letter

As a software provider, Phantom can now serve as a non-custodial interface to connect users to registered exchanges (e.g., Designated Contract Markets, DCMs) without assuming the regulatory obligations of an introducing broker.

The letter includes several conditions designed to ensure the CFTC's policy priorities are met while protecting user rights.

Under this model, users can submit orders directly to registered exchanges, with Phantom never handling customer funds. This provision specifically applies to custodial models with registered exchange partners and does not cover DeFi derivatives or tokenized prediction markets.

Our Approach

The entire process that led to Phantom securing this exemption letter exemplifies how regulatory procedures should ideally function.

We are grateful to the CFTC for keeping its doors open to support progress. We proactively engaged with the CFTC to seek clear guidance on how to provide users with access to regulated markets through registered partners as a non-custodial interface without having to register as an intermediary ourselves.

Instead of choosing to build first and seek forgiveness later, we took a different path to provide users with a safe and reliable way to access traditional financial markets. This letter is the result of that process.

Implications Beyond Phantom

This is the world's first exemption of its kind for this specific model. The CFTC's letter acknowledges that they are working on rules or guidance that may replace this letter in the future. We hope our involvement will contribute to forming a lasting framework that benefits the entire industry.

We also extend our thanks to the CFTC for collaborating with us seriously and in good faith. Addressing truly groundbreaking legal issues requires effort from both sides, and this outcome reflects a mutual willingness to do the work rather than defaulting to rejection.

Phantom was founded on the belief that crypto should be safe and easy to use. We are committed to continuing to lead the development of innovative, compliant, and user-first products.

"The key to making crypto safe and easy to use lies in creating financial products governed by clear, reasonable regulations. Engaging with regulators early and finding compliant pathways, when necessary, leads to better outcomes for users, the industry, and regulators themselves. This letter is proof of that.

We appreciate the CFTC's collaboration in addressing this truly groundbreaking issue and look forward to launching more innovative products in a way that instills user confidence and sets the right precedents."

—Brandon Millman, CEO

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the significance of Phantom receiving a no-action relief letter from the CFTC?

AThe CFTC's no-action relief letter allows Phantom to directly connect users to regulated markets, such as designated contract markets (DCMs), within its non-custodial wallet application without requiring Phantom to register as an introducing broker. This is a global first for this specific model and represents a major milestone in regulatory compliance for crypto wallets.

QHow does Phantom's approach to regulatory compliance differ from the 'build first, ask for forgiveness later' method?

APhantom proactively engaged with the CFTC to seek clear guidance on how to provide access to regulated markets through registered partners without registering as an intermediary itself. This approach of 'compliance first, then launch' contrasts with the common industry practice of building products first and addressing regulatory issues afterward.

QWhat are the key conditions outlined in the CFTC's no-action relief letter for Phantom?

AThe letter includes several conditions to ensure CFTC policy priorities are met and user rights are protected. A key condition is that users submit orders directly to registered exchanges, and Phantom never handles customer funds. This model specifically applies to custodial arrangements with registered exchange partners and does not cover DeFi derivatives or tokenized prediction markets.

QWhy is this exemption considered a potential new template for the crypto industry's interaction with regulators?

AThe process of Phantom actively communicating with the CFTC, seeking guidance, and obtaining formal approval before launching the service demonstrates a collaborative approach to regulation. This path of engaging regulators early to find a compliant solution could serve as a new model for the industry, leading to better outcomes for users, the industry, and regulators themselves.

QWhat does Phantom's CEO, Brandon Millman, say is key to making crypto safe and easy to use?

ABrandon Millman states that the key to making crypto safe and easy to use is 'building financial products that are constrained by clear, sensible regulation.' He emphasizes that engaging with regulators early to find a compliant path, when necessary, leads to better results for everyone involved, as evidenced by this no-action letter.

Leituras Relacionadas

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbitHá 31m

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbitHá 31m

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbitHá 1h

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbitHá 1h

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX LearnHá 1h

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX LearnHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片