People Laid Off by AI Won't Disappear; They Will Become the Creators of the Next Economy

marsbitPublicado em 2026-03-23Última atualização em 2026-03-23

Resumo

The article argues that the real question surrounding AI is not whether it will cause unemployment, but what happens to the people displaced. AI is replacing not humans, but the standardized, replicable, and automatable parts of human work. This follows historical patterns where technological revolutions, from stone tools to computers, made old skills obsolete and dissolved old structures—but humanity adapted and reorganized. The author draws a parallel to China’s large-scale layoffs during state-owned enterprise reforms 30 years ago, which initially seemed catastrophic but eventually fueled the growth of a new private economy, new companies, and new types of jobs. Engineers, though among the first impacted, are also positioned to recover fastest. Their systemic understanding and proximity to new productive forces make them ideal candidates to adapt and create in the new economy. More importantly, AI is reshaping companies themselves—reducing organizational bloat, communication costs, and bureaucracy. This enables smaller, more agile teams and empowers strong creators who may have previously struggled with management rather than innovation. The core issue is not job loss, but self-definition: will individuals wait to be reassigned by the old system, or use new tools to reorganize production? AI accelerates differentiation—eliminating some jobs, shattering illusions for some, and offering others a chance to leap forward. The author’s view is that AI is dismantling an entir...

Author: WhiteForest

 

Everyone is asking the wrong question. The question is not "Will I lose my job?" but: Where do the unemployed go?

AI is not replace people; it replaces the parts of people that can already be standardized, replicated, and automated.

Think about it: humans originally evolved from monkeys.

Stone tools, writing, gunpowder, steam engines, electricity, computers. Every tool revolution has devalued a set of old skills, eliminated a set of old jobs, and collapsed a set of old orders. Humans did not disappear. Humans reorganized.

AI is the same pattern, just faster.

China Experienced a Larger-Scale Layoff Wave 30 Years Ago

Too many white-collar jobs are essentially about information搬运, rule application, and local optimization. Once models are smart enough, these jobs will inevitably be repriced. This is not an apocalypse; it's a clearance.

30 years ago, China experienced a more intense version. State-owned enterprise reforms led to massive layoffs. At the time, it seemed like the end for tens of millions of that generation. In retrospect, what disappeared was not the people, but the old positions. New private economies, new companies, and new jobs all grew out of that rupture. 15 years ago, a large proportion of China's listed companies actually inherited assets from the state-owned enterprise reforms.

Engineers Will Be the First to Be Impacted and the First to Recover

They understand abstraction the best, systems the best, and are closest to the new productive forces. When an engineer is laid off, it usually means that the part of their ability they were selling has matured enough to be packaged and automated. This is not a denial of their value; it is proof of the maturity of their past output.

But these people, like the state-owned enterprise laid-off workers 30 years ago, are precisely some of the smartest people of this era. Once these people enter the free market, the creativity they bring is immeasurable.

But most people overlook a more important point: AI is not just cutting jobs; it is rewriting the form of the company.

Most companies are not large because the problems require that many people. It's because the costs of communication, coordination, and execution are too high, so they can only keep adding people, layers, and processes.

AI is turning these organizational costs into software.

Companies will be smaller. What used to take 50 people will be done by 5 in the future. What used to require a team can be done by a strong individual with the right tools.

The Revenge of the Creators

The old game rewarded those who were good at managing large teams,搞 hierarchical coordination, and organizational expansion. This led to situations where HR became C-level or even CEO. Managing business was不如 managing people. Many of the best creators did not lose on judgment, product, or technology, but on their inability to operate an organization that increasingly resembled a bureaucratic machine.

AI weakens this shortcoming. In the next cycle, more small but strong companies will emerge. More people who are "not good at management but extremely good at creation" will be repriced. They did not lose to the market in the past; they lost to the organization. After AI lightens the organization, these people can directly transact with the world for the first time.

The Real Problem Is Not Unemployment, But How You Define Yourself

After the old positions disappear, are you someone who waits for the system to take you in, or are you someone who uses new tools to reorganize production?

AI will not淘汰 everyone equally. It accelerates differentiation. Some lose their jobs, some lose their illusions, and some use this reorganization to complete their leap.

My Judgment:

What AI lays off is not a group of people; it is an entire generation's superstition about stable career paths. The first people to be laid off will not disappear. Some of them will be the first to reorganize themselves, transforming from employees of the old system into creators of the next economy.

In every productivity revolution, what is淘汰 is not people, but those who refuse to rewrite themselves.

Those who最先 accept reality and begin to create a new world will prevail.

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core argument of the article regarding AI-induced job displacement?

AThe core argument is that AI is not eliminating people, but rather replacing standardized, replicable, and automatable parts of human labor. The key question isn't whether people will lose jobs, but where these displaced workers will go. The article posits that they will reorganize and become the driving force behind the next wave of economic creation, similar to historical technological revolutions.

QHow does the article use China's history to support its perspective on AI and employment?

AThe article draws a parallel to China's large-scale layoffs during state-owned enterprise reforms 30 years ago. While it seemed like an endpoint for millions at the time, it ultimately led to the emergence of a new private economy, new companies, and new jobs. The 'old positions' disappeared, not the people, and this historical 'clearance' became a source of new growth, with many current listed companies inheriting assets from that reform period.

QWhy does the article suggest that engineers, though heavily impacted, are also poised for a quick recovery?

AEngineers are described as the ones who best understand abstraction, systems, and are closest to the new productive forces (AI). Being laid off indicates that the specific skills they were selling have matured enough to be automated and packaged, which is actually proof of the value and maturity of their past work. As some of the smartest people, their entry into the free market is expected to unleash immense creativity.

QIn what way is AI 'rewriting the form of the company' according to the article?

AAI is transforming companies by drastically reducing organizational costs—such as those for communication, coordination, and execution—and turning them into software. This leads to smaller, more agile companies. Tasks that once required 50 people might only need 5, and what needed a team can now be done by a single strong individual with the right AI tools. This shift weakens the advantage of large, bureaucratic structures.

QWhat is meant by the 'Revenge of the Creators' in the context of AI's impact?

AThe 'Revenge of the Creators' refers to a shift where individuals who are 'extremely good at creating but not good at management' will be revalued. In the past, these creators often lost to those who excelled at managing large, hierarchical organizations. AI, by making organizations 'lighter' and reducing the need for complex management, allows these pure creators to transact directly with the world and compete more effectively, leading to a rise of small but powerful companies built on creativity rather than bureaucratic skill.

Leituras Relacionadas

Must-Watch Events Next Week|CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

**Summary: Key Events and Developments to Watch (August 3-9)** The upcoming week is marked by significant financial disclosures, key legislative deadlines, and notable product updates. **Major Financial Events:** Several companies are scheduled to release their Q2 2026 earnings. American Bitcoin (ABTC) will report on August 3, followed by SpaceX and Hut 8 Mining Corp. on August 4, and Circle on August 5. Notably, a significant portion of SpaceX shares (up to 12% of total shares) will be unlocked on August 6 following their earnings release. **Key Legislative Deadline:** The U.S. Senate faces an August 7 deadline to secure 60 votes for the CLARITY Act, a bipartisan bill aiming to establish a federal regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. The Senate may hold a full vote on the bill during the week. **Economic Data:** The U.S. July Non-Farm Payrolls report will be released on August 7, providing crucial labor market data. **Technology & Product Updates:** * **Shutdowns:** DeFi portfolio tracker Zapper and wallet app Ctrl Wallet will cease operations on August 3. * **Upgrades:** LayerZero will deprecate its v1 relayers on August 3. XRP Ledger's new version 3.3.0, featuring five new functions, is expected next week. * **AI:** Elon Musk announced that the advanced Grok 4.6 AI model is set for release around August 7. * **Bitcoin:** The BIP-110 forced signaling for a potential Bitcoin network change is scheduled to begin around August 8. **Other Notable Events:** Chinese robotics firm Unitree Tech has set its preliminary price inquiry for its IPO for August 5. South Korean exchange Upbit will delist AQT and AERGO tokens on August 3.

marsbitHá 1h

Must-Watch Events Next Week|CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

marsbitHá 1h

Stocks Are Plummeting More Sharply Than Cryptocurrencies. Where Has the Money Gone?

Stock Markets Plunge Deeper Than Cryptocurrencies: Where Did the Money Go? In late July, Seoul's Kospi index triggered circuit breakers for two consecutive days, plummeting over 40% from its June high. The collapse was led by heavyweight stocks like SK Hynix, whose record profits still disappointed investors, and devastating leveraged ETFs, with one major product losing over 83% of its value. This signaled a global, forced deleveraging targeting the most crowded trades. Interestingly, while stocks exhibited extreme volatility akin to crypto markets, Bitcoin rose nearly 15% in July after a prior steep drop. Analysis shows the money fleeing equities did not flow into Bitcoin. Instead, Bitcoin had already absorbed its sell-off in May-June, when U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw historic outflows. The true safe-haven beneficiary was gold, whose price rose over 20% year-on-year, highlighting a decoupling between Bitcoin and gold as "digital gold." The sell-off was a targeted unwinding of leveraged positions in tech and semiconductors, accelerated by broker-dealer risk management and shifts in the AI narrative, including new competition from Chinese memory chipmakers. The retreat path was clear: from high-valuation tech stocks to cash and U.S. Treasuries, then to gold. For Bitcoin to attract sustained institutional inflows, conditions like eased global liquidity pressure, a "soft-landing" Fed rate cut, and U.S. regulatory clarity via legislation like the stalled CLARITY Act are needed. Currently, Bitcoin is not a safe haven but an already-cleared asset. Its low correlation with tech stocks, however, makes it a potential diversification play for institutional portfolios once the storm passes. The money isn't here yet, but the positioning is underway.

marsbitHá 1h

Stocks Are Plummeting More Sharply Than Cryptocurrencies. Where Has the Money Gone?

marsbitHá 1h

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns in an interview that the current AI boom shows classic bubble characteristics, which could lead to significant economic downturns as seen in past cycles like 1929 or 2000. He explains that speculative enthusiasm, fueled by debt and overvaluation, often precedes a crash when rising rates or taxation force asset sales, causing widespread losses and recession. Dalio also outlines his "Big Cycle" theory, describing an approximate 80-year pattern where widening wealth gaps, massive government deficits, and shifting geopolitical power (like China's rise) create internal conflict and global instability. He emphasizes that we are in a late-cycle, transitional phase where traditional powers like the US and UK face decline. For personal wealth protection, Dalio advises diversification beyond cash into assets like stocks, bonds, real estate, and particularly gold, which he prefers over Bitcoin. While he holds about 1% of his portfolio in Bitcoin as a non-printable hard asset, he views gold as more secure from technological or governmental threats. Regarding AI's impact, Dalio believes it will disproportionately benefit capital owners, worsening inequality by replacing both physical and cognitive labor. He suggests that human intuition and emotional intelligence, combined with AI, will be key for future workers. On taxation, Dalio argues that wealth taxes are impractical and risk triggering asset sell-offs, reducing productive investment. He points to the UK as a cautionary example of debt, low productivity, and political strife. Geopolitically, Dalio foresees a more regionalized world, with the US showing weakness in prolonged conflicts like with Iran, akin to past imperial declines. The ideal outcome, he suggests, is coexisting powerful blocs (e.g., Americas, China-Asia Pacific) without major war.

marsbitHá 5h

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

marsbitHá 5h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar PEOPLE

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Depois de comprar o teu ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Transaciona facilmente ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

573 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar PEOPLE

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de PEOPLE (PEOPLE) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片