Paradex Rollback Criticized, HIP-3 Competition Heats Up: What Happened in the Mainstream Ecosystems?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-01-20Última atualização em 2026-01-20

Resumo

Over the past 24 hours, the crypto market has seen significant developments across multiple areas. The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) announced a blockchain-based securities trading platform, sparking optimism about RWA (Real World Assets) adoption, though technical and regulatory challenges remain. The "Trove闹剧" incident, involving an alleged rug pull and undisclosed KOL promotions, led to community backlash and discussions on ICO transparency and accountability. WalletConnect introduced a POS payment product aiming to enable on-chain settlements, though adoption faces hurdles in existing payment infrastructure. On Solana, Magic Eden revealed a revenue-sharing model, directing 15% of platform earnings to $ME token buybacks and staking rewards, receiving positive community feedback. Ethereum ecosystem updates included MegaETH's upcoming stress test targeting high TPS, a partnership between Coinbase/Circle and Bermuda to build a digital economy, and ENS launching a Google BigQuery dataset for easier data analysis. In the Perp DEX space, competition for Hyperliquid's HIP-3 deployment intensified, with expectations of a crowded field and high bidding costs. Analysis revealed that much of the trading volume is algorithm-driven and incentive-based rather than organic. Additionally, HyperLend announced its token launch, and Trade.xyz upgraded to isolated margin mode. A major controversy emerged when Starknet-based Paradex performed a chain rollback due to a pricing error that ca...

Over the past 24 hours, the crypto market has shown complex developments across multiple dimensions. Mainstream discussions have focused on the RWA (Real World Assets) potential sparked by the NYSE's advancement of an on-chain securities trading platform, as well as the backlash against ICO models and KOL promotion chaos following the Trove "drama." In terms of ecosystem development, WalletConnect attempted to enter on-chain payment adoption with a POS terminal, while the market continued to debate the evolution of trading and clearing mechanisms, as well as the博弈 between channels and incentive structures.

I. Mainstream Topics

1. NYSE Launches On-Chain Securities Trading Platform, Sparking Discussion

The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) announced the launch of an on-chain securities trading platform, integrating the Pillar matching engine with a blockchain-based post-trade system to provide trading and settlement capabilities for tokenized securities, and introducing 24/7 operations, instant settlement, and stablecoin funding channels. The platform supports swaps between tokenized shares and traditional securities and is compatible with multi-chain custody. NYSE's parent company, ICE, is also advancing the construction of a 24/7 clearing system, emphasizing "native on-chain issuance" rather than repackaging existing assets. The market widely views this as a significant development in the RWA sector, potentially accelerating the penetration of blockchain infrastructure into capital markets.

Community reactions are generally optimistic, believing this could bring structural impact to traditional finance. However, controversies also focus on technical details (such as the choice of underlying chain) and mechanism risks (clearing, risk control, and liquidity pressures under 24/7 trading). Discussions further extend to its impact on DeFi and crypto-native L1/L2 ecosystems: some see it as an entry point for incremental capital and new scenarios, while others worry that traditional finance's "entry" could squeeze or even reshape the existing ecosystem landscape. Infrastructure projects like Chainlink are seen as potential beneficiaries, while DEXs featuring equity perpetual contracts (such as Hyperliquid) are viewed by some users as potential negatives. Overall, positive views still dominate, but regulatory adaptation and long-term variables such as quantum security are repeatedly mentioned.

2. "Trove Drama" Continues to Escalate, KOL Promotion Exposed

TroveMarkets' ICO project was exposed as a suspected rug pull: originally planning to raise $2.5 million, it ultimately over-raised to $12 million, refunded only $100,000, with the remaining funds used by the team for a so-called "pivot" to a new product instead of executing the original roadmap. Meanwhile, multiple KOLs were accused of receiving $8,000 in promotion fees without disclosure, leading to community users bearing the losses. The Ethos network subsequently launched a "slash" action, imposing reputation penalties on related accounts, affecting approximately 792 users and 16,000 reputation points. The incident collectively exposed longstanding issues with the ICO model: lack of transparency, misaligned incentives, and trust deficits in the promotion chain.

Community sentiment is strong and focused, with controversies mainly集中在两端:一是对 KOL 推销行为的责任追问,二是对项目方资金挪用与欺诈的法律追责呼吁. Many users demand full refunds and call for judicial intervention. Ethos's slash mechanism is seen by some as a "community self-cleaning tool," but it also raises concerns: whether reputation penalties can truly form constraints, and whether tokenized reputation systems might bring new governance and collateral damage risks. A few involved KOLs辩解称未收钱或研究不足, but the overall consensus is closer to a warning: the market is清算 "lazy promotion," and due diligence and disclosure transparency remain the bottom line.

3. WalletConnect Launches POS Payment Product, Sparking Discussion on Payment Track

WalletConnect released a POS payment product, supporting integration into Android terminal app stores, attempting to bypass the traditional banking system on the merchant side to achieve on-chain payments and stablecoin settlement. The product targets offline merchant terminal scenarios, but practical challenges仍集中在分销层: POS terminals are often controlled by acquirers (such as Worldpay), and such institutions may lack motivation to promote due to potential losses in interchange fee income. The team emphasizes that "open terminals" and merchant cost reduction demands could become突破口, but撬动存量基础设施 still faces long-term inertia and chain博弈.

The market generally认可 the product direction, believing it theoretically has cost reduction potential and could provide a more realistic entry point for on-chain payments. However, more discussions remain pragmatic,普遍认为真正瓶颈不在技术,而在渠道控制权与经济激励结构. Some suggestions propose using QR codes, on-chain credit, etc., as transitional solutions, while also paying attention to external variables such as antitrust litigation that may release new channel opportunities. Overall, the product is seen as a positive signal for payment transformation, but most also admit that achieving large-scale adoption in欧美市场 remains extremely difficult, ultimately离不开监管推进与产业协同.

II. Mainstream Ecosystem Dynamics

1. Solana

Magic Eden announced that starting February 1, 2026, it will directly inject 15% of all platform revenue into the $ME token ecosystem. These funds will be evenly distributed in a fixed ratio: 50% for $ME buybacks, and 50% rewarded to $ME stakers in USDC. Rewards will be calculated based on staking amount and holding duration ("staking power") and distributed on a monthly basis. The first event is for February, with claims opening in March, and must be completed within 90 days.

Unlike previous $ME buybacks conducted only on the market side, this upgraded scheme is a long-term mechanism covering the entire ecosystem, applicable to all Magic Eden product lines (NFTs, prediction markets, Packs, etc.), intending to more directly bind platform growth to token value, achieving "alignment of platform success and ecosystem收益".

Community reaction is overall positive. Many users believe the mechanism will bring "seven-figure level" buyback and reward pools, significantly strengthening $ME's value support and narrative shift. Some discussions also point out that long-term effects仍需观察平台营收的稳定性与可持续性, but overall sentiment is偏兴奋, with几乎没有明显的负面声音.

2. Ethereum

MegaETH will launch a global stress test on January 22, aiming to process 11 billion transactions in 7 days, with expected throughput in the 15,000–35,000 TPS range. More latency-sensitive application scenarios will be opened during the test, and the mainnet is expected to go live within days after the stress test concludes. Users have shown strong interest in this test, believing it could become the most symbolic transaction volume verification in the history of EVM chains, but also提醒需重点关注故障与稳定性表现.

Meanwhile, Coinbase and Circle announced a collaboration with the Bermuda government to provide digital asset infrastructure, enterprise tools, and educational system support, helping Bermuda build the "world's first fully on-chain national economy." This collaboration sparked optimistic discussions in the community, with many believing it could become an important model for promoting global compliant adoption, but some voices also提醒需警惕 Coinbase 在过往业务争议上的历史包袱.

In terms of community building, the Hong Kong, China Ethereum Community Center is planned to open in spring and will hold a launch gathering on January 24, focusing on offline交流、共创与活动承接. Many users see it as an important node for connecting the East Asian ecosystem and express期待 for its落地.

Additionally, ENS officially launched the Google Cloud BigQuery dataset, enabling anyone to analyze ENS on-chain activity in seconds using SQL, providing core tables including registrations, resolvers, reverse records, etc., with daily updates. The dataset also natively integrates Google's Gemini AI, which can be used to draft and optimize SQL queries, and is seen by many users as a tool that greatly lowers the threshold for research and data analysis. Overall evaluation is positive, but a few discussions extend to L2 incentive mechanisms and the uncertainty of regulatory variables.

3. Perp DEX

The competition for Hyperliquid's HIP-3 continues to heat up. Known deployers include teams and institutions such as @felixprotocol, @markets_xyz, @ventuals, @tradexyz, @hyenatrade, @Dreamcash, @SeliniCapital, and the expected auction price for deployment资格 has been pushed to 3000–4000 HYPE. Discussions普遍认为,未来 6 个月内可能出现 20+ 部署者, but the players who can form long-term advantages will be very limited, with the landscape closer to "winner-takes-all."

Many users judge that smaller teams are likely to be directly eliminated during the bidding stage, and the ultimate determinant of victory is not just product capability but also the ability to secure unique distribution channels and trading traffic入口.

On the other hand, the股权永续流量结构分析 released by Markets.xyz has attracted attention: 91% of its trading volume comes from algorithmic trading,其中 86% is non-directional trading (closer to a "mining" logic), with only 14%来自散户交易. This data is seen as revealing the current reality that Perp DEX growth highly relies on incentives rather than real demand, further strengthening community skepticism about "traffic authenticity."

Meanwhile, HyperLend announced the launch of the HPL token (TGE approaching), with 30.14% of token allocation for ecosystem incentives, and disclosed that it has raised $1.7 million. Staking and locking mechanisms are expected to open soon. Community evaluation is overall偏正面,认为其有助于对齐 Hyperliquid 生态利益, but also提醒市场警惕假冒代币与信息混淆风险.

Additionally, Trade.xyz's XYZ100 will switch to isolated margin mode starting January 20 and will allow users to withdraw unrealized profits and losses from open positions, which is seen by many as a critical upgrade that can significantly improve capital utilization efficiency and strategy flexibility. Overall, the focus of discussion集中在竞争烈度提升与激励结构对市场行为的深度影响上.

4. Others: Paradex Rollback Ignites Controversy, On-Chain DEX "Reliability" Questioned

Starknet ecosystem Perp DEX Paradex announced it would roll back the chain to block 1,604,710 due to a database migration error that caused the BTC price to briefly display as zero, triggering大规模清算. The incident quickly sparked ridicule and质疑, with many believing the rollback行为暴露了链上 DEX 的脆弱性,以及 "去中心化" 叙事与实际控制权之间的落差.

In the discussions, a comparison was frequently mentioned: some users emphasized that Solana has never experienced a rollback or fork, attributing it to a more dispersed validator structure (the community mentioned 800+ validators), believing this gives it superiority in security and availability over some L2 architectures. Others further pointed out pessimistically that perp DEX might have been the "wrong product form" from the start, because in extreme situations, centralized control often reappears in the name of "fixing the system."

Overall舆论几乎一边倒地负面, with core concerns集中在可靠性与中心化风险上,几乎没有正向反馈.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the significance of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) launching an on-chain securities trading platform?

AThe NYSE's on-chain securities trading platform integrates Pillar's matching engine with a blockchain post-trade system, offering trading and settlement for tokenized securities with 24/7 operations, instant settlement, and stablecoin funding channels. It is seen as a major advancement for the RWA (Real World Assets) sector, potentially accelerating the integration of blockchain infrastructure into capital markets.

QWhat issues did the TroveMarkets ICO controversy expose?

AThe TroveMarkets ICO controversy exposed problems such as lack of transparency, misaligned incentives, and trust deficits in the promotional chain. It involved alleged rug pull tactics where funds raised were misused, and KOLs were paid for promotions without proper disclosure, leading to community backlash and calls for legal accountability.

QWhat is WalletConnect's new POS payment product and its challenges?

AWalletConnect's POS payment product allows integration into Android terminal app stores, enabling on-chain payments and stablecoin settlements for merchants, bypassing traditional banking systems. The main challenges include distribution control, as POS terminals are often dominated by acquirers like Worldpay, and the need to overcome existing infrastructure inertia and economic incentives.

QWhy did Paradex's chain rollback spark criticism?

AParadex, a Starknet生态 Perp DEX, rolled back its chain due to a database migration error that caused BTC price to display as zero, triggering mass liquidations. This move was heavily criticized for exposing the fragility of on-chain DEXs and the gap between decentralization narratives and actual central control, raising concerns about reliability and centralization risks.

QWhat is the community's reaction to Magic Eden's revenue sharing plan for $ME token holders?

AThe community reacted positively to Magic Eden's plan to allocate 15% of all platform revenue to the $ME token ecosystem starting February 2026, with 50% for token buybacks and 50% as USDC rewards for stakers. It is seen as a strong value reinforcement for $ME, though long-term success depends on platform revenue stability.

Leituras Relacionadas

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Há 3m

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Há 3m

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHá 20m

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHá 20m

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHá 48m

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHá 48m

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

Foresight News, July 21 – Pump.fun has launched its new "BOOST" mode as the standard launch mechanism for new tokens. The core of BOOST is to address the issue of "dead liquidity." Historically, when a token migrates from its bonding curve to a liquidity pool, roughly 20% of its liquidity becomes permanently locked and unusable, a problem the platform estimates costs over $100 million annually. The new mechanism redirects this 20% of funds, which would have been locked, to instead be used for a 5-minute Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) buyback of the token immediately after migration. The purchased tokens are then permanently burned. For example, this means reserving 17.6 SOL for SOL pairs or about $2516 for USDC pairs at migration. This creates a short-term buying pressure and reduces the token's supply. The goal is to improve the immediate post-launch performance of memecoins, potentially increasing trader retention and transaction volume on the platform. However, critics warn this could lower the bar for token launches, encouraging low-quality projects, and that the brief 5-minute buy pressure might lead to sharper price crashes once it ends if followed by large sell-offs.

Foresight NewsHá 57m

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

Foresight NewsHá 57m

What Signals Can Be Read from the Trading Data of India's Largest Asset Manager SBI's IPO?

India's largest asset manager, SBI Funds Management, successfully listed on July 21 with a nearly $10 billion IPO, attracting approximately 42 times subscription. However, the first-day closing price rose only about 6.3%, falling short of the 16% premium anticipated in the grey market. This signals robust demand for core Indian financial assets but also disciplined pricing, indicating the IPO market is selectively open for strong brands with clear growth narratives. The low reported underwriting fees, which led some global banks to reduce participation, highlight a shift in pricing power towards powerful issuers like SBI. Its strong brand, banking parent, and stable cash flows reduced reliance on traditional investment banking sales channels, with local brokers playing a larger role. This fee dynamic may not be replicable for weaker issuers. SBI's performance is seen as a key test for India's IPO pipeline, including potential future large listings like Reliance Jio and NSE. Its success with tempered gains sets a new price anchor: high-quality assets can launch, but excessive valuation premiums are constrained. The true measure of a sustained market reopening will be whether subsequent major offerings can proceed smoothly at reasonable valuations.

marsbitHá 1h

What Signals Can Be Read from the Trading Data of India's Largest Asset Manager SBI's IPO?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow