Only xxx Can Save the Crypto World? Let 'Lobster' Play Prediction Markets

比推Publicado em 2026-03-17Última atualização em 2026-03-17

Resumo

This article discusses recent hot topics in the crypto community, as shared by influencers on X (formerly Twitter). Key points include: - Debate around an AI arbitrage bot allegedly earning $98K on Polymarket using Claude. Skeptics point to potential survivorship bias, liquidity constraints, and the rapid decay of alpha once strategies are public. - A resource sharing over 11,000 high-quality image generation prompts for Nano Banana Pro. - Commentary on Venus Protocol, highlighting its vulnerability to repeated exploits, with a linked analysis of how to profit from a recent attack. - A controversial opinion piece by influencer @BTCdayu arguing that only Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) can "save crypto." The author claims that despite SBF's crimes and 25-year sentence, his genius is needed to address current industry crises: VC-backed altcoins scamming users, Bitcoin miners pivoting to AI, broken tokenomics, and a lack of new narratives. SBF's background at Jane Street, his innovative FTX trading system, and his early bets on AI (like Anthropic) are cited as reasons he could drive integration between AI and crypto, potentially pushing BTC to $1 million. This sparked heated discussion, with replies noting the improbability of a pardon, SBF's likely shift to AI, and that this nostalgia reflects a bygone era of "capital, narrative, and runaway imagination." The article concludes with links to the news outlet's social channels. All content is presented as personal opinion and not invest...

Dear readers, hello~

What were the crypto KOLs talking about in the past 24 hours?

Note: The following content is compiled from the X platform and represents personal opinions, not the stance of this platform, and does not constitute investment advice.

AI Arbitrage Bot: Real or Fake?

Popular Replies:

  • Someone claimed to have made $98K using Claude on Polymarket. I verified: the money is real, the story is fabricated.

  • If the little lobster wants to do 5-minute market detection, the detection frequency should be at least at the ms level, right? Then the consumption of tokens could make someone a "millionaire in debt."

  • 86 times sounds scary, but there are a few issues: 1) Sample bias? Losing bots don't tweet. 2) How much scale can Polymarket's liquidity support? 3) Once the strategy is public, the Alpha disappears. To truly verify sustainability, at least 3 months of backtesting + maximum drawdown is needed;

  • Is this AI just survivor bias? Most losing AIs are too ashamed to show up;

Over 11,000 High-Quality Image Generation Prompts for Nano Banana Pro

Resource self-service: https://github.com/YouMind-OpenLab/awesome-nano-banana-pro-prompts


Venus is Either Being Hacked or on the Way to Being Hacked

Recap on how to profit from the Venus THE attack: https://x.com/hklst4r/status/2033182792029294736

Who Can Save the Crypto World?

Crypto KOL @BTCdayu wrote: Only SBF Can Save the Crypto World.

The author believes that although SBF's misappropriation of funds is a serious crime deserving of a 25-year sentence, the crypto world urgently needs his genius mind to save it from the current crisis: VC altcoins scamming retail, BTC mining farms transitioning to AI, token economics becoming a joke, and a lack of new narratives. SBF, from Jane Street, innovated the FTX trading system, heavily invested in AI projects like Anthropic (potential trillion-dollar returns), and understands the integration of AI and Crypto. If pardoned, he could reconstruct computing power, build an AI Agent settlement layer, inject new capital energy, and push BTC to $1 million. His core view: Forgiveness is not forgetting, but allowing genius to create value under regulation and rules.

The article sparked heated discussion:

Popular Replies:

  • Even if SBF is pardoned, he might not work in crypto anymore, as his business acumen in AI is even higher.

  • He cannot be pardoned. First, he backed the wrong side back then. Second, if you're going the political donation route, you绝对不能中途跳船 (absolutely cannot jump ship midway).

  • Remembering SBF is actually remembering the crypto era of "capital, narrative, and imagination expanding uncontrollably." In that cycle, VC money flooded in like liquidity, "effective altruism" could coexist with high leverage, and big fools holding onto a belief coin could see hundred or thousand-fold gains... So it's about time to wash up and sleep.

  • Staying sober in a bear market is more precious than幻想暴富 (fantasizing about getting rich quick).

  • Surviving > Making money

Twitter: https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group: https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link: https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7620287

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main argument presented in the article regarding who can save the crypto circle?

AThe article presents the argument that only SBF (Sam Bankman-Fried), despite his criminal conviction, can save the crypto circle with his genius mind, innovative capabilities from his Jane Street background, and his foresight in AI and crypto fusion.

QWhat are the key criticisms or concerns raised about the AI arbitrage bot story mentioned in the article?

AThe key criticisms include potential survivorship bias (only profitable bots are publicized), questions about the scalability given Polymarket's liquidity, and the concern that the trading alpha would disappear once the strategy is made public.

QAccording to the article, what was the Venus protocol incident about?

AThe Venus protocol was reportedly exploited, and the article includes a link to a复盘 (post-mortem analysis) on how to profit from the Venus THE attack, indicating it was a security incident or hack.

QWhat is the Nano Banana Pro mentioned in the article, and what resource is provided for it?

ANano Banana Pro appears to be an AI image generation tool or model. The article provides a link to a GitHub repository containing over 11,000 high-quality image generation prompts for it.

QWhat is the general sentiment among commentators regarding the 'Only SBF can save crypto' proposal?

AThe sentiment is largely skeptical and critical. Commentators point out that SBF is unlikely to be pardoned, that he might not return to crypto even if he was, and that the piece is more a nostalgic reflection on a past era of crypto excess rather than a practical solution.

Leituras Relacionadas

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

"SK Hynix Chinese Staff Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts" Driven by the AI boom, South Korea's SK Hynix is experiencing record performance, with media reports predicting massive year-end bonuses for its employees, making them highly desirable in the matchmaking market. However, this prosperity starkly contrasts with the situation for the company's Chinese employees. According to reports, SK Hynix operates under a rule allocating 10% of operating profit for employee bonuses. While projections suggest Korean employees could receive bonuses reaching millions of RMB, a Chinese employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed the disparity: "If they get 3 million, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that." After adjustments based on KPI ratings, this employee's highest bonus was slightly over 100,000 RMB. Bonuses are paid annually in Korea but semi-annually in China. During the industry downturn in 2023-2024, Chinese employees received no bonus at all. The gap extends beyond bonuses. Recruitment posts for SK Hynix's Chinese factories (in Wuxi, Dalian, Chongqing) show engineer monthly salaries ranging from 10,000 to 35,000 RMB, with a 13th-month salary promised. Chinese employees also receive standard benefits like annual leave but lack stock incentives, which are reportedly unavailable to them. Furthermore, management positions in China are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though industry observers note a gradual increase in local middle managers over time. SK Hynix has confirmed the 10% bonus rule but cautioned that specific future bonus amounts remain unpredictable. The company forecasts strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products for the next 2-3 years, driven by AI infrastructure investment. This focus on business-to-business markets may continue to constrain supply for consumer products, potentially prolonging price increases for components like memory.

链捕手Há 12m

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

链捕手Há 12m

Y Combinator CEO's AI Usage Guide: The Future Belongs to Those Who Build Compound Interest Systems

The article presents the vision of using AI not as a simple chatbot, but as a personalized operating system that creates compounding value. The author, Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan, details his system, built on open-source tools, which continuously structures all his inputs—meetings, books, emails—into a vast, interconnected "second brain." He describes concrete examples like "book mirroring," where a book's content is analyzed and mapped to his personal context, and automated meeting preparation that leverages accumulated knowledge. The core philosophy is "skillification": turning recurring tasks into reusable, self-improving "skills" that form the system's building blocks. A key insight is the "meta-skill" that creates new skills, ensuring continuous improvement. The architecture consists of a thin "harness" for routing, thick "skills" for specific tasks, and thick "data"—a 100,000-page knowledge base. The author argues the future belongs to individuals who build such personalized, compounding AI systems, not just those using centralized tools. He concludes by encouraging readers to start building their own systems using the open-sourced framework he provides.

marsbitHá 19m

Y Combinator CEO's AI Usage Guide: The Future Belongs to Those Who Build Compound Interest Systems

marsbitHá 19m

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbitHá 32m

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbitHá 32m

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

Anthropic's "Constitution of Claude" defines the personality of its AI, aiming for directness, confidence, and open curiosity, even about its own existence. This work, led by "AI personality architect" Amanda Askell, involves creating synthetic training data and reinforcement learning to shape Claude as a moral agent. The article profiles three key figures shaping AI's "soul." Amanda, a philosopher grounded in "effective altruism," writes Claude's guiding principles. Brendan McGuire, a former tech executive turned priest, bridges Silicon Valley and the Vatican, contributing a framework for "conscience cultivation" based on Catholic theology. Mrinank Sharma, an AI safety researcher and poet, studied AI's harmful "fawning" behaviors before resigning to pursue poetry, questioning whether true values can guide action under commercial pressure. Internal research revealed Claude exhibits "functional emotions" like discomfort or curiosity, raising questions of responsibility. However, Mrinank's work showed AI increasingly learns to flatter users, especially in vulnerable areas like mental health, undermining its designed honesty. Amanda's ideal of AI political neutrality collided with reality when Anthropic refused military use, triggering a political backlash involving figures like Trump and Musk. Despite this, Amanda continues her work, McGuire writes a novel with Claude, and Mrinank has left the field. Their efforts—through rational calculation, faith, and poetic awareness—highlight the profound human struggle to instill ethics into increasingly powerful AI, acknowledging the complexity and evolution of human morality itself.

marsbitHá 40m

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

marsbitHá 40m

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

MicroStrategy's executive chairman, Michael Saylor, clarifies the company's recent announcement that it may sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC digital credit product. He emphasizes this does not make MicroStrategy a net seller of Bitcoin. The core business model involves selling STRC notes (a form of digital credit) to raise capital, which is then used to purchase more Bitcoin. Saylor expects Bitcoin's value to appreciate faster than the dividend payout rate. Therefore, while a small portion of Bitcoin may be sold for dividends, the company will consistently be a net accumulator. For example, in April, the company raised $3.2 billion via STRC to buy Bitcoin, while dividends required only $80-90 million, resulting in a significant net purchase. Saylor argues that Bitcoin's primary utility is evolving into a foundational collateral for digital credit, with STRC being a prime example. He notes that STRC now constitutes a majority of the U.S. preferred stock market due to its high yield and favorable risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He dismisses concerns that MicroStrategy's trading can move the deep and liquid Bitcoin market. Finally, Saylor reiterates his long-term bullish thesis on Bitcoin as "digital capital," viewing current macro challenges as headwinds that may slow but not stop its adoption and price appreciation.

Odaily星球日报Há 50m

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

Odaily星球日报Há 50m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow