Odaily Interviews Aster: DEX Will Ultimately Devour the Entire Trading World, Optional Privacy is the Key Ladder

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2026-03-31Última atualização em 2026-03-31

Resumo

Odaily Interview with Aster: DEX Will Ultimately Devour the Trading World, Optional Privacy is the Key Ladder Aster has initiated key steps to build institutional-grade private DeFi infrastructure, marked by the launch of its Layer 1 mainnet, Aster Chain, on March 17. The mainnet offers traders fair ordering and optional privacy. This was followed by the launch of its native staking function on March 20. The project has rapidly evolved from an innovative Perp DEX into a complete infrastructure layer, achieving record-breaking trading volumes in late 2025 and a successful TGE. In an interview, CEO Leonard explained their core logic: launching a mainnet *after* securing users and revenue, not with a "cold start." This ensures every step is validated by real market demand. Aster's key differentiator is its unique "optional privacy" value proposition, implemented through a ZK + Stealth Address architecture. This allows for automatic privacy for each transaction while maintaining verifiability. The team believes this feature is a prerequisite for mass adoption and will be a primary driver for institutional use of DEXs, forming the core of their moat. Looking ahead, Aster predicts the DEX landscape will evolve into an oligopoly dominated by a few major players. The project is actively pursuing partnerships with both Web2 and Web3 entities, with significant interest from financial firms looking to build markets or list assets on its chain. For the immediate future, Aster's Q2 fo...

Recently, Aster marked its first anniversary as a new starting point, initiating key steps to build institutional-grade privacy DeFi infrastructure. On March 17, the Aster Chain mainnet officially launched, dedicated to providing traders with fair sequencing and optional privacy trading experiences. Shortly after, on March 20, Aster Chain's native staking feature went live, deeply binding network security with ecosystem growth through a dual reward mechanism.

From repeatedly breaking trading volume records in the second half of 2025, to successfully completing the brand upgrade and TGE, to the current L1 mainnet launch, Aster is rapidly evolving from an innovative Perp DEX into a more complete infrastructure layer.

However, in the current context of L1 oversaturation, cold market sentiment, major macro changes, and severely fragmented attention, is launching an L1 the best timing? What are the differentiated advantages of Aster Chain? And what are the upcoming roadmap plans?

To answer these questions, Odaily Planet Daily specially interviewed Aster CEO Leonard, delving into its key decisions over the past year, insights into industry challenges, and the long-term vision of building "trusted Infrastructure".

I found that the core logic lies in: "First have users and revenue, then launch the mainnet," rather than a "cold start." This ensures that every step Aster takes is grounded in real demand and market validation. Simultaneously, Aster Chain's unique "optional privacy" value proposition will be the source of its moat.

There is much in Aster's story worth pondering for Web3 entrepreneurs. Below, the story will be told in the first person by Aster CEO Leonard, enjoy~

What Did Aster Do Right in the Past Year?

Starting in the second half of 2025, the platform's 24h trading volume kept breaking records, from $1 billion in June to reaching $11 billion in September, feeling the project's rapid development. Also in September, during Aster's TGE, achievements like a 24h trading volume breakthrough of $345 million, 330,000 new wallet addresses, and platform TVL exceeding $1 billion solidified Aster's position in the DEX market. When trading volumes broke records, it made us realize that we entered the right track at the right time.

Alongside the TGE, the brand also successfully transitioned from APX to Aster.

And when we launched the L1 mainnet with truly "optional privacy" functionality, it was a unique product unavailable on the market and a prerequisite for on-chain trading moving towards mass adoption.

How Did We Get Through the Darkest Times?

When we initially underwent the rebranding, the market was almost monopolized by Hyperliquid, and no one thought anyone could challenge their position. For a long time before our TGE, the general public thought this was impossible. Before the Aster TGE, the estimated FDV (Fully Diluted Valuation) wasn't high, but we ultimately received a valuation far exceeding expectations, which also triggered a re-evaluation of Perp DEX (Perpetual Contract Decentralized Exchange) projects by the market.

In fact, we once postponed the TGE plan because we felt there was room for product improvement before the official launch. However, we later decided to choose "execution speed" over "pursuing perfection". Looking back, this was the right decision.

The lesson learned is: In an emerging market like Perp DEX, there is no so-called "standard playbook" for handling the toughest problems. Most consensus advice only applies to normal conditions. There's no magic here, only believing in what you do and working hard.

And the core belief that can lead the team to "embrace hardship" is: DEX will ultimately devour the entire trading world, and "optional privacy" is the key to achieving this process.

Behind the High-Speed Growth, Which Team Growth Experiences Can Be Reused?

As the project scaled, we proactively moved away from the early decision-making model reliant on intuition, instead deeply relying on data. Aster's current organizational structure is more refined, decision-making is more systematic, and team metrics are clearer to achieve quantifiable, trackable growth.

Although the organization is growing, some underlying logic remains constant: the owner consciousness of all members, taking full responsibility for the final outcome; rejecting hesitation, action first; result-oriented, processes must ultimately translate into substantive value for users and the protocol.

To maintain the early team's execution and judgment, we adopted three major strategies: Extreme flatness, rejecting internal friction, minimizing management layers as much as possible, reducing ineffective communication links, ensuring transparent and symmetric information; Decision delegation, full authorization: Give teams clear KPIs and Ownership, delegate decision-making power to those closest to the action; Land first, perfect later, emphasizing "quick delivery, small steps fast running", letting the market provide first-hand correction feedback, completing iteration and optimization in a real environment.

The Hardest Time for a New L1? How Does Aster Chain Define Itself?

First, let's talk about the differentiated technical design. Aster Chain adopts a ZK + Stealth Address architecture: Stealth Address makes every transaction automatically private, ZKproof makes every private transaction verifiable. (Friends interested in the technical details of how Aster Chain balances on-chain fund transparency and transaction privacy, please refer to the Gitbook.)

For developers, we launched Aster Code, which is an ecosystem for fee sharing. The core benefit is allowing developers to build their own trading interfaces and directly automate revenue generation from them.

Furthermore, Aster Code also improves developers' integration efficiency, provides a transparent and controlled authorization mechanism, and supports data monitoring and instant settlement.

The Real Challenge of L1: After the Mainnet Launch, How to Make Developers and Users Stay?

The L1 battle is a competition for liquidity.

Technical solutions are basic requirements; users should not feel the difference between centralized and decentralized architectures when trading. Users of Aster Perp DEX are inherently users of Aster Chain. We had users, even revenue, before launching the mainnet. This is the model for successful projects in this cycle, not building a chain first and then looking for a business model.

Regarding ecosystem growth, I believe the privacy option will drive substantive adoption of decentralized trading by institutions, which has always been a past obstacle. Now that we provide privacy features, institutions will at least start trying to move part of their trading flow on-chain. The reasoning is sound: they want diversification, and many institutions already believe the future of trading lies in DEXs. They just needed a viable solution. And now, that solution has emerged: Aster Chain.

What Will the Future Industry Landscape Be? And What is Aster's Moat?

Privacy and core trading experience are our core. In the liquidity competition track, network effects mean capital will inevitably concentrate towards the top players. I believe it's highly likely that an "oligopoly"格局 dominated by the top three players will form in the future; for DEXs, this concentration could be even higher.

Because for DEXs, geographical region or market segment limitations barely exist. Competitive differentiation mainly comes from different design principles and philosophies. Just like Aster always focuses on privacy and is willing to make necessary trade-offs for this core value, this反而 constitutes our moat, allowing us to survive in the long-term competition.

When Contacting B-end, What Point Most Impresses Potential Partners?

Aster Chain is actively promoting cooperation in both Web2 and Web3 fields.

Web3 companies have huge potential for product collaboration with us. For example, we are talking with other stablecoin projects, exploring cooperation models similar to the World Liberty Financial architecture. Additionally, we are also focusing on prediction markets because there is high overlap between prediction market users and perp DEX traders, and the cross-selling opportunities are obvious.

On the Web2 side, most conversations focus on financial companies. The most common point of interest is: building markets on Aster or getting assets listed. This type of cooperation is the easiest阶段性 goal for them to achieve. Although the cycle for establishing cooperation with large companies, especially regulated financial institutions, is long, once confirmed, we will announce it publicly.

What Should We Do Now? Backcasting Based on Judgments About the Future

After the mainnet launch, Aster's Q2 priorities include:

  • Attracting users, professional traders, and institutional traders with privacy needs;
  • Increasing asset types and liquidity;
  • Expanding the ecosystem through Aster Code and Aster Chain;
  • Strengthening token utility and governance;
  • Optimizing the trading interface (UI/UX)......

Crypto Market Downturn, External AI Hype, Any Rhythm Adjustments or Countermeasures from Aster?

Aster cannot predict the market, can only focus on building, surviving the winter and continuously creating value is the only certain path to the next ATH.

As for the AI trend, Aster has already provided relevant skill interfaces for AI Agents. Although not AI experts, we can empower AI developers and Agents, allowing them to build tools on Aster and provide us feedback on how to optimize the product, making Aster not only human-friendly but also attractive to AI Agents.

Years later, I hope the industry's evaluation of Aster is: infrastructure that users can trust long-term and can carry funds and strategies.

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core belief driving Aster's vision for the future of trading?

AThe core belief is that DEX will eventually consume the entire trading world, and 'optional privacy' is the key enabler to achieve this vision.

QWhat was Aster's strategy for launching its L1 mainnet, and why was it considered successful?

AAster adopted a 'users and revenue first, then launch the mainnet' approach instead of a 'cold start.' This ensured each step was validated by real market demand and user needs, making the launch successful.

QHow does Aster Chain achieve a balance between on-chain transparency and transaction privacy?

AAster Chain uses a ZK + Stealth Address architecture: Stealth Address ensures each transaction is private, while ZK-proofs make every private transaction verifiable, maintaining transparency and privacy.

QWhat is Aster Code, and how does it benefit developers on the Aster Chain ecosystem?

AAster Code is a fee-sharing ecosystem that allows developers to build their own trading interfaces and automatically earn revenue from it. It also improves integration efficiency with transparent authorization mechanisms and real-time settlement.

QWhat does Aster identify as its main competitive advantage or 'moat' in the DEX landscape?

AAster's moat is its focus on privacy and core trading experience. By prioritizing optional privacy and making necessary trade-offs, it creates a defensible position in the long-term competitive DEX market.

Leituras Relacionadas

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbitHá 11m

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbitHá 11m

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手Há 23m

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手Há 23m

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbitHá 38m

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbitHá 38m

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

Title: Wall Street Sees Kimi K3 as a Catalyst for Compute Demand, Not a "DeepSeek Moment 2.0" Summary: Following the release of Moonshot AI's powerful open-source model Kimi K3, initial market reaction mirrored the "DeepSeek moment" that sparked a sell-off in compute stocks earlier in 2025, fearing reduced demand for AI infrastructure. However, major Wall Street banks including UBS, Nomura, BofA, and Citi argue the opposite: K3 will accelerate, not weaken, demand for compute, memory, storage, and networking. Their analysis centers on K3's specifications—2.8 trillion parameters, 1M token context, and MoE architecture—which represent a "scale" story rather than a pure "efficiency" one like DeepSeek R1. These features increase pressure on inference, memory (especially KV cache), and storage. Analysts invoke Jevons Paradox: as high-quality models become more affordable (K3 is cheaper than top closed models but not the cheapest), usage and token volumes expand, ultimately increasing total compute consumption. The reports highlight that competition will force leading US AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) to invest more in training and iteration to maintain their edge. Furthermore, the rise of capable open-source models like K3 is expanding the global AI developer ecosystem, with Chinese models now accounting for over 45% of developer traffic. Key beneficiaries identified across the AI infrastructure chain include memory/storage players (e.g., Micron, Samsung), compute leaders (Nvidia, TSMC), networking suppliers (due to "super-node" cluster needs for deploying K3), and cloud platforms (e.g., Alibaba) that host diverse model ecosystems. The consensus is that stronger open-source models are an entry point for the next wave of infrastructure demand diffusion, provided workload growth outpaces efficiency gains.

链捕手Há 41m

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

链捕手Há 41m

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar ASTER

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Aster (ASTER) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Aster (ASTER) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Aster (ASTER)Depois de comprar o teu Aster (ASTER), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Aster (ASTER)Transaciona facilmente Aster (ASTER) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

605 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar ASTER

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de ASTER (ASTER) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片