Odaily Exclusive丨Polymarket Opens Store in New York, Kalshi Gives Away $50 Supermarket Vouchers: Are Prediction Markets Now Handing Out Eggs Too?

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2026-02-04Última atualização em 2026-02-04

Resumo

Polymarket and Kalshi, two leading prediction market platforms, are launching offline promotional campaigns in New York to attract users ahead of the Super Bowl. Kalshi hosted a pop-up event at a local supermarket, offering $50 worth of free groceries to participants, while Polymarket is set to open a "free grocery store" in New York on February 12, alongside a $1 million donation to a local food bank. These initiatives aim to engage users with low-barrier, real-world event predictions, such as gas price changes. The campaigns also appear strategically timed to align with local political discussions around food affordability and potential regulatory changes, including proposed bills that could restrict prediction markets in New York. The author notes that such offline tactics echo classic user-acquisition strategies long used in China’s internet industry.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser(@wenser 2010)

"Each generation has its own eggs to claim"—the value of this statement continues to rise!

This time, the two giants of the prediction market—Kalshi and Polymarket—are the ones stirring up this egg-grabbing battle.

To gain more attention ahead of the "American Super Bowl," the two platforms recently started their own "offline promotion performances"—Kalshi gave away $50 worth of free groceries to users at a supermarket in New York; Polymarket went even further, directly launching its long-planned "first free grocery store in New York," scheduled to open on February 12. In the competition for attention and user growth, the prediction market giants, valued at tens of billions of dollars, have chosen the most old-school but effective "offline promotion" route.

Regarding this, we immediately contacted Odaily Planet Daily’s New York-based colleague Connie to get the latest on "Kalshi and Polymarket’s offline promotions" and real information such as "how much $50 can actually buy in New York," to share with our readers.

When Prediction Market Giants Dive into Offline Promotions: Kalshi’s Pop-Up, Polymarket’s "Instant Store"

As one of America’s major metropolises, New York has become a battleground and focal point for the two prediction market giants, Kalshi and Polymarket.

Addressing the increasingly pressing issue of rising living costs in New York and across the U.S., Kalshi and Polymarket have rolled out their big moves—

On February 3, Kalshi 【limited time】 offered $50 worth of free groceries to select users at Westside Market on Third Avenue, 84th Street, to attract more users to participate in various real-event predictions on its platform.

Judging from the surrounding "flyers," "supermarket KT boards," and other promotional materials, Kalshi’s offline promotion更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”,更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“快闪活动”更像是一场即兴的“极速快闪活动” (pop-up event), collaborating with local supermarkets to place offline materials for a short time, using "free $50 groceries" as "bait" to attract people to line up, participate, and spectate. This was also confirmed by Connie.

Additionally, it's clear that through this pop-up, Kalshi hopes to get more people to join the prediction market by betting on everyday, low-threshold, easy-to-understand questions like "Will New York City's gas price exceed $3.3 this year?" thereby achieving commercial goals like brand marketing and user activation.

Kalshi co-branded pop-up supermarket eggs were snapped up

Compared to Kalshi's somewhat crude and highly commercial approach, Polymarket's preparations were much more thorough.

On February 3, slightly earlier than Kalshi's announcement, Polymarket officially announced that after months of offline preparation, it plans to open the "first free grocery store in New York" on February 12 (EST) by leasing a physical storefront. Additionally, Polymarket donated $1 million to the New York City Food Bank to address the "hunger issue" in the area.

Polymarket also released actual photos of distributing vegetables like tomatoes and eggplants offline, instantly reminiscent of the domestic internet platform's ground promotion era, full of the vibe of "download the APP get eggs" or "first recharge get newcomer gift pack."

It is worth mentioning that Polymarket not only emphasized that "Polymarket's offline store is well-stocked, no purchase necessary," but also called on everyone to donate to the New York City Food Bank at the end of its tweet, encouraging people to take practical action to solve the real "hunger problem" caused by high food costs and high cost of living.

Seeing this, I can't help but sigh—

Fake crypto project ground promotion: Hold offline conferences, eat seafood feasts, shill various fake concept tokens;

Real crypto project ground promotion: Give away vegetables, give away eggs, open offline stores to distribute free food, do charity and public welfare, call on people to donate and show love.

Regarding the real purchasing power of Kalshi and Polymarket's "egg collection activities," we also had a detailed discussion with Connie from Odaily in New York.

The Real Purchasing Power of $50 in New York, USA: 5 McDonald's Meals, 1.5 lbs of Beef, or 2 Days of Food for the Average Person

According to Connie, the real purchasing power of $50 in New York, USA, can be considered "quite valuable."

"Buying a 0.5 lb (about 0.45 kg) portion of beef at a local supermarket in New York costs about $18, so $50 can buy about 1.5 lbs of beef," which is enough protein for an adult's three meals a day. For comparison, the price of one jin (0.5 kg) of beef in China is only about 30 RMB, which is only 1/8 of the cost in New York.

Converting to the well-known "Big Mac Index," the real purchasing power of $50 is also quite astonishing—a cheeseburger combo meal delivery with about 800-1000 calories costs about $10.89, so $50 can buy about 5 combo meals; if you buy a double burger with 580 calories, it only costs about $7.20. Of course, this price is "sky-high" domestically; the same burger combo in China only costs 25-40 RMB, which is only 1/2 the price of the same food in New York.

In other words, spent frugally, $50 is close to covering the food cost for an average person in New York for about 2 days (calculated as 5~6 meals). According to Connie, Kalshi's event attracted many Americans to line up for "free food," and "Americans' enthusiasm for lining up to receive things is even higher than that of Chinese people." Polymarket's "offline free grocery store" is also expected to attract a large crowd to line up and participate. Based on the existing information released by Kalshi and Polymarket, the hard costs of the two platforms' related activities are estimated to be at least $50,000 to $100,000.

Investing so much manpower and resources, beyond doing charity and showing love, Kalshi and Polymarket also have their own "business calculations."

The "Business Strategy" Behind Prediction Market Platforms "Giving Away Eggs": Using Political Issues to Influence Institutional Regulation

None of the above food donation activities by Kalshi and Polymarket were coordinated or communicated with the New York City government; they were spontaneous company actions.

However, the wording and purpose of their external statements are very similar to the "policies" repeatedly emphasized by New York's new mayor, Zohran Mamdani, during his campaign—the latter had proposed "opening publicly owned grocery stores in New York's five boroughs to lower food prices." Furthermore, Zohran Mamdani pointed out that city-owned grocery stores could reduce rent and operating costs through non-profit operating models and the use of public property. This proposal is still in the pilot stage, and a final implementation timetable has not been determined.

On the other hand, as one of the important key states in the U.S., New York's legislators are busy drafting new bills targeting the emerging prediction market industry. Among them, the 《ORACLE Act》 plans to restrict or prohibit New York residents from betting on certain prediction market events and impose stricter restrictions on event-based prediction markets; another piece of legislation plans to require prediction market operators to obtain a state-issued license before operating.

It is clear that some legislative decision-makers still have various concerns about prediction markets, viewing them as similar to unregulated gambling or more susceptible to insider manipulation.

In light of this, although the New York mayor has no direct jurisdiction over the regulation of prediction markets (Odaily Planet Daily Note: Regulatory authority over prediction market platforms belongs to state and federal governments), Kalshi and Polymarket's move may also be an attempt to seek regulatory friendliness through indirect means.

Finally, regardless of the ultimate impact of their "egg-giving" actions, we have to say that China's internet promotion models are at least 5-10 years ahead of the Western world.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the two major prediction market platforms mentioned in the article that are conducting offline promotions in New York?

AKalshi and Polymarket.

QWhat specific free benefit did Kalshi offer to users during its flash promotion at a New York market?

AKalshi offered a $50 free food benefit to users.

QWhat is the name of the bill mentioned in the article that aims to restrict or ban New York residents from betting on certain prediction market events?

AThe ORACLE Act.

QHow much did Polymarket donate to the New York City Food Bank, as stated in the article?

APolymarket donated $1 million to the New York City Food Bank.

QAccording to the article, what is the estimated cost of a 0.5-pound portion of beef in a New York supermarket?

AA 0.5-pound portion of beef costs approximately $18 in a New York supermarket.

Leituras Relacionadas

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Há 43m

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Há 43m

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHá 1h

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHá 1h

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHá 1h

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片