NVIDIA Earnings Countdown: Beating Expectations Is a Near Certainty, but Wall Street Is Most Concerned About These Five Questions

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-20Última atualização em 2026-05-20

Resumo

NVIDIA Earnings Countdown: Beating Expectations is a Given, but Wall Street Cares Most About These Five Issues The upcoming NVIDIA Q1 earnings report is expected to easily surpass the consensus revenue estimate of ~$78.7B. However, Wall Street's focus has shifted from the numbers themselves to five key strategic questions. **1. Shareholder Returns: Will "Frugality" Change?** Despite being the S&P 500's largest company, NVIDIA's shareholder returns (dividends + buybacks) averaged only 47% of its free cash flow from 2022-2025, far below the 80% peer average and its own historical norm. Its 0.02% dividend yield also lags the peer average of 0.89%. This low cash return, partly due to investments in AI ecosystem partners, is cited as a core reason for NVIDIA's valuation discount compared to other "Magnificent 7" stocks. Increasing returns could attract long-term income funds and be a catalyst. **2. Vera Rubin: The Next-Gen Chip Timeline** Analysts expect the next-generation Vera Rubin (R200) platform to ramp in the second half of 2026, following the current Blackwell series. It will use TSMC's 3nm process and share Blackwell Ultra's "Oberon" rack architecture, suggesting a smooth transition with limited gross margin impact. The market also awaits any update on NVIDIA's $1 trillion cumulative revenue forecast for 2025-2027. **3. Gross Margin: Can the 75% Level Hold?** Gross margin, a key valuation support, is expected to stabilize in the near term due to the shared architecture...

Original Author: Long Yue

Original Source: Wall Street News

NVIDIA earnings season—the most important thing is no longer the numbers themselves.

On May 18, Bank of America Securities analyst Vivek Arya's team released a preview report for NVIDIA's Q1 earnings, which will be announced after the U.S. market close on Wednesday, May 20.

According to NVIDIA's historical pattern over the past ten quarters, actual revenue has averaged 7% to 8% above management guidance. Management previously provided F1Q27 revenue guidance of $78 billion. Based on this calculation, actual revenue is highly likely to fall in the range of $83 billion to $84 billion, while the current market consensus is only $78.7 billion.

In other words, 'beating expectations' is almost a foregone conclusion. But analysts believe what will truly move the market's nerve after the earnings release are the following five questions.

Cash Return: Can NVIDIA Change Its 'Stinginess'?

This is the most discussed topic in the report and is considered by them to be the core reason for NVIDIA's long-term valuation discount.

NVIDIA is currently the largest company by market cap in the S&P 500, accounting for a high weight of 8.3% in the index, exceeding the historical peaks of Apple (7.9%) and Microsoft (7.2%). However, the problem is that NVIDIA's shareholder return efforts are severely mismatched with its size.

The data is straightforward: from 2022 to 2025, NVIDIA's free cash flow payout ratio (dividends + buybacks) averaged only 47%, while the average for comparable peers in the same period was 80%. Even NVIDIA's own average over the previous ten years was 80%.

Meanwhile, NVIDIA's current dividend yield is only 0.02%, while the peer average is 0.89%. Among equity income funds, NVIDIA is held by only 16% of funds, while Microsoft is held by 57% and Apple by 32%.

Where is the money going? Analysts point out that NVIDIA is investing heavily in the ecosystem—OpenAI, Anthropic, technology partners. These investments are seen as controversial by some outsiders, with voices suggesting it's "round-trip financing"—NVIDIA lends money to customers, who then use that money to buy NVIDIA's chips.

How large is the valuation discount? Data shows that NVIDIA's forward P/E ratio for 2026/2027 is 26x/19x, while the mean for other 'Magnificent Seven' members is 49x/42x, representing a discount of nearly 50%.

A more specific comparison: analysts predict NVIDIA's combined free cash flow for 2026+2027 will exceed $430 billion, higher than the combined ~$375 billion for Apple and Microsoft. However, NVIDIA's market cap is approximately $5.46 trillion, about 28% lower than the combined $7.5 trillion for Apple and Microsoft.

Analysts believe that if NVIDIA increases its dividend and buyback efforts, it could attract more long-term funds that prefer income, narrowing the valuation discount while also dispelling concerns about "round-trip financing." They list this change as a "potential catalyst for the second half of the year."

Vera Rubin: When Will the Next-Generation Chip Arrive?

NVIDIA's current main products are the Blackwell series. The market is concerned: when will the next-generation Vera Rubin platform officially ramp up?

The bank's judgment is the second half of 2026. Vera Rubin (codenamed R200) uses TSMC's 3nm process and shares the "Oberon" rack architecture with Blackwell Ultra, making the product transition relatively smooth, with limited expected impact on gross margins.

Looking further ahead, Vera Rubin Ultra (codenamed VR300) will be launched in the second half of 2027, featuring a completely new "Kyber" rack architecture, while the cost proportion of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) will also further increase.

The market also wants to hear NVIDIA's latest stance on the "trillion-dollar revenue forecast" during the earnings call—NVIDIA previously gave an outlook for cumulative revenue of $1 trillion from 2025 to 2027, but contributions from LPU (Language Processing Unit) racks, CPUs, and Vera Rubin Ultra have not yet been included. Will this be updated this time?

Gross Margin: Can the 75% Defense Line Hold?

Gross margin is one of the core supports of NVIDIA's valuation.

Analysts judge: in the short term, because Vera Rubin reuses Blackwell's rack architecture, gross margins are relatively stable during the product transition period. However, in the medium to long term, the rising proportion of HBM memory costs is a persistent pressure source.

Market consensus shows NVIDIA's gross margin fluctuating within the 74% to 75% range. The bank has no disagreement with this but emphasizes that any better-than-expected gross margin performance will be a positive catalyst.

How Will the AI Accelerator Market Size Forecast Be Updated?

Bank of America previously provided NVIDIA's "trillion-dollar" prediction framework for the AI market from 2025 to 2027. This earnings report, the market is focused on whether NVIDIA will update this forecast, especially by incorporating three new growth drivers previously not counted:

  1. LPU (Language Processing Unit) racks
  2. Vera CPU (NVIDIA's self-developed server CPU)
  3. Vera Rubin Ultra

The bank expects that by 2030, the overall AI accelerator market size will reach approximately $1.17 trillion, with NVIDIA maintaining about 68% to 70% market share.

Specifically, NVIDIA's AI accelerator revenue is expected to grow from $102.2 billion in 2024 to $800 billion in 2030, AMD from $5 billion to $80.1 billion over the same period, and Broadcom from $9.3 billion to $181.9 billion.

Is the Competitive Threat from Google TPU and CPU Exaggerated?

A narrative has been circulating in the market recently: as AI enters the "Agentic AI" era, the importance of CPUs will surpass that of GPUs, thus threatening NVIDIA's moat.

The bank clearly disagrees with this, providing two reasons:

First, NVIDIA's self-developed "Vera CPU" will have new progress disclosed at the upcoming Computex conference, and its competitiveness in the standalone CPU market should not be underestimated.

Second, in already large-scale deployments of Blackwell and TPU clusters, the CPU-to-GPU ratio is already 1:2, which does not align with the narrative that "Agentic AI requires more CPUs."

The conclusion is: while the CPU market is large, there are many competitors (with strong contenders in both x86 and ARM architectures). NVIDIA's dominant position in the GPU/AI accelerator field is difficult to shake in the short term. It is estimated that by 2030, NVIDIA will maintain approximately 70% revenue share in a total addressable AI market exceeding $1.7 trillion.

Valuation: A 'Tech Leader' at a 50% Discount

Finally, back to valuation. The report uses a set of data to directly highlight NVIDIA's current valuation paradox.

Based on CY26/27 forward P/E ratios, NVIDIA is at 26x/19x, while the "Magnificent Seven" (Mag-7) average is 49x/42x—NVIDIA is at a nearly 50% discount.

Based on EV/FCF (Enterprise Value/Free Cash Flow), NVIDIA is at 28x/20x, while the Mag-7 average is 83x/59x—a discount exceeding 66%.

Based on PEG (Price/Earnings to Growth ratio), NVIDIA is at 0.41x, while the Mag-7 average is 2.61x, and the S&P 500 overall is above 1.3x.

Bank of America maintains a "Buy" rating with a price target of $320, based on a CY27 forward P/E ratio of 28x (excluding cash), which is at the mid-to-low end of NVIDIA's historical valuation range of 25x to 56x.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the report, what is the core reason for NVIDIA's valuation discount relative to its 'Magnificent 7' peers?

AThe core reason is NVIDIA's relatively low shareholder return rate (dividends + buybacks). Its average free cash flow return rate from 2022-2025 is only 47%, compared to an industry average and its own ten-year historical average of 80%. Its low dividend yield of 0.02% (vs. peer avg. 0.89%) means fewer income-focused funds hold its stock, contributing to the valuation gap.

QWhen does Bank of America's analyst team expect NVIDIA's next-generation Vera Rubin platform to ramp up in volume?

AThe analyst team expects the Vera Rubin platform (code R200) to ramp up in volume in the second half of 2026.

QWhat are the three new growth areas that could be included in an update to NVIDIA's 'trillion-dollar revenue' forecast?

AThe three new growth areas are: 1) LPU (Language Processing Unit) racks, 2) Vera CPU (NVIDIA's self-developed server CPU), and 3) Vera Rubin Ultra.

QWhat two reasons does the report give for downplaying the competitive threat from CPUs (like Google's TPU) to NVIDIA?

A1) NVIDIA's self-developed 'Vera CPU' is a competitive contender in the standalone CPU market, with new details expected at Computex. 2) In already deployed large-scale Blackwell and TPU clusters, the CPU-to-GPU ratio is already 1:2, which doesn't support the narrative that 'Agentic AI' requires significantly more CPUs.

QWhat is Bank of America's price target for NVIDIA and what is the valuation metric used to derive it?

ABank of America maintains a 'Buy' rating with a $320 price target. This target is based on a CY27 estimated P/E of 28x (excluding cash), which is at the low-to-mid range of NVIDIA's historical valuation range of 25x to 56x.

Leituras Relacionadas

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is "Bleeding Out" – How Can Practitioners Survive Better? In a candid reflection, the founder of IOSG Ventures voices deep concerns about the current state of Web3, describing an ecosystem experiencing severe "blood loss." Despite the recent MuShanghai event showcasing a successful pivot towards a more diverse, global community, a somber reality persists: many crypto-native attendees were there exploring exits or new labels in biotech, AI, and robotics. The core issue is identified as a breakdown in the ecosystem's positive feedback loop. Alarmingly, underestimated "low-probability bad events" are occurring simultaneously: a significant brain drain of Chinese developers to AI, a lack of breakout applications despite massive funding, and a widening credibility gap for practitioners globally, often stigmatized as scam artists. This has created a dire接班人 (successor) problem, with the next generation seeing little professional prestige or financial upside in crypto compared to fields like AI. A significant portion of the critique focuses on Ethereum and Vitalik Buterin. While not pessimistic about Ethereum's technology, the founder worries that critical development windows were missed by focusing on niche technical narratives like ZK and L2 instead of mass-market applications. A more urgent concern is that Vitalik may be isolated in an "information bubble," shielded from the grassroots community's hardships by layers of intermediaries, preventing crucial feedback from reaching him. The call is for Vitalik to return to a founder's mindset, re-engage directly with the community, and rally efforts for the next decade. The divergence between U.S. and Chinese OG (Original Gangster) ecosystems is stark. While many U.S. builders reinvest their wealth into the ecosystem, the Chinese scene suffers from a severe lack of "造血能力" (blood-making ability), with most market-driven funds struggling and many early success stories cashing out entirely. This threatens the entire Asian Web3 ecosystem's survival. For individual practitioners, survival advice is pragmatic: find your core "why," maintain life balance beyond token prices, continuously learn new skills (like AI), form small, trusted alliances for mutual support, and practice self-compassion. The industry's greatest need is not money or tech, but lighthouses—individuals at all levels who offer mentorship, grants, referrals, and honest reflection to guide others. The piece concludes with a direct appeal: OGs must pay forward the opportunities the industry gave them; founders must not struggle alone; and builders must continue their work, ensuring it remains a viable profession. The survival of Web3's "cathedral" depends not on any single leader but on the collective responsibility of everyone who remains.

marsbitHá 24m

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

marsbitHá 24m

Deficits, Inflation, and the New Fed: The Deep Logic Behind US Bond Yields Breaking 5% and the Market Reset

In the week of May 15-19, 2026, U.S. long-term Treasury yields surged to multi-year highs, with the 30-year yield hitting 5.2%, a level unseen since 2007, and the 10-year yield climbing to 4.687%. Equity markets declined in response. Four primary factors are driving the rise in yields. First, stubborn inflation persists, with April wholesale prices rising 6% year-over-year, fueling expectations of potential future Fed rate hikes instead of cuts. Second, newly confirmed Fed Chair Kevin Warsh inherits a complex inflation battle, with markets closely awaiting his first FOMC meeting. Third, deteriorating U.S. fiscal health, marked by large deficits and rising debt servicing costs, is eroding the traditional "safe-haven" premium for Treasuries. Fourth, the "One Big Beautiful Bill" tax cuts are projected to add trillions to the national debt, contributing to Moody's recent credit rating downgrade. Rising yields pressure stocks through several channels: a higher discount rate reduces the present value of future earnings (especially for growth stocks); rising risk-free rates compress equity risk premiums, making bonds relatively more attractive; higher borrowing costs impact consumers and corporations; and a stronger dollar affects multinational earnings. For investors, the environment favors value and financial stocks over long-duration growth stocks. Bond investors find attractive yields in short to intermediate maturities, while income investors see the best fixed-income opportunities in over a decade. Key developments to watch include Chair Warsh's first FOMC meeting, upcoming inflation data, Treasury auction demand, and whether the 30-year yield approaches 6%, a level that could trigger a more sustained equity valuation reset. The bond market's message is clear: the era of cheap government borrowing is over, posing a central challenge for markets in late 2026.

marsbitHá 25m

Deficits, Inflation, and the New Fed: The Deep Logic Behind US Bond Yields Breaking 5% and the Market Reset

marsbitHá 25m

Is MicroStrategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Deconstructing the 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment

The article "Is Strategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Decoding 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment" analyzes why companies might sell their bitcoin holdings, arguing it's not necessarily negative. It begins by noting the market's surprise at Strategy's potential sale, contrasting its previous "never sell" stance. The core argument is that corporate decisions prioritize shareholder value, and selling bitcoin can be a rational strategic choice. The article outlines five key financial reasons for such sales: 1. **Increase Bitcoin Holdings Per Share:** Companies can use proceeds from bitcoin sales to repurchase shares when the stock price is undervalued relative to its bitcoin assets. This reduces the outstanding share count, potentially increasing the bitcoin amount backing each remaining share. 2. **Optimize Capital Structure & Reduce Financing Costs:** Building cash reserves through bitcoin sales can improve credit ratings (as favored by agencies like S&P), leading to lower future borrowing costs. Repaying debt with sale proceeds also reduces financial leverage. 3. **Legitimate Tax Planning:** In the absence of wash-sale rules for bitcoin in the US, companies can sell to realize capital losses, then repurchase, lowering the tax basis of their holdings and creating tax offsets. 4. **Counter Negative Market Narratives:** A controlled, non-disruptive sale could demonstrate market resilience and disprove fears that corporate selling would crash the market, thereby normalizing bitcoin as a corporate treasury asset. 5. **Repurchase Preferred Stock at a Discount:** If a company's preferred stock trades significantly below its face value, using bitcoin sale proceeds to repurchase it can retire expensive liabilities at a profit, saving on future dividend payments. The conclusion emphasizes that bitcoin's monetary properties offer flexibility. Strategic sales can protect corporate and shareholder interests, making asset utilization more important than rigid "hold" mandates.

marsbitHá 55m

Is MicroStrategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Deconstructing the 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment

marsbitHá 55m

Why Did Zhipu Surge Nearly 30% in a Single Day?

"Global AI Model Unicorn" Zhipu's stock surged nearly 30% in a single day, reaching a new market cap high. The catalyst was the launch of its GLM-5.1-highspeed API, boasting a generation speed of **400 tokens per second**, setting a new global benchmark. This speed, roughly 3-5 times faster than industry leaders like OpenAI's GPT-4o and Anthropic's Claude, is achieved **without compromising the full-scale model's capabilities**. In the era of AI Agents requiring dozens of self-calls, such latency reduction is critical, transforming speed from a system metric into a determinant of intelligence limits. The breakthrough stems from a three-layer technical overhaul: 1. **TileRT Inference Engine**: Compiles the entire model into a continuous, always-on computation pipeline using "Warp Specialization," minimizing GPU idle time by having different processor groups handle data loading, computation, and communication in parallel. 2. **Heterogeneous Parallelism for MLA**: To efficiently run the GLM-5.1 model using the MLA attention mechanism, TileRT employs a heterogeneous strategy. One GPU handles sparse indexing/routing, while the others perform dense computation, optimizing for MLA's unique workflow. 3. **ZCube Network Architecture**: Replaces the standard Spine-Leaf (ROFT) network topology with a flat, dual-group interconnect. This design creates a single optimal path between any two GPUs, eliminating network congestion at scale and reducing latency. The business impact is significant: a 15% increase in cluster throughput (free extra capacity), a 40.6% reduction in tail latency (improved stability), and a one-third cut in networking hardware costs. Long-term, this innovation challenges the dominance of NVIDIA's integrated hardware-software stack (GPU+NVLink+InfiniBand), potentially benefiting manufacturers of high-density Leaf switches and optical modules while lowering the software barrier for domestic AI chips like Huawei's Ascend. The innovation proves that more can be achieved with the same compute, reshaping the infrastructure beyond just GPUs.

marsbitHá 2h

Why Did Zhipu Surge Nearly 30% in a Single Day?

marsbitHá 2h

The Powell Era Concludes: Warsh Takes Over the Fed, What It Means for Global Finance and the Crypto Market?

The podcast discusses the implications of Jerome Powell's departure and Kevin Warsh's appointment as Federal Reserve Chair for global markets and crypto. It highlights a significant divergence between bond markets, which price in global tightening and persistent inflation, and equity markets, driven by AI hype—a disparity reminiscent of the dot-com bubble. The analysis introduces the "Bliss Trade" concept, a structural expectation of government stimulus during crises, which underpins risk asset valuations and currency debasement trades. Inflation is seen as sticky, driven by deglobalization and further complicated by geopolitical tensions, unlikely to fall quickly even if immediate crises subside. Powell's tenure is critiqued for misjudging inflation and overseeing the de-banking of crypto firms, despite defending Fed independence. Regarding crypto, Bitcoin is viewed as a macro asset and a hedge against currency debasement, but its current muted performance stems from competition with higher-beta assets like AI stocks. The potential Clarity Act is seen as more beneficial for Ethereum than Bitcoin, with concerns about tokenization innovation leading to pure speculation. A key warning signal is the widening gap between the market-cap-weighted and equal-weighted S&P 500 indices, suggesting underlying market fragility.

marsbitHá 2h

The Powell Era Concludes: Warsh Takes Over the Fed, What It Means for Global Finance and the Crypto Market?

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow