New Zealand's ACT Party Proposes to Abolish Capital Gains Tax on Cryptocurrency Transactions

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2026-08-28Última atualização em 2026-08-28

Resumo

The New Zealand political party ACT (Association of Consumers and Taxpayers) has proposed a significant policy update to modernize the country's approach to digital assets. A key proposal is the removal of the capital gains tax for retail investors who hold cryptocurrency assets for more than a year, aiming to position crypto as a viable long-term investment tool. Professional traders and businesses would remain under existing tax rules, and assets held for less than a year would still be taxed. Additionally, the plan would exempt small personal purchases paid with crypto from tax, promoting its use as a payment method. Other provisions include establishing clear regulatory and tax frameworks for stablecoins and tokenized securities, creating a regulatory "sandbox" for startups, and reviewing current policies to ensure crypto companies are not excluded from financial infrastructure. ACT Deputy Leader Nicole McKee stated the policy aims to unlock New Zealand's digital economy potential with clear rules and reduced bureaucracy, positioning the country as a hub for digital finance and innovation. This marks a shift from previously restrictive stances on cryptocurrency in New Zealand.

Cryptocurrency assets are gaining increasing significance in national policy, occupying an important place in the election promises of parties worldwide, all vying to secure the support of crypto investors.

On Thursday, the "Association of Consumers and Taxpayers" (ACT) party unveiled a proposal to modernize New Zealand's approach to digital assets, involving leveraging the benefits of tokenization, stablecoin payments, and cryptocurrency-related tax incentive measures within the country's economic structure.

The right-leaning conservative party, holding 11 seats in New Zealand's parliament, proposed abolishing the capital gains tax for taxpayers who hold these assets for more than a year, opening up opportunities for their use as effective long-term investment tools.

This rule would apply only to private retail investors; professional traders and businesses would still be subject to existing tax rules, and transactions involving assets held for less than a year would be taxed.

Furthermore, the ACT party's plan also exempts from tax small personal purchases paid for with cryptocurrency assets, paving the way for their use as an effective payment method nationwide.

This would be followed by other provisions, including establishing a clear regulatory and tax framework for relevant crypto-stablecoins, clear legal and tax rules for tokenized securities and real-world assets, creating a "sandbox" for startups to test innovative new products, and reviewing current regulatory policies to determine whether cryptocurrency companies have been excluded from the existing financial infrastructure.

ACT deputy leader Nicole McKee emphasized that "with clear rules, sensible safeguards, and reduced red tape, the ACT party will unlock the potential of New Zealand's digital economy and help New Zealanders invest, create, and transact with confidence in a modern, competitive economy."

Although New Zealand has pursued policies that could be described as anti-cryptocurrency, including opposition to stablecoins from the former Governor of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, in its pledge, the ACT party stressed that "ACT will make New Zealand a trusted hub for digital finance, modern capital markets, and financial innovation, supporting productive investment, the creation of high-paying jobs, and economic growth."

end-content

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main policy proposal by New Zealand's ACT party regarding cryptocurrencies?

AThe ACT party proposes to abolish capital gains tax on cryptocurrency transactions for assets held for more than a year by private retail investors.

QWhich group of cryptocurrency owners would be exempt from the proposed capital gains tax, and which would not?

APrivate retail investors holding crypto assets for over a year would be exempt. Professional traders, businesses, and assets held for less than a year would still be taxed under existing rules.

QApart from the capital gains tax change, what other crypto-related incentives are included in the ACT party's plan?

AThe plan includes tax exemptions for small personal purchases paid with crypto, establishing clear regulatory and tax frameworks for stablecoins and tokenized assets, creating a regulatory 'sandbox' for startups, and reviewing current policies for financial infrastructure inclusion.

QAccording to ACT deputy leader Nicole McKee, what will be the outcome of their proposed policies?

ANicole McKee stated that with clear rules, sensible protections, and reduced bureaucracy, the policies will unlock the potential of New Zealand's digital economy, allowing people to invest, innovate, and transact with confidence in a modern, competitive economy.

QHow does the ACT party characterize the current state of cryptocurrency policy in New Zealand, and what is their goal?

AThe ACT party suggests New Zealand has had an anti-crypto stance. Their goal is to make the country a trusted hub for digital finance, modern capital markets, and financial innovation, supporting productive investment, high-paying jobs, and economic growth.

Leituras Relacionadas

One Vote Could Make SOL's Daily Burn Rate Soar 14 Times

Solana's first formal on-chain governance vote concluded on August 27th, coinciding with SOL hitting a yearly high. Three key proposals aimed at reshaping the network's tokenomics were decided. Solana's core challenge is a massive usage-to-value capture gap. Despite processing 120x more transactions than Ethereum and leading in DEX volume, its fee revenue is significantly lower due to its fee structure. Currently, most fees (priority fees) go to validators, with only a small base fee partially burned. This results in high net inflation (approx. 6k SOL issued vs. ~650 burned daily). The three proposals seek to address this: **SGP-0001** establishes the formal governance framework. **SGP-0002** (Double Deflation Acceleration) proposes doubling the annual reduction rate of new SOL issuance from 15% to 30%, aiming to reach the terminal inflation rate by 2029 instead of 2032, reducing issuance by an estimated 18.9 million SOL. **SGP-0003** (Resource & Entry Fee Restructuring) would split the base fee into a fixed "entry fee" for block producers and a variable, fully burned "resource fee." This could increase daily SOL burns by ~14x to 7,500-9,000. Major stakeholders like Helius, Jupiter, and Jito support the changes. However, opposition exists, notably from Solana Company (HSDT), whose revenue is 99.4% from staking. They argue rapid changes could disrupt institutional adoption. Critics also highlight a potential conflict where validators can vote against reduced staking yields using delegated SOL without explicit voter consent. The outcome of these votes provides a directional mandate. If passed, they represent a significant step towards aligning Solana's immense network activity with tangible economic value for SOL holders.

marsbitHá 3m

One Vote Could Make SOL's Daily Burn Rate Soar 14 Times

marsbitHá 3m

Chinese Venture Capital Is Shifting from 'Selecting People' to 'Selecting Cities'

Chinese Venture Capital: Shifting from "Picking Founders" to "Picking Cities" The article discusses a significant shift in China's venture capital (VC) landscape. Historically, VC investments heavily focused on the individual founder's vision, track record, and capability, as seen in early internet-era successes like Wang Xing (Meituan), Li Bin (Nio), and Li Xiang (Li Auto). The belief was that betting on exceptional people was the key to success. However, the rise of hard tech startups—in fields like semiconductors, robotics, AI, and biotech—has changed this calculus. These industries depend heavily on deep, localized ecosystems: specialized talent pools, established supply chains, manufacturing bases, and application scenarios. A city's industrial "resume" now significantly impacts a startup's chances. Examples include Shenzhen's dominance in robotics, Beijing's concentration of AI firms, Suzhou's biotech cluster, and Hefei's successful bet on semiconductor giant ChangXin. This shift is further driven by changes in funding sources. Government-guided funds and state-owned capital now dominate VC limited partners (LPs). These "patient capital" investors prioritize local economic development, job creation, and industrial chain growth alongside financial returns. Their early bets signal viability to other investors. Ultimately, the VC logic remains about managing risk and increasing the odds of success. In the hard tech era, a supportive city ecosystem provides crucial resources—talent, suppliers, R&D, and policy stability—that a single founder cannot easily assemble. The investment due diligence process has thus expanded from evaluating just the founder to also evaluating the founder's city. Consequently, capital is concentrating in a few regions with strong, focused industrial foundations, challenging other cities to build compelling, credible ecosystems to attract investment.

marsbitHá 57m

Chinese Venture Capital Is Shifting from 'Selecting People' to 'Selecting Cities'

marsbitHá 57m

Trading

Spot
活动图片