Nasdaq Ventures into Prediction Markets: Wall Street Bets on Tech Index with 'Yes or No'

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2026-03-03Última atualização em 2026-03-03

Resumo

Nasdaq has filed a proposal with the SEC to launch binary options, or "outcome-related options," on its flagship Nasdaq-100 and Nasdaq-100 Micro indexes. These contracts allow investors to make "yes or no" predictions on whether specific conditions will be met by the index at expiration. Priced between $0.01 and $1.00, the contract value reflects the perceived probability of the outcome—settling at $1 if true and $0 if false. This simplifies trading to a direct bet on event outcomes, rather than price movements. The Nasdaq-100, heavily weighted toward major tech stocks like Apple and Nvidia, is highly sensitive to market sentiment, making it an ideal underlying asset for such products. This move signals traditional exchanges' growing interest in prediction markets. Unlike the Intercontinental Exchange's recent strategic investment in Polymarket, Nasdaq is directly integrating predictive structures into its existing product lineup. If approved, this would mark a significant step in bringing prediction-based trading into the regulated mainstream financial system, blending traditional derivatives with event-driven speculation.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Asher (@Asher_ 0210)

Last night, Nasdaq Inc. submitted a rule change proposal to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), planning to introduce an options contract that allows investors to make "yes or no" judgments on major stock indices.

According to the document, Nasdaq intends to list "binary options," also known as "outcome-related options," on its flagship products—the Nasdaq 100 Index and the Nasdaq 100 Micro Index. If approved, this would mark Nasdaq's first official foray into products with prediction market attributes.

This move signifies that traditional stock exchange giants are actively entering the rapidly growing prediction market sector.

What Are Binary Options?

The proposed contracts have a pricing range of 1 cent to 1 dollar, with the price itself directly reflecting the market's judgment of the probability of a specific outcome.

For example, if a contract is based on whether "the Nasdaq 100 Index meets a certain condition at a specific time point," then:

  • If the market believes the probability of this outcome is 80%, the price might be close to $0.80;
  • If the condition is met at expiration, the contract settles at $1;
  • If the condition is not met, the contract value becomes zero.

If traditional options are about betting on "how much it will rise or fall," binary options are more concerned with "whether it will happen." There are no complex parameters, no interval calculations—only the outcome itself. This all-or-nothing settlement method makes trading more like making a clear judgment about the future.

Because of this, such products are closer in form to the logic of prediction markets.

Why Choose the Nasdaq 100?

Nasdaq's choice is not an ordinary index but one of the most sentiment-sensitive assets. The Nasdaq 100 has long been regarded as a core indicator of the U.S. technology sector, with concentrated holdings in heavyweight companies like Apple, NVIDIA, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta. These companies almost always become market focal points each quarter. An earnings report, a regulatory update, or even a policy statement can quickly reflect in the index's movement.

The high concentration of components means that the Nasdaq 100's trends often revolve around a single focus. The market might bet on AI expectations for a period, then shift to interest rate paths or policy changes. During earnings or policy-intensive periods, the index typically reflects market judgments in a relatively short time rather than prolonged back-and-forth fluctuations.

Additionally, the Nasdaq 100 itself has a mature derivatives trading foundation, ample liquidity, and a well-established pricing system. Introducing new structured products on this underlying asset is risk-controllable and more likely to gain market acceptance.

Two Ways Traditional Exchanges Are Entering the Market

Nasdaq is not the first traditional exchange to show interest in prediction markets. In October 2025, Intercontinental Exchange, the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, announced a strategic investment of approximately $2 billion in Polymarket, acquiring about a 20% stake, with the transaction valuation once reaching around $8 billion.

The NYSE's choice was not to launch its own prediction products but to enter the field through capital participation and data cooperation. Its core intention is to obtain real-time probability data formed by prediction markets and incorporate it into institutional service systems. For the NYSE, prediction markets are more like supplementary sentiment indicators and data assets.

In contrast, Nasdaq's approach is more direct. It chooses to embed binary structures into its core index product line, extending within the existing trading framework. Compared to investing in external prediction market platforms, this method means predictive trading is incorporated into the standardized securities product system, rather than being just an external data source.

The difference in strategies reflects the varying judgments of traditional exchanges when facing new trading structures.

Prediction Markets Are Being Integrated into Traditional Exchange Product Systems

Regardless of whether the SEC ultimately approves this proposal, Nasdaq's submission of the rule change application itself sends a clear signal—predictive trading is no longer just an experiment on crypto platforms or niche markets but is beginning to be integrated into traditional exchange product systems.

For a long time, mainstream derivatives have revolved around price fluctuations, with investors judging the magnitude and timing of rises and falls through different structures. Binary options simplify the question to whether the outcome will occur, shifting the trading focus from magnitude to the conclusion itself.

When the Nasdaq 100 Index is incorporated into such contract structures, the trading logic becomes more direct. The market's focus is no longer on the magnitude of fluctuations but on whether a specific outcome will materialize. The price reflects not just volatility but the consensus on the probability of the outcome.

For Nasdaq, this is an extension of its product line. For prediction market, it is the beginning of its structure being formally accepted by the mainstream system. If this product eventually launches, it could become a bridging attempt between traditional derivatives and event-based trading.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the new type of option contract that Nasdaq has proposed to the SEC?

ANasdaq has proposed a 'binary option' or 'outcome-related option' contract that allows investors to make 'yes or no' judgments on major stock indices.

QWhich specific indices will the new binary options be based on if approved?

AThe binary options will be based on the Nasdaq 100 Index and the Nasdaq 100 Micro Index.

QHow does the pricing of these binary options reflect market expectations?

AThe price, ranging from 1 cent to 1 dollar, directly reflects the market's judgment of the probability of a specific outcome. For example, a price of $0.80 indicates an 80% probability that the condition will be met.

QWhat is the key difference between traditional options and these new binary options?

ATraditional options focus on 'how much' the price will move, while binary options focus on 'whether' a specific outcome will happen, with a simple all-or-nothing settlement.

QHow does Nasdaq's approach to entering the prediction market differ from that of the New York Stock Exchange's parent company?

ANasdaq is directly integrating binary structures into its core index products, while NYSE's parent, Intercontinental Exchange, made a strategic investment in an external prediction market platform, Polymarket, to gain access to real-time probability data.

Leituras Relacionadas

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

North Korean hackers, particularly the notorious Lazarus Group and its subgroup TraderTraitor, have stolen over $500 million from cryptocurrency DeFi platforms in less than three weeks, bringing their total theft for the year to over $700 million. Recent major attacks on Drift Protocol and KelpDAO, resulting in losses of approximately $286 million and $290 million respectively, highlight a strategic shift: instead of targeting core smart contracts, attackers are now exploiting vulnerabilities in peripheral infrastructure. For instance, the KelpDAO attack involved compromising downstream RPC infrastructure used by LayerZero's decentralized validation network (DVN), allowing manipulation without breaching core cryptography. This sophisticated approach mirrors advanced corporate cyber-espionage. Additionally, North Korea has systematically infiltrated the global crypto workforce, with an estimated 100 operatives using fake identities to gain employment at blockchain companies, enabling long-term access to sensitive systems and facilitating large-scale thefts. According to Chainalysis, North Korean-linked hackers stole a record $2 billion in 2025, accounting for 60% of all global crypto theft that year. Their total historical crypto theft has reached $6.75 billion. Post-theft, they employ specialized money laundering methods, heavily relying on Chinese OTC brokers and cross-chain mixing services rather than standard decentralized exchanges. Security experts, while acknowledging the increased sophistication, emphasize that many attacks still exploit fundamental weaknesses like poor access controls and centralized operational risks. Strengthening private key management, limiting privileged access, and enhancing coordination among exchanges, analysts, and law enforcement immediately after an attack are critical to improving defense and fund recovery chances. The industry's challenge now extends beyond secure smart contracts to safeguarding operational security at the infrastructure level.

marsbitHá 27m

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

marsbitHá 27m

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire's recent activities in Seoul indicate a strategic shift for the company, moving away from issuing a Korean won-backed stablecoin and instead focusing on embedding itself as a key infrastructure provider within Korea’s financial and crypto ecosystem. Despite Korea accounting for nearly 30% of global crypto trading volume—with a market characterized by high retail participation and altcoin dominance—Circle has chosen not to compete for the role of stablecoin issuer. Instead, Allaire met with major Korean banks (including Shinhan, KB, and Woori), financial groups, leading exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone), and tech firms like Kakao. This approach reflects a broader industry transition: the core of stablecoin competition is shifting from issuance rights to systemic positioning. With Korean regulators still debating whether banks or tech companies should issue stablecoins, Circle is avoiding regulatory uncertainty by strengthening its role as a service and technology partner. The company is deepening integration with trading platforms, building connections, and promoting stablecoin infrastructure. This positions Circle to benefit regardless of which entity eventually issues a won stablecoin. Allaire also noted the potential for a Chinese yuan stablecoin in the next 3–5 years, underscoring a regional trend of stablecoins becoming more regulated and integrated with traditional finance. Ultimately, Circle’s strategy highlights that future influence in the stablecoin market will belong not necessarily to the issuers, but to the foundational infrastructure layers that enable cross-system transactions.

marsbitHá 55m

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

marsbitHá 55m

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

SpaceX has secured an option to acquire AI programming company Cursor for $60 billion, with an alternative clause requiring a $10 billion collaboration fee if the acquisition does not proceed. This structure is not merely a potential acquisition but a strategic move to control core access points in the AI era. The deal is designed as a flexible, dual-path arrangement, allowing SpaceX to either fully acquire Cursor or maintain a binding partnership through high-cost collaboration. This "option-style" approach minimizes immediate regulatory and integration risks while ensuring long-term alignment between the two companies. At its core, the transaction exchanges critical AI-era resources: SpaceX provides its Colossus supercomputing cluster—one of the world’s most powerful AI training infrastructures—while Cursor contributes its AI-native developer environment and strong product adoption. This synergy connects compute power, models, and application layers, forming a closed-loop AI capability stack. Cursor, founded in 2022, has achieved rapid growth with over $1 billion in annual revenue and widespread enterprise adoption. Its value lies in transforming software development through AI agents capable of coding, debugging, and system design—positioning it as a gateway to future software production. For SpaceX, this move is part of a broader strategy to evolve from a aerospace company into an AI infrastructure empire, integrating xAI, supercomputing, and chip manufacturing. Controlling Cursor fills a gap in its developer tooling layer, strengthening its AI narrative ahead of a potential IPO. The deal reflects a shift in AI competition from model superiority to ecosystem and entry-point control. With programming tools as a key battleground, securing developer loyalty becomes crucial for dominating the software production landscape. Risks include questions around Cursor’s valuation, technical integration challenges, and potential regulatory scrutiny. Nevertheless, the deal underscores a strategic bet: controlling both compute and software development access may redefine power dynamics in the AI-driven future.

marsbitHá 1h

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片