My 24 Hours Under Bombardment in Dubai

marsbitPublicado em 2026-03-01Última atualização em 2026-03-01

Resumo

Author Brother Bing recounts 24 hours in Dubai during missile attacks following US-Israel joint declaration of war against Iran. Initially dismissing the conflict due to Dubai's reputation as a safe haven, the author continues daily routines until hearing blasts in the afternoon. Despite explosions nearby, public life remains normal with cafes full and people outdoors. At midnight, intense bombardments prompt evacuation to the garage with neighbors. Rumors spread about leaders' deaths and airport destruction, though authorities later advise returning home. Attacks continue the next morning with reports of Burj Al Arab being hit but minimal casualties. The author analyzes impacts: Dubai's "safe hub" narrative is shattered, potentially affecting tourism, property speculation, and foreign migration. While ground invasion remains unlikely, the psychological blow to stability could divert capital and expatriates to alternatives like Singapore. The author concludes by noting the UAE's efficiency and wealth may mitigate long-term damage, while humorously requesting a bomb shelter for future incidents.

Author: brother bing / Bing Xiong

8:00am: Woke up to a phone notification with news of the United States and Israel jointly declaring war on Iran.

Perhaps I've been in Dubai for too long; I've become somewhat indifferent to the conflicts in this region. Although Dubai is located in a powder keg, the UAE has always been, in my mind, a neutral and safe "Little Switzerland of the Middle East."

After all, money from both legitimate and illegitimate sources flows here. I thought to myself, Iran wouldn't destroy its own little treasury.

  • 9:30am: A colleague came to discuss some matters, so we went downstairs for coffee and brunch. He was flying back to the UK from Abu Dhabi today; his flight wasn't canceled, and there were no changes to his ticket. Everything seemed completely normal.

  • 12:00pm: I went home at noon to start working. Then I saw that Iran had decided to attack the surrounding Gulf countries. I still didn't take it seriously. It wasn't until I saw photos of missiles posted by a friend in Abu Dhabi on Instagram that I realized the situation might be more serious than I thought.

  • 1-3:00pm: Throughout the afternoon, there were constant posts on X from people living near me saying they heard the sound of missile explosions. Since I didn't hear anything myself, I assumed these accounts were spreading false information.

  • 4:30pm: While I was working intently at my computer, a relatively strong explosion suddenly erupted overhead, causing my half-open balcony door to vibrate. I went out to the balcony and, sure enough, the air was filled with the smell of gunpowder.

Because I had a 5:00 pm Pilates class scheduled, or perhaps my brain hadn't fully processed it yet, I closed the balcony door and went downstairs to class. Out on the street, it was still a scene of peace and tranquility. People were walking their babies as usual, walking their dogs as usual.

The café next to the yoga studio was packed. Influencers were still happily taking selfies.

  • 6:00pm: After exercising and returning home, the explosive sounds became more frequent. I saw online that a hotel on the Palm Jumeirah had been hit, and smoke was rising over City Walk.

The funny thing was, I was in the middle of discussing company matters with my co-founder on the phone while hearing explosions outside. I found myself wondering: are those missiles or Ramadan fireworks? A few times, I interrupted the call to go to the balcony and check if anything was falling from the sky.

  • 7:30pm: After finishing the work call, I went downstairs for a walk. The street lights were on, shops were open, and there was no obvious panic among the crowds. Except for the delivery times being a bit longer.

I thought the night would pass quietly, waiting for Khamenei to be captured, the Iranian people to be liberated, and everyone to go home.

But then...

  • 12:30am: I was eating Japanese ramen delivery at home in the middle of the night when I received alerts on all my phones and computers about missile attacks. At that moment, loud, rumbling explosions erupted outside my window. I quickly grabbed my passport, cards, and phone, rushed out the door, took the elevator down to the parking garage. In the elevator were a Ukrainian man and an Indian couple holding their sleeping child.

  • 1:30am: I stayed in the garage for over an hour. During this time, I saw on X that Khamenei had died, but also that Dubai Airport had been completely destroyed. While I was trying to figure it out, building staff came over and told us to go back upstairs to our homes.

When I got home, I saw a message from a friend saying Iran was unlikely to bomb the UAE for now and had turned to attack Israel instead.

  • The next morning, 8:00am: 24 hours have passed. Apart from the Burj Al Arab hotel being hit last night, there don't seem to be mass casualties. In my area, explosive sounds can be heard intermittently.

Iran says it will continue attacks on the Gulf today to pressure the US to stop its attacks on Iran.

Finally, let's talk about the impact of this attack on Dubai and the UAE.

Many people are comparing this event to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which is utterly absurd and shows a lack of thought. Aerial bombardment is one thing; ground warfare is another. The possibility of the UAE's mainland being occupied is extremely low. It's highly unlikely this country will descend into prolonged war.

The real impact is that it violently tears apart the narrative of Dubai as the "gold rush dream" and the "successful case of Middle Eastern reform and opening up." As a global node for tourism and capital flow, Dubai will undoubtedly face short-term shocks. The first to feel the pressure will be the tourism industry. The second will likely be the short-term property speculators.

More long-term, and more dangerous, is a significant reduction in foreign immigration. An economy reliant on foreign population and capital inflow is extremely dependent on a sense of "stability." Many Europeans come to Dubai for job opportunities or tax avoidance; after a few missiles, they might turn to Singapore or other Asian countries.

Of course, the UAE is a highly efficient monarchy. Plus, it's not poor. This black swan event also came at a rather timely moment, serving as a wake-up call for everyone. Next time, please build a bomb shelter in my building.

Enough talk, I'm going downstairs for a coffee.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the author's initial reaction to the news of the US and Israel declaring war on Iran?

AThe author felt indifferent and unconcerned, believing Dubai was a safe, neutral 'Middle Eastern Switzerland' and that Iran wouldn't target its own financial hub.

QWhat was the first physical sign of the conflict that the author personally experienced?

AAt around 4:30 pm, the author heard a strong explosion overhead that caused their half-open balcony door to vibrate and smelled gunpowder in the air.

QHow did the author and other residents react to the missile attacks around 12:30 am?

AThe author grabbed their passport, cards, and phone and rushed to the building's garage for shelter, where they were joined by a Ukrainian man and an Indian couple with their sleeping child.

QAccording to the author, what are the two main short-term economic impacts of the attacks on Dubai?

AThe two main short-term impacts are a blow to the tourism industry and pressure on short-term real estate speculators.

QWhat does the author identify as the more dangerous long-term consequence for Dubai's economy?

AThe more dangerous long-term consequence is a significant reduction in foreign immigration, as the economy relies heavily on an influx of people and capital, which depends on a sense of stability.

Leituras Relacionadas

Within Strategy's Framework, STRC's Dividend Yield Remains at 12% as Share Price Stays Below Par Value

Michael Saylor, Executive Chairman of Strategy (MSTR), confirmed that the dividend rate for its STRC perpetual preferred shares will remain at 12.00% through August 2026. The rate has increased from 9% at its July 2025 launch to the current high via a "ratchet" mechanism, which permanently raises the rate by 0.5% whenever the share price falls below $95. This mechanism is intended to push the price back toward its $100 par value and support Strategy's "at-the-market" (ATM) program for issuing new shares to fund Bitcoin purchases. However, the mechanism has not worked as intended. STRC shares closed at $89.46 on July 31, remaining about 10-11% below par value despite the record-high dividend. Competition from rival Strive's higher-yielding SATA securities has pressured demand. The persistent discount has forced Strategy to suspend new STRC issuances via its ATM program, limiting this funding channel for Bitcoin acquisitions. STRC's struggles reflect Bitcoin's own volatility, as the preferred shares historically move in tandem. Analysts have warned the ratchet structure carries long-term, one-way risk. A law firm is investigating Strategy's ability to maintain dividend payments if Bitcoin's price stays low. Retail investors own roughly 83% of outstanding STRC shares, a group seen as prone to panic selling during downturns. In response, Strategy has established financial reserves, including a liquidity cushion covering about 26 months of dividend/interest obligations, and a $2 billion share buyback program alongside a Bitcoin monetization framework, though the company emphasized it is not obligated to sell any Bitcoin.

cryptonews.ruHá 1m

Within Strategy's Framework, STRC's Dividend Yield Remains at 12% as Share Price Stays Below Par Value

cryptonews.ruHá 1m

Analyst: Bitcoin's Price Will Drop to $60k in August, Then Rebound to $70k

Financial analyst Andrey Poroshin has provided a new forecast for Bitcoin's price dynamics in August. Poroshin, an analyst at the Bitbanker exchange, expects the cryptocurrency market to experience a downturn this month, with prices retesting the $60,000 level due to a lack of supportive macroeconomic catalysts. He noted that the recent US Federal Reserve decision to hold interest rates did not significantly impact the market, while inflation remains above the 2% target. Poroshin stated that Bitcoin is ending July under pressure from moderate volatility and a lack of new macroeconomic stimuli, leading to continued market caution. According to his base scenario, Bitcoin will drop to a range of $60,000 to $62,000 before recovering to $70,000. He pointed out that even $70,000 remains below the cost of mining in the US, which has prompted some miners to shift towards AI data center operations. Poroshin cited the winding down of BitMEX's operations as a potential catalyst for a price rebound, suggesting the exit of weaker players often coincides with market reversals and reduced short-term selling pressure. He believes Bitcoin is currently less susceptible to geopolitical shocks, such as the Iran-US conflict, and does not expect significant market changes in August related to the pending CLARITY Act. Looking ahead, Poroshin forecasts that September will bring more active price fluctuations driven by potential Fed rate decisions and possible discussions or approval of the CLARITY Act.

cryptonews.ruHá 1m

Analyst: Bitcoin's Price Will Drop to $60k in August, Then Rebound to $70k

cryptonews.ruHá 1m

In Jinjiang, Fujian, a Storage Super Unicorn Lies Quiet

In Fujian's Jinjiang, a city known for sportswear, lies a quiet semiconductor giant: Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Co. (JHICC). Once a promising domestic DRAM manufacturer alongside Yangtze Memory and ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), its journey was derailed in 2018 when the U.S. placed it on an Entity List and filed criminal charges for alleged trade secret theft. This halted production for years. A turning point came in February 2024 when a U.S. federal court found JHICC not guilty. However, it had lost crucial time. While CXMT soared to become a top-valued A-share company in 2024, JHICC, with an estimated valuation of 80 billion RMB, was just restarting. Its current output is primarily customized DDR4 chips, not the advanced DDR5/HBM demanded for AI, but it still benefits from the broader memory chip upcycle. JHICC's story is tied to Chen Zhengkun, a veteran engineer who left Micron to lead the venture. Founded in 2016 with state-backed funding, JHICC partnered with Taiwan's UMC to develop DRAM technology. Rapid progress was cut short by the U.S. actions, which Micron initiated, partly due to its heavy reliance on the Chinese market. Post-sanctions, Chen's team worked to rebuild the production line with reduced reliance on U.S. technology. According to its records, JHICC achieved small-scale production and revenue growth under immense pressure. It now focuses on the stable "niche" DRAM market (e.g., TVs, routers) with a monthly capacity of ~40,000 wafers, aiming for 60,000 by 2026. It holds over 1,000 patents but remains on the Entity List. For Jinjiang, investing in JHICC was a bold industrial leap. The local government provided unwavering financial and logistical support during the crisis, helping the company survive. JHICC has become the anchor for a growing local semiconductor cluster. Though its scale lags behind domestic peers, JHICC's persistence symbolizes a hard-won foothold in a global market long dominated by Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron. Having missed one boom, it seeks a place in the new AI-driven memory supercycle.

marsbitHá 2h

In Jinjiang, Fujian, a Storage Super Unicorn Lies Quiet

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
活动图片