My 24 Hours Under Bombardment in Dubai

marsbitPublicado em 2026-03-01Última atualização em 2026-03-01

Resumo

Author Brother Bing recounts 24 hours in Dubai during missile attacks following US-Israel joint declaration of war against Iran. Initially dismissing the conflict due to Dubai's reputation as a safe haven, the author continues daily routines until hearing blasts in the afternoon. Despite explosions nearby, public life remains normal with cafes full and people outdoors. At midnight, intense bombardments prompt evacuation to the garage with neighbors. Rumors spread about leaders' deaths and airport destruction, though authorities later advise returning home. Attacks continue the next morning with reports of Burj Al Arab being hit but minimal casualties. The author analyzes impacts: Dubai's "safe hub" narrative is shattered, potentially affecting tourism, property speculation, and foreign migration. While ground invasion remains unlikely, the psychological blow to stability could divert capital and expatriates to alternatives like Singapore. The author concludes by noting the UAE's efficiency and wealth may mitigate long-term damage, while humorously requesting a bomb shelter for future incidents.

Author: brother bing / Bing Xiong

8:00am: Woke up to a phone notification with news of the United States and Israel jointly declaring war on Iran.

Perhaps I've been in Dubai for too long; I've become somewhat indifferent to the conflicts in this region. Although Dubai is located in a powder keg, the UAE has always been, in my mind, a neutral and safe "Little Switzerland of the Middle East."

After all, money from both legitimate and illegitimate sources flows here. I thought to myself, Iran wouldn't destroy its own little treasury.

  • 9:30am: A colleague came to discuss some matters, so we went downstairs for coffee and brunch. He was flying back to the UK from Abu Dhabi today; his flight wasn't canceled, and there were no changes to his ticket. Everything seemed completely normal.

  • 12:00pm: I went home at noon to start working. Then I saw that Iran had decided to attack the surrounding Gulf countries. I still didn't take it seriously. It wasn't until I saw photos of missiles posted by a friend in Abu Dhabi on Instagram that I realized the situation might be more serious than I thought.

  • 1-3:00pm: Throughout the afternoon, there were constant posts on X from people living near me saying they heard the sound of missile explosions. Since I didn't hear anything myself, I assumed these accounts were spreading false information.

  • 4:30pm: While I was working intently at my computer, a relatively strong explosion suddenly erupted overhead, causing my half-open balcony door to vibrate. I went out to the balcony and, sure enough, the air was filled with the smell of gunpowder.

Because I had a 5:00 pm Pilates class scheduled, or perhaps my brain hadn't fully processed it yet, I closed the balcony door and went downstairs to class. Out on the street, it was still a scene of peace and tranquility. People were walking their babies as usual, walking their dogs as usual.

The café next to the yoga studio was packed. Influencers were still happily taking selfies.

  • 6:00pm: After exercising and returning home, the explosive sounds became more frequent. I saw online that a hotel on the Palm Jumeirah had been hit, and smoke was rising over City Walk.

The funny thing was, I was in the middle of discussing company matters with my co-founder on the phone while hearing explosions outside. I found myself wondering: are those missiles or Ramadan fireworks? A few times, I interrupted the call to go to the balcony and check if anything was falling from the sky.

  • 7:30pm: After finishing the work call, I went downstairs for a walk. The street lights were on, shops were open, and there was no obvious panic among the crowds. Except for the delivery times being a bit longer.

I thought the night would pass quietly, waiting for Khamenei to be captured, the Iranian people to be liberated, and everyone to go home.

But then...

  • 12:30am: I was eating Japanese ramen delivery at home in the middle of the night when I received alerts on all my phones and computers about missile attacks. At that moment, loud, rumbling explosions erupted outside my window. I quickly grabbed my passport, cards, and phone, rushed out the door, took the elevator down to the parking garage. In the elevator were a Ukrainian man and an Indian couple holding their sleeping child.

  • 1:30am: I stayed in the garage for over an hour. During this time, I saw on X that Khamenei had died, but also that Dubai Airport had been completely destroyed. While I was trying to figure it out, building staff came over and told us to go back upstairs to our homes.

When I got home, I saw a message from a friend saying Iran was unlikely to bomb the UAE for now and had turned to attack Israel instead.

  • The next morning, 8:00am: 24 hours have passed. Apart from the Burj Al Arab hotel being hit last night, there don't seem to be mass casualties. In my area, explosive sounds can be heard intermittently.

Iran says it will continue attacks on the Gulf today to pressure the US to stop its attacks on Iran.

Finally, let's talk about the impact of this attack on Dubai and the UAE.

Many people are comparing this event to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which is utterly absurd and shows a lack of thought. Aerial bombardment is one thing; ground warfare is another. The possibility of the UAE's mainland being occupied is extremely low. It's highly unlikely this country will descend into prolonged war.

The real impact is that it violently tears apart the narrative of Dubai as the "gold rush dream" and the "successful case of Middle Eastern reform and opening up." As a global node for tourism and capital flow, Dubai will undoubtedly face short-term shocks. The first to feel the pressure will be the tourism industry. The second will likely be the short-term property speculators.

More long-term, and more dangerous, is a significant reduction in foreign immigration. An economy reliant on foreign population and capital inflow is extremely dependent on a sense of "stability." Many Europeans come to Dubai for job opportunities or tax avoidance; after a few missiles, they might turn to Singapore or other Asian countries.

Of course, the UAE is a highly efficient monarchy. Plus, it's not poor. This black swan event also came at a rather timely moment, serving as a wake-up call for everyone. Next time, please build a bomb shelter in my building.

Enough talk, I'm going downstairs for a coffee.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the author's initial reaction to the news of the US and Israel declaring war on Iran?

AThe author felt indifferent and unconcerned, believing Dubai was a safe, neutral 'Middle Eastern Switzerland' and that Iran wouldn't target its own financial hub.

QWhat was the first physical sign of the conflict that the author personally experienced?

AAt around 4:30 pm, the author heard a strong explosion overhead that caused their half-open balcony door to vibrate and smelled gunpowder in the air.

QHow did the author and other residents react to the missile attacks around 12:30 am?

AThe author grabbed their passport, cards, and phone and rushed to the building's garage for shelter, where they were joined by a Ukrainian man and an Indian couple with their sleeping child.

QAccording to the author, what are the two main short-term economic impacts of the attacks on Dubai?

AThe two main short-term impacts are a blow to the tourism industry and pressure on short-term real estate speculators.

QWhat does the author identify as the more dangerous long-term consequence for Dubai's economy?

AThe more dangerous long-term consequence is a significant reduction in foreign immigration, as the economy relies heavily on an influx of people and capital, which depends on a sense of stability.

Leituras Relacionadas

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHá 1m

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHá 1m

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHá 6m

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHá 6m

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbitHá 12m

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbitHá 12m

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbitHá 12m

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbitHá 12m

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbitHá 28m

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbitHá 28m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片