Most Crypto Assets Confirmed As Non-Securities By SEC And CFTC In New Guidance

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-03-17Última atualização em 2026-03-17

Resumo

In a significant regulatory development, the US SEC and CFTC have issued joint guidance clarifying that the majority of crypto assets are not securities. This long-awaited move aims to end over a decade of uncertainty by providing a clear framework for digital tokens under federal securities laws. The guidance establishes a detailed taxonomy, categorizing assets as digital commodities, collectibles, tools, stablecoins, or securities. It explains how token classification can change over time and addresses the application of securities rules to activities like airdrops, staking, and mining. Both agencies encourage market participants to review the interpretation to understand regulatory jurisdiction.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on Tuesday issued joint guidance that clarifies how federal securities laws apply to many crypto assets, a move aimed at ending years of regulatory uncertainty.

The agencies said the interpretation makes clear that the bulk of digital tokens are not securities, while laying out how certain transactions and token evolutions can bring them within, or remove them from, securities regulation.

Clarity After A Decade Of Crypto Uncertainty

In the official release, the SEC framed the guidance as a milestone in its effort to provide clearer rules for market participants and to complement ongoing Congressional work to codify a comprehensive market-structure framework.

“After more than a decade of uncertainty, this interpretation will provide market participants with a clear understanding of how the Commission treats crypto assets under federal securities laws,” SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins said.

Chair Atkins added that the interpretation recognizes something the previous administration did not fully acknowledge: most crypto assets are not securities.

The guidance also acknowledges that investment-contract status can end — a point Atkins said will help entrepreneurs and investors while Congress advances bipartisan market-structure legislation (CLARITY Act).

The CFTC joined the SEC’s interpretation and signaled it will administer the Commodity Exchange Act in a manner consistent with the SEC’s approach. Together, the agencies provided a more detailed taxonomy to help classify digital assets and the activities that surround them.

Fresh Classification Framework

Key elements of the interpretation include a structured token taxonomy that separates digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, stablecoins, and digital securities.

This categorization is intended to reduce ambiguity about which regulatory regime applies to different types of tokens and, by extension, to the platforms and services that handle them.

The guidance also addresses the dynamic nature of token classification. It clarifies how a “non-security crypto asset” — defined as a crypto asset that is not itself a security — may become subject to securities rules, and how it may cease to be treated as an investment contract over time.

The interpretation further explains how federal securities laws apply to airdrops, protocol mining, protocol staking, and the practice of “wrapping” a non-security crypto asset. The statement concludes:

Market participants—from innovators and issuers to individual investors—should review this interpretation to better understand the regulatory jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC. The interpretation will be published on SEC.gov and in the Federal Register.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap at $2.5 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of the joint guidance issued by the SEC and CFTC?

AThe joint guidance aims to end years of regulatory uncertainty by clarifying how federal securities laws apply to crypto assets, providing clear rules for market participants, and complementing ongoing Congressional work on market-structure legislation.

QAccording to the guidance, how are most crypto assets classified?

AThe guidance confirms that most crypto assets are not securities, providing a clear classification that separates them from digital securities under federal securities laws.

QWhat key elements are included in the new token taxonomy framework?

AThe new taxonomy framework categorizes digital assets into digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, stablecoins, and digital securities to reduce ambiguity about which regulatory regime applies.

QHow does the guidance address the dynamic nature of token classification?

AIt clarifies how a non-security crypto asset may become subject to securities rules or cease to be treated as an investment contract over time, acknowledging that investment-contract status can change.

QWhat specific crypto-related activities does the interpretation explain in relation to federal securities laws?

AThe interpretation explains how federal securities laws apply to airdrops, protocol mining, protocol staking, and the practice of 'wrapping' a non-security crypto asset.

Leituras Relacionadas

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbitHá 36m

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbitHá 36m

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbitHá 1h

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片