Mine Owners' New Business: Sitting on Land and Collecting Rent, Earning Billions Annually

比推Publicado em 2026-03-16Última atualização em 2026-03-16

Resumo

The article "Mine Owners' New Business: Collecting Rent, Earning Billions Annually" explores the strategic pivot of Bitcoin mining companies towards AI infrastructure and high-performance computing (HPC) as Bitcoin approaches its supply limit. By 2026, with only 1 million Bitcoin left to mine and rising operational costs squeezing profitability, major mining firms are capitalizing on their existing assets—large-scale power capacity, data centers, and cooling systems—to serve the exploding demand for AI compute. Companies like IREN, Core Scientific, Cipher Digital, and Hut 8 have secured long-term contracts worth tens of billions of dollars with tech giants (Microsoft, Amazon, Google) and AI firms (Anthropic, CoreWeave) to provide GPU cloud services and HPC hosting. Financial reports highlight a stark contrast: while Bitcoin毛利率 have plummeted post-halving, AI-related services boast margins as high as 86%. Firms are rebranding, exiting mining, and leveraging their power infrastructure advantages—deploying AI data centers in months versus years for traditional builders. However, this转型 comes with risks: high debt from infrastructure upgrades, strict contract deadlines, regulatory hurdles, and operational challenges. The shift positions these companies as key "digital power stations" in the AI era, where control over electricity and grid access becomes a critical competitive edge. The period from 2026 to 2028 will be crucial for determining which players succeed in this ...

Author: KarenZ, Foresight News

Original Title: Mine Owners, the New Landlords of the AI Era


The world's mineral deposits will eventually become difficult to mine and one day be exhausted. The gold in California, the coal in the Ruhr, the tin in Cornwall—the turning point of vein depletion always forces an industry to restructure.

Bitcoin mining is no exception.

On March 9, 2026, the 20 millionth Bitcoin was officially "mined," with less than 1 million left to be mined. As the shadow of the 2028 block reward halving looms early, mining companies are falling into a survival anxiety.

However, unexpectedly, the explosion of the AI wave has opened up a "second growth curve" for mining companies.

Since 2024, AI companies and cloud providers have begun frantically competing for the power and data centers of mining companies. From the second half of 2025 to the present, this trend has not slowed down but has instead expanded and accelerated. The GPUs, electricity, and data centers required to train large models are creating a new thirst for computing power.

Timely, those Bitcoin mining farms once labeled "electricity guzzlers" have already laid the groundwork with large-scale power access, professional cooling systems, and high-power data centers.

These once standard features for mining have now become the most sought-after scarce chips in the AI era.

AI Companies Queue to Buy Electricity, Bitcoin Miners Sign Billion-Dollar Orders

From 2025 to early 2026, those old players who once "dug for gold" with ASIC miners quietly signed AI contracts worth tens of billions of dollars in total.

First, let's look at the names of the clients in the miners' AI mega-deals: Microsoft, Amazon, Anthropic, CoreWeave, Google, Fluidstack. These are the core players in the AI computing arms race, lining up to "give money" to the mining companies.

On November 3, 2025, Microsoft, to lock in GPU cloud services from IREN (a Bitcoin miner and AI data center), not only signed a five-year contract worth $9.7 billion but also paid a 20% advance payment upfront.

To support this "computing power engine," IREN in turn purchased $5.8 billion worth of NVIDIA GB300 chips from Dell. The speed of this move is enough to put most traditional data centers to shame.

In the second half of 2025, Google, through "cloud customer endorsement + ecosystem cooperation," guaranteed $1.73 billion for the computing power hosting project of miner Cipher Digital and Fluidstack (with Cipher's total contract revenue being $3.8 billion over 10 years) and holds at least 5% of Cipher Digital's equity.

At the same time, Amazon (AWS) also locked in a 15-year, approximately $5.5 billion high-performance computing (HPC) long-term contract with Cipher Digital on November 3, 2025.

If the giants are betting on the future, then AI newcomers like Anthropic and CoreWeave are the "hard-demand buyers" for mining companies.

U.S. Bitcoin miner and high-performance computing digital infrastructure company Core Scientific, leveraging its existing power capacity, delivered 350MW of high-density hosting for CoreWeave by March 2, 2026, aiming to complete 590MW by early 2027, to provide HPC hosting services for CoreWeave's NVIDIA GPUs. This 12-year contract has an estimated total revenue of $10.2 billion.

It is worth mentioning that CoreWeave itself is an AI cloud company "born from the mining circle." NVIDIA is its key strategic partner and important investor, having continuously invested over the years. CoreWeave was originally named Atlantic Crypto, founded in 2017, primarily mining Ethereum with GPUs. In 2019, Atlantic Crypto renamed itself CoreWeave and successfully transitioned to AI cloud services, focusing on GPU-accelerated cloud computing, particularly AI workloads, becoming a leader in the AI cloud service field.

Veteran Bitcoin miner Hut 8, in December 2025, joined forces with Anthropic and Fluidstack, committing to deliver AI data center infrastructure starting at 245MW, expandable up to 2295MW (total contract value $7 billion). TeraWulf, another U.S. operator focused on HPC hosting and Bitcoin mining, has a 25-year lease agreement with Fluidstack involving approximately $9.5 billion in contract revenue.

According to CoinShares statistics, as of the end of October 2025, mining companies had reached contract agreements with AI companies and tech giants totaling $65 billion. As time progressed to March 2026, the signing spree continues.

The Truth Hidden in Financial Reports: AI Expected Revenue is Overwhelming Mining

The latest financial reports from mining companies are revealing an irreversible turning point: the high gross margin and long-term expected revenue of the AI business are structurally overwhelming traditional mining.

Mining profit margins are being continuously squeezed. After Bitcoin's fourth halving in 2024, on one side, block rewards were halved, and on the other, the network's total computing power continued to climb. Riot Platforms' financial report shows that the average mining cost per coin has risen from $32,216 in 2024 to nearly $50,000 in 2025, a cost increase of 54%. And this is the number after excluding depreciation costs.

These pressures are ultimately reflected in the cliff-like drop in mining gross margins. Core Scientific's self-mining gross margin plummeted from 23% in 2024 to 5% in 2025; Bitdeer's self-mining gross margin in 2025 was only 10.9%.

In stark contrast is the "money printing" nature of the AI business.

AI hosting and cloud services generally have much more stable and higher gross margins than mining. IREN's AI cloud service gross margin (after deducting operating costs, excluding depreciation and amortization) is as high as 86%; Bit Digital's subsidiary WhiteFiber's cloud service gross margin (excluding depreciation and amortization) also reaches about 65%. Even Core Scientific, which uses a stricter accounting method by fully including depreciation and operating expenses in costs, still had a full-year AI hosting gross margin of 30% in 2025, climbing to 46% in the fourth quarter.

More decisive is this: the long-term expected revenue locked in by the AI contracts signed by mining companies is overwhelming mining by orders of magnitude.

In the fourth quarter of 2025, IREN's AI cloud service revenue was $17.3 million, a sequential growth rate of 137%. Although the current scale is still limited, thanks to the long-term GPU cloud service agreements signed with tech giants like Microsoft, the company expects to push its target Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) to $3.4 billion by the end of 2026, which will significantly exceed mining revenue (mining revenue in fiscal year 2025 was $485 million). And all this consumes only about 10% of the company's locked grid capacity (>4.5GW), leaving huge room for subsequent growth.

Core Scientific similarly presents a pattern of "mining contraction, AI explosion." In 2025, its AI hosting revenue increased to $65.4 million, a surge of 168% year-on-year;同期 self-mining revenue shrank from $400 million to $230 million. The 12-year long-term contract signed with CoreWeave alone locks in total revenue of $10.2 billion, with an annualized stable revenue of about $850 million.

TeraWulf also reached a turning point. Of its total revenue of $168.5 million in 2025, mining still accounted for 90% (about $150 million), but it achieved HPC leasing revenue for the first time ($16.9 million). Although the current proportion is not high, it has signed long-term contracts for 522MW, with a total value of over $12.8 billion, basically locking in stable cash flow for the next few years.

However, the current general industry situation is: most mining companies still have a low proportion of AI revenue, but the logic of high gross margins + long-cycle locked orders has been established. Once the construction is completed and the proportion of AI revenue increases to 30%–50%, it will have a significant multiplier effect on overall profit quality. This is also the core logic behind the capital market's willingness to give high valuation premiums to transforming mining companies.

As Ben Gagnon, CEO of the listed Bitcoin mining company Bitfarms, said, after the company's Washington site was converted into a high-performance computing center, it accounted for less than 1% of the overall resources but is expected to create higher net operating income than previous Bitcoin mining.

The Most Radical Miners Are Abandoning Mining

The determination to transform is even engraved in the change of company names. Iris Energy changed its name to IREN, Marathon Digital upgraded to MARA Holdings, Applied Blockchain transformed into Applied Digital, Cipher Mining was renamed Cipher Digital, and Bitfarms plans to change its name to Keel Infrastructure and relocate to the United States.

This is never a simple name重塑, but a public and firm declaration—we are no longer the "mine owners" who focused solely on mining.

According to the degree of transformation radicalism, mining companies have diverged into the following three choices:

The radical embrace faction is represented by Cipher Digital, TeraWulf, Bit Digital, Bitfarms, and IREN. The characteristics of these companies are: transitioning fully to AI through brand renaming, exiting some mining sites, or even completely abandoning mining operations.

  • Bit Digital began gradually exiting the Bitcoin mining business from 2025, focusing all computing resources on its high-performance computing subsidiary WhiteFiber, while also focusing on Ethereum assets;

  • TeraWulf's AI transformation is progressing at a high speed, positioning HPC/AI as the "primary growth engine," while Bitcoin mining becomes "opportunistic operation."

  • Besides renaming, Cipher Digital is gradually exiting some existing mining site assets while accelerating its bet on AI hosting. Its mining assets totaling 4.4 EH/s in multiple mines in West Texas have been acquired by Canaan Technology to free up resources for a full transformation. On February 24, 2026, Cipher Digital officially announced this strategic transformation at its Q4 and full-year 2025 earnings conference.

  • Bitfarms announced in February 2026 its plan to rename the company to Keel Infrastructure and has clearly planned to gradually exit the Bitcoin mining business between 2026-2027 and convert sites into HPC/AI data center infrastructure.

  • Although IREN is still running Bitcoin mining operations, its business focus has clearly shifted towards AI.

In the hybrid model, representatives like TeraWulf, CleanSpark, and Bitdeer retain some or most mining operations as a cash flow buffer, while directing core resources to AI data centers.

  • Core Scientific currently derives most of its revenue from Bitcoin mining, but has significantly shifted from Bitcoin mining to high-density AI/HPC hosting. However, mining still dominates the income source currently.

  • CleanSpark uses the cash flow generated from mining to accelerate power and land expansion, controlling a portfolio of over 1.8GW—able to attack AI hosting and defend the mining position.

  • Bitdeer still regards Bitcoin mining as the cornerstone of its business but is evaluating the acquisition of land and the layout of high-performance computing infrastructure and hosting services by liquidating all Bitcoin and issuing notes.

Of course, some choose to stay true to their original intention and remain in the core battlefield of Bitcoin. They firmly believe in the long-term value of BTC as digital gold, refuse to chase the AI boom, and instead choose to weather the cycle through computing power expansion, position accumulation, and ecosystem cultivation. American Bitcoin continues to increase its Bitcoin mining efforts and continuously accumulates Bitcoin; BitFuFu adheres to the dual drive of cloud mining + self-mining. On the hardware side, Canaan Technology and Bitmain still firmly bet on ASIC manufacturing. This also provides stable computing power support for the Bitcoin network and may usher in excess returns when the coin price rebounds.

Regarding specific transformation paths, the "sit on land and collect rent, stable hosting" landlord model is the first choice for most mining companies. Most miners like Core Scientific, TeraWulf, Riot Platforms, Applied Digital, Hut 8, Cipher Digital, CleanSpark, etc., utilize existing power, sites, cooling systems, and operational experience to transform original mining farms into infrastructure that meets AI requirements, rent them out to AI companies, and collect stable rent. AI companies achieve "move-in ready" rapid deployment.

Different from this, mining companies like IREN, Bit Digital's subsidiary WhiteFiber, Bitdeer, and Bitfarms are not satisfied with this. They choose to go further, purchasing expensive chips themselves, building their own computing power pools, and directly conducting GPU cloud services (GPUaaS).

There is also a "speed run path"—directly acquiring mature data centers. The core is to use capital for time, seize track positions, and directly acquire companies with existing infrastructure and customer resources. The most representative is MARA, which acquired a 64% stake in Exaion, the high-performance computing subsidiary of the French electric power group EDF.

The Chips of Mining Companies

The confidence of mining companies in collective transformation stems from the hardcore chips they hold: existing power capacity, heavy asset infrastructure, and professional cooling systems. These chips ultimately translate into two core killer features:极致的时间优势 (ultimate time advantage), and flexible power elasticity that can advance or retreat.

First, let's talk about the time advantage.

Building a new AI data center requires going through the entire process from 0 to 1, often stuck in multiple rounds of approval, grid connection queues, and infrastructure construction, taking years.

Mining companies, holding approved power capacity, ready-made data center sites, and extensive experience in high-voltage electricity use and computing power operation and maintenance, directly save most of the infrastructure hassle, able to shorten the deployment cycle by up to 75% (according to Bernstein analysts' estimates).

CleanSpark CEO Matt Schultz told a story in an interview with CNBC: "The company recently won a 100MW data center contract in Cheyenne, Wyoming, competing against Microsoft."

A mining company with a market cap of less than a few billion dollars beat a tech giant worth trillions.凭什么? Matt Schultz explained, "Because we can build and power it within 6 months, while traditional AI data centers take 3 to 6 years."

Secondly, there is the rarely mentioned "power dispatch flexibility."

AI large model training has extremely high requirements. Data center contracts usually specify an absolute online rate of 99.99999%, with no room for compromise.

Mining companies adopting a "mining + AI" dual-line layout can shut down miners when the grid load is critical, feeding back into the grid. This flexibility to advance and retreat is precisely what pure AI data centers cannot do.

The Cost of Transformation: The Unseen Shoals

The AI transformation of mining companies seems smooth sailing with broad prospects, but this road is full of unseen shoals.

Infrastructure upgrades require real money investment. Original substations and fiber connections must be completely transformed to adapt to the high-density electricity demand of GPU clusters. Where does this money come from? Besides selling assets, most can only rely on aggressive borrowing.

Take Applied Digital's subsidiary APLD 2 as an example. To secure Oracle's 15-year data center lease, it issued $2.15 billion in guaranteed notes to build a data center in Polaris Forge 2. According to S&P Global estimates, its debt/EBITDA (an indicator used to measure a company's debt repayment ability) is expected to be as high as 8 times by 2028. S&P Global毫不客气地 gave APLD 2 a "B+" entity credit rating.

Similar financing pressures are普遍存在 in the industry. Cipher Digital also financed related data centers through high-yield bond issuance, with total funds raised reaching $3.73 billion. Core Scientific obtained a maximum $1 billion 364-day loan facility (initially $500 million fully drawn) from Morgan Stanley in March 2026 for data center development and energy procurement.

Risks are not limited to leverage. Contracts cannot be late, construction cannot go wrong; there is not much room for error in every link.

S&P Global pointed out that in the cooperation agreement between Applied Digital and Oracle, if the delivery is delayed by more than 150 days, Oracle has the right to terminate the lease. According to statistics from real estate services firm Jones Lang LaSalle, in 2025, 57% of data center projects were delayed by more than three months.

Finally, there is the multiple squeeze of operations and macro environment.

Externally, grid access and environmental impact approvals in places like Texas and New York are becoming increasingly stringent; internally, talent gaps are often underestimated. AI cluster scheduling, GPU operation and maintenance, and SLA service management are completely different capability systems. Coupled with the uncertainty of Bitcoin price fluctuations—mining cash flow一旦收缩, will directly drag down AI project investment and disrupt the entire transformation rhythm.

The High-Stakes Gamble Has No Retreat

In the AI era, what is truly scarce may not be chips, but power入口.

And Bitcoin mining companies—an industry that has long lingered on the边缘 of the tech industry—are step by step闯入 the core seats of this competition. They are no longer just miners, but are reshaping into "digital power stations" of the AI era. In this computing power war, GPUs can be manufactured, data centers can be built, but power capacity and grid access are difficult to replicate—and mining companies happen to sit on this entrance.

2026 to 2028 will be the key兑现窗口 for this transformation. Can billion-dollar contracts truly transform into gross profit in financial reports? Will the high-leverage debt structure expose risks due to construction delays? These issues are not only operational indicators but also matters of survival.

Five years from now, this track may give birth to new infrastructure giants, but more participants will likely only become footnotes in this migration.

And this industrial migration revolving around electricity and computing power, once started, is difficult to stop.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

原文链接:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7620090

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason Bitcoin mining companies are shifting their focus to AI-related businesses?

AThe main reason is the approaching Bitcoin supply limit, with only 1 million left to mine by March 2026 and the upcoming 2028 halving, which is squeezing mining profitability. Meanwhile, the AI boom has created massive demand for GPU computing power, electricity, and data centers, areas where mining companies already have established infrastructure.

QWhich major AI and tech companies have signed significant contracts with Bitcoin mining firms, and what was the largest contract mentioned?

AMajor companies include Microsoft, Amazon, Anthropic, CoreWeave, Google, and Fluidstack. The largest contract mentioned was between Core Scientific and CoreWeave, a 12-year deal worth $10.2 billion for high-performance computing (HPC)托管 services.

QHow does the profitability of AI services compare to Bitcoin mining for these companies, according to their financial reports?

AAI services show significantly higher and more profitable margins. For example, IREN's AI cloud service毛利率 was 86% (excluding depreciation), while Core Scientific's AI hosting毛利率 reached 46% in Q4 2025. In contrast, mining毛利率 for companies like Core Scientific dropped to just 5% in 2025 due to rising costs and reduced block rewards.

QWhat are the two key advantages that give Bitcoin mining companies an edge in transitioning to AI infrastructure?

AThe two key advantages are: 1) **Time Advantage**: They possess pre-approved power capacity and ready-built data center sites, allowing them to deploy AI infrastructure up to 75% faster than building from scratch. 2) **Power调度 Elasticity**: Their hybrid mining-AI setup allows them to shut down mining operations to supply power to the grid during high demand, a flexibility pure-play AI data centers lack.

QWhat are some of the major risks and challenges these companies face in their transition to AI?

AKey risks include: high debt from financing infrastructure upgrades (e.g., Applied Digital's subsidiary issued $2.15 billion in notes), stringent contract delivery deadlines with penalties for delays, increasingly strict grid access and environmental permits, a shortage of skilled AI operations talent, and the volatility of Bitcoin prices which could impact the cash flow needed to fund the AI transition.

Leituras Relacionadas

KOL's Perspective: Why Is SOL Set to Rise from This Point?

**Summary: Why SOL is Positioned for Growth at This Level** The article argues that SOL is poised for an upward move from its current price point, citing several key factors. Primarily, SOL has just broken out of a 4-month consolidation phase. This breakout signals a return of risk appetite to the broader crypto market, as SOL is seen as a key indicator of overall crypto health. The token's ownership has reportedly shifted from short-term traders and tourists to long-term accumulators, leading to low volume. Any meaningful increase in trading activity could thus trigger significant upward momentum. Fundamental strengths include strong institutional adoption, integration with DeFi and RWAs (Real-World Assets), and the potential benefits from the Clarity Act. Despite its high volatility—having dropped 70% from its all-time high but still up 12x from its bear market low—SOL is highlighted as one of the few tokens from the last cycle to reach new highs. It boasts a robust ecosystem of applications, users, and protocols. Future catalysts include the expected influx of AI developers following the Miami Accelerate conference, which focused on AI on Solana. Furthermore, Solana is positioned as the premier chain for memecoin activity, a trend expected to continue and drive network usage and fees. The article concludes that recent price action reflects a healthy transfer to long-term holders, setting the stage for growth.

marsbitHá 47m

KOL's Perspective: Why Is SOL Set to Rise from This Point?

marsbitHá 47m

Those Pre-Bitcoin PoW Protocols Have Recently Been Reimplemented

This article details a recent surge in replicating pre-Bitcoin Proof-of-Work (PoW) protocols, specifically focusing on Hal Finney's 2004 RPOW (Reusable Proofs of Work). Within five days in May 2026, multiple independent builders in the Bitcoin/cypherpunk community launched projects inspired by this early electronic cash proposal. The initiative began with Fred Krueger's `rpow2.com`, a centralized but auditable system that replaced RPOW's original IBM 4758 hardware with Ed25519 signatures. Initially a faithful replica, it later adopted Bitcoin-like features (21M supply cap, difficulty adjustment) and a controversial 5.24% founder allocation. This sparked rapid forks, including `rpow4.com` which incorporated full Bitcoin parameters, a prediction market (`rpowmarket.com`), and a DEX (`rpow2swap.com`). Concurrently, Mike In Space created a prototype of Wei Dai's 1998 b-money proposal (`b-money.replit.app`), pushing the historical exploration even further back. The article contrasts these centralized, server-dependent experiments with Bitcoin's core innovation of decentralized, trustless consensus. It also highlights a parallel development: the `HASH` project on Ethereum, which uses smart contract hooks to enable a purely fair-launch, browser-mineable PoW token with 0% allocations to team or VCs. The collective activity is framed as a meme-driven, educational exploration of cypherpunk history rather than a serious financial movement, with all projects heavily disclaiming any investment value.

marsbitHá 52m

Those Pre-Bitcoin PoW Protocols Have Recently Been Reimplemented

marsbitHá 52m

South Korean Exchanges 'Battle' Regulators, Challenging the Boundaries of Enforcement and Legislation

South Korea's cryptocurrency industry is engaged in a rare, direct confrontation with regulators. The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the primary anti-money laundering (AML) watchdog, has recently imposed heavy penalties on major exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb for alleged violations involving unregistered overseas VASPs and AML procedures. However, exchanges are now actively challenging these actions in court and through industry associations. In a significant shift, the Seoul Administrative Court ruled in favor of Upbit's operator, Dunamu, overturning part of an FIU-ordered business suspension. The court found the FIU's penalty criteria and justification insufficiently clear. Similarly, the court suspended the enforcement of a six-month business suspension against Bithumb pending a final ruling, citing potential irreversible harm to the exchange. Beyond legal battles, the industry is contesting proposed legislative amendments. The Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA) strongly opposes a draft rule that would mandate Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) for all crypto transfers over 10 million KRW (~$6,800). DAXA argues this "poison pill" clause violates legal principles and would overwhelm the STR system, increasing reports from 63,000 to an estimated 5.45 million annually for major exchanges, thereby crippling effective AML monitoring. This conflict highlights a structural tension in South Korea's crypto governance: comprehensive digital asset laws are still developing, while regulators rely heavily on AML enforcement. The industry's move from passive compliance to active legal and legislative challenges signifies a new phase, pressing for clearer rules and more proportionate enforcement. While short-term disputes may intensify, this clash could ultimately lead to a more mature and sustainable regulatory framework for South Korea's vibrant crypto market.

marsbitHá 1h

South Korean Exchanges 'Battle' Regulators, Challenging the Boundaries of Enforcement and Legislation

marsbitHá 1h

After 50x Storage Surge, Justin Sun Always Looks to the Next Decade

Sun Yuchen, known for his controversial stunts like a $30 million lunch with Warren Buffett (canceled due to a kidney stone) and eating a $6.2 million duct-taped banana, is often overshadowed by a significant fact: his decade-long track record of spotting major investment trends. In 2016, he famously advised young people to invest in Bitcoin, Nvidia, Tesla, and Tencent instead of buying property. A hypothetical $20,000 investment in Nvidia and Tesla from that list would now be worth over 50 million RMB. His latest major call was on November 6, 2025, predicting a "50x storage opportunity" tied to the AI boom, which materialized with Sandisk's stock surging nearly 50-fold by 2026. Looking ahead, Sun now focuses on the next frontier: Physical AI. He identifies four key areas: 1. **Embodied AI/Robotics**: He sees this reaching its "iPhone moment," with companies like UBTech and Galaxy General leading in commercialization. 2. **Drones**: Viewed as the first commercially viable form of Physical AI, revolutionizing sectors from warfare (e.g., AeroVironment's Switchblade) to logistics. 3. **Spatial Computing**: Beyond VR, it's about AI understanding physical space, a foundational technology for robotics and autonomous systems, exemplified by Apple's Vision Pro. 4. **Space Exploration**: After a 2025 suborbital flight with Blue Origin, Sun advocates for space as the ultimate frontier, discussing blockchain's potential role in space asset management and data transactions. His investment philosophy involves betting on entire, inevitable trends rather than single companies. For robotics, he sees Tesla (the body/manufacturer) and Nvidia (the brain/AI platform) as complementary plays. In defense drones, he highlights companies making tanks obsolete (AeroVironment) and those augmenting fighter jets (Kratos). For space, he participated in Blue Origin's flight and anticipates SpaceX's potential IPO to redefine the sector's valuation. Sun Yuchen's vision frames the next two decades not as a revolution in information flow (like the internet), but in the fundamental operation of the physical world through AI-powered robots, autonomous systems, and spatial intelligence, ultimately extending human and AI activity into space. While many still focus on conventional assets, he continues to look toward the next technological horizon.

marsbitHá 2h

After 50x Storage Surge, Justin Sun Always Looks to the Next Decade

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片