Micron Technology: The AI Storage Leader with a 13x P/E, an Undervalued 'Hidden Champion'

Publicado em 2026-08-24Última atualização em 2026-08-24

Resumo

The current Micron (NASDAQ: MU) is the purest AI storage stock long-term investors can buy, and in terms of valuation, it's simply not competing on the same level.

The current Micron (Nasdaq: MU) is the purest AI storage play long-term investors can buy, and from a valuation perspective, it's not even a competition in the same league.

The stock price is $966.78, with a forward P/E ratio of only 13x. This means the market is valuing this storage chip leader, which is tied to the demand from AI super-giants, like a value stock. Micron's profitability tripled in the most recent fiscal year, making this valuation window extremely rare.

Valuation Hasn't Caught Up with Earnings Power

Micron's trailing twelve-month P/E is 21x, but the real number to watch is the forward P/E—it's only 6x. This number is based on the Q4 FY2026 guidance: $50 billion in revenue, non-GAAP EPS of $31, and a gross margin of approximately 86%.

The average price target from 45 Wall Street analysts is $1501.98—with 9 giving a Strong Buy, 31 a Buy, 5 a Hold, and zero Sell ratings. You can count on one hand the number of stocks in the entire U.S. market with zero bearish sell-side analysts.

How Explosive Was This Earnings Report?

Micron's Q3 FY2026 (ending May 28th) revenue was $41.46 billion, up 345.72% year-over-year! Non-GAAP EPS was $25.11, marking the seventh consecutive quarter of exceeding expectations.

Even more staggering is the free cash flow—$18.3 billion in a single quarter. Furthermore, Micron has already shipped over $1 billion worth of HBM4 (5th generation High Bandwidth Memory), and the ramp-up speed for HBM4 12-high is twice that of HBM3E 12-high, with demand still accelerating.

$100 Billion in Long-Term Contracts, the Cycle Theory Rendered Obsolete

This is the core point—Micron has already signed 16 strategic customer agreements, all of which are rigid "take-or-pay" contracts, covering the period from 2026 to 2030. These contracts lock in approximately $100 billion in revenue, including minimum purchase volumes and price floors.

Management has explicitly stated that these floor prices are "well above the peak gross margins of any past cycle." In other words, the old logic that "memory chips are cyclical" has been completely invalidated by these $100 billion contracts.

Additionally, Micron pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 (increased by 30% this fiscal year) and has repurchased $650 million worth of shares in the past nine months.

Why Micron Is a Better Buy Than Western Digital or Seagate

Western Digital and Seagate are direct competitors in storage, but their common shortcoming is that their main businesses are HDD and NAND, with no HBM business whatsoever. HBM is precisely the highest-margin, fastest-growing segment in AI infrastructure.

Micron's core data center business achieved an 87% gross margin last quarter, a figure that HDD-focused competitors can't even reach half of. Micron is essentially taking the lion's share of the money in the AI storage space.

The Only Risk—Already Locked Down by Contracts

The only bearish argument left for Micron skeptics is that "the memory chip cycle will crash." But those $100 billion strategic contracts mentioned earlier have already established a price floor.

Management has also stated that tight supply conditions will persist beyond 2027. Even renowned financial host Jim Cramer posted "How FAB!!" this week, praising Micron's manufacturing capabilities.

A 13x forward P/E, $100 billion in contracts locked through 2030, exploding demand for HBM4—Micron is that undervalued long-term AI storage leader, shining brightly right in front of you.

Leituras Relacionadas

Besu Patches Vulnerabilities in 5 Components: What Node Operators Need to Know

The Ethereum client Besu, developed by the Hyperledger community, has patched five security vulnerabilities discovered by blockchain security firm CertiK. These vulnerabilities, detailed in four security advisories on August 14, were all addressed in version 26.7.1, an urgent security update initially released on July 27. The intentional delay between the patch release and the public disclosure of details gave node operators a crucial window to update. JiaLiang Chang, CertiK's Director of Security Engineering, explained this "patch first, details later" model provides defenders a time advantage, allowing them to identify affected systems, test the update, and coordinate deployments—particularly important for institutional or permissioned blockchain networks requiring formal change management. The vulnerabilities, found through CertiK's "Chain Scan" attack methodology, involved issues in block announcement handling, consensus proposal buffering, WebSocket subscription limits, and JSON-RPC filter creation. If exploited, they could have allowed an attacker to exhaust a node's memory or thread resources, compromising its availability and the consensus process. Chang highlighted that while the open-source ecosystem is moving toward more formalized security testing (like differential fuzzing and bug bounty programs), coverage remains uneven. Testing often focuses more on protocol compliance than on continuous resource exhaustion, race conditions, or deployment-specific failures. He emphasized that third-party research remains vital for uncovering attack vectors beyond routine development, advocating for a mature, cumulative security model combining continuous integration, multi-node attack testing, independent audits, and regression testing for each confirmed vulnerability.

cryptonews.ruHá 20m

Besu Patches Vulnerabilities in 5 Components: What Node Operators Need to Know

cryptonews.ruHá 20m

Hack of Term Finance: Attacker Withdraws $8.5 Million Through Governance System Vulnerability

Decentralized lending protocol Term Finance lost $8.5 million due to an exploit of its governance mechanism, not a smart contract hack. The attacker manipulated the low voter turnout in the Meta Vaults system. By depositing just 0.5 ETH, they received a token (tmvETH) representing a share in the vault. Most users did not convert this token into a separate voting token (gtmvETH). The attacker did, gaining control of 90.66% of the issued voting power despite owning only 0.017% of the vault's capital. The attacker created a legitimate governance proposal to disable the 7-day withdrawal timelock and add their own contract to receive user funds. The proposal, publicly viewable for about 145 hours, passed due to a quorum requirement of only 5% and simple majority rule. After voting ended on August 23, 2026, the proposal was executed, allowing the immediate theft of 2,841 WETH and 1.68 million USDC (later swapped for DAI) from several vaults. The incident highlights systemic risks in decentralized governance when voting rights are separated from economic stake and low participation thresholds exist. Security mechanisms like timelocks were ineffective as the attacker could disable them from within the proposal itself. In response, Term Labs irrevocably closed all Meta Vaults and revoked DAO roles. The core lending protocol remained unaffected. The attack underscores the need for governance designs where security parameters are protected from modification through ordinary proposals.

cryptonews.ruHá 20m

Hack of Term Finance: Attacker Withdraws $8.5 Million Through Governance System Vulnerability

cryptonews.ruHá 20m

Trading

Spot
活动图片