Michael Saylor Says Quantum Threat to Bitcoin Is Not Immediate

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-24Última atualização em 2026-02-24

Resumo

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, addressed concerns about quantum computing as a potential threat to Bitcoin, stating it is not an immediate risk and is at least a decade away. He emphasized that the broader cybersecurity community views quantum risk as a long-term issue rather than a current threat. Saylor expressed confidence in the Bitcoin ecosystem’s ability to adapt, noting that upgrades would be implemented across global systems if such a risk emerged. He also highlighted MicroStrategy’s significant Bitcoin holdings, which now total 717,722 BTC worth approximately $54.56 billion, despite recent market declines.

Michael Saylor, founder of Strategy, formerly MicroStrategy, discussed concerns about the quantum threat to Bitcoin in an interview and clarified that it is not an immediate security risk at this time, as it is ten years away.

​On February 23, Natalie Brunell, who shared a recent episode of her Coin Stories podcast on X with Saylor, in which they discussed several topics around Bitcoin and Strategy. In the middle of the conversation, Brunell asked whether quantum computing poses an existential threat to Bitcoin.

​She noted that many people are not technical enough to independently verify the seriousness of the risk and referenced Strategy’s earlier statement suggesting Bitcoin is “quantum-proof.” She asked Saylor why this is not considered a bigger threat.

​In response, Saylor stressed that quantum risk is not seen as imminent by the larger cybersecurity community. He insisted that the “consensus of the cyber security community broadly held is that quantum risk, if it exists, is more than ten years out. It’s not a this-decade thing.”

Quantum Threat Would Trigger Upgrades

Saylor stated, “The crypto community is the most sophisticated cybersecurity community,” he added, adding that it already makes use of innovative authentication techniques like hardware keys. He proposed that Bitcoin uses extremely sophisticated security measures in comparison compared to traditional banking systems.

​Then, Saylor went on and said that if a quantum risk materialized, it would lead to upgrades in the software that runs the Bitcoin network, the global banking system, the global internet, consumer devices, and all crypto networks. Eventually, post-quantum-resistant cryptography would replace all digital devices. In his view, quantum risk is currently in the spotlight largely because other anticipated risks have not materialized.

​He said, “You’ll see it coming. We’ll all see it coming, as the crypto security community will be the first to identify any real quantum threat, perceive it, and lead the way. Also, it can have enough time to implement necessary upgrades in response to emerging threats.

Strategy’s Bitcoin Accumulation and Market Performance

Saylor had previously posted “The Orange Century” on his X account, hinting at Strategy’s 100th Bitcoin buy. As the company began to accumulate Bitcoin in 2020 and has since expanded to become the biggest corporate owner in the world. The company owns 717,722 Bitcoin, which is worth around $54.56 billion.

​While writing this article, Bitcoin is down over 3% in the past 24 hours, and is trading at $62,884, which is actually down over 29% over the past month. Also, Bitcoin is down beyond 50% from its last all-time high of $126,198.07 in October 2025

Highlighted Crypto News:

Crypto Funds Shed $4B as Outflows Hit Five-Week Streak

TagsBitcoinMicheal Saylorquantum

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to Michael Saylor, when is the quantum threat to Bitcoin expected to become a significant risk?

AAccording to Michael Saylor, the consensus of the cybersecurity community is that the quantum risk, if it exists, is more than ten years away and is not a threat for this decade.

QWhat did Michael Sayer suggest would happen if a quantum risk to cryptography did materialize?

ASaylor stated that a materialized quantum risk would trigger upgrades to the Bitcoin network's software, the global banking system, the internet, consumer devices, and all crypto networks, leading to their replacement with post-quantum-resistant cryptography.

QHow does Michael Saylor describe the Bitcoin and crypto community in terms of cybersecurity?

ASaylor described the crypto community as 'the most sophisticated cybersecurity community,' which already employs innovative authentication techniques like hardware keys and uses extremely sophisticated security measures compared to traditional banking systems.

QHow many Bitcoins does MicroStrategy (Strategy) own, and what is their approximate value?

AMicroStrategy owns 717,722 Bitcoins, which are worth approximately $54.56 billion.

QWhat was the price of Bitcoin and its performance at the time the article was written?

AAt the time of writing, Bitcoin was trading at $62,884, down over 3% in the past 24 hours and down over 29% over the past month. It was also down more than 50% from its all-time high of $126,198.07 in October 2025.

Leituras Relacionadas

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight NewsHá 5m

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight NewsHá 5m

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbitHá 16m

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbitHá 16m

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbitHá 1h

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片