MEXC Surges to Third Place Among Global Crypto Exchanges, Doubles Trading Volume in 2025

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-11Última atualização em 2026-02-11

Resumo

MEXC has surged to become the third-largest global cryptocurrency exchange by spot trading volume, capturing 7.8% market share with $1.5 trillion in trades throughout 2025, according to Coingecko. The platform achieved 90.9% year-over-year growth, far exceeding the industry average of 7.6%. Its success is attributed to a retail-focused strategy and a transformative zero-fee trading model, which attracted new and active traders. While major competitors like Binance and Bybit saw declining volumes, MEXC grew alongside other rising exchanges. The exchange aims to continue removing barriers to entry and enhancing user experience, supporting its position as a top player in the crypto market.

MEXC, the fastest-growing global cryptocurrency exchange, redefining a user-first approach to digital assets through true zero-fee trading, has secured the third position among centralized exchanges worldwide, capturing 7.8% market share and recording $1.5 trillion in spot trading volume throughout 2025, according to Coingecko.

The exchange demonstrated exceptional growth of 90.9% year-over-year, significantly outpacing the industry average of 7.6% and establishing itself as the fastest-growing platform among the top 10 exchanges. This momentum continued through December 2025, when MEXC processed $86.0 billion in monthly spot trading volume.

“We are proud to stand among the top three fastest-growing exchanges in a year when much of the industry struggled to expand,” said Vugar Usi, Chief Operating Officer of MEXC. “While many competitors leaned heavily on institutional flows, we built our platform around retail users. That focus allowed us to attract new traders, boost activity, and capture meaningful market share. Our goal is simple: challenge the status quo by pushing barriers to entry as close to zero as possible, so both high-frequency traders and retail users can participate without compromise.”

The platform’s aggressive zero-fee policy has proven transformative in attracting diverse trading activity. While competitors maintained traditional fee structures, MEXC’s approach resonated particularly well with active traders seeking to maximize returns and retail investors entering the cryptocurrency market.

MEXC’s ascent becomes more remarkable when contextualized within the broader market. While industry leader Binance saw volumes contract by 0.5% and second-place Bybit declined 13.7%, MEXC’s growth trajectory positioned it alongside other rising platforms like Bitget (+45.5%) and Gate (+39.7%). The exchange now processes comparable volume to Bybit’s $1.5 trillion, despite Bybit’s longer market presence.

The achievement follows a year of sustained momentum across the cryptocurrency sector, with the top 10 exchanges collectively processing $18.7 trillion in trading volume during 2025. MEXC’s performance contributed significantly to this total while capturing market share from established competitors.

Looking ahead, MEXC remains focused on expanding its zero-fee commitment while enhancing platform infrastructure and user experience. The exchange continues to prioritize accessibility, security, and innovation as core pillars of its growth strategy.

About MEXC

Founded in 2018, MEXC is committed to being “Your Easiest Way to Crypto.” Serving over 40 million users across 170+ countries, MEXC is known for its broad selection of trending tokens, everyday airdrop opportunities, and low trading fees. Our user-friendly platform is designed to support both new traders and experienced investors, offering secure and efficient access to digital assets. MEXC prioritizes simplicity and innovation, making crypto trading more accessible and rewarding.

MEXC Official Website| X | Telegram |How to Sign Up on MEXC

For media inquiries, please contact MEXC PR team: media@mexc.com

Disclaimer: TheNewsCrypto does not endorse any content on this page. The content depicted in this Press Release does not represent any investment advice. TheNewsCrypto recommends our readers to make decisions based on their own research. TheNewsCrypto is not accountable for any damage or loss related to content, products, or services stated in this Press Release.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat position did MEXC secure among global centralized cryptocurrency exchanges in 2025, and what was its market share?

AMEXC secured the third position among global centralized cryptocurrency exchanges in 2025, capturing a 7.8% market share.

QHow much spot trading volume did MEXC record in 2025, and what was its year-over-year growth rate?

AMEXC recorded $1.5 trillion in spot trading volume in 2025, with a year-over-year growth rate of 90.9%.

QAccording to the COO, what was the key focus of MEXC's strategy that contributed to its growth, unlike many competitors?

AAccording to COO Vugar Usi, MEXC built its platform around retail users, focusing on attracting new traders and pushing barriers to entry as close to zero as possible, unlike many competitors who leaned heavily on institutional flows.

QHow did the trading volume of industry leaders Binance and Bybit change in comparison to MEXC's growth?

AWhile MEXC's volume grew by 90.9%, industry leader Binance saw its volumes contract by 0.5% and second-place Bybit declined by 13.7%.

QWhat are the core pillars of MEXC's growth strategy as mentioned in the press release?

AThe core pillars of MEXC's growth strategy are accessibility, security, and innovation.

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight NewsHá 29m

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight NewsHá 29m

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight NewsHá 47m

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight NewsHá 47m

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbitHá 58m

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbitHá 58m

Bitcoin Falls Sharply Behind Micron Technology As Investors Favor Semiconductor Exposure

Bitcoin is struggling to break the $63,000 level, having dropped sharply from its all-time high. It is now significantly underperforming compared to semiconductor stocks, particularly Micron Technology. Market analysis by Joao Wedson reveals Bitcoin has fallen over 95% against Micron, signaling a major investor rotation towards AI and semiconductor infrastructure assets. While this divergence could profoundly impact crypto markets, Wedson suggests cryptocurrency may eventually become a contrarian play. Meanwhile, Bitcoin's price decline is linked to large stakeholders ("whales") selling over 24,600 BTC last week, indicating market caution. Conversely, small-scale traders increased their holdings, potentially signaling a future buy opportunity.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Bitcoin Falls Sharply Behind Micron Technology As Investors Favor Semiconductor Exposure

bitcoinistHá 1h

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbitHá 1h

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?