Matrixport Market Watch: Crypto Market Repair Window Opens, Structure and Sentiment Warm Up Simultaneously

marsbitPublicado em 2026-01-07Última atualização em 2026-01-07

Resumo

Matrixport Market Watch: Crypto Market Enters Recovery Phase with Improving Structure and Sentiment The crypto market has begun 2026 with a positive recovery, as BTC and ETH posted significant gains in the first week. This rebound follows the fading of year-end 2025 selling pressure, particularly from U.S. tax-loss harvesting. Key drivers include the return of normal trading activity post-holidays, the dissipation of concentrated selling, and fresh capital inflows, especially from Asian markets. Macro conditions remain supportive, with the Federal Reserve continuing its rate cut path and lowering the federal funds rate to 3.50%-3.75% by end-2025. Softer inflation and a cooling labor market suggest further monetary easing is possible in 2026. While geopolitical events caused brief risk-off sentiment, they were quickly absorbed as short-term noise. On-chain data indicates strengthening fundamentals: BTC and ETH are experiencing net outflows from exchanges, reducing immediate sell-side pressure; stablecoin market cap is rising again, providing more on-chain liquidity for crypto purchases; and network activity, measured by daily active addresses, is recovering. Derivatives markets signal a clear shift in sentiment from defensive to cautiously optimistic. Implied volatility (IV) has dropped to near two-year lows, indicating lower expectations for extreme near-term price swings. The 25-delta skew for BTC options has turned positive, showing reduced demand for downside protectio...

As the market disturbances of late 2025 gradually recede, the crypto market has welcomed a positive recovery trend in the first week of 2026. Both BTC and ETH recorded considerable gains, with market sentiment and on-chain structure showing signs of recovery from the year-end pressure. This article will analyze the current market phase by combining the macro background, on-chain data, and derivatives market structure.

On the macro level, the core logic of market trading remains the shift in global liquidity expectations. The Federal Reserve continued its interest rate cut path in 2025, lowering the federal funds rate target range to 3.50% - 3.75% by year-end. The sustained cooling of inflation and the job market provides room for further monetary policy easing in 2026.

Although geopolitical events (such as the situation in Venezuela) triggered brief risk-off sentiment at the beginning of the year, the market quickly digested them as short-term emotional disturbances and did not constitute a driver for a trend reversal. Overall, the relatively mild macro policy outlook has created favorable external conditions for the crypto market's recovery.

Market Performance: Tax-Loss Selling Pressure Subsides, Capital Inflow Drives Price Recovery

In the first week of the year, BTC and ETH showed a clear recovery-driven upward trend. BTC rebounded from around 88,000 USDT to above 92,000 USDT, with a year-to-date return of approximately +5%; ETH rose by about +6% over the same period. This movement is the result of the superposition of three forces:

  • End of Holidays: Trading activity returns to normal, and market liquidity recovers.

  • Tax-Loss Selling Pressure Subsides: The concentrated year-end selling pressure from U.S. investors realizing capital gains tax losses, which was released in December, significantly weakened at the beginning of the new year. Historical data shows that the market often rebounds after such selling pressure ends.

  • Capital Inflow: New allocation funds and buying interest from the Asian time zone actively entered the market, absorbing the year-end selling pressure and driving prices upward from the post-pullback consolidation range.

On-Chain Insights: Signs of Supply Tightening and Capital Inflow

Changes in on-chain data provide micro-level evidence for the market's stabilization and recovery: Continued Decline in Exchange Balances: BTC and ETH continue to experience net outflows from centralized exchanges, tightening the supply of chips available for immediate trading in circulation and reducing potential concentrated selling pressure; Stablecoin Supply Rebounds: The total market capitalization of major stablecoins has resumed an upward trajectory, indicating that the "ammunition" available on the market for purchasing crypto assets is more sufficient, providing liquidity support for the market; On-Chain Activity Warms Up: The daily active address count on the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks has rebounded at the beginning of the year, reflecting a gradual recovery in user participation and market sentiment.

Derivatives Signals: Sentiment Shifts from Defense to Tentative Offense

Changes in the derivatives market structure clearly reveal the shift in market sentiment: Implied Volatility (IV) at Low Levels: Short-term option IV has fallen to near two-year lows, indicating low market expectations for extreme volatility in the near term and a trend towards stable sentiment; Skew Structure Significantly Repaired: The 25Δ skew in the options market has rapidly converged, with BTC's skew turning from negative to positive. This means that the demand for downside protection (put option premium) has weakened, while the demand for chasing upside (call option premium) has begun to heat up, shifting market sentiment from defensive to bullish; Open Interest (OI) Concentrated Distribution: A large number of option open interest positions are concentrated around key price levels near the current spot price (such as the $90,000 and $100,000 regions for BTC), which will become important psychological and technical battle axes in the short term.

Product Strategy: Adapting to the Market Phase, Optimizing Risk and Return

Combined with the current market characteristics of "recovery consolidation, direction pending," investors can choose suitable structured product tools based on their own views.

  • Expecting Consolidation: If expecting the market to continue range-bound consolidation, consider strategies like FCN/Dual Currency, which "sell volatility" to obtain fixed coupons within a specific price range, suitable for phases where volatility is falling from highs.

  • Bullish on Buying Dips: If long-term bullish but unwilling to chase highs, discounted Accumulator allows for automatic分批 buying at preset lower levels, with knock-out conditions to control upside risk, suitable for分批布局.

  • Bullish or Hedging: Holding spot and希望 to take profit in batches above, or needing to hedge short-term risks, consider Decumulator/covered call writing, the former can automatically sell in batches, the latter can enhance spot returns and partially lock in the selling price.

  • Need Liquidity: If financing is needed but unwilling to bear margin call risk, non-recourse financing can provide low-interest liquidity without margin call risk, suitable for long-term holders.

In summary, the current market is in a recovery phase following the year-end pullback. Improved macro liquidity expectations, tightening micro on-chain supply, and warming derivatives market sentiment together constitute a偏多 market structure. However, prices have rebounded near key resistance areas. Whether the market can start a new trend仍需观察 the effective breakthrough of the important resistance levels above.

The above content is all from Daniel Yu, Head of Asset Management. This article only represents the author's personal views.

Disclaimer: The market is risky, and investment requires caution. This article does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset trading can be extremely risky and volatile. Investment decisions should be made after careful consideration of personal circumstances and consultation with financial professionals. Matrixport is not responsible for any investment decisions based on the information provided in this content.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the three key factors driving the recovery of BTC and ETH in the first week of 2026 according to the article?

AThe three key factors are: 1) The end of the holiday season leading to a return to normal trading activity and liquidity, 2) The significant weakening of tax-loss selling pressure from US investors after its release in December, and 3) The influx of new allocation funds and buying interest from the Asian time zone, pushing prices upward.

QHow does the article describe the change in market sentiment as reflected in the derivatives market?

AThe article states that derivatives market signals show a clear shift from defensive to tentatively bullish sentiment. This is evidenced by low implied volatility (IV), the convergence and positive turn of the 25Δ Skew for BTC (indicating reduced demand for downside protection and increased demand for upside calls), and a concentration of open interest (OI) around key price levels.

QWhat specific on-chain data points are provided as evidence for market stabilization and recovery?

AThe on-chain evidence includes: 1) A continuous net outflow of BTC and ETH from centralized exchanges, making the available supply for immediate trading tighter. 2) A rebound in the total market capitalization of major stablecoins, indicating more 'ammunition' is available to buy crypto assets. 3) A recovery in the daily active address count on the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks, reflecting improved user participation and market sentiment.

QWhat core macro logic is the market trading on, and what is the Fed's policy stance as of the end of 2025?

AThe core macro logic is the shift in global liquidity expectations. The Federal Reserve continued its interest rate cut path in 2025, lowering the federal funds rate target range to 3.50% - 3.75% by the end of the year, with the potential for further monetary policy easing in 2026 due to cooling inflation and the job market.

QFor an investor who is 'Bullish but wants to buy on dips', which structured product strategy does the article suggest?

AThe article suggests the 'Discounted Accumulator' strategy for investors who are long-term bullish but unwilling to buy at high prices. It allows for automatic分批 (batch) buying at pre-set lower price levels and includes a knock-out condition to control upside risk, making it suitable for布局 (position building) in batches.

Leituras Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHá 31m

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHá 31m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHá 51m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHá 51m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHá 59m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHá 59m

Trading

Spot
活动图片