Losses from Hacks of Crypto Projects Exceed $1.3 Billion

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2026-07-27Última atualização em 2026-07-27

Resumo

According to a report by Onchain Lens, crypto project losses from hacks have exceeded $1.3 billion this year. The primary cause of damage was the compromise of access control mechanisms, where attackers obtained privileged rights or critical credentials. The biggest losers were Kelp DAO ($292M), Drift Protocol ($280M), Humanity Protocol ($31M), Step Finance ($30M), and Truebit ($26.5M). The second largest cause of loss was phishing and social engineering attacks, accounting for approximately $282 million. Attacks on oracles—services that feed external data into blockchains—also caused significant damage, with Ostium losing $24M, Blend Protocol $10.86M, and Bonzo $9M. The data indicates that the total damage stems from a limited number of highly effective attacks, rather than hundreds of small incidents. A shift in threat patterns is noted, with multi-million dollar losses increasingly resulting from compromised keys and access permissions rather than smart contract bugs. Security experts emphasize that the human factor remains a major industry risk, as phishing and social engineering remain as profitable as technical attacks. In a related incident, Blockaid reported a $24.15 million hack of the AFX Trade decentralized exchange's cross-chain bridge.

According to a report by Onchain Lens, the largest losses for crypto projects are related to the compromise of access control mechanisms. By obtaining privileged rights or access to critical credentials, attackers were able to carry out the most profitable attacks of the half-year. The greatest losses were incurred by:

  • Kelp DAO — $292 million;

  • Drift Protocol — $280 million;

  • Humanity Protocol — $31 million;

  • Step Finance — $30 million;

  • Truebit — $26.5 million.

The second largest cause of losses was phishing attacks and the use of social engineering methods. Approximately $282 million was stolen using this method. Another vulnerability turned out to be oracles—services that transmit external data to the blockchain. Due to attacks related to this infrastructure, the Ostium project lost $24 million, Blend Protocol — $10.86 million, and Bonzo — $9 million.

Onchain Lens statistics show: the total volume of damage was formed not by hundreds of separate incidents, but by a limited number of the most effective attacks. Simultaneously, the nature of threats is changing: increasingly, the cause of multi-million dollar losses is not errors in smart contracts, but the compromise of keys, permissions, and other access control mechanisms.

Security specialists stated that the human factor remains one of the main risks for the industry. Despite the development of protective measures, phishing and social engineering continue to bring attackers hundreds of millions of dollars, maintaining effectiveness on par with technical attacks.

Earlier, analysts from the company Blockaid reported a hack of the cross-chain bridge of the decentralized exchange AFX Trade. As a result of the attack, the attackers stole USDC stablecoins amounting to $24.15 million.

end-content

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the total reported damage from hacks to crypto projects in the first half of the year, according to Onchain Lens?

AThe total reported damage exceeded $1.3 billion.

QWhat was identified as the primary cause of the largest losses for crypto projects in the Onchain Lens report?

AThe primary cause was the compromise of access control mechanisms, where attackers gained privileged rights or access to critical credentials.

QWhich crypto project suffered the single largest loss mentioned in the article, and what was the amount?

AKelp DAO suffered the single largest loss mentioned, amounting to $292 million.

QBesides compromised access controls, what were the other two major categories of attacks leading to significant losses?

AThe other two major categories were phishing/social engineering attacks (resulting in about $282 million in losses) and attacks targeting oracle infrastructure.

QWhat trend in the nature of security threats does the Onchain Lens report highlight?

AThe report highlights a shift where multi-million dollar losses are increasingly caused not by smart contract bugs, but by the compromise of keys, permissions, and other access management mechanisms, alongside the persistent risk of human factors like phishing.

Leituras Relacionadas

With Two Consecutive Quarters of Losses, Coinbase Must Rely on Paths Beyond Trading

Coinbase posted its second consecutive quarterly net loss of $359 million on $1.22 billion in revenue for Q2, highlighting its vulnerability to crypto market cycles where weaker prices and lower volatility reduce user trading. However, the report also reveals a strategic shift in its business model. Despite a 25% quarter-over-quarter decline in global spot trading volume, Coinbase increased its market share to a company-record 10.3%. This suggests its position as a compliant U.S. on-ramp is strengthening even in a cooler market. A key development is the diversification of revenue streams. Transaction revenue fell to $599 million, nearly equaling subscription and services revenue of $555 million. Stablecoin services, generating $292 million, are becoming a crucial revenue "floor." This income, derived from interest on the $20 billion average USDC balance held on its platform, is less tied to daily trading activity. Furthermore, while spot trading volume dropped significantly, derivatives volume held steady at $1.03 trillion. Coinbase is pushing to integrate spot, stablecoin, and derivatives liquidity to create a more interconnected and sticky ecosystem for users. The GAAP net loss includes non-cash expenses like stock-based compensation and crypto asset valuation changes. Its adjusted EBITDA remained positive at $208 million for the 14th straight quarter, indicating core operations can cover ongoing costs. The company is also reducing expenses to manage the downturn. The central question moving forward is whether Coinbase's growing market share, stablecoin revenues, and expanding product integration can sufficiently offset the inherent cyclicality of its core trading business during future market contractions.

marsbitHá 17m

With Two Consecutive Quarters of Losses, Coinbase Must Rely on Paths Beyond Trading

marsbitHá 17m

In the Age of Artificial Intelligence, We Need 'Magicians,' Not 'Managers'

In the AI era, leadership must shift from management to magic. As knowledge rapidly expires, value shifts from what leaders know to what they can facilitate. Traditional "inside-out" management, driven by internal experience, is giving way to "outside-in" thinking focused on external opportunities, customer needs, and disruptive change. The core challenge is fostering new ideas that may invalidate existing knowledge. While technologies like steam, electricity, and AI provide the "skeleton" for innovation, it is human vision—connecting technology to customer dreams—that creates magic. Historical figures like Richard Arkwright and Eldridge R. Johnson succeeded not by inventing core technologies, but by reimagining work and business models from the outside in. Leaders must transition from controllers to "architects of flourishing." Their role is to design environments where empowerment, creativity, and adaptive learning thrive. This involves granting autonomy, fostering partnerships, and building resilient systems that scale innovation. Critical leadership qualities now include judgment, creativity, and the ability to learn continuously rather than relying on static expertise. Therefore, cultivating future leaders requires a focus on timeless fundamentals, humanities for broader perspective, and social acuity, rather than over-specialization in quickly outdated technical skills. The future rewards those who respond to the unseen and create conditions for better answers to emerge. Leadership in the AI age is less about having all the answers and more about enabling others to discover them—creating organizations where people explore, imagine, and thrive.

marsbitHá 52m

In the Age of Artificial Intelligence, We Need 'Magicians,' Not 'Managers'

marsbitHá 52m

Trading

Spot
活动图片