Liquid staking under the lens after Nasdaq files JitoSOL ETF rule change – Details

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-02-27Última atualização em 2026-02-27

Resumo

Nasdaq has filed with the SEC to list the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF, which would be the first Solana spot ETF fully backed by a liquid staking token (LST). The fund aims to track the price of JitoSOL, a tradable asset users receive for staking SOL, allowing them to earn rewards without managing validators. The filing argues that JitoSOL is economically comparable to SOL, citing extremely high hourly price correlations (over 0.997) on major exchanges. This suggests the ETF introduces no new pricing risks beyond existing Solana ETFs. The SEC has 45 to 90 days to review the proposal. If approved, staking rewards would be reflected in the fund’s net asset value rather than distributed separately. This is the first U.S. filing for an LST-backed fund, though other products offering combined spot and staking exposure, like the REX-Osprey Solana ETF, already trade.

Nasdaq has submitted a filing to the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), proposing a rule change to list the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF. This fund was announced on 22 August 2025 as the first Solana [SOL] Spot ETF 100% backed by a liquid staking token (LST). It aims to track the price of JitoSOL, which it achieves using the MarketVector JitoSol VWAP Close Index.

In liquid staking, users receive a tradable asset in return for staking crypto. Users staking SOL receive JitoSOL in return. These can be traded while still earning the on-chain rewards from the staked SOL. These users don’t need to run validators or manage their on-chain staking.

Correlation data cited to show JitoSOL as analogous to SOL

The goal of the Nasdaq filing was to allow the listing and trading of the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF, which would hold JitoSOL directly. It submitted the proposal under Nasdaq Rule 5711(d), “which governs the listing and trading of Commodity-Based Trust Shares on the Exchange.”

The exchange relied on the “generic listing standards” the SEC approved in September. By demonstrating a high price alignment and correlation between JitoSOL and SOL, with hourly price correlations of approximately 0.9979 on OKX and 0.9985 on Coinbase, it argues that JitoSOL is economically comparable to SOL.

Therefore, the JitoSOL ETF does not bring new pricing risks not already present in the already-approved Solana ETF market.

The SEC’s review process gives the agency 45 days to approve or disapprove this proposal. This deadline can be extended to 90 days.

According to Jito Foundation president Brian Smith, staking rewards would not be distributed separately if the fund is approved. Instead, the rewards would reflect on the fund’s net asset value.

In August, JitoSOL had revealed that the Vaneck ETF filing was a result of months of collaborative policy outreach efforts with the SEC. This filing is still in the SEC’s exchange review stage. No liquid staking token fund is trading in the United States.

Other products that allow exposure to spot and staking rewards exist though. The REX-Osprey Solana + Staking ETF (SSK) began trading in early July. The REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF (ESK) was launched in September.

Grayscale introduced staking for its Ethereum and Solana ETFs in October too.

Final Summary

The Nasdaq filing to the SEC is aimed at allowing the listing and trading of the Vaneck JitoSOL.
High price alignment between JitoSOL and SOL means the two assets are economically comparable.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the purpose of the rule change filing submitted by Nasdaq to the SEC?

AThe purpose of the Nasdaq filing is to propose a rule change to allow the listing and trading of the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF, a fund that would be 100% backed by the liquid staking token JitoSOL.

QWhat is the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF designed to track, and how does it achieve this?

AThe Vaneck JitoSOL ETF is designed to track the price of JitoSOL, which it achieves by using the MarketVector JitoSol VWAP Close Index.

QWhat key data did Nasdaq cite in its filing to argue that JitoSOL is economically comparable to SOL?

ANasdaq cited high hourly price correlations of approximately 0.9979 on OKX and 0.9985 on Coinbase between JitoSOL and SOL to demonstrate their economic comparability.

QHow would staking rewards be handled for investors if the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF is approved?

AAccording to Jito Foundation president Brian Smith, staking rewards would not be distributed separately but would instead be reflected in the fund's net asset value.

QWhat is the current status of the Vaneck JitoSOL ETF filing and are there any similar funds trading in the U.S.?

AThe filing is currently in the SEC's exchange review stage, and no liquid staking token fund is currently trading in the United States.

Leituras Relacionadas

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

This article presents a scenario-based forecast for the crypto industry from 2026 to 2029, arguing that the next major cycle will be driven not by technological narratives but by legal access to real-world assets. The author predicts that by mid-2026, pre-IPO perpetual contracts for top private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic on platforms like Hyperliquid will become the primary gateway for accessing quality assets, as most crypto-native tokens fail to capture real value. The much-hyped AI x Crypto intersection largely fails except for prediction markets, which thrive on betting on AI model supremacy. By 2027, public blockchain foundations are forced to choose between catering to retail speculation or building compliant infrastructure for institutions, with many opting for the latter. Growth in stablecoins and tokenized private credit/equity hits a "triple ceiling" due to regulatory and political uncertainty rather than market demand. The pivotal shift is forecast for 2028. A major liquidation event in pre-IPO perpetuals exposes the structural flaw of synthetic markets lacking a real underlying asset anchor. In response, regulatory changes finally allow the public solicitation of private securities resales to verified accredited investors. This creates a legitimate secondary market for real company equity, which then becomes the core asset class of the new bull market, relegating synthetic perps to a niche role. By 2029, the industry becomes "boring" but foundational. Tokens without claims on real cash flows or assets cease trading. Stablecoin growth is steady but politically capped. Crypto infrastructure fades from view as it gets absorbed into traditional finance backends. The article's central thesis is that the key bottleneck for crypto's next phase is legal and regulatory channels for real asset ownership, not technology.

marsbitHá 14m

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

marsbitHá 14m

Kalshi-CFTC Fight In New Mexico Could Shape Prediction Market Rules

A jurisdictional battle between the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the state of New Mexico over the regulation of prediction markets could set national rules for the industry. At issue is who polices platforms like Kalshi, with the CFTC asserting federal oversight and New Mexico arguing state gaming and consumer protection laws apply, especially for contracts resembling wagers on events like elections or sports. The outcome will determine if prediction markets can scale nationally under a clear federal framework or face a fragmented, state-by-state regulatory landscape. This dispute is significant for the crypto-adjacent trading community, which often engages with these speculative event markets. A clearer rulebook could boost mainstream adoption, liquidity, and integration with crypto infrastructure, while a state-led challenge could stifle growth. The case is particularly sensitive for sports-related contracts, where the line between financial markets and gambling blurs. Ultimately, this legal fight will shape whether prediction markets become a scalable national product or remain constrained by jurisdictional conflicts.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Kalshi-CFTC Fight In New Mexico Could Shape Prediction Market Rules

bitcoinistHá 1h

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbitHá 6h

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手Há 7h

Why Is Nvidia Borrowing $20 Billion When It's Not Short of Cash?

Nvidia's recent announcement to issue at least $20 billion in senior notes, despite holding a strong cash position with over $48.6 billion in free cash flow last quarter, is not a sign of financial need. Instead, it represents a strategic move to leverage its high credit rating (recently upgraded to AA by S&P) to secure low-cost, long-term debt. This capital will support long-term AI infrastructure investments, data centers, R&D, supply chain prepayments, and strategic investments, while allowing the company to continue aggressive shareholder returns through stock buybacks and dividends. The decision reflects a mature capital management strategy: using debt to finance long-term growth assets is more efficient and less dilutive to shareholders than equity financing. It signals that Nvidia, like other tech giants (Alphabet, Meta, Amazon), is entering a new phase of heavy AI capital expenditure, shifting from a pure growth story to a story about capital allocation, credit strength, and long-term ecosystem positioning. The key question for investors is whether Nvidia can maintain its high cash flow generation and ensure that returns from these AI investments justify the cost of capital over the long term. The bond issuance amplifies its expansion capabilities but also ties its valuation more closely to the broader AI investment cycle's sustainability and profitability.

marsbitHá 7h