Lighter DEX Introduces Native LIT Token as Part of Ecosystem Expansion

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2025-12-30Última atualização em 2025-12-30

Resumo

Lighter, a decentralized perpetual exchange, has launched its native Light Infrastructure Token (LIT) as part of its ecosystem expansion. The token has a total supply of 1 billion, with 50% allocated to the ecosystem—including an airdrop for points program participants—and the other 50% reserved for the team and investors. LIT will be used for governance, staking to access premium trading and data services, and paying platform fees. Shortly after the announcement, Lighter activated the LIT/USDC trading pair, making the token available for trading.

Lighter, a decentralized perpetual exchange and DeFi infrastructure platform, has unveiled its native token for its crypto ecosystem, named Light Infrastructure Token (LIT). They confirmed it through their X handle by this morning in a thread post, describing its token allocation, structure, and utilities. Then, within a few hours, the lighter activated the LIT/USDC trading pair, and the token was live on the platform after the announcement.

Where this Lighter is built on Ethereum Layer 2 using Zero-knowledge rollup technology, in the post, they mentioned in the thread post that the earnings generated by their main DEX product, as well as future products and services, can be tracked openly by anyone in real time on chain and will be divided between growth and buybacks depending on market circumstances.

Token Allocation and LIT Use Cases

When it comes to token allocation, the total supply of the LIT token is 1 billion. With that, the Lighter clarified that half of the percentage is kept for the ecosystem. Then, the other 50% is reserved for the team/investors, in that 26% is vested in the team and 24% allocated to investors.

Regarding the ecosystem portion, the 2025 points season programs produced 12.5 million points, which will be distributed immediately through an airdrop. This equates to 25% of the entire token supply. The remaining 25% will be preserved for future reward schemes, with a tiny portion going toward partnerships and ecosystem growth.

With that, they have added that the LIT tokens are not only used for governance, but also have other use cases. The Lighter platform offers trading excursion and data verification services designed in different tiers, which require staking of the LIT tokens to use the features to their full potential. Also, LIT is to pay fees for all platform activities.

Lighter Introduces New Trading Pair

Then, shortly after the LIT token announcement, Lighter announced its LIT/USDC trading pair this morning through its X handle and Discord channel. As the LIT is live now and available for trading, it is drawing attention from crypto circles.

New listing: $LIT is live! pic.twitter.com/grbcGUMkI2
— Lighter (@Lighter_xyz) December 30, 2025

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the name of the native token introduced by Lighter DEX and what does LIT stand for?

AThe native token is named Light Infrastructure Token, and LIT stands for Light Infrastructure Token.

QOn which blockchain and Layer 2 technology is Lighter built?

ALighter is built on Ethereum Layer 2 using Zero-knowledge rollup technology.

QWhat is the total supply of LIT tokens and how is it allocated between ecosystem, team, and investors?

AThe total supply is 1 billion LIT tokens. 50% is allocated to the ecosystem, 26% to the team, and 24% to investors.

QWhat are some of the use cases for the LIT token on the Lighter platform?

ALIT tokens are used for governance, staking to access trading and data verification services, and paying fees for all platform activities.

QHow did Lighter distribute a portion of the tokens to users and what was the program called?

ALighter distributed 12.5 million tokens (25% of total supply) through an airdrop as part of the 2025 points season programs.

Leituras Relacionadas

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

When launching a crypto payment business, obtaining the necessary licenses is the crucial first step. However, the second, and arguably more critical, step is designing a comprehensive operational framework that forms a coherent business loop. This loop must be clearly understood and executable by all stakeholders: banks, payment partners, exchanges, on-chain analytics providers, regulators, and your internal team. Many projects mistakenly believe a single license permits all operations. Licenses merely grant entry; they don't define how the specific business functions. The real challenge lies in detailing every aspect of the workflow. This involves clarifying the customer base, the flow of fiat and crypto assets, the settlement process, and establishing clear lines of responsibility for risks like AML compliance, sanctions screening, chargebacks, and regulatory inquiries. A robust framework must answer seven core questions: Who are the clients and merchants? Who collects fiat and crypto? Who handles conversion and custody? And who is ultimately accountable for compliance and risk management? Projects often fail not from a lack of licensing, but during due diligence when they cannot convincingly explain these operational details. Therefore, beyond securing licenses, the priority must be constructing a closed-loop system. This system ensures the business model is transparent, risks are managed, responsibilities are delineated, contracts are aligned, and the entire process is comprehensible to partners and regulators. The true competitive edge in crypto payments lies not in acquiring a license quickly, but in integrating licensing, banking, compliance, and operations into a sustainable and executable whole.

marsbitHá 32m

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

marsbitHá 32m

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Arthur Hayes argues that the current AI market is a bubble poised to burst, which will exert downward pressure on the crypto market in the near term. The core trigger is rising oil prices due to the US-Iran conflict and a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Higher energy costs directly increase the operational expenses of AI data centers, squeezing profit margins for companies like Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI. Hayes predicts that persistent inflation from high oil prices will force Trump, in a bid to win the November election, to turn public sentiment against the AI industry. He may propose regulations and taxes on data centers and AI companies to appeal to voters concerned about costs and job displacement. Such political rhetoric could shatter market confidence. Furthermore, the market is unlikely to healthily absorb the massive concurrent IPOs of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, which together seek valuations in the trillions. The combination of soaring energy costs, overwhelming equity supply, and negative political pressure will puncture the AI bubble. Hayes notes that nearly all new USD liquidity since 2022 has flowed into AI, leaving crypto like Bitcoin behind. When the AI bubble bursts, liquidity will contract sharply, pulling down all risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. In response, Hayes's fund, Maelstrom, has sold all AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. It maintains core positions in Bitcoin and Ethereum while increasing exposure to energy sector equities, betting on rising oil and gas prices. He expects Bitcoin to bottom after the AI-led market decline, before rallying again with future monetary easing.

Foresight NewsHá 46m

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Foresight NewsHá 46m

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

After To C and To B, the Next Wave is To A: Serving AI Agents In a recent quarterly earnings call, Meituan's Wang Xing introduced a new concept: To A (To Agent), signifying that future business services will increasingly target AI Agents as primary clients, not just consumers or merchants. This shift implies that internet giants must now consider how to make their services more appealing for AI Agents to recommend, fundamentally altering traditional distribution logic. This "To A era" is prompting an unusual trend of alliances among major tech companies. Unlike previous competitive battles, firms like Meituan, Tencent, JD.com, Huawei, OPPO, and OpenAI are rapidly forming partnerships. The reason is strategic: as AI Agents become the primary user interface, handling tasks from a single command (e.g., "Book a Japanese restaurant for tomorrow"), the risk for platforms is being bypassed entirely. Companies are positioning themselves within this new value chain. Three primary strategies are emerging: 1. **Super-Entry Points + Service Providers:** Platforms like Tencent's Yuanbao, WeChat, and ChatGPT aim to be the first-stop Agent, integrating various services (food delivery, shopping, travel) from partners like Meituan and JD.com. 2. **Apps as Callable Services:** Companies like Meituan, JD.com, and Uber are ensuring their core services remain accessible and callable by external Agents, shifting from front-end apps to back-end capabilities. 3. **System-Level Agent Entry Points:** Smartphone makers (Huawei, Honor, OPPO) are leveraging their OS-level AI assistants to control the initial user command, redistributing it to relevant service apps. While alliances offer mutual benefit—entry points gain service capabilities, and service providers gain traffic—inherent conflicts of interest exist. A dominant Agent platform could eventually attempt to connect directly with suppliers (restaurants, hotels), bypassing current aggregators like Meituan or Ctrip. Other unresolved challenges include the potential for Agent recommendations to become a new form of paid ranking and unclear accountability for faulty recommendations. The current rush to form alliances is a defensive move by service providers to secure their position before the landscape solidifies. In this To A-driven restructuring, the greatest risk is not losing the race but failing to hear the starting gun.

marsbitHá 55m

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

marsbitHá 55m

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

As humanoid robots become increasingly lifelike, they confront a significant psychological barrier known as the "Uncanny Valley Effect," a concept proposed by Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori in 1970. This phenomenon describes a dip in human comfort and acceptance when robots appear almost, but not perfectly, human. Minor imperfections in facial expressions, eye movements, or skin texture trigger a subconscious sense of unease, as the brain detects something trying, yet failing, to mimic a person. Examples range from the controversial human-like robot Sophia to animated characters in films like *The Polar Express*. The effect poses a key design challenge for robotics companies. Some, like Boston Dynamics, avoid it entirely by creating highly capable but visibly mechanical robots. Others, like Hanson Robotics, push for greater human likeness despite the risk. For consumer robots, especially in homes, most manufacturers opt for stylized or clearly mechanical designs to ensure broader acceptance. While the Uncanny Valley remains a powerful force, its impact may diminish over time through technological advancements that achieve near-perfect realism or through generational familiarity as people grow accustomed to interacting with humanoid machines. Ultimately, navigating this psychological frontier requires as much understanding of human perception as of robotics technology itself.

marsbitHá 56m

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

marsbitHá 56m

Over $31 Million Stolen from Humanity, Is the Team Behind It Paving the Way for a New Project?

The article reports a major security incident involving Humanity Protocol (H), resulting in over $31 million stolen. The team attributes the hack to a private key leak from a Humanity Foundation member, leading to a rapid sale of H tokens and a 90% price drop. However, prominent on-chain investigator ZachXBT suggests the event might be an "exit scam" orchestrated by the team, rather than an external hack. This suspicion is fueled by the team's controversial history, including past management failures, legal issues, and previous scandals like outsourced technology and problematic airdrops. Further investigation reveals that the core team behind Humanity is already involved with a new project called "Everything," which recently secured funding. This has led to community speculation that the alleged hack is a deliberate scheme to abandon the H project while shifting focus and resources to their new venture, leaving investors to bear the losses. The article questions whether this is a genuine security failure or a premeditated "rug pull" strategy.

Odaily星球日报Há 2h

Over $31 Million Stolen from Humanity, Is the Team Behind It Paving the Way for a New Project?