‘Let crypto bill die’ – Crypto VC cites stablecoin yields as red line

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-01-11Última atualização em 2026-01-11

Resumo

Some crypto industry leaders are expressing strong opposition to a potential stablecoin yield ban in the upcoming crypto market structure bill. Following reports that lawmakers are receptive to TradFi demands to restrict yields, Galaxy CEO Mike Novogratz criticized Congress for prioritizing bank profits over consumers. Nic Carter of Castle Island Ventures stated that if stablecoin yields are killed, the entire bill should be allowed to die. However, Consensys lawyer Bill Hughes remains optimistic about the bipartisan negotiations. Key committees are set to mark up their versions of the bill on January 15th, covering SEC and CFTC oversight. The bill requires Democrat support to pass committee votes. Contentious issues include stablecoin yields, DeFi provisions, and ethics standards. If the vote fails, it could sour market sentiment and delay progress until at least 2026 due to upcoming elections and crowded legislative calendars.

Some crypto industry leaders are disappointed following reports that lawmakers might be open to the idea of banning stablecoin yields.

According to reporter Sander Lutz, lawmakers are now receptive to TradFi demands to change stablecoin yield rules during bipartisan negotiations on the crypto market structure bill. The bill is scheduled for a markup on 15 January.

Reacting to the development, Galaxy CEO Mike Novogratz slammed the legislators, calling the update a “sad state.”

“Sad state that Congress cares more about banks margins than they do consumers! Both D’s and R’s need to ask who are they serving?”

For his part, Nic Carter, partner at crypto VC firm Castle Island Ventures, said that the sector would be better off without the bill if stablecoin rewards are restricted.

“If they want to kill stablecoin yield we might as well just let the bill die.”

Bill Hughes, a lawyer at Consensys and one of the attendees at the meeting, acknowledged potential pitfalls. However, he remains optimistic about the crypto bill.

“For what it’s worth, I left the call more bullish than I had been previously. We are close. Pitfalls, for sure. But closer than we’ve ever been. And smart people calling the game. I’m optimistic.”

What to expect from crypto bill markup

Both the Senate Banking Committee and Senate Agriculture Committee are expected to markup their respective version of the crypto bill on 15 January. The Banking committee handles the SEC’s oversight mandate, while the Agriculture committee will cover the responsibility of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Although the bill is sponsored by Republicans, they must have Democrat buy-in to pass the committee vote before being advanced to the Senate chamber for a final floor vote.

For the Senate Banking group, the key contentious issues have been stablecoin yields, DeFi provisions, and ethics standards that seek to ban President Donald Trump’s family from the crypto sector.

Based on Carter and Novogratz’s reactions, it’s unclear whether yields or DeFi regulations will be deal-breakers.

However, according to Senator Tim Scott (R-SC), Senate Banking Committee chair, it may be time to take the bill to the next step after “good-faith, bipartisan negotiations.”

What’s next if the vote fails?

Alex Thorn, Galaxy Research’s Head of Research, recently reiterated that the bill needs 7-10 Democrats to pass the Senate Banking committee vote (A total of 60 YES votes needed to pass).

If the vote falters, it would have minimal impact. However, it will still sour market sentiment, he said. He also warned that another committee vote could be challenging in 2026.

“If the Senate falls short next week, the combination of crowded congressional calendars and looming midterm elections makes a second run in 2026 highly uncertain.”


Final Thoughts

  • TradFi’s demand to restrict stablecoin yields is reportedly gaining traction in Congress.
  • Failure to pass the committee vote on 15 January could throw the bill into limbo.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main concern of crypto industry leaders regarding the upcoming stablecoin bill?

ACrypto industry leaders are concerned and disappointed that lawmakers might be open to the idea of banning stablecoin yields, which they see as a major red line.

QWho is Mike Novogratz and what was his reaction to the proposed changes?

AMike Novogratz is the CEO of Galaxy. He slammed the legislators, calling the update a 'sad state' and accused Congress of caring more about bank margins than consumers.

QAccording to Nic Carter, what would be the consequence of restricting stablecoin yields in the bill?

ANic Carter, a partner at crypto VC firm Castle Island Ventures, stated that if stablecoin yields are restricted, the sector would be better off letting the bill die.

QWhat are the key contentious issues for the Senate Banking Committee regarding the crypto bill?

AThe key contentious issues for the Senate Banking Committee are stablecoin yields, DeFi provisions, and ethics standards that seek to ban President Donald Trump’s family from the crypto sector.

QWhat did Alex Thorn say would happen if the Senate Banking committee vote fails on January 15?

AAlex Thorn, Galaxy Research’s Head of Research, said that if the vote fails, it would have minimal immediate impact but would sour market sentiment, and a second run in 2026 would be highly uncertain due to crowded congressional calendars and midterm elections.

Leituras Relacionadas

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHá 48m

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHá 48m

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHá 58m

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHá 58m

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHá 2h

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHá 2h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHá 2h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片