‘Let crypto bill die’ – Crypto VC cites stablecoin yields as red line

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-01-11Última atualização em 2026-01-11

Resumo

Some crypto industry leaders are expressing strong opposition to a potential stablecoin yield ban in the upcoming crypto market structure bill. Following reports that lawmakers are receptive to TradFi demands to restrict yields, Galaxy CEO Mike Novogratz criticized Congress for prioritizing bank profits over consumers. Nic Carter of Castle Island Ventures stated that if stablecoin yields are killed, the entire bill should be allowed to die. However, Consensys lawyer Bill Hughes remains optimistic about the bipartisan negotiations. Key committees are set to mark up their versions of the bill on January 15th, covering SEC and CFTC oversight. The bill requires Democrat support to pass committee votes. Contentious issues include stablecoin yields, DeFi provisions, and ethics standards. If the vote fails, it could sour market sentiment and delay progress until at least 2026 due to upcoming elections and crowded legislative calendars.

Some crypto industry leaders are disappointed following reports that lawmakers might be open to the idea of banning stablecoin yields.

According to reporter Sander Lutz, lawmakers are now receptive to TradFi demands to change stablecoin yield rules during bipartisan negotiations on the crypto market structure bill. The bill is scheduled for a markup on 15 January.

Reacting to the development, Galaxy CEO Mike Novogratz slammed the legislators, calling the update a “sad state.”

“Sad state that Congress cares more about banks margins than they do consumers! Both D’s and R’s need to ask who are they serving?”

For his part, Nic Carter, partner at crypto VC firm Castle Island Ventures, said that the sector would be better off without the bill if stablecoin rewards are restricted.

“If they want to kill stablecoin yield we might as well just let the bill die.”

Bill Hughes, a lawyer at Consensys and one of the attendees at the meeting, acknowledged potential pitfalls. However, he remains optimistic about the crypto bill.

“For what it’s worth, I left the call more bullish than I had been previously. We are close. Pitfalls, for sure. But closer than we’ve ever been. And smart people calling the game. I’m optimistic.”

What to expect from crypto bill markup

Both the Senate Banking Committee and Senate Agriculture Committee are expected to markup their respective version of the crypto bill on 15 January. The Banking committee handles the SEC’s oversight mandate, while the Agriculture committee will cover the responsibility of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Although the bill is sponsored by Republicans, they must have Democrat buy-in to pass the committee vote before being advanced to the Senate chamber for a final floor vote.

For the Senate Banking group, the key contentious issues have been stablecoin yields, DeFi provisions, and ethics standards that seek to ban President Donald Trump’s family from the crypto sector.

Based on Carter and Novogratz’s reactions, it’s unclear whether yields or DeFi regulations will be deal-breakers.

However, according to Senator Tim Scott (R-SC), Senate Banking Committee chair, it may be time to take the bill to the next step after “good-faith, bipartisan negotiations.”

What’s next if the vote fails?

Alex Thorn, Galaxy Research’s Head of Research, recently reiterated that the bill needs 7-10 Democrats to pass the Senate Banking committee vote (A total of 60 YES votes needed to pass).

If the vote falters, it would have minimal impact. However, it will still sour market sentiment, he said. He also warned that another committee vote could be challenging in 2026.

“If the Senate falls short next week, the combination of crowded congressional calendars and looming midterm elections makes a second run in 2026 highly uncertain.”


Final Thoughts

  • TradFi’s demand to restrict stablecoin yields is reportedly gaining traction in Congress.
  • Failure to pass the committee vote on 15 January could throw the bill into limbo.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main concern of crypto industry leaders regarding the upcoming stablecoin bill?

ACrypto industry leaders are concerned and disappointed that lawmakers might be open to the idea of banning stablecoin yields, which they see as a major red line.

QWho is Mike Novogratz and what was his reaction to the proposed changes?

AMike Novogratz is the CEO of Galaxy. He slammed the legislators, calling the update a 'sad state' and accused Congress of caring more about bank margins than consumers.

QAccording to Nic Carter, what would be the consequence of restricting stablecoin yields in the bill?

ANic Carter, a partner at crypto VC firm Castle Island Ventures, stated that if stablecoin yields are restricted, the sector would be better off letting the bill die.

QWhat are the key contentious issues for the Senate Banking Committee regarding the crypto bill?

AThe key contentious issues for the Senate Banking Committee are stablecoin yields, DeFi provisions, and ethics standards that seek to ban President Donald Trump’s family from the crypto sector.

QWhat did Alex Thorn say would happen if the Senate Banking committee vote fails on January 15?

AAlex Thorn, Galaxy Research’s Head of Research, said that if the vote fails, it would have minimal immediate impact but would sour market sentiment, and a second run in 2026 would be highly uncertain due to crowded congressional calendars and midterm elections.

Leituras Relacionadas

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbitHá 33m

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbitHá 33m

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbitHá 1h

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片