Legendary Investor: 'Absolutely No Way' for Walsh to Cut Rates, AI Bull Market Could Last 1-2 More Years

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-08Última atualização em 2026-05-08

Resumo

Billionaire hedge fund manager Paul Tudor Jones says incoming Fed Chair Wash is highly unlikely to cut rates and could even consider raising them, citing FOMC pushback and persistent inflation. He remains bullish on the AI-driven stock market rally, comparing it to historical tech revolutions like Microsoft's founding (1981) and the commercialization of the internet (1995). Jones believes this AI bull market is only about 50-60% complete and could continue for another 1-2 years, though he warns the current period resembles the late stages of the 1999 dot-com bubble, setting the stage for a potential sharp correction if valuations become extreme. He also cautions that AI requires eventual government regulation to mitigate long-term risks.

Source: Jinshi Data

Billionaire hedge fund manager Paul Tudor Jones made a significant statement in an interview with CNBC on Thursday, predicting that incoming Fed Chair Walsh is not only unlikely to cut interest rates but may even consider raising them. Meanwhile, he remains optimistic about the AI-driven U.S. stock bull market, believing it is in a middle stage with another 1-2 years of gains possible, though it will ultimately face the risk of a sharp correction.

No Hope for Walsh to Cut Rates, Possibly Even a Rate Hike

Regarding the policy direction of the incoming Federal Reserve Chair Walsh, Jones stated unequivocally: "Will he cut rates? Absolutely no way."

Walsh has previously expressed a dovish leaning, with the Fed's benchmark rate currently held in the 3.5%-3.75% range, unchanged since last December. However, his inclination towards easing will face significant resistance from the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) – the most recent meeting saw the highest number of dissenting votes in nearly 34 years, with most regional Fed presidents opposing the statement's hint at possible further easing "after three rate cuts by the end of 2025."

Jones believes that even a rate hike could be justified in the current environment: "I would consider raising rates, of course depending on the data, but I would definitely consider it. And I think he will be constrained before the midterm elections."

The current policy backdrop is complex: the labor market is stabilizing, but inflation remains persistently above the Fed's 2% target due to the war in Iran and Trump's tariff policies. According to CME Group's FedWatch tool, futures traders expect the Fed to keep rates unchanged this year, with probabilities for cuts or hikes being roughly equal and both relatively low.

Drawing Parallels to Historical Tech Waves, AI Bull Market Has 1-2 Years Left

Regarding the stock market, Jones is firmly bullish on the AI-driven rally, revealing he has recently increased his holdings in related stocks. He compares the current AI development to two major historical tech revolutions: "I think the emergence of the Claude large model in January this year is equivalent to the founding of Microsoft in 1981; and the current stage of AI proliferation is similar to the release of Windows 95 in 1995 and the acceleration of internet commercialization."

Jones noted that both those technological revolutions ushered in sustained "productivity miracles" lasting 4 to 5.5 years, driving long-term stock market gains. "This current AI bull market has probably run about 50% to 60% of its course. If I had to pick a timeframe, it could last another 1 to 2 years."

In recent years, U.S. stocks have continued hitting new highs driven by AI transformation expectations, with mega-cap tech stocks related to AI infrastructure leading the gains. Chips, cloud computing, and generative AI companies have become magnets for capital, pushing the S&P 500 index to repeated all-time highs.

Analogous to Pre-1999 Dot-com Bubble, U.S. Stocks May Face Sharp Correction Risk in Future

Despite his bullish short-term outlook, Jones draws a parallel between the current market and the prelude to the 1999 dot-com bubble – about a year before it peaked in early 2000. He warns: "Imagine the market going up another 40%, the total market cap to GDP ratio could reach 300% to 350%, and at that point, there will inevitably be a breathtakingly sharp correction."

As a macro trader, Jones said he employs a basket allocation strategy, while also emphasizing: "I always like to look for historical precedents, and this is a very unique period."

Additionally, he issued a warning about the long-term risks of AI: "The government will eventually need to step in with regulation. If left unchecked, artificial intelligence could pose a danger to humanity."

Jones gained fame for successfully predicting and profiting from the 1987 "Black Monday" stock market crash. He is also a co-founder of the non-profit organization Just Capital, which rates U.S. public companies based on social and environmental metrics.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to Paul Tudor Jones, what is the likelihood of the incoming Fed Chair Walsh cutting interest rates?

AAccording to Paul Tudor Jones, the likelihood of the incoming Fed Chair Walsh cutting interest rates is absolutely none. Jones stated: 'He will cut rates? Absolutely not.'

QWhat historical technological revolutions does Paul Tudor Jones compare the current AI boom to?

APaul Tudor Jones compares the current AI boom to two historical technological revolutions. He compares the emergence of Claude's large model in January of this year to Microsoft's founding in 1981. He then compares the current stage of AI proliferation to the period following the release of Windows 95 in 1995, which accelerated the commercialization of the internet.

QHow much longer does Paul Tudor Jones believe the AI-driven bull market can continue?

APaul Tudor Jones believes the AI-driven bull market can continue for another 1 to 2 years. He estimates the current bull run is about 50% to 60% complete.

QWhat market period does Jones use as a cautionary analogy for the potential end of the current AI bull market?

AJones uses the period preceding the 1999-2000 dot-com bubble as a cautionary analogy. He warns that the market could resemble 1999, roughly a year before the peak in early 2000, and ultimately face a sharp correction.

QWhat long-term risk associated with AI does Paul Tudor Jones highlight?

APaul Tudor Jones highlights the long-term risk that artificial intelligence could pose a danger to humanity if left unchecked. He warns that 'government will ultimately have to step in to regulate it, and if left unchecked, artificial intelligence could be dangerous to humans.'

Leituras Relacionadas

Warsh's First Day in Office, Markets Deliver a 'Wake-up Call': Rate Hike Expected This Year

On his first day in office, newly inaugurated Federal Reserve Chairman Warsh received a stark market warning, with expectations now fully pricing in a 25-basis-point interest rate hike this year. The shift was triggered by hawkish remarks from Fed Governor Waller, who stated that inflation is now the key policy "driver" and that the odds of a hike or cut are evenly split. This sent short-term Treasury yields higher. Waller signaled a significant pivot in his stance, citing disappointing inflation and labor data. He suggested removing "easing bias" language from Fed statements and did not rule out future rate increases if inflation fails to recede, though he noted immediate action isn't warranted without signs of unanchored inflation expectations. Chairman Warsh faces immediate pressure at his first FOMC meeting in June. With the preferred inflation gauge at a three-year high, analysts warn that failing to hike could be interpreted as an implicit easing of policy. The geopolitical situation in the Middle East is adding to existing price pressures. The market's expectation for a hike contrasts sharply with earlier forecasts for multiple cuts. While long-term Treasury yields have been contained by lower energy prices recently, analysts note they remain under structural upward pressure. Warsh's swearing-in at the White House highlights political scrutiny over Fed independence. However, the market has made it clear that inflation is the most urgent challenge, leaving the new chairman little time to settle in.

marsbitHá 2h

Warsh's First Day in Office, Markets Deliver a 'Wake-up Call': Rate Hike Expected This Year

marsbitHá 2h

Has Microsoft Lost Its Way in the AI Race, and Can Copilot Bring It Back on Track?

Microsoft, once seen as an early AI frontrunner due to its investment in OpenAI, is navigating a strategic shift amid increased competition. Its initial reliance on OpenAI’s GPT models has been complicated by OpenAI’s growing ambitions as a direct competitor, rapid advancements from rivals like Claude and Gemini, and the disruptive rise of AI agents, which challenge its traditional SaaS business model. These factors contributed to stock declines and slower-than-expected adoption of its flagship Copilot products. In response, CEO Satya Nadella has taken a hands-on role in product development, signaling the urgency of change. Microsoft is pivoting from a model-centric strategy to a "model-agnostic" enterprise platform approach. It aims to become the foundational layer connecting various AI models—from OpenAI, Anthropic, or its own new "Superintelligence" team—with enterprise workflows, data, security, and cloud services. Recent organizational changes merged consumer and enterprise Copilot teams to accelerate innovation, exemplified by new products like Copilot Tasks and Copilot Cowork. However, this transformation comes at a high cost. Microsoft faces massive capital expenditures, potentially reaching ~$190 billion by 2026, to support AI infrastructure. While its platform strategy shows early signs of traction with growing Azure AI revenue, it must balance startup-like agility with the reliability expected by enterprise clients. The core challenge is no longer being the sole AI winner but defending its position as the essential enterprise software entry point amidst rapid technological commoditization and the shift towards always-on AI agents.

marsbitHá 3h

Has Microsoft Lost Its Way in the AI Race, and Can Copilot Bring It Back on Track?

marsbitHá 3h

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

Why FX Stablecoins Never Took Off: A Path Forward via Synthetic FX Despite the explosive growth of stablecoin-powered digital banking, which has seen ~$6B in VC investment and a 24x surge in crypto card spending in under a year, a major limitation persists: these banks are essentially dollar-only accounts. This leaves 95-99% of global accounts, which are denominated in non-USD currencies, underserved. Attempts to create native foreign currency (FX) stablecoins (like EURC) have largely failed, with total FX stablecoin TVL at ~$600M compared to $400B for USD stablecoins—a 700x gap. These FX tokens face critical challenges: fragile pegs due to low liquidity, limited exchange/FinTech acceptance, poor on/off-ramps, complex regional compliance, and a chicken-and-egg adoption problem. The article argues that the solution lies not in competing with entrenched USD stablecoin networks (USDT/USDC), but in adopting a synthetic FX model inspired by traditional finance. Specifically, it advocates for Mark-to-Market Non-Deliverable Forwards (NDFs)—cash-settled FX derivatives that allow users to maintain underlying USD stablecoin holdings while having their account balance and P&L denominated in a foreign currency. This approach offers key advantages: strong oracle-based pegs, retention of deep USD stablecoin liquidity and yield, superior on/off-ramps, scalability to any currency with a reliable feed, and capital efficiency. It mirrors how modern institutional FX markets operate. Primary use cases for on-chain NDFs include: 1. **Digital Banks/Wallets:** Enabling multi-currency accounts for international users without leaving the USD stablecoin ecosystem, boosting deposits and retention. 2. **FX Carry Trade Vaults:** Offering access to sovereign interest rate differentials (e.g., earning yield on BRL) in a more stable and scalable format than crypto-native products like Ethena. 3. **Global Enterprise Payments:** Allowing merchants to receive payments in local currency equivalents while settling in USD stablecoins, similar to services offered by Stripe for fiat. The conclusion is that synthetic FX, not native FX stablecoins, is the viable path to integrating foreign exchange into the growing stablecoin digital banking landscape, potentially unlocking the next phase of institutional DeFi and multi-trillion-dollar global adoption.

链捕手Há 3h

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

链捕手Há 3h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片