Lawmakers Warn That Banks' Refusal to Serve Crypto Clients Could Paralyze Growth of the UK Market

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2026-08-11Última atualização em 2026-08-11

Resumo

Around 40% of domestic cryptocurrency transfers in the UK are currently being delayed or entirely rejected by British banks, and a majority of exchanges have seen an increase in blocked transactions over the past year. Lawmakers, including leaders of the UK's parliamentary Crypto and Digital Assets Group, are now questioning this trend, warning that major banks refusing to serve crypto clients could paralyze the growth of the UK market. They have called on banks to explain their stance towards digital asset firms following numerous reports of such companies struggling to open accounts. Industry executives argue that financial institutions are hindering properly registered and compliant businesses. Earlier this year, the government urged banks to treat all crypto sector enterprises fairly. A cross-party parliamentary group also launched an investigation into how banks block accounts and restrict transactions for digital asset companies. The group's co-chairs, Lord Vaizey and MP Dr. Gurinder Singh Josan, recently stated that banks are stalling the UK's crypto boom by denying services. They warn these restrictions risk undermining the effectiveness of the upcoming UK crypto regulatory framework, set for 2027. Banks justify their actions as necessary to protect customers from crypto fraud and volatility, a stance reinforced by recent stronger risk warnings from the Financial Conduct Authority. Concerns are rising that these banking restrictions could undermine the UK's ambition...

Currently, about 40% of domestic cryptocurrency transfers are delayed or completely rejected by UK banks. Furthermore, four out of five exchanges have seen an increase in blocked transactions over the past 12 months.

Some lawmakers are now questioning this trend. They warn that the refusal of major banks to accept crypto clients could potentially paralyze the growth of the UK market.

Currently, leaders of the UK parliamentary group on cryptocurrencies and digital assets have called on UK banks to explain their position towards companies operating with digital assets, following numerous reports of difficulties faced by crypto companies when opening bank accounts.

For some time, crypto company executives have also been protesting that financial institutions are hindering the operations of legitimate digital asset businesses, even if these firms are properly registered and comply with current regulations.

In June, the organization Stand With Crypto UK even mobilized its 286,000 members to challenge UK retail banks over widespread restrictions on cryptocurrency transactions.

Earlier, the UK government called for fair treatment of cryptocurrency providers.

In early July, the UK Parliament's cross-party group on digital assets launched an investigation to examine how major credit institutions block accounts and restrict transactions for companies operating with digital assets. At that time, the group insisted: "Access to banking services is fundamental to any legitimate business, and where unnecessary barriers exist, they can hinder growth, investment, and innovation."

Nevertheless, the group maintains this position. Most recently, co-chairs of the parliamentary group on cryptocurrencies and digital assets, Lord Waizi and MP Gurinder Singh Ghosn, stated that banks are slowing down the cryptocurrency boom in the UK by hindering crypto companies' access to their services.

They also warned that the restrictions imposed by banks risk undermining the effectiveness of the UK's upcoming regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. Currently, the UK's digital asset industry is preparing for the adoption of new regulatory rules starting October 2027.

Some bank executives justify their actions by arguing that these measures are necessary to protect customers from the rise in cryptocurrency fraud schemes and the risk of significant losses due to price volatility.

Primarily, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has intensified its warnings about cryptocurrency-related risks in recent months, exacerbating banks' concerns about potential large fines for unintentionally facilitating illegal financial activity.

Earlier this year, a representative of the UK Treasury, the country's economic and financial department, stated that the government expects banks to treat all businesses in the crypto sector fairly, including licensed firms, and will not restrict service provision to licensed companies only.

Banking Restrictions Could Undermine the UK's Crypto Ambitions

The imposed restrictions also raise questions about whether the UK can attract companies operating with digital assets while they struggle to access basic banking services.

The problem may intensify as the government introduces a clearer regulatory framework for digital assets. Legislators and industry representatives argue that maintaining banking restrictions could hinder the scaling of legitimate crypto businesses and weaken the UK's position as a global hub for digital assets.

Some Are Concerned About Political Changes in the UK

Meanwhile, Andy Burnham of the Labour Party recently took office as Prime Minister. However, some fear that his administration may not prioritize the fintech industry or the digital asset industry.

Burnham has already stated his intention to halt the digital identity project and instead focus on providing economic assistance to citizens, which has elicited mixed reactions. However, Jonathan Herbst from Norton Rose Fulbright assured the nation that the Chancellor would implement stable financial reforms.

"For international companies, part of the UK's appeal is the stability of the regulatory environment; therefore, capital markets, fintech, digital assets, and sustainable finance will continue to be important tests of this commitment," he said.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat percentage of domestic cryptocurrency transfers are currently delayed or rejected by UK banks, according to the article?

AAccording to the article, around 40% of domestic cryptocurrency transfers are currently delayed or completely rejected by UK banks.

QWhat actions have British legislators taken regarding banks' treatment of crypto clients?

ABritish legislators in the parliamentary Crypto and Digital Assets Group have called on UK banks to explain their stance towards digital asset firms. They have also launched an inquiry to investigate how major credit institutions block accounts and restrict transactions for companies operating with digital assets.

QHow do some bank executives justify the restrictions they place on crypto companies?

ASome bank executives justify their actions by claiming these measures are necessary to protect customers from the rise of cryptocurrency fraud schemes and the risk of significant losses due to price volatility.

QWhat potential consequence do the lawmakers warn about regarding the upcoming UK crypto regulatory framework?

ALawmakers warn that the restrictions imposed by banks risk undermining the effectiveness of the UK's upcoming cryptocurrency regulatory framework, which is set to be implemented from October 2027.

QWhat broader concern does the article raise about UK's ambitions in the crypto sector due to banking restrictions?

AThe article raises the concern that banking restrictions could undermine the UK's ambitions to attract digital asset companies, as they struggle to access basic banking services, potentially weakening the UK's position as a global hub for digital assets.

Leituras Relacionadas

FTX Scenario? BitMart Accused of Issues With Withdrawals and Insolvency

Cryptocurrency exchange BitMart, which previously announced its closure, is facing accusations of insolvency and withdrawal issues, drawing comparisons to the FTX collapse. Despite announcing a gradual wind-down until January 2027 and assuring users they could withdraw assets, reports emerged of significant problems shortly after. On-chain analysts noted unusually low withdrawal volumes, with some users reporting failed or stuck transactions. BitMart's CEO, Sheldon Xia, eventually broke the company's silence on August 8, 2026, claiming the team was consolidating assets for an orderly shutdown and denied misappropriating funds, mentioning potential court and auditor involvement. However, new complaints arose. A user named BeardStaff claimed $10.1 million was stuck, while Matthew Wang, co-founder of market maker OpenGradient, accused BitMart of insolvency, noting his firm's funds were also trapped. Wang highlighted a suspicious offer from BitMart for high-yield, locked staking just a week before the closure announcement. Numerous other users reported being unable to withdraw sums ranging from thousands to millions of dollars. Several crypto projects, including Gen6, Paxi Network, and Scandic Coin, are pursuing legal action. Data from Arkham Intelligence shows BitMart's wallet holdings have plummeted from over $100 million in early July 2026 to around $36.4 million, while CoinMarketCap data indicates reserves are only $4.6 million, mostly in BitMart's native BMX token.

cryptonews.ruHá 48m

FTX Scenario? BitMart Accused of Issues With Withdrawals and Insolvency

cryptonews.ruHá 48m

Trading

Spot
活动图片