Kyle Samani Is Back: This Time, We're Going to Outcompete CEX in Efficiency!

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2026-03-12Última atualização em 2026-03-12

Resumo

Kyle Samani, former co-founder of Multicoin Capital, has returned to advocate for PropAMM, a Solana-based innovation he claims is one of the most significant advancements in market microstructure in decades. He argues that by hosting market maker algorithms directly on-chain, PropAMM eliminates the latency inherent in traditional centralized exchanges (CEXs), where constant data exchange between market makers and the exchange server is required. On Solana, pricing updates occur within the same physical silicon, drastically reducing delays. PropAMM already dominates SOL-USDC spot trading on Solana with tighter spreads than major CEXs. Samani predicts it will become the dominant model for on-chain spot, perpetuals, and prediction markets this year. Current challenges include ensuring best execution for takers due to private algorithms and non-deterministic routing, but solutions from aggregators like Jupiter and dFlow are expected. Upcoming Solana upgrades—such as higher compute limits, reduced slot times, and lower network latency—will further enhance PropAMM performance, solidifying its efficiency advantage over CEXs.

Source:Kyle Samani

Compiled by|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina); Translator|Azuma(@azuma_eth)

Editor's Note: The man who knows best how to promote Solana, the former co-founder of Multicoin Capital Kyle Samani, who had loudly exited the crypto world not long ago, is back!

Last night, Kyle Samani posted a long Thread on his personal X account. In the article, Kyle Samani once again demonstrated his highly persuasive "shilling" (not derogatory here) rhetoric, using "efficiency"—a weak point in the decentralized narrative—as a breakthrough. He detailed how the Solana ecosystem's currently promoted PropAMM will catch up with or even surpass traditional centralized models in efficiency, arguing that PropAMM is one of the most important innovations in market microstructure in recent years, or even decades.

  • Related articles: 《The Man Who Knows Best How to Shill SOL Exits the Crypto World》; 《Is There More to Kyle Samani's Exit?》.

Below is the original content by Kyle Samani, compiled by Odaily Planet Daily.

PropAMM is one of the most important innovations in market microstructure in recent years, and perhaps even one of the most significant in decades.

To help everyone understand this conclusion, let's first look at how market makers (MMs) quote prices on traditional centralized exchanges (CEX).

Market makers typically engage in physical co-location with the exchange. Each market maker runs an algorithm on a server and connects to another server running the exchange's system via a network cable of uniform length (e.g., 50 meters).

A massive stream of data is constantly exchanged back and forth between market makers and the exchange. Whenever a market maker sends an order to the exchange—whether it's a limit order, cancellation, or market order—the exchange must broadcast this information to all other market makers; then, the other market makers resend their own orders based on the new information; this cycle repeats indefinitely.

Here is a simple diagram.

Now, let's look at how propAMM works on the Solana mainnet.

The beauty of propAMM on Solana is that the blockchain itself directly "hosts" the market maker algorithms. This means the system no longer needs to send billions of messages back and forth between market makers and the exchange; the market-making algorithms will run directly on the same physical machine as the exchange.

The new diagram is as follows. (That's right, only the Solana blockchain is needed!)

There has long been a common view in the cryptocurrency industry that decentralized systems must be slower (have higher latency) than centralized systems because they require communication between global nodes.

But if you think about it differently, on-chain hosted algorithms could actually have lower latency than traditional centralized exchanges in finance.

Why is that? The reason is that the latency required for propAMM to update prices only involves electrons moving within the same physical piece of silicon. For example, if the last market order causes a change in the SOL-USD price, this information is immediately visible to all propAMMs and used to price the next market order. Everything happens within the same piece of silicon; there is no longer a need for two-way communication between servers.

It's worth noting that propAMM does require frequent oracle updates, but this is not a problem and does not change the overall fact I described above.

The most critical point remains that when the exchange—in this case, the Solana blockchain—directly hosts the propAMM algorithms, the market makers' pricing changes in real-time within the same physical piece of silicon.

propAMM has already become the dominant mechanism for SOL-USDC spot quotes on Solana, with narrower spreads than all major CEXs. I expect this market structure to become the dominant model for on-chain trading this year, including spot, perpetual contracts (perps), and even prediction markets.

The biggest challenge for propAMM is that there is currently no way to ensure that the taker always gets the best execution, because:

  • All propAMM algorithms are not public (which is reasonable, as traditional market-making algorithms are also proprietary);
  • When routing trades between multiple propAMMs, the result is non-deterministic.

However, this problem can be solved. I expect all relevant aggregator teams to launch solutions this year, such as Jupiter and dFlow for spot, and Phoenix for contracts.

Current propAMM is still under-optimized and subject to various limitations of the Solana blockchain itself. This year, Solana will roll out a series of major upgrades that will significantly enhance propAMM's performance, including:

  1. Higher CU (Compute Unit) limits per transaction and larger transaction sizes;
  2. Higher CU limits per block;
  3. Alpenglow: Reducing slot time from 400ms to 100–150ms;
  4. DoubleZero: Reducing global network latency;
  5. Application-controlled execution;
  6. Multiple concurrent leaders.

If propAMM on the Solana mainnet can already offer narrower quotes than all CEXs without these upgrades, imagine how powerful they will become as these upgrades are gradually implemented.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is PropAMM and why does Kyle Samani consider it a major innovation in market microstructure?

APropAMM is a mechanism on the Solana blockchain where the market maker algorithms are hosted directly on-chain. Kyle Samani considers it one of the most important innovations in market microstructure in recent years, or even decades, because it eliminates the need for constant bidirectional messaging between market makers and an exchange, allowing pricing updates to occur with extremely low latency on the same physical silicon.

QHow does the efficiency of PropAMM on Solana compare to traditional CEX market making?

APropAMM on Solana is more efficient than traditional CEX market making. In a CEX, market makers and the exchange servers constantly send data back and forth, creating latency. In contrast, PropAMM algorithms run on the same physical machine as the exchange (the Solana blockchain), so price updates happen almost instantaneously as electrons move within the same piece of silicon, resulting in lower latency and tighter spreads.

QWhat evidence does Kyle Samani provide to show that PropAMM is currently outperforming CEXs?

AKyle Samani states that PropAMM has become the dominant quoting mechanism for the SOL-USDC spot pair on Solana and is already achieving narrower spreads than all major centralized exchanges (CEXs).

QWhat are the current challenges facing PropAMM, according to the article?

AThe main challenges are the inability to guarantee best execution for takers because the PropAMM algorithms are not public (which is standard for proprietary trading algorithms) and the non-deterministic nature of routing trades across multiple PropAMMs.

QWhat future Solana upgrades are mentioned that will further improve PropAMM performance?

AThe article lists several upcoming Solana upgrades: higher Compute Unit (CU) limits per transaction and larger transaction sizes, a higher CU limit per block, Alpenglow (reducing slot time from 400ms to 100-150ms), DoubleZero (reducing global network latency), application-controlled execution, and multiple concurrent leaders.

Leituras Relacionadas

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbitHá 9m

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbitHá 9m

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Elon Musk's much-anticipated "WeChat-like" app, XChat, has officially launched after multiple delays. The initial review reveals a product that falls short of expectations, offering an experience largely similar to X Platform's (formerly Twitter) direct messages, despite being marketed as an encrypted communication tool. Key observations from the first-day test include: 1. The app's promoted "end-to-end encryption" and its claimed relation to Bitcoin's architecture were criticized by experts as a superficial attempt to capitalize on crypto buzz, with no real technical connection. 2. Musk's vision of an ad-free "secure communication system" is technically met, but only because the app is currently extremely basic, featuring only a single chat interface. 3. A promised anti-screenshot feature appears inconsistent; it works in X Platform group chats but fails within the XChat app itself, where screenshots still capture avatars. 4. The app supports 45 languages and has a 16+ age rating, indicating a broader tolerance for content compared to WeChat's 13+ rating. 5. A puzzling login process requires users to verify the email associated with their X account. 6. The touted encryption" feels minimal in practice, with its presence only indicated by a simple "Encrypted - Yes" label on messages. 7. Disappearing message timers for groups can be set from 5 minutes to 4 weeks, with the timer starting upon being read by a user. 8. Group invite links are shared with X Platform groups. 9. Group size limits are planned to be increased, aiming for 1000 members, a move that has drawn user criticism. 10. The app offers 8 different colored icons, and its chat bubbles are notably similar to WeChat's. Message deletion options mimic Telegram's. Crucially, many pre-announced features like importing X contacts, integrating Grok AI, X Money payments, and Cashtags are not yet available. The initial release is seen as a bare-bones and underwhelming first step.

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片