Kraken’s Motion To Dismiss Keeps The SEC Exchange Cases Under Pressure

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-07-08Última atualização em 2026-07-08

Resumo

Kraken has filed a motion to dismiss the SEC's amended complaint against it, joining a growing trend of major U.S. crypto firms aggressively challenging the regulator's legal theories. The exchange argues that the SEC is improperly attempting to expand securities laws into areas like secondary trading of crypto assets, where they do not clearly apply. This legal argument represents a core fault line in U.S. crypto regulation. The motion is seen as both a legal strategy and a public signal that Kraken will not accept the SEC's framing quietly. Industry observers are closely watching this and similar exchange cases, as their outcomes significantly impact token listings, product design, and market confidence. While a motion to dismiss doesn't decide the entire case, it pressures the SEC to demonstrate that its claims can withstand detailed judicial scrutiny.

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Kraken is taking the same route several large crypto firms are increasingly willing to take: push back hard and force the SEC to defend its theory in detail. Its motion to dismiss is part legal filing, part signal to the market that the exchange is not going to accept the agency’s framing quietly.

That makes it a story about more than Kraken alone.

For more details, visit the official Kraken platform.

TL;DR

  • Kraken submitted a motion to dismiss the SEC’s amended complaint.
  • The exchange argues the SEC’s theory still stretches securities law too far.
  • The filing adds to the wider legal pushback from major US-facing crypto platforms.

The Argument Kraken Wants Heard

At the centre of Kraken’s position is the claim that the SEC is still trying to expand securities law into areas where it does not cleanly belong, particularly in secondary trading contexts.

That argument has become one of the defining legal fault lines in US crypto regulation, and every new filing sharpens it.

Why The Industry Watches Closely

Exchange cases carry outsized weight because they influence token listings, product design, and the confidence of both builders and investors. A motion to dismiss does not decide the whole case, but it can shape momentum and public framing.

For now, Kraken’s move keeps pressure on the SEC to show that its claims can survive close judicial scrutiny.

This article is based on information from Kraken.

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

This report is based on information from Kraken. at Kraken

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Bitcoinist Editorial Team

Follow

Full Profile

Related Posts

XRPL’s Latest AMM Upgrade Shows Ripple’s Ecosystem Is Still In Build Mode

Tether’s Adecoagro Bet Shows Stablecoin Giants Want Exposure To Real Assets, Not Just Reserves

Payward Europe EMI License Highlights Kraken’s Regulated Fiat-Rail Expansion

SEC Investor Education Appointment Keeps Crypto Risk Messaging In Focus

TRON Sets Transaction and Active Address Records Driven by Stablecoin Settlements

Solana Prediction Market World Adopts Chainlink Price Feeds via Phantom Wallet

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat action did Kraken take in response to the SEC's amended complaint?

AKraken filed a motion to dismiss the SEC's amended complaint.

QWhat is the core legal argument Kraken is making against the SEC?

AKraken argues that the SEC is improperly trying to expand securities law into areas where it does not belong, particularly concerning secondary trading of crypto assets.

QWhy are exchange cases like Kraken's considered significant for the broader crypto industry?

AExchange cases carry outsized weight because their outcomes influence token listings, product design, and the confidence of both builders and investors across the industry.

QWhat does a motion to dismiss achieve, even if it doesn't decide the whole case?

AA motion to dismiss can shape the momentum of the case and the public framing of the legal arguments, forcing the SEC to demonstrate that its claims can withstand close judicial scrutiny.

QWhat is one of the major fault lines in U.S. crypto regulation highlighted by Kraken's filing?

AA major fault line is the debate over whether and how securities law applies to secondary market trading of crypto assets.

Leituras Relacionadas

The 'Saving U.S. Treasuries' Baton Pass: Bessent Fumbled Last Week, This Week It's Wash's Turn

"Rescuing US Treasuries" Relay: After Bessent's Miss, All Eyes Are on Walsh Last week, US Treasury Secretary Bessent's announcement to at least double long-term Treasury buybacks failed to sustainably lower yields, which quickly rebounded. The market response saw a drop in the dollar alongside surges in gold and Bitcoin, interpreted as a "pressure release valve" for anxiety. The focus now shifts to Fed Chairman Walsh's upcoming Jackson Hole speech. Markets are highly sensitive to his message, seeking clarity on the Fed's policy response to stubborn inflation and worsening fiscal conditions. Analysts warn that a lack of new guidance could disappoint markets and worsen the sell-off in long-dated bonds. Analysts question the scale of Bessent's operations, noting they are too small relative to the overall debt market and do not constitute quantitative easing. A key issue is the Fed's massive holdings of long-term bonds, which distorts the market. With the Fed holding low-yielding short-term bonds that are losing money relative to its policy rate, discussion is growing around a potential Fed-led "Operation Twist." This would involve selling short-term bonds to buy long-term ones, aiming to lower long-end yields without expanding the balance sheet. The upcoming PCE inflation data will set the stage for Walsh's speech. However, the window for action is narrowing amid political pressures. A critical threshold is the 30-year yield at 5%; holding above it could increase stress on the dollar and leveraged sectors. Overall, the article suggests that without coordinated Fed action to anchor inflation expectations, Treasury interventions may ultimately fail, with investors increasingly looking to assets like gold as hedges.

marsbitHá 26m

The 'Saving U.S. Treasuries' Baton Pass: Bessent Fumbled Last Week, This Week It's Wash's Turn

marsbitHá 26m

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

Hyperliquid’s Compliance Path: From Permissionless to Permissioned HIP-3 Hyperliquid currently blocks U.S. access because its permissionless, on-chain infrastructure conflicts with U.S. market structure laws, which restrict futures trading to registered exchanges, clearinghouses, and brokers. Through its Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), the project is advocating for regulatory modernization, proposing that regulated entities be allowed to build products on HyperCore (its exchange and clearing layer) while fulfilling their compliance obligations. The platform’s modular stack separates roles like a traditional exchange (DCM), clearinghouse (DCO), and broker (FCM), but reconstructs them on-chain with code. This enables permissionless access, self-custody, and 24/7 global trading, but clashes with U.S. rules requiring KYC, specific margin models, and custodial arrangements. To resolve this, HPC is engaging with U.S. regulators (CFTC, SEC) to seek clarity that deploying on-chain software does not itself trigger licensing, and to establish exemptions allowing non-custodial wallets to route users to regulated derivatives. Recent political signals suggest openness to this approach. On the technical side, Hyperliquid Labs has introduced permissioned HIP-3 deployers on testnet. These allow regulated entities to launch markets, perform KYC, and whitelist compliant users. While these create separate order books, whitelisted market makers can bridge liquidity between them, ensuring deep, shared liquidity across the same L1. Features like payload-based “PA” permissions enable DEX-level account controls (e.g., reduce-only orders), mirroring traditional broker authorities. The strategy is not to open the native, permissionless front-end to U.S. users, but to position Hyperliquid as neutral infrastructure that U.S. regulated firms can use while meeting their legal duties. This paves a compliant path for U.S. investor access while preserving the protocol’s core, permissionless nature.

marsbitHá 50m

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

marsbitHá 50m

Two Funding Rounds in Three Months: The Chinese Version of Palantir is on Fire

Investment Community AI has learned that Beijing Zhongshu Ruizhi Technology Co., Ltd., a domestic industrial-grade causal intelligence and high-reliability decision-making AI company, has recently completed a strategic financing round worth hundreds of millions of RMB. This round saw participation from China Internet Investment Fund, Suzhou Chuangtou National Social Security Fund, Financial Street Capital, ICBC Capital, Kunlun Capital, among others, with existing shareholders also increasing their investment. This follows a Series B funding round in the hundreds of millions completed just three months prior. The rapid succession of two major funding rounds signifies strong market recognition of the company's underlying original technology and scaled commercial implementation. Often referred to as the "Chinese version of Palantir," Zhongshu Ruizhi is entering a new phase of accelerated technological iteration, widespread scenario replication, and scaled performance release, mirroring the explosive growth of China's AI market. Founded in April 2020 by Dr. Han Han, a Tsinghua University Ph.D. and former core drafter of national AI policies, the company is mission-driven to "move AI from the digital world to the physical world." It focuses on the high-reliability, strong-decision industrial AI track and enterprise-grade AI Agent full-stack infrastructure. The team tackles the challenge of applying AI to China's vast and complex industrial and energy systems by developing a new intelligent operating system from scratch. Its core technological breakthrough lies in three proprietary底层 technologies: meta-causal cognitive theory, causal models, and a dynamic ontology engine. These address critical pain points of generative large models in industrial settings—such as AI hallucinations, insufficient reasoning, lack of temporal logic, unverifiable decisions, and multi-source rule conflicts—thereby providing trustworthy, explainable, and executable智能决策 capabilities. Commercially, Zhongshu Ruizhi has achieved scaled deployment, serving over 50 central state-owned enterprises and industrial groups in sectors like power, petroleum, and aerospace, with implementations in more than 800 highly complex production scenarios. The company reported doubled revenue in 2025, demonstrating strong self-sufficiency and a viable business model—a rarity among new-generation AI firms. The latest funds will be allocated towards advancing foundational theoretical research, replicating successful application models to expand market presence (including overseas), and attracting top-tier talent. Lead investor China Internet Investment Fund highlighted that in the current shift from general AI capability contests to deep industrial empowerment, industrial-grade causal intelligence is crucial for building China's modern digital foundation and fostering new quality productive forces. They expressed support for the company's efforts to define decision-making paradigms and trustworthy standards for industrial intelligence, aiming to secure a rule-making voice in the global physical AI arena.

marsbitHá 1h

Two Funding Rounds in Three Months: The Chinese Version of Palantir is on Fire

marsbitHá 1h

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

In the AI era, the most pressing political economy question is: as machines become increasingly capable, how can humanity share in the value they create? An article originally critiquing China's tech focus has sparked a deeper debate on this global challenge. Historically, industrial progress improved efficiency but still relied on human labor for wealth creation and distribution. AI is fundamentally different—it is now replacing cognitive and knowledge work. As AI and robots take over more tasks, economic growth may continue while direct human participation in value creation shrinks, creating a core tension between productivity gains and widespread income generation. The issue is not unique to China. While leading tech companies amass enormous wealth, labor's share of income is declining globally. The core problem is a broken link: technological innovation and corporate profits are not translating into sufficient consumer income and demand. Three potential paths forward are outlined: a traditional capitalist model where profits primarily go to capital owners; a state-capitalist approach with public investment in AI; and more innovative models like digital sovereign wealth funds, universal shareholding, or AI-era basic income schemes to directly distribute AI-generated value. The future competitive advantage may lie not just in technological supremacy, but in which society can build a new, inclusive distribution system for the intelligent economy. The ultimate challenge is ensuring that as AI creates value, humans have a means to obtain income and share in the resulting widespread social benefits.

marsbitHá 1h

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片