Kelp DAO Suffers $292 Million rsETH Exploit – Details

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-04-19Última atualização em 2026-04-19

Resumo

Kelp DAO has suffered a major cross-chain exploit resulting in the loss of approximately 116,500 rsETH, valued at nearly $292 million. The attack targeted a vulnerability in the protocol's cross-chain bridge mechanism, specifically through LayerZero’s EndpointV2. On-chain investigator ZachXBT first identified the breach, noting that the attacker used Tornado Cash to conceal funding sources. In response, Kelp DAO immediately paused all rsETH contracts across mainnet and Layer-2 networks, preventing two additional attempts to drain another $100 million in assets. The protocol is collaborating with LayerZero and Unichain for a full investigation. The incident has impacted the broader DeFi ecosystem, leading Aave to freeze rsETH markets on its V3 and V4 deployments as a precaution, though its own contracts remain secure. The stolen rsETH represents around 18% of its circulating supply, significantly damaging liquidity and user confidence.

Wu Blockchain reports that Kelp DAO has suffered a massive cross-chain exploit that drained approximately 116,500 rsETH, valued at nearly $292 million. The incident raises fresh concerns about the protocol’s security, coming less than a year after a previous disruption tied to a smart contract bug

Kelp DAO Response Prevents Additional Exploit Attempts

According to blockchain data, the attack on the Kelp DAO exploited a weakness in cross-chain communication, specifically targeting the bridge mechanism used to transfer assets across networks. The exploit was executed via a call to the “Iz Receive” function on LayerZero’s EndpointV2, which ultimately triggered the release of funds to an attacker-controlled wallet.

On-chain sleuth ZachXBT was among the first to uncover the breach, estimating losses exceeding $280 million across Ethereum and Arbitrum. The blockchain investigator also noted that the attack addresses had been initially funded via Tornado Cash, indicating a deliberate effort to conceal the funding sources for the highly coordinated attack.

In response to this attack, Kelp DAO implemented an immediate halt to all rsETH contracts across its mainnet and connected L2 networks. The protocol also froze activity across its core contracts and systems that cover deposits, withdrawals, and oracle functions. According to Kelp DAO, an ongoing investigation is underway with LayerZero and Unichain.

Notably, the attacker attempted two additional transactions to drain another 40,000 rsETH, worth close to $100 million. However, Kelp DAO’s swift measures ensured both attempts failed, preventing losses from rising to $391 million.

Aave Freezes rsETH Contracts

In other news, the fallout has quickly spread beyond Kelp DAO, with lending protocols feeling immediate pressure. Aave, one of the largest DeFi lending platforms, responded by freezing rsETH markets across its V3 and V4 deployments.

However, Aave has clarified that its own smart contracts were not exploited, and the measure is purely precautionary to limit further debt exposure to rsETH as they assess the situation. Aave management is also committed to evaluating potential mitigation strategies if any bad debt emerges from the exploits.

rsETH itself is a liquid restaking token designed to represent staked ETH while enabling users to earn additional yield through restaking strategies. It plays a key role in cross-chain DeFi, allowing capital to move seamlessly across multiple networks, including Arbitrum, Base, and Scroll. The scale of the exploit is particularly damaging as the stolen funds represent roughly 18% of rsETH’s total circulating supply, representing a significant hit to both liquidity and user confidence.

ETH trading at $2,345 on the daily chart | Source: ETHUSDT chart on Tradingview.com

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the total value of rsETH drained in the Kelp DAO exploit, and how many tokens were stolen?

AApproximately 116,500 rsETH was drained, valued at nearly $292 million.

QWhich specific function was exploited in the cross-chain communication attack on Kelp DAO?

AThe exploit was executed via a call to the 'Iz Receive' function on LayerZero's EndpointV2.

QHow did Kelp DAO respond to the attack to prevent further losses?

AKelp DAO immediately halted all rsETH contracts across its mainnet and connected L2 networks, and paused activity in its contracts for deposits, withdrawals, and oracle functions. This prevented two additional attempts to drain 40,000 rsETH.

QWhat action did the lending protocol Aave take in response to the Kelp DAO exploit, and why?

AAave froze rsETH markets across its V3 and V4 deployments as a precautionary measure to limit further debt exposure to the compromised token, clarifying that its own smart contracts were not exploited.

QWhat is rsETH and what key role does it play in the DeFi ecosystem?

ArsETH is a liquid restaking token that represents staked ETH, enabling users to earn additional yield through restaking strategies. It allows capital to move seamlessly across multiple networks like Arbitrum, Base, and Scroll, playing a key role in cross-chain DeFi.

Leituras Relacionadas

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

SpaceX is preparing for a massive IPO aiming to raise around $75 billion at a valuation of approximately $1.75 trillion. While its achievements in reusable rockets and the profitable Starlink satellite internet service are clear, the market is concerned about the aggressive valuation. Key issues include: the current $1.75 trillion valuation, which is about 94 times 2025 revenue, seems to price in not just existing businesses but also unproven future ventures like AI infrastructure and orbital data centers. Financially, while Starlink is profitable, the AI division, bolstered by the acquisition of xAI, is incurring massive losses and consuming the majority of capital expenditures. This acquisition also introduced complex related-party financing arrangements and debt onto SpaceX's balance sheet. Furthermore, corporate governance poses a challenge. SpaceX's dual-class share structure ensures founder Elon Musk retains absolute control, limiting ordinary shareholders' influence over high-risk, long-term strategic decisions. The future success of ambitious projects like the Starship rocket—critical for lowering costs and enabling new services—remains a significant variable for the valuation. In summary, the market's apprehension (FUD) centers not on doubting SpaceX's past technological triumphs but on questioning how much premium public investors should pay for a future that combines proven profits with highly speculative and capital-intensive new ventures, all under a governance structure that offers limited shareholder oversight.

marsbitHá 22m

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

marsbitHá 22m

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

Vitalik Buterin has proposed a new DeFi design to eliminate the automatic liquidation mechanism that causes market instability during sharp downturns. The current system, used by protocols like Aave, triggers forced sales when collateral value falls below a threshold, often exacerbating price drops and creating systemic selling pressure. Buterin's alternative model is based on splitting an asset like ETH into two synthetic option-like tokens, P and N, pegged to a price index. Their combined value always equals one ETH. Instead of sudden liquidation, a position's value gradually drifts from its target peg if the market moves. Users must proactively rebalance their holdings to maintain their desired exposure, transferring the management burden from the protocol to the user or automated tools. A key advantage is the reduced reliance on real-time oracles. Pricing decisions are deferred until contract expiry, allowing for more robust, fault-tolerant oracle designs. This removes a clear liquidation threshold that speculators can target for manipulation or MEV extraction. However, significant challenges remain. Frequent rebalancing could incur high slippage and transaction costs, necessitating new liquidity provider models. The design is better suited for hedging instruments than for stablecoins requiring a rigid 1:1 peg. While not an immediate replacement for existing systems, the proposal challenges the foundational assumption that instantaneous forced liquidation is an unavoidable necessity in DeFi, opening the door for fundamentally different risk management architectures.

marsbitHá 26m

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

marsbitHá 26m

The End of Single-Factor Cryptography

The article "The End of Single-Factor Crypto" posits a fundamental shift in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. It argues the era where crypto asset valuations were predominantly driven by, and correlated with, Bitcoin's price is ending. The space is bifurcating into two distinct economies: endogenous and exogenous. The endogenous economy represents traditional crypto, where token and project values are directly tied to crypto market prices. The emerging exogenous economy comprises projects and businesses that may utilize blockchain technology or tokens but derive their fundamental value from external, non-crypto factors like consumer demand, subscription revenue, or real-world utility. Examples include AI inference platforms like Venice, fintech lenders using blockchain for efficiency, and stablecoin/payment infrastructure companies acquired by giants like Mastercard and Stripe. This shift means investment analysis must change. For exogenous assets, evaluating traditional business fundamentals—such as revenue streams, unit economics, and competitive moats—becomes more critical than tracking Bitcoin charts. While endogenous assets like Bitcoin remain relevant, the growth of the exogenous category is driven by measurable demand independent of crypto price cycles, paving the way for a new, more diversified market phase. Consequently, crypto is evolving from a single-factor, reflexive asset class into a multifaceted ecosystem with varied drivers and investment theses.

marsbitHá 27m

The End of Single-Factor Cryptography

marsbitHá 27m

Morning Post | Bitmine Plans to Raise $300 Million Through Preferred Stock Issuance; Polymarket Accuses Kalshi of Commercial Espionage

ChainCatcher's Daily Crypto Brief: Key developments from the past 24 hours include significant funding moves, regulatory actions, and market predictions. Bitmine announced a $300 million preferred stock fundraising. Polymarket accused rival prediction platform Kalshi of corporate espionage, citing numerous suspicious coincidences in product launches, a claim Kalshi strongly denied. The U.S. Department of Justice, in a joint "Disruption Week" anti-fraud operation with companies like Coinbase and Meta, froze over $3.8 million in cryptocurrency linked to scams. In infrastructure news, Macau completed its integration with the multi-central bank digital currency bridge, mBridge, aiming to build efficient cross-border payment channels. Cosmos Labs acquired the block explorer Mintscan. Market-wise, Geoffrey Kendrick, Standard Chartered's Head of Digital Assets Research, stated Bitcoin is nearing a bottom around $63,000, maintaining a year-end target of $100,000. He noted stability in U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF holdings. Ahead of SpaceX's anticipated IPO, internal insiders at Rocket Lab (RKLB) sold over $18.41 million in stock. In tokenization, Goldman Sachs partnered with Apex and Archax to launch a tokenized real estate fund. The meme token tracker GMGN reported the top trending tokens: on Ethereum, HEX, SHIB, LINK, PEPE, mUSD; on Solana, TROLL, swarms, WORLDCUP, neet, Buttcoin; and on Base, PEPE, toby, ODDS, ELSA, SKI.

链捕手Há 41m

Morning Post | Bitmine Plans to Raise $300 Million Through Preferred Stock Issuance; Polymarket Accuses Kalshi of Commercial Espionage

链捕手Há 41m

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar DAO

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de DAO Maker (DAO) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar DAO Maker (DAO) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu DAO Maker (DAO)Depois de comprar o teu DAO Maker (DAO), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona DAO Maker (DAO)Transaciona facilmente DAO Maker (DAO) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

187 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar DAO

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de DAO (DAO) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片