Justin Sun-Linked Wallets Accumulate $40M Worth of LIT

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-01-02Última atualização em 2026-01-02

Resumo

A number of wallets associated with Justin Sun have accumulated a significant amount of LIT tokens, the native asset of the Lighter decentralized exchange. On-chain analysis reveals that four wallets linked to Sun purchased 1.6 million LIT shortly after the token’s launch, eventually accumulating a total of 14.89 million LIT—valued at approximately $39.8 million. The activity was tied to liquidity provisioning rather than airdrop farming, with around $200 million deposited into Lighter’s Liquidity Provider Program. Sun now holds about 5.32% of the circulating supply. LIT launched on December 30 as part of a futures DEX on Ethereum zk-rollup, with 25% allocated to early users and liquidity providers. The token experienced volatility post-launch, dropping about 30% from its initial trading price of $3.40.

A number of wallets associated with Just Sun have silently made a quite large place in the newly launched LIT token by Lighter. The on-chain data has revealed that the purchases were linked to liquidity provisioning instead of airdrop farming.

The on-chain researcher MLM released its analysis on Jan 1, revealing that 4 wallets linked with Justin Sun accumulated 1.6 million LIT soon after the token generation event, taking the amount to about 6.4 million LIT, whose value is said to be around $17 million as per the current market rate.

The wallets’ funding took place 34 and 50 minutes after the closing of the Lighter airdrop allocation form. However, there is no proof that the wallets also participated in earlier points farming.

Adding more to this, the activity deposits around $200 million into the Lighter’s Liquidity Provider Program. Further, he took out about $38 million, using around $33 million to buy an extra 13.25 million LIT on the market. Totalling this, the wallets now have 14.89 million LIT, sitting at $39.8 million.

A Dig Into LIT

With this, Sun has around 5.32% of the circulating supply and 1.33% of the total supply. About $5.5 million stays in spot balances associated with the same group of wallets. The data has also dropped hints that similar arrangements may persist for other big LLP participants. A wallet deposited $50 million USDC in the programme and, after around a month, got 874,875 LIT via attribution.

Lighter rolled out LIT on December 30, an efficient, long-lasting futures DEX made as an Ethereum zk-rollup. With the launch, 25% was launched to early users and liquidity providers, quickly taking the circulating supply to around 250 million tokens.

After the launch, LIT is under the pressure because of liquidity withdrawals and post-airdrop profit-taking, which usually can be seen for new tokens having wide distributions. The debut price stood at around $3.40 at the time of initial trading but soon experienced volatility, falling around 30% to $2.45-$2.80.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Jupiter Launches Mobile V3 With Native Pro Trading Tools

TagsJustin SunlighterLIT

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QHow much LIT did the wallets linked to Justin Sun accumulate, and what is its approximate value?

AThe wallets linked to Justin Sun accumulated 14.89 million LIT, with an approximate value of $39.8 million.

QWhat was the primary purpose of the purchases made by the Justin Sun-linked wallets according to on-chain data?

AAccording to on-chain data, the purchases were linked to liquidity provisioning, not airdrop farming.

QWhat percentage of the circulating and total supply of LIT does Justin Sun now hold?

AJustin Sun holds approximately 5.32% of the circulating supply and 1.33% of the total supply of LIT.

QWhen was the LIT token launched, and what is Lighter?

ALighter rolled out the LIT token on December 30. Lighter is an efficient, long-lasting futures DEX built as an Ethereum zk-rollup.

QWhat happened to the price of LIT shortly after its launch?

AShortly after its launch, the price of LIT experienced volatility, falling around 30% from its debut price of approximately $3.40 to a range of $2.45-$2.80 due to liquidity withdrawals and post-airdrop profit-taking.

Leituras Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHá 24m

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHá 24m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHá 43m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHá 43m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHá 52m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHá 52m

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar SUN

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de SUN (SUN) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar SUN (SUN) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu SUN (SUN)Depois de comprar o teu SUN (SUN), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona SUN (SUN)Transaciona facilmente SUN (SUN) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

578 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2025.03.21

Como comprar SUN

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de SUN (SUN) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片