‘Just the beginning’: Paul Atkins signals SEC’s new crypto rule changes

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-03-20Última atualização em 2026-03-20

Resumo

SEC Chair Paul Atkins announced the agency will soon issue formal proposed rules to codify its recent interpretive guidance, which classifies most crypto assets as non-securities and categorizes them into five groups: digital commodities, collectibles, tools, stablecoins, and securities. The SEC also plans to create a regulatory sandbox for experimentation. Atkins noted that while this is a significant step, courts could still deviate from the SEC’s interpretation. He described the move as a "bridge" as Congress progresses on the CLARITY Act. Senator Cynthia Lummis reported that stablecoin yield issues are "99% resolved" in the bill negotiations. Market optimism for the bill has improved slightly despite earlier setbacks.

Paul Atkins, the chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has said the agency will soon issue formally proposed rules for the recent crypto asset classification guidance.

In the latest interpretive guidance, the SEC designated most crypto assets as non-securities. Additionally, the framework classified digital assets into five categories, including digital commodities, collectibles, tools, stablecoins, and securities. It also explained how they fit into the current U.S. law.

To codify the framework, Atkins said the agency will formalize it alongside creating a sandbox for experimenting with different crypto products. But he warned the court could still ‘deviate’ from its interpretation.

This is just an interpretation, and the courts can deviate from that if they don’t like our rationale.

He added,

We’ll shortly follow up with a proposed rule to put much more of this framework into effect. And construct a series of exemptions, equivalent of sandbox for people to experiment and develop proof-of-concept for their products.

SEC’s plans and CLARITY Act progress

For Atkins, SEC’s interpretation of crypto laws is ‘just a beginning,’ and the move would be a ‘bridge’ as the Congress works its way through the CLARITY Act. In fact, most of the guidance issued in the past few days and months covers key topics being discussed in the CLARITY Act. For others, the SEC’s proposed rulemaking on key issues would be sufficient for the market, even if the CLARITY Act’s momentum stalls.

That said, the stablecoin yield issue has been the key deal breaker dragging the crypto bill.

Even so, after the recent Senate Republican meeting on the bill, Senator Cynthia Lummis was ‘positive,’ terming it ‘productive,’ and added,

We’re 99% of the way there on stablecoin yield, and negotiations on the digital asset portions of the bill are in a good place.

Source: Polymarket

As expected, market optimism on the bill’s passage improved slightly following the recent meetings and updates.

In early March, the chance of the CLARITY Act becoming law dropped to nearly 50% as the White House and the banking industry hit a snag over stablecoin yields.

Whatever the outcome, however, the crypto industry may still be in a better position for clear rules for the road if the SEC continues to issue and codify them.


Final Summary

  • SEC Chair reiterated plans to formalize rulemaking for its recent interpretive guidance on crypto asset classification and how current U.S. law applies to them.
  • According to Senator Lummis, the stablecoin yield issue was ‘99% resolved’ in CLARITY Act talks.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat did SEC Chairman Paul Atkins announce regarding crypto asset classification?

APaul Atkins announced that the SEC will soon issue formally proposed rules to codify its recent interpretive guidance on crypto asset classification, which designates most crypto assets as non-securities and categorizes them into five groups.

QHow did the SEC classify digital assets in its latest guidance?

AThe SEC classified digital assets into five categories: digital commodities, collectibles, tools, stablecoins, and securities, explaining how they fit under current U.S. law.

QWhat did Paul Atkins say about the role of courts in relation to the SEC's interpretation?

AAtkins warned that courts could deviate from the SEC's interpretation if they disagree with the rationale, emphasizing that the guidance is just an interpretation.

QWhat is the CLARITY Act, and how does it relate to the SEC's actions?

AThe CLARITY Act is a congressional bill addressing crypto regulation. The SEC's interpretive guidance covers key topics in the bill and is seen as a 'bridge' while Congress works on the legislation.

QAccording to Senator Cynthia Lummis, what progress has been made on the stablecoin yield issue in the CLARITY Act negotiations?

ASenator Lummis stated that the stablecoin yield issue is '99% resolved' and that negotiations on the digital asset portions of the bill are in a good place.

Leituras Relacionadas

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Há 9m

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Há 9m

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHá 27m

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHá 27m

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHá 55m

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHá 55m

Trading

Spot
活动图片