JPMorgan to Expand JPM Coin Across Blockchains Starting With Canton

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-01-09Última atualização em 2026-01-09

Resumo

JPMorgan is expanding its JPM Coin deposit token to multiple blockchain networks, starting with the Canton Network, as part of a broader strategy to build an interoperable digital money system. JPM Coin represents U.S. dollar deposits held at the bank and is currently operational on Coinbase’s Ethereum Layer 2 network, Base. The expansion aims to enable near-instant value transfers across financial markets in a secure, regulated environment. Access is restricted to whitelisted institutional wallets to ensure compliance. Unlike JPMorgan’s private Kinaxis network—which supports multi-currency cross-border payments for clients like Siemens—JPM Coin operates entirely on public blockchain infrastructure, with all transactions recorded on-chain.

JPMorgan is planning to widen its blockchain payment infrastructure by taking its JPM Coin deposit token to various blockchain networks. The expansion is set to be initiated with the Canton Network.

After this, other platforms will be the target, as the firm targets making an interoperable digital money system. JPM Coin depicts U.S. dollar deposits held at the bank. Institutional clients can use the token to make payments on distributed ledgers.

The token currently uses Base, an Ethereum Layer 2 network made by Coinbase, for its operation. A spokesperson from JPMorgan revealed that the expansion will make regulated interoperable digital money.

The system will also permit near-instant value transfers over financial markets. Institutions leveraging Canton will be capable of receiving, transferring and redeeming JPMD swiftly within a safe environment.

The bank only permits whitelisted wallet addresses handled by institutional clients to use JPM Coin to ensure compliance and control. The limitations obstruct access while preserving security standards.

Delving Deep into JPM Coin

JPM Coin is not like other blockchain products of JPMorgan. The token isn’t built on the bank’s Kinexys network. The spokesperson reveals that JPM Coin has never been offered on private or permissioned infrastructure.

The Kinexys Digital Payments network was introduced in 2019, offering blockchain deposit accounts for institutional clients. These accounts permit 24/7 cross-border foreign exchange payments in USD, EUR and GBP.

Siemens leverages this system for international money transfers. The firm preserves Blockchain Deposit Accounts in Frankfurt and New York. These accounts permit Siemens to offer near-instant USD-to-EUR foreign exchange payments.

The system aids Siemens in beating restricted settlement windows. This enhances productivity for the company’s global business operations. The technology backs multi-currency, cross-border payments and liquidity management with the treasury platform of Siemens.

JPM Coin works completely on public blockchain infrastructure; when a client trades the token, the transaction is listed directly on-chain. This is not similar to traditional banking systems that leverage private databases.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Ethereum Struggles Below $3,300 as US Demand and ETF Flows Weaken

TagsBlockchainJPMDJPMorgan

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is JPMorgan planning to expand with the Canton Network?

AJPMorgan is planning to expand its JPM Coin deposit token to various blockchain networks, starting with the Canton Network.

QHow does JPM Coin currently operate and on which network?

AJPM Coin currently operates on Base, an Ethereum Layer 2 network made by Coinbase.

QWhat is the primary purpose of JPM Coin for institutional clients?

AInstitutional clients can use JPM Coin to make payments on distributed ledgers, as it depicts U.S. dollar deposits held at JPMorgan.

QHow does the JPM Coin system ensure compliance and security?

AThe bank only permits whitelisted wallet addresses handled by institutional clients to use JPM Coin to ensure compliance and control.

QWhat key difference exists between JPM Coin and JPMorgan's Onyx network?

AJPM Coin is not built on JPMorgan's Onyx network and has never been offered on private or permissioned infrastructure, operating completely on public blockchain infrastructure.

Leituras Relacionadas

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbitHá 8m

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbitHá 8m

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHá 1h

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片