Japan plans major shift as crypto moves from payments to securities law

cointelegraphPublicado em 2025-12-10Última atualização em 2025-12-10

Resumo

Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) is planning to shift cryptocurrency regulation from the Payment Services Act to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA), treating crypto primarily as investment products rather than payment methods. This move aims to enhance user protection by imposing stricter disclosure rules for initial exchange offerings (IEOs), including mandatory pre-sale information, third-party code audits, and issuer identity disclosure. The new framework also strengthens measures against unregistered platforms and explicitly prohibits insider trading. The regulatory shift coincides with government discussions to implement a flat 20% tax rate on crypto trading profits.

Japan’s financial regulators are preparing to move crypto asset oversight out of the country’s payments regime and into a framework designed for investment and securities markets.

The Financial Services Agency (FSA) on Wednesday released a comprehensive report from the Financial System Council’s Working Group on the regulatory status of cryptocurrencies across multiple sectors.

The document outlines a plan to shift the legal basis for crypto regulation from the Payment Services Act (PSA) to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA), which is the primary law regulating securities markets, issuance, trading and disclosures.

“Crypto assets are increasingly being used as investment targets both domestically and internationally,” the report noted, underscoring the need to protect users by providing regulation that treats crypto as a financial product.

Strengthening data disclosure regulations

One of the core changes brought by bringing crypto under FIEA regulatory scope is strengthening data disclosure requirements for initial exchange offerings (IEOs), or token sales managed by crypto exchanges.

“Crypto transactions conducted by users are similar to securities transactions, and may involve the sale of new crypto assets or the buying and selling already in circulation,” the document reads, highlighting the importance of timely information during IEO sales.

Source: FSA Japan

Among the requirements for IEOs, the proposal mandates that exchanges provide pre-sale disclosures, including detailed information about the core entities behind the offering. It also requires code audits by independent third-party experts and encourages consideration of feedback from self-regulatory organizations.

In addition to exchanges, it places responsibilities on issuers, requiring them to disclose their identities, regardless of whether the project is decentralized, and how tokens are issued and distributed.

Related: Crypto payments coming to PlayStation as Sony plans stablecoin launch in 2026

The proposed framework would also give regulators stronger tools to crack down on unregistered platforms, particularly those operating from overseas or tied to decentralized exchanges. It also includes explicit prohibitions on insider trading, echoing provisions of the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework and South Korea’s regulations.

The news came amid the Japanese government’s consideration of plans to reduce the maximum tax rate on crypto profits by imposing a flat rate of 20% on all gains from crypto trading.

On Tuesday, FSA also signaled a cautious stance on permitting derivatives for foreign crypto asset exchange-traded funds, reportedly describing the underlying assets as “not desirable.”

Magazine: When privacy and AML laws conflict: Crypto projects’ impossible choice

Leituras Relacionadas

When AI Begins to Audit the World: From Claude Discovering the ZEC Vulnerability, Watching the Encryption Industry Enter the 'Recursive Security Era'

**When AI Audits the World: From Claude's Discovery of a ZEC Vulnerability, Viewing the Crypto Industry Entering a "Recursive Security Era"** This article examines a pivotal shift in the blockchain security landscape, triggered by the convergence of two events: Anthropic's research on AI's "Recursive Self-Improvement" and Claude Opus 4.8's discovery of a critical vulnerability in Zcash's code. Traditionally, crypto security has relied on human experts and automated tools for periodic audits. However, the article argues AI is transitioning from a mere tool to an active participant in understanding and analyzing complex systems. Claude's ability to identify a subtle flaw in Zcash's zero-knowledge proof system demonstrates AI's potential to dramatically lower the cost and time required for risk discovery. This goes beyond finding a single bug; it signals a change in the very mechanism of how vulnerabilities are found. The core thesis introduces the concept of "Recursive Security," drawing a parallel to Anthropic's "Recursive Self-Improvement." Just as AI can accelerate its own development through feedback loops, security systems are evolving towards a continuous cycle of analysis, risk identification, remediation, and re-analysis. Security is becoming a persistent, evolving capability integrated into a system's lifecycle, rather than a one-time pre-launch audit. This shift is particularly urgent for the crypto industry, where system complexity from Layer-2 networks, modular architectures, and ZK-proofs is growing faster than human analysis capacity. AI excels at the pattern recognition and contextual understanding needed to navigate this complexity. Importantly, the article cautions that AI augments both defenders and potential attackers, accelerating the entire threat landscape. The future competitive advantage may not lie in having zero vulnerabilities, but in having the fastest risk discovery, validation, and response capabilities. The Claude-Zcash incident is thus an early signal of an era where AI-driven, recursive security systems become essential for managing risk in an increasingly complex digital world.

marsbitHá 24m

When AI Begins to Audit the World: From Claude Discovering the ZEC Vulnerability, Watching the Encryption Industry Enter the 'Recursive Security Era'

marsbitHá 24m

From MSTR to STRC+: Where Is the Limit of the Strategy Universe?

From MSTR to STRC+: The Evolution and Limits of the Strategy Universe This article examines the transformation of Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) from a simple "Bitcoin treasury" company into a complex financial engineering firm building a BTC-backed credit system. **Core Thesis:** Strategy's true significance lies not just in its massive BTC holdings (~844k BTC), but in its attempt to transform this static reserve into a multi-layered credit curve within traditional capital markets and, subsequently, into on-chain yield infrastructure. **The MSTR Flywheel:** The initial model was a reflexive loop: BTC price rises → MSTR stock rises → company raises capital (debt/equity) at a premium → buys more BTC → increases per-share BTC exposure → MSTR premium grows. This "amplified Bitcoin" equity (MSTR) thrives on bullish momentum but is vulnerable to tightening premiums and rising funding costs. **Building the Credit Curve:** Strategy's innovation is slicing its single BTC balance sheet into different risk/return profiles via specialized securities: * **MSTR:** High-volatility equity layer absorbing full BTC upside/downside. * **STRC:** Key product. A perpetual preferred stock designed as "short duration high yield credit," offering ~11.5% floating monthly dividends. It attracts fixed-income investors seeking yield without direct BTC exposure, funding Strategy's operations. * **STRD/STRK/STRF:** Other preferred/share classes with varying durations, conversion rights, and fixed dividends. **Risks of the STRC Model:** STRC's high yield is not risk-free. Its stability depends on: 1) Sufficient BTC asset coverage, 2) Strategy's continued ability to pay dividends, and 3) Market faith in the MSTR/STRC funding flywheel. Stress points include deep BTC price declines eroding the asset buffer, rising dividend costs if STRC trades below par, and a broken flywheel if MSTR's premium (mNAV) falls persistently. **On-Chain Expansion: STRC+:** Projects like **Saturn** and **Apyx** aim to package STRC's (and other DAT preferred stock) cash flows into on-chain stablecoin yield (e.g., sUSDat, apyUSD). They offer DeFi a new yield source distinct from trading fees or incentives—cash dividends from traditional securities. However, this introduces compounded risks: off-chain custody, issuer credit risk, BTC volatility, and protocol execution risk. **Conclusion: The Ultimate Boundary** Strategy's endgame is not infinite BTC accumulation. It is the market's long-term acceptance of a new credit system where BTC serves as collateral for tradable securities whose cash flows can power on-chain financial applications. Its "universe" expands if this BTC-native credit curve gains legitimacy, but contracts if these instruments are repriced purely as high-risk, yield-bearing credit assets without stablecoin mythology.

marsbitHá 43m

From MSTR to STRC+: Where Is the Limit of the Strategy Universe?

marsbitHá 43m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片