Jane Street Sued: Suspected of Using Telegram Insider Information to Exit and Short Before Terra Collapse, Profiting $134 Million

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-22Última atualização em 2026-05-22

Resumo

Wall Street trading giant Jane Street Group is facing a lawsuit alleging it used insider information from a private Telegram channel with a former Terraform Labs intern to avoid losses and profit from the collapse of the Terra ecosystem in May 2022. According to newly unsealed court documents, Jane Street allegedly sold nearly $192 million worth of the UST stable币 before its depeg, and then established short positions, netting approximately $134 million in profits. The suit, filed by Terraform's bankruptcy estate, claims the firm gained a critical "information advantage" through these private communications, allowing it to execute large sales, including an $85 million UST transaction on Curve Finance minutes after Terraform quietly withdrew liquidity. Jane Street has denied the allegations as "baseless" and moved to dismiss the case. A 2023 court ruling that classified UST and Luna as securities bolsters the legal basis of this suit.

Author:CoinDesk

Compiled by: Deep Chao TechFlow

Deep Chao Introduction: Wall Street's top trading firm, Jane Street, is accused of using a private Telegram chat to obtain insider information before the Terra collapse, precisely exiting their position and shorting to profit $134 million. This lawsuit not only exposes the information advantage of traditional finance giants in the crypto market but also gains stronger legal footing due to a 2023 court ruling that recognized UST and Luna as securities. It holds significant reference value for investors understanding institutional behavior and market manipulation.

Jane Street Group, one of Wall Street's largest trading firms, is accused of selling $192 million worth of the TerraUSD (UST) stablecoin just before the Terra collapse in May 2022, allegedly through a private Telegram channel with Terraform Labs insiders, according to newly unsealed court filings in Manhattan federal court.

The lawsuit, brought by the administrator liquidating Terraform's bankruptcy estate, was amended last week to reduce redactions and reveal new details about how Jane Street allegedly obtained non-public information as the Terra ecosystem crumbled.

Jane Street denied the initial allegations when they were filed in February, calling them "desperate" and "baseless," and asked the court to dismiss the case.

According to the suit, Jane Street's alleged informational edge came from a private Telegram backchannel between former Terraform intern Bryce Pratt (then working at Jane Street) and his former Terraform colleagues.

The bankruptcy administrator claims this access helped Jane Street unload its UST position near its face value before the algorithmic stablecoin's implosion and then establish short positions, profiting approximately $134 million during the collapse of Terra's $40 billion ecosystem.

In one internal exchange cited in the suit, Pratt allegedly joked that colleagues should be "slightly happier" about having an "information advantage."

With that advantage, Jane Street allegedly sold its entire UST position on May 7, 2022, unloading roughly 193 million tokens. Its single largest trade was an $85 million UST sale on the decentralized exchange Curve Finance, which occurred just nine minutes after Terraform quietly withdrew $150 million in UST liquidity from the same pool.

This trade is significant because public post-mortems of Terra's collapse have long focused on a large swap on Curve that helped push the token off its $1 peg. The lawsuit now alleges that wallet belonged to Jane Street.

When a crypto analytics firm later told a Jane Street contact that the firm had "made a killing," internal communications cited in the case show traders worrying about how their wallet was identified and then discussing how to "deactivate" them.

"This lawsuit is a transparent attempt to extract money in the well-known context that losses suffered by Terra and Luna holders were the result of a multi-billion dollar fraud perpetrated by Terraform Labs management," a Jane Street spokesperson said. "As demonstrated by the motion to dismiss filed with the court last month, we will vigorously defend ourselves against these baseless, opportunistic claims."

The suit also names Jane Street co-founder Robert Granieri and trader Michael Huang. It alleges violations of federal securities laws and the Commodity Exchange Act and seeks to recover the profits to repay creditors.

A 2023 federal court ruling in a separate U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission case that found UST and Luna qualified as securities gives the new lawsuit stronger legal grounding.

The lawsuit states that on May 18, 2022, five days after UST bottomed, Jane Street offered a job to a Terraform research lead. He joined the firm two weeks later.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core accusation against Jane Street Group in the lawsuit related to Terra's collapse?

AJane Street Group is accused of obtaining non-public insider information about Terraform Labs through a private Telegram channel with a former Terraform intern, allegedly using that information to sell off $192 million worth of UST stablecoin and establish short positions before Terra's collapse, profiting approximately $134 million.

QWho is Bryce Pratt mentioned in the article, and what role does the lawsuit allege he played?

ABryce Pratt is a former Terraform Labs intern who was working at Jane Street. The lawsuit alleges he provided Jane Street access to a private 'backdoor' Telegram channel with his former Terraform colleagues, giving the firm an information advantage.

QWhat specific transaction on Curve Finance is highlighted in the lawsuit as significant to the UST depegging?

AThe lawsuit highlights Jane Street's sale of $85 million worth of UST on the Curve Finance decentralized exchange, which occurred just nine minutes after Terraform Labs quietly removed $150 million in UST liquidity from the same pool. This transaction is alleged to have been a key event in pushing UST away from its $1 peg.

QHow did a 2023 court ruling in an SEC case impact the legal basis for this new lawsuit against Jane Street?

AA 2023 federal court ruling in a separate SEC case determined that UST and Luna were securities. This legal finding strengthened the foundation of the new lawsuit, which includes allegations of violations of federal securities laws.

QWhat action did Jane Street allegedly take regarding their trading wallets after an analytics firm noted their profits?

AAccording to internal communications cited in the lawsuit, after a crypto analytics firm informed a Jane Street contact that the firm had 'made a killing,' Jane Street traders expressed concern about how their wallet was identified and discussed how to 'deactivate' it.

Leituras Relacionadas

70% of the Public Opposes AI, Americans Hope the U.S. Loses the AI War

70% of Americans believe AI development is moving too fast, with growing public resistance evolving from online criticism to real-world protests and violence. This widespread anti-AI sentiment stems from fears of job losses, rising utility costs, environmental damage, threats to democracy, and financial instability. Key incidents illustrate the backlash: Google's former CEO Eric Schmidt was loudly booed at a graduation for promoting AI; AI company ads are vandalized; protests and even violent attacks target AI firms and data centers. Polls show deep public pessimism and strong local opposition to data center construction, often surpassing resistance to nuclear power plants. The core grievances are economic and practical: AI is seen as automating jobs, concentrating wealth, and increasing household electricity and water bills due to massive data center resource demands. Environmentalists also oppose AI's high energy use and carbon emissions. This opposition has turned AI into a major political issue in the US. While the Trump administration prioritizes AI innovation for global competition, bipartisan pushback is growing. Democrats and factions within the MAGA movement are forming temporary alliances to support stricter regulations and local bans on new data centers, pressuring the administration to choose between its tech industry backers and its voter base. The situation highlights a profound national divide over AI's future.

marsbitHá 19m

70% of the Public Opposes AI, Americans Hope the U.S. Loses the AI War

marsbitHá 19m

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

In the race to dominate the AI era's entry point, China's tech giants—Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba—are aggressively deploying AI Agents to control the future of traffic distribution. Alibaba is pursuing a dual-track "closed loop + openness" strategy. Its Qianwen app is evolving into a super-Agent integrated across its ecosystem (Taobao, Alipay, etc.) to handle complex tasks like travel planning. Concurrently, it is opening its platform to external brands (Luckin Coffee, KFC) and has launched a B2B Agent platform, "Wukong," targeting enterprise automation. Its other flagship, Quark, aims to be an "AI super search box" for information and tasks. ByteDance is executing an omnipresent "sprawl strategy." Its Doubao app boasts over 300 million monthly active users and is evolving into a default AI entry point for daily life, with plans for paid versions and e-commerce integration. Its core weapon is the Kouzi platform, a visual "AI assembly factory" for developers to build custom Agents. ByteDance is also pushing hardware integration, collaborating on AI phones and developing smart glasses to embed Doubao everywhere. Tencent is playing its long-held "ultimate card" by quietly embedding an AI Agent directly into WeChat. This Agent, accessible via a swipe, can understand user commands and automatically execute tasks by calling upon WeChat's millions of mini-programs (e.g., finding and ordering coffee). This leverages WeChat's unparalleled 1.4-billion-user ecosystem to position the app as an AI-powered "service operating system," a move that could dramatically reshape the competitive landscape. The core battleground is shifting from competing for "user screen time" to competing to be the "default execution layer" for user intent. The business model is evolving from an "attention economy" to an "intent economy," where the Agent that can most efficiently fulfill a user's need gains control over service access and token flow. This represents a fundamental change in how users connect with digital services, making the fight for the Agent入口 (entry point) a pivotal moment for redefining industry leadership in the AI age.

marsbitHá 2h

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片