It's 2026, DAOs Should Have Matured by Now

marsbitPublicado em 2026-01-29Última atualização em 2026-01-29

Resumo

The year 2025 marked a pivotal turning point for DAOs, shifting from idealistic experiments to a more mature hybrid model that balances decentralized oversight with operational efficiency. Key trends include a move away from pure community governance towards structures with clearer operational control, as seen with Arbitrum's OpCo and Uniswap's DUNI framework. While voter participation declined, voting power became more concentrated among active delegates. A major development was the focus on value accumulation for token holders through mechanisms like buybacks, fee switches, and burns, addressing a critical flaw in previous tokenomics. Significant conflicts, such as those at Gnosis and Aave, forced DAOs to confront issues of accountability and structural flaws. Looking ahead to 2026, key trends will include: the formalization of legal structures becoming necessary; governance evolving into risk management infrastructure; the decline of purely governance-focused tokens in favor of those with value capture; increased professional delegation; and the growing role of privacy, AI for decision fatigue, and futarchy markets. This evolution represents a maturation of the space, moving towards more effective and accountable organizations where growth benefits token holders and all participants are held responsible.

Author: Pink Brains

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Intro: 2025 was a critical inflection point for decentralized governance (DAO). After years of idealistic experimentation, mainstream protocols began to seriously address core pain points such as power distribution, accountability mechanisms, and sustainability. This article, written by seasoned DAO delegate Pink Brains, draws from the practical experience of casting 725 votes within top protocols like Aave, Lido, and Gnosis, offering an in-depth analysis of the shift in DAOs from 'community autonomy' to a 'hybrid operation' model.

The author points out that governance tokens alone are no longer sustainable. The future of DAOs will evolve towards economic alignment, legal entity formation, and AI-assisted decision-making. This is not just a review of governance but also a prophecy for the evolution of Web3 organizational structures in 2026.

Full Text Below:

2025 marked a turning point for decentralized governance.

After years of experimentation, major protocols began to confront fundamental questions about power distribution, accountability, and sustainability.

The answers weren't always pleasant, but they were necessary.

What We Achieved in 2025

2025 was also the first year of our operation as an active DAO Delegate.

  • Cast 725 votes across 18 protocols
  • Held voting power exceeding 8 million
  • Top 10 delegate in Aave and Lido
  • Top 3 delegate in Velodrome
  • Top 6 delegate in Gnosis

This perspective, grounded in practical governance work, allowed us to clearly observe the patterns reshaping DAOs in 2025 and define their trajectory entering 2026.

Changes in DAOs in 2025

Shift in Operational Model: From Pure Community Governance to Hybrid Control

The most significant change in 2025 was the shift from purely community governance towards hybrid models with clearer operational control.

  • @arbitrum introduced an Operating Company (OpCo), channeling all DAO operations through a unified structure.
  • @JupiterExchange completely paused governance for nearly six months to reassess its approach.
  • @Uniswap launched the DUNI framework, centralizing operational authority.
  • The @Gnosis DAO executed a hard fork amidst reduced community engagement. Scroll transitioned to a CEO-led structure.
  • @Scroll_ZKP paused its DAO, shifting focus to centralized governance.
  • Recently, the Celo Foundation merged with @cLabs into a unified core contributor organization.

The motivation for this shift was DAOs hitting scaling limits. Execution became the bottleneck. Community-wide votes were often too slow for operations, too noisy for technical nuances, and too vulnerable for security-sensitive actions.

Consequently, governance power is concentrating towards smaller, high-context groups, while the broader community shifts towards an oversight role, as reflected in the next section.

Fewer Voters, But More Concentrated Power

In 2025, the number of proposals and voter participation dropped significantly across major DAOs. However, the voting power behind each proposal remained strong.

  • Lido saw an increase in participation after adopting a dual governance framework.
  • Arbitrum and Uniswap still had the highest overall participation, but the number of voters decreased for both.

Caption: From DeFiLlama's State of DeFi 2025 Report

This does not signal the failure of governance. Instead, governance is becoming more bundled, more operationally abstract, and less frequent.

Governance influence migrated to a small number of highly active Delegates and large capital participants.

Value Accrual for Token Holders

"Token buyback", "buyback and burn", and "fee switch" became central themes in 2025.

For years, token utility revolved around voting rights and incentive distribution, but offered minimal economic value to token holders. 2025 changed this equation.

  • Lido adopted a buyback framework.
  • Uniswap DAO activated the long-awaited fee switch, pledging to burn nearly $600 million worth of UNI tokens.
  • Aave implemented a token buyback mechanism. Optimism launched a buyback program.
  • CoW Protocol increased solver profitability in a way that benefits token holders.

This trend addresses a key challenge in tokenomics. Buybacks and burns reduce circulating supply, making the token more scarce. If demand remains stable, the price strengthens. When token holders can truly benefit from the protocol's success, they are more incentivized to buy, hold, and participate in governance decisions long-term.

Who Really Owns the DAO?

Two major controversies forced DAOs to confront structural flaws.

  • Gnosis voted to terminate Karpatkey's treasury mandate due to fee disputes, underperformance, and a ~$700k loss related to liquidity issues.
  • Tensions flared between Aave DAO and Aave Labs when it was discovered that approximately $10 million annually in swap fees from the CoW Swap integration were flowing to Aave Labs instead of the DAO. A vote on brand ownership failed, and the controversy left a harder question: what does "DAO-owned" really mean when the core team controls development and distribution?

These conflicts forced protocols to patch holes in accountability and governance structures.

Legal Infrastructure is Adapting to DAOs

Despite DeFi's growth, most DAOs still lack clear legal structures, creating increasing liability and regulatory risks as protocols scale.

While jurisdictions like Wyoming have introduced DAO LLC frameworks, and Switzerland offers mature legal pathways, most DAOs remain in a legal gray area.

2026 Trend Predictions

Centralized DAO as a New Practice

Protocols will develop clear frameworks to delineate "community decisions" from "operational decisions," moving beyond the false binary of "fully decentralized" or "fully centralized."

  • Operational Execution: Will be handled by Labs teams, not foundations.
  • Community Oversight: DAO delegates and the community will be responsible for treasury strategy, long-term direction, and major structural decisions.

Governance Shifts to Risk Management Infrastructure

The DAO of the future will look less like a forum full of chatter. More teams will bifurcate decisions into concave decisions and convex decisions.

Concave problems require:

  • Pre-approved guardrails and automated execution.
  • Professional oversight (risk services, auditors, security teams).
  • Rapid response frameworks for emergencies and market shocks.
  • Fewer proposals, but each decision carries higher economic impact.

Convex problems (like product direction) require decisive leadership, where the DAO acts as a "brake" or "checkpoint," not the "steering wheel."

By 2026, this will be standard for lending, stablecoins, perps, and any protocol where financial risk can compound quickly.

The End of Governance Tokens? Value Capture Must Be Built

Continuing into 2026, tokens with only governance functions will struggle to maintain long-term engagement.

Delegates, whales, and strategic holders will not consistently protect the system without a visible upside. Protocols will increasingly adopt at least one value accrual path:

  • Token buyback frameworks.
  • Fee diversion or revenue sharing.
  • Staking tied to protocol cash flows.
  • Treasury strategies aimed at supporting the token's value.

When holders gain economically from the protocol's success, they are incentivized to stay attentive, participate, and protect the system.

Legal Structures Shift from Optional to Necessary

Regulatory pressure and real-world legal challenges will push DAOs towards formal entity formation, seeking a balance between decentralized governance and legal clarity.

Professional Delegation

As governance complexity increases, token holders will increasingly delegate to full-time professional delegates. While this concentrates voting power, it may improve decision quality. Meanwhile, weaker delegate institutions that cannot financially sustain themselves will fold, as governance work becomes more professional, political, and costly.

Privacy, AI & Futarchy

Public governance is a social game. When every vote is public, decisions are influenced by reputation, pressure, and alliances, not purely the protocol's best interest. Therefore, governance privacy will become more important in the future.

AI will address decision fatigue. It can assist in analyzing proposals and auto-voting on routine upgrades based on user-defined preferences, requiring human intervention only for disputes or significant impact.

Futarchy markets will also play a larger role in DAOs. They let market signals predict which option might create value. Gnosis is testing this model, using retail prediction markets to reflect sentiment on proposals.

Crypto is Maturing, and So Are DAOs

The shifts we see in DAO operations, economic alignment, accountability conflicts, and professionalization represent maturation, not the end of DAOs.

DAOs are evolving from ideological experiments into organizational structures that balance "decentralized oversight" with "proven operational efficiency." We believe DAO governance becomes more meaningful if teams can align with community interests: moving fast when action is needed, letting growth benefit token holders, and holding all participants—core teams and delegates alike—accountable.

As Vitalik said: We need more DAOs, but different and better ones.

If you believe in the value of DAOs, we can be your voice.

Effective delegation is more than just casting a vote; it means doing the actual work: reading proposals, staying active on forums, understanding risks, and voting against bad decisions even when it's not popular.

This is how we operate as delegates: through clear communication and educational content, helping protocols grow while staying aligned with community incentives.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the most significant shift in DAO operational models in 2025 according to the article?

AThe most significant shift was the transition from pure community governance to hybrid models with clearer operational control, where governance power was concentrated into smaller, high-context groups while the broader community shifted to a supervisory role.

QHow did the trend of 'value accumulation for token holders' manifest in major protocols in 2025?

AIt manifested through mechanisms like token buybacks, burns, and fee switches. For example, Lido adopted a buyback framework, Uniswap DAO activated its fee switch to burn nearly $600 million worth of UNI, and Aave and Optimism implemented token buyback programs.

QWhat two major controversies forced DAOs to confront their structural flaws in 2025?

AThe first was Gnosis voting to terminate Karpatkey's treasury mandate due to fee disputes, underperformance, and a $700,000 loss. The second was the conflict between Aave DAO and Aave Labs over approximately $10 million in annual swap fees from a CoW Swap integration that went to the Labs instead of the DAO.

QWhat is one key prediction for DAO governance in 2026 regarding decision-making?

AGovernance will shift towards risk management infrastructure, where decisions are split into 'concave decisions' (requiring pre-approved guardrails, professional oversight, and fast response frameworks) and 'convex decisions' (requiring decisive leadership with the DAO acting as a brake or checkpoint).

QWhy does the article suggest that 'governance privacy' will become more important in the future?

ABecause public governance is a social game where decisions can be influenced by reputation, pressure, and alliances rather than the protocol's best interest. Privacy in governance can help mitigate these influences and lead to more objective decision-making.

Leituras Relacionadas

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbitHá 25m

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbitHá 25m

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbitHá 32m

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbitHá 32m

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手Há 34m

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手Há 34m

Bitcoin flashes 3 macro-bottom signals – But can BTC reach $70K?

The article discusses Bitcoin's recent price movement above $66,000 and a shift in market analysis from focusing on a local bottom to a potential macro-cycle bottom. It cites a crypto analyst noting that BTC has flashed three historical technical signals that previously coincided with major market bottoms in 2015, 2019, and 2022, suggesting the current zone could be a strong long-term accumulation area. However, the article also highlights a significant challenge: despite the price breakout, on-chain data shows a lack of supporting liquidity. Stablecoin dominance is rising while the total stablecoin market cap is shrinking, with capital continuing to leave exchanges. This divergence indicates that while the technical setup is bullish, the rally may struggle to sustain enough momentum for a decisive move into the $70,000 region without an influx of fresh capital.

ambcryptoHá 37m

Bitcoin flashes 3 macro-bottom signals – But can BTC reach $70K?

ambcryptoHá 37m

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手Há 51m

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手Há 51m

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow