It's 2026, DAOs Should Have Matured by Now

marsbitPublicado em 2026-01-29Última atualização em 2026-01-29

Resumo

The year 2025 marked a pivotal turning point for DAOs, shifting from idealistic experiments to a more mature hybrid model that balances decentralized oversight with operational efficiency. Key trends include a move away from pure community governance towards structures with clearer operational control, as seen with Arbitrum's OpCo and Uniswap's DUNI framework. While voter participation declined, voting power became more concentrated among active delegates. A major development was the focus on value accumulation for token holders through mechanisms like buybacks, fee switches, and burns, addressing a critical flaw in previous tokenomics. Significant conflicts, such as those at Gnosis and Aave, forced DAOs to confront issues of accountability and structural flaws. Looking ahead to 2026, key trends will include: the formalization of legal structures becoming necessary; governance evolving into risk management infrastructure; the decline of purely governance-focused tokens in favor of those with value capture; increased professional delegation; and the growing role of privacy, AI for decision fatigue, and futarchy markets. This evolution represents a maturation of the space, moving towards more effective and accountable organizations where growth benefits token holders and all participants are held responsible.

Author: Pink Brains

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Intro: 2025 was a critical inflection point for decentralized governance (DAO). After years of idealistic experimentation, mainstream protocols began to seriously address core pain points such as power distribution, accountability mechanisms, and sustainability. This article, written by seasoned DAO delegate Pink Brains, draws from the practical experience of casting 725 votes within top protocols like Aave, Lido, and Gnosis, offering an in-depth analysis of the shift in DAOs from 'community autonomy' to a 'hybrid operation' model.

The author points out that governance tokens alone are no longer sustainable. The future of DAOs will evolve towards economic alignment, legal entity formation, and AI-assisted decision-making. This is not just a review of governance but also a prophecy for the evolution of Web3 organizational structures in 2026.

Full Text Below:

2025 marked a turning point for decentralized governance.

After years of experimentation, major protocols began to confront fundamental questions about power distribution, accountability, and sustainability.

The answers weren't always pleasant, but they were necessary.

What We Achieved in 2025

2025 was also the first year of our operation as an active DAO Delegate.

  • Cast 725 votes across 18 protocols
  • Held voting power exceeding 8 million
  • Top 10 delegate in Aave and Lido
  • Top 3 delegate in Velodrome
  • Top 6 delegate in Gnosis

This perspective, grounded in practical governance work, allowed us to clearly observe the patterns reshaping DAOs in 2025 and define their trajectory entering 2026.

Changes in DAOs in 2025

Shift in Operational Model: From Pure Community Governance to Hybrid Control

The most significant change in 2025 was the shift from purely community governance towards hybrid models with clearer operational control.

  • @arbitrum introduced an Operating Company (OpCo), channeling all DAO operations through a unified structure.
  • @JupiterExchange completely paused governance for nearly six months to reassess its approach.
  • @Uniswap launched the DUNI framework, centralizing operational authority.
  • The @Gnosis DAO executed a hard fork amidst reduced community engagement. Scroll transitioned to a CEO-led structure.
  • @Scroll_ZKP paused its DAO, shifting focus to centralized governance.
  • Recently, the Celo Foundation merged with @cLabs into a unified core contributor organization.

The motivation for this shift was DAOs hitting scaling limits. Execution became the bottleneck. Community-wide votes were often too slow for operations, too noisy for technical nuances, and too vulnerable for security-sensitive actions.

Consequently, governance power is concentrating towards smaller, high-context groups, while the broader community shifts towards an oversight role, as reflected in the next section.

Fewer Voters, But More Concentrated Power

In 2025, the number of proposals and voter participation dropped significantly across major DAOs. However, the voting power behind each proposal remained strong.

  • Lido saw an increase in participation after adopting a dual governance framework.
  • Arbitrum and Uniswap still had the highest overall participation, but the number of voters decreased for both.

Caption: From DeFiLlama's State of DeFi 2025 Report

This does not signal the failure of governance. Instead, governance is becoming more bundled, more operationally abstract, and less frequent.

Governance influence migrated to a small number of highly active Delegates and large capital participants.

Value Accrual for Token Holders

"Token buyback", "buyback and burn", and "fee switch" became central themes in 2025.

For years, token utility revolved around voting rights and incentive distribution, but offered minimal economic value to token holders. 2025 changed this equation.

  • Lido adopted a buyback framework.
  • Uniswap DAO activated the long-awaited fee switch, pledging to burn nearly $600 million worth of UNI tokens.
  • Aave implemented a token buyback mechanism. Optimism launched a buyback program.
  • CoW Protocol increased solver profitability in a way that benefits token holders.

This trend addresses a key challenge in tokenomics. Buybacks and burns reduce circulating supply, making the token more scarce. If demand remains stable, the price strengthens. When token holders can truly benefit from the protocol's success, they are more incentivized to buy, hold, and participate in governance decisions long-term.

Who Really Owns the DAO?

Two major controversies forced DAOs to confront structural flaws.

  • Gnosis voted to terminate Karpatkey's treasury mandate due to fee disputes, underperformance, and a ~$700k loss related to liquidity issues.
  • Tensions flared between Aave DAO and Aave Labs when it was discovered that approximately $10 million annually in swap fees from the CoW Swap integration were flowing to Aave Labs instead of the DAO. A vote on brand ownership failed, and the controversy left a harder question: what does "DAO-owned" really mean when the core team controls development and distribution?

These conflicts forced protocols to patch holes in accountability and governance structures.

Legal Infrastructure is Adapting to DAOs

Despite DeFi's growth, most DAOs still lack clear legal structures, creating increasing liability and regulatory risks as protocols scale.

While jurisdictions like Wyoming have introduced DAO LLC frameworks, and Switzerland offers mature legal pathways, most DAOs remain in a legal gray area.

2026 Trend Predictions

Centralized DAO as a New Practice

Protocols will develop clear frameworks to delineate "community decisions" from "operational decisions," moving beyond the false binary of "fully decentralized" or "fully centralized."

  • Operational Execution: Will be handled by Labs teams, not foundations.
  • Community Oversight: DAO delegates and the community will be responsible for treasury strategy, long-term direction, and major structural decisions.

Governance Shifts to Risk Management Infrastructure

The DAO of the future will look less like a forum full of chatter. More teams will bifurcate decisions into concave decisions and convex decisions.

Concave problems require:

  • Pre-approved guardrails and automated execution.
  • Professional oversight (risk services, auditors, security teams).
  • Rapid response frameworks for emergencies and market shocks.
  • Fewer proposals, but each decision carries higher economic impact.

Convex problems (like product direction) require decisive leadership, where the DAO acts as a "brake" or "checkpoint," not the "steering wheel."

By 2026, this will be standard for lending, stablecoins, perps, and any protocol where financial risk can compound quickly.

The End of Governance Tokens? Value Capture Must Be Built

Continuing into 2026, tokens with only governance functions will struggle to maintain long-term engagement.

Delegates, whales, and strategic holders will not consistently protect the system without a visible upside. Protocols will increasingly adopt at least one value accrual path:

  • Token buyback frameworks.
  • Fee diversion or revenue sharing.
  • Staking tied to protocol cash flows.
  • Treasury strategies aimed at supporting the token's value.

When holders gain economically from the protocol's success, they are incentivized to stay attentive, participate, and protect the system.

Legal Structures Shift from Optional to Necessary

Regulatory pressure and real-world legal challenges will push DAOs towards formal entity formation, seeking a balance between decentralized governance and legal clarity.

Professional Delegation

As governance complexity increases, token holders will increasingly delegate to full-time professional delegates. While this concentrates voting power, it may improve decision quality. Meanwhile, weaker delegate institutions that cannot financially sustain themselves will fold, as governance work becomes more professional, political, and costly.

Privacy, AI & Futarchy

Public governance is a social game. When every vote is public, decisions are influenced by reputation, pressure, and alliances, not purely the protocol's best interest. Therefore, governance privacy will become more important in the future.

AI will address decision fatigue. It can assist in analyzing proposals and auto-voting on routine upgrades based on user-defined preferences, requiring human intervention only for disputes or significant impact.

Futarchy markets will also play a larger role in DAOs. They let market signals predict which option might create value. Gnosis is testing this model, using retail prediction markets to reflect sentiment on proposals.

Crypto is Maturing, and So Are DAOs

The shifts we see in DAO operations, economic alignment, accountability conflicts, and professionalization represent maturation, not the end of DAOs.

DAOs are evolving from ideological experiments into organizational structures that balance "decentralized oversight" with "proven operational efficiency." We believe DAO governance becomes more meaningful if teams can align with community interests: moving fast when action is needed, letting growth benefit token holders, and holding all participants—core teams and delegates alike—accountable.

As Vitalik said: We need more DAOs, but different and better ones.

If you believe in the value of DAOs, we can be your voice.

Effective delegation is more than just casting a vote; it means doing the actual work: reading proposals, staying active on forums, understanding risks, and voting against bad decisions even when it's not popular.

This is how we operate as delegates: through clear communication and educational content, helping protocols grow while staying aligned with community incentives.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the most significant shift in DAO operational models in 2025 according to the article?

AThe most significant shift was the transition from pure community governance to hybrid models with clearer operational control, where governance power was concentrated into smaller, high-context groups while the broader community shifted to a supervisory role.

QHow did the trend of 'value accumulation for token holders' manifest in major protocols in 2025?

AIt manifested through mechanisms like token buybacks, burns, and fee switches. For example, Lido adopted a buyback framework, Uniswap DAO activated its fee switch to burn nearly $600 million worth of UNI, and Aave and Optimism implemented token buyback programs.

QWhat two major controversies forced DAOs to confront their structural flaws in 2025?

AThe first was Gnosis voting to terminate Karpatkey's treasury mandate due to fee disputes, underperformance, and a $700,000 loss. The second was the conflict between Aave DAO and Aave Labs over approximately $10 million in annual swap fees from a CoW Swap integration that went to the Labs instead of the DAO.

QWhat is one key prediction for DAO governance in 2026 regarding decision-making?

AGovernance will shift towards risk management infrastructure, where decisions are split into 'concave decisions' (requiring pre-approved guardrails, professional oversight, and fast response frameworks) and 'convex decisions' (requiring decisive leadership with the DAO acting as a brake or checkpoint).

QWhy does the article suggest that 'governance privacy' will become more important in the future?

ABecause public governance is a social game where decisions can be influenced by reputation, pressure, and alliances rather than the protocol's best interest. Privacy in governance can help mitigate these influences and lead to more objective decision-making.

Leituras Relacionadas

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbitHá 19m

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbitHá 19m

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手Há 29m

AI Bubble Is Bursting

链捕手Há 29m

The AI Bubble is Bursting

The article argues that while a bubble in the AI sector is real and is currently showing signs of deflation, this is a typical, even necessary, phase for a transformative technology. It draws parallels to the dot-com bubble, where speculative excess was followed by the consolidation of internet infrastructure, enabling the digital age. Similarly, today's massive investments in AI infrastructure (data centers, power, cooling) far outpace current application-layer revenue, creating a valuation imbalance. However, the author contends this apparent bubble is not a sign of failure but of a transition. Key drivers include the plummeting cost of AI inference (over 99.7% in two years), which, per Jevons Paradox, has unleashed massive new demand as AI moves from simple tasks to complex agentic workflows across all industries. The market is now cleansing itself of shallow, speculative ventures, shifting value from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative AI applications. The conclusion is that the underlying productive force of AI is undeniable. The current financial correction will eliminate weak players, leaving behind robust infrastructure and efficient models. This will ultimately fuel an "AI+" era where intelligence becomes as ubiquitous and essential as the internet, embedding itself into every sector of the economy.

marsbitHá 30m

The AI Bubble is Bursting

marsbitHá 30m

The Next Bitcoin ETF Boom May Be Coming From Japan – Here’s Why

Despite recent outflows from US Spot Bitcoin ETFs, market attention is shifting to Japan as the potential next major market for such funds. This follows regulatory reforms in Japan that are moving cryptocurrency oversight to a financial instruments framework, potentially enabling Bitcoin ETF approval. Analysis suggests a Japanese spot Bitcoin ETF could attract significant inflows, ranging from ¥900 billion ($5.61 billion) in a conservative scenario to ¥3.1 trillion ($19.34 billion) in a bullish one. A base-case estimate of ¥1.4 trillion ($8.73 billion) would equate to demand for roughly 140,000 BTC. Beyond price impact, a Japanese ETF is seen as boosting Bitcoin's legitimacy and accessibility for investors and institutions. Bitcoin's price was around $61,038 at the time of writing, down 2.81% over 24 hours.

bitcoinistHá 51m

The Next Bitcoin ETF Boom May Be Coming From Japan – Here’s Why

bitcoinistHá 51m

Trump's 43 Minutes: The Strongman Narrative Unravels, the Media War Escalates

President Donald Trump's first public appearance in over a week, intended to project control amidst health concerns and political challenges, devolved into a 43-minute display of grievance and insecurity. He focused initially on a reflecting pool renovation, compared his rally size to Martin Luther King Jr.'s, and repeatedly attacked political opponents, judges, and U.S. cities. He signed executive orders, including one weakening job protections for senior federal employees, potentially replacing expertise with loyalty. His speech meandered to topics like communism before ending abruptly. The article highlights Trump's agitated, defensive state and the systemic pressures enabling his power. It details his personal attack on a CNN reporter, framing it as part of a broader assault on independent media to undermine public trust in unfavorable facts. This pressure is exemplified by the reported erosion of editorial independence at CBS. The author argues that as mainstream media faces political and commercial pressures, supporting independent journalists becomes crucial for preserving truthful information. The piece concludes by noting a symbolic House vote challenging Trump's Iran actions, suggesting growing Republican dissent, and frames financial support for independent media as a direct form of resistance.

marsbitHá 5h

Trump's 43 Minutes: The Strongman Narrative Unravels, the Media War Escalates

marsbitHá 5h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow