Israeli Military Catching Insiders on Polymarket

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2026-02-13Última atualização em 2026-02-13

Resumo

Israeli military and civilian prosecutors have charged a reservist soldier and a civilian with using classified military information to profit from bets on the prediction market platform Polymarket. The suspects allegedly leveraged insider knowledge on the timing of military operations to place winning bets, netting over $150,000. One user, identified as "Rundeep," reportedly achieved a 100% success rate in six Israel-related predictions, often betting when odds were below 50%. The case highlights concerns about insider trading on prediction markets, especially regarding sensitive areas like military actions, where such activities could compromise operational security and potentially influence real-world outcomes. Regulatory scrutiny may follow as these platforms face growing scrutiny over their role in public affairs betting.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Azuma (@azuma_eth)

Insider information providing an unfair competitive advantage has long been a controversial focus on prediction markets like Polymarket.

Previously, during the US military's operation to capture Venezuelan President Maduro, the odds for related events on Polymarket showed abnormal movements ahead of time (see "When War is Settled Before the News: How Prediction Markets 'Priced' the Maduro Capture Operation 6 Days Early"). If that suspected insider activity could still be explained away by fluctuations in the "Pizza Index," then this time, it can be said that there is definitely an insider on Polymarket, completely confirmed.

Israeli Military Catching "Insiders" Internally

On February 12, Israel's largest English-language newspaper, The Jerusalem Post, reported that the Tel Aviv District Court indicted an Israeli civilian and an Israel Defense Forces (IDF) reservist on Monday, accusing the two of using classified military information to place bets on Polymarket for profit. The court revealed on Thursday that Israeli authorities believe this behavior poses a serious operational security risk during wartime.

According to a statement approved for release by the prosecution, the suspects were arrested in a joint operation by the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet), the investigation unit under the Ministry of Defense's security agency, and the Israeli police. Investigators suspect that some reservists are using the classified information they access through their military duties to bet on the timing of military operations and profit from it.

Following the investigation, the prosecution stated that it has obtained evidence of misconduct by the civilian and the reservist and has therefore decided to indict the two on charges of "serious security crimes" as well as bribery and obstruction of justice. Meanwhile, the prosecution requested the court to extend the suspects' detention until the conclusion of the trial.

Apart from the information released above, more details of the case remain under a legal gag order, including the identities of the defendants, the specific betting content, and the alleged information flow situation.

Tracing the Insider's Activities

Although we cannot learn the true identity and account information of this insider, the X community had already discovered an account on Polymarket with clearly abnormal behavior. The Jerusalem Post also included a screenshot of this account's profits in its report.

As shown in the image above, this user named Rundeep joined Polymarket in June 2025 and subsequently achieved a 100% win rate in six prediction markets related to Israeli military actions, with five of those bets placed when the probability was below 50%, ultimately profiting over $150,000.

It is worth mentioning that Odaily Planet Daily found that Rundeep had only one loss on Polymarket aside from these "six wins in six attempts." However, this failed prediction was not directly related to Israel but was about "whether the US military would take action against Iran before Saturday (June 21, 2025)"... It seems allied intelligence isn't very reliable after all.

The Real-World Repercussions of Prediction Markets, Truly Frightening to Ponder

Due to Polymarket's open, permissionless nature, anyone can freely place bets on the platform, which objectively provides a more convenient channel for "monetizing information" for those with intelligence advantages — driven by profit, those holding unequal information advantages find it hard to resist the temptation, making it inevitable that insiders will step in to make money.

If such things happened in conventional areas like sports or entertainment, the impact might still be somewhat controllable. But when similar insider betting events occur in sensitive areas like politics or even war, the potential连带 (liándài -连带 means连带, chain, related) terrifying consequences are hard to imagine.

Taking this article as an example, if opposing forces guessed the direction of an Israeli operation in advance through insider betting on Polymarket before the action took place, could it have a huge impact on the subsequent evolution of events? Most people might not easily sympathize with Israel, but in fact, such events could happen to any entity.

In traditional gambling, public affairs such as political elections, legislative outcomes, and wars are usually subject to clear restrictions. Whether prediction markets will face similar regulatory restrictions in the future may involve a long-term regulatory博弈 (bóyì -博弈 means game theory,博弈, struggle,博弈).

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main subject of the article regarding the Israeli military and Polymarket?

AThe article reports that the Israeli military is prosecuting a civilian and an IDF reservist for allegedly using classified military information to place bets and profit on the prediction market platform Polymarket.

QWhich user on Polymarket was identified by the X community as having suspiciously successful betting activity related to Israeli military actions?

AA user named Rundeep was identified, who achieved a 100% win rate across six prediction markets related to Israeli military actions, with five of those bets placed when the probability was below 50%, earning over $150,000.

QWhat potential risk does the article suggest that insider betting on platforms like Polymarket could pose in the context of military operations?

AThe article suggests that insider betting could pose a severe operational security risk in wartime, as opposing forces might detect upcoming military actions by observing suspicious betting patterns on the prediction market, potentially altering the course of events.

QWhat was the outcome of the single bet that the user Rundeep lost on Polymarket, and what was it about?

ARundeep's only lost bet was on the prediction 'Will the US military take action against Iran by Saturday (June 21, 2025)?', which was not directly related to Israeli operations.

QHow does the article contrast the regulation of traditional betting markets with prediction markets like Polymarket concerning public affairs?

AThe article notes that traditional betting markets often have explicit restrictions on public affairs like political elections, legislation, and war, and it suggests that prediction markets may face a long-term regulatory battle over similar restrictions in the future.

Leituras Relacionadas

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

On Thursday (June 11, U.S. Eastern Time), Wall Street staged a textbook V-shaped reversal. The Dow Jones surged 929.97 points (+1.86%) to close above 50,000, while the Nasdaq and S&P 500 rose 2.54% and 1.75%, respectively. The rally occurred despite the hottest PPI report in years, with May data showing a 6.5% year-on-year surge, the highest since 2022. The market ignored the inflation data, focusing instead on reports that former President Trump called off a planned strike on Iran, hinting at a potential multi-party peace agreement draft. This sparked a sharp drop in oil prices, fueling hopes that inflation may have peaked. Sector rotations were stark: previously battered AI hardware and cyclical stocks led the gains, while defensive sectors that hit record highs the prior day were sold off. Chip stocks like Micron and Intel saw sharp rebounds. In contrast, software giant Oracle plunged nearly 10% despite beating earnings, with concerns over cloud revenue and cash flow. Adobe also fell after hours despite raising guidance, as its CFO announced departure. The rally's sustainability is questioned, driven largely by social media posts about unconfirmed geopolitical developments. Inflation risks remain, with pipeline pressures still high. Meanwhile, the market's risk appetite faces a major test with SpaceX's historic IPO. Priced at $135 per share, it aims to raise ~$75 billion with a $1.75 trillion valuation, becoming the largest U.S. IPO ever. It will join the Nasdaq 100 in 15 days, triggering massive index fund buying. However, critics cite extreme valuation (88x sales) and market liquidity concerns.

marsbitHá 21m

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

marsbitHá 21m

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Mega IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare? The capital market in 2026 is witnessing a highly anticipated wave of tech IPOs, centered on SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Collectively valued at over $3.5 trillion, their potential listing represents one of the largest such waves in recent years. This raises concerns about market liquidity, valuation bubbles, and potential capital outflows from other assets like crypto. SpaceX's valuation narrative has shifted from rocket launches to becoming a global infrastructure play via its Starlink satellite network, which now drives most revenue. Despite ongoing losses, investors focus on its long-term growth potential. OpenAI and Anthropic represent the core productivity engines of generative AI. Their public listings would offer the first direct investment opportunity in large foundation model companies, potentially triggering a repricing within the AI sector. Market fears of a massive "capital drain" from these IPOs are likely overstated. Historical precedents like Alibaba and Saudi Aramco show that mega-listings primarily cause capital reallocation, not destruction, within the vast equities market. Systemic risk is rarely triggered by IPOs alone. For stock markets, short-term volatility and sector repricing are expected, especially for AI concept stocks. Long-term, these listings could reinforce the tech sector's importance. For crypto, direct competition for speculative capital exists, particularly affecting AI-themed tokens. However, crypto's trajectory remains more tied to its own cycles, macro liquidity, and Bitcoin ETF flows rather than a single IPO event. The real risk lies not in the listings themselves but in the sky-high growth expectations embedded in these valuations. If future revenue, profitability, or commercialization progress disappoints, significant valuation resets could follow, impacting high-growth tech stocks. Ultimately, the market's direction hinges on macroeconomic conditions and whether these companies can deliver on their ambitious promises.

链捕手Há 37m

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

链捕手Há 37m

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Title: Trillion-Dollar Valuations at Stake: Super IPOs of SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic – Tech Boom or Crypto Nightmare? TL;DR: A wave of mega-tech IPOs is approaching, featuring SpaceX (targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation), OpenAI (~$852B), and Anthropic (~$965B), with a combined potential valuation exceeding $3.5 trillion. This tests the market's pricing of innovation and sparks debate on liquidity impact. * **SpaceX**'s valuation is now driven more by its Starlink global communications infrastructure than its core rocket business. * **OpenAI & Anthropic** offer the first major public investment opportunities in foundational AI models, potentially repricing the entire AI sector. * Concerns about a market-wide "liquidity drain" are likely overblown; history shows large IPOs mainly cause fund reallocation, not disappearance, and rarely trigger systemic risk. * Crypto markets, especially some AI-themed tokens, may face short-term fund competition, but their long-term trajectory depends more on macro liquidity, regulation, and Bitcoin cycles. * The real risk lies not in the IPOs themselves, but in whether these companies can justify their sky-high valuations with future revenue growth and profitability. Unmet expectations could lead to significant repricing pressure. Ultimately, these IPOs represent a massive market pricing of next-gen tech infrastructure, not a prelude to a market crash. The broader market direction will be determined by macro conditions, corporate earnings, and risk appetite.

marsbitHá 37m

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

marsbitHá 37m

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

On June 11, Anthropic apologized not for a model failure, but for a lack of transparency. Its new Claude Fable 5 model was found to be secretly rerouting requests from users engaged in advanced AI model development to a weaker version, Opus 4.8, without any notification. The company's response—promising future notifications for such "downgrades"—was met with user skepticism. The article argues the core issue isn't technical but commercial: Anthropic's "safety" measures are primarily a business strategy. A key feature, the "intelligent safety classifier," marketed as user protection, is described as a tool for "competitive defense" to protect Anthropic's market lead by limiting rivals' research capabilities. This covert mechanism was designed for low "false positives," precisely targeting AI researchers. Anthropic's model involves a calculated three-step process: publishing alarming security research to amplify public anxiety, offering its Fable 5 model with a "safety classifier" as a premium-priced solution, and cashing in through a planned high-value IPO. This contrasts with OpenAI's more direct "tool-and-traffic" approach. The apology, merely changing a secret downgrade to a visible one, is seen as a business "patch" rather than a principled shift. The incident risks damaging Anthropic's "safest AI" reputation among the developer community, which underpins its valuation and appeal to government and corporate clients. Ultimately, the article concludes that for Anthropic, safety is a business, and the apology is merely customer service for that business.

marsbitHá 1h

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片