Is crypto security at risk? Google warns of 20x faster quantum threat

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-03-31Última atualização em 2026-03-31

Resumo

Google's research indicates quantum computing advances could threaten cryptocurrency security by breaking widely used encryption standards. The report warns cryptographically relevant quantum computers (CRQCs) with approximately 1,200-1,450 logical qubits could potentially break 256-bit elliptic curve encryption in minutes. This capability might compromise Bitcoin private keys in under nine minutes and expose up to 1,000 Ethereum wallets in roughly nine days, with an estimated 6.7 million Bitcoin addresses currently vulnerable. Google emphasizes a 20-fold reduction in required physical qubits, accelerating the quantum threat timeline. In response, Google advocates transitioning to post-quantum cryptographic standards by 2029, though implementation requires coordinated upgrades and policy changes. Failure to adapt may lead to exploitation risks and market instability. Asian countries show the highest search interest in post-quantum cryptography solutions.

Security concerns around cryptocurrencies are intensifying after new research from Google warned that advances in quantum computing could undermine the cryptographic foundations securing billions in digital assets.

The report highlights how emerging quantum systems may soon be capable of breaking widely used encryption standards, raising fresh questions about the long-term resilience of blockchain networks such as Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Quantum threat puts crypto security at risk

The findings come at a critical time for the cryptocurrency industry, as institutional investors and governments increasingly embrace digital assets. Furthermore, a successful breach of cryptographic systems would leave wallets vulnerable to theft and undermine trust in blockchain infrastructure. As a result, this trust, which is based on the assumption of computational security, may be severely undermined.

Google’s research outlines a scenario where cryptographically relevant quantum computers (CRQCs) could decrypt both public and private keys. This would allow attackers to gain control of wallets and execute fraudulent transactions.

The report focuses on blockchains that use the industry standard 256-bit elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem (ECDLP-256). Furthermore, it estimates that a sufficiently advanced quantum system, with approximately 1,200 to 1,450 logical qubits and fewer than 500,000 physical qubits, could break this encryption in minutes. As a result, once such quantum capabilities are developed, the security of these blockchains could be jeopardized.

For context, such a system could compromise Bitcoin private keys in under nine minutes, faster than the network’s average block time. In Ethereum’s case, the same capability could enable attackers to access up to 1,000 wallets in roughly nine days. Google estimates that approximately 6.7 million Bitcoin addresses are currently among the most vulnerable.

“This represents an approximately 20-fold reduction in the number of physical qubits required to solve ECDLP-256,” the researchers noted, underscoring how quickly the technical barrier is shrinking.

Google urges a post-quantum shift by 2029

In response to these risks, Google has set a 2029 target for transitioning toward post-quantum cryptographic standards. The shift would involve replacing existing encryption schemes with quantum-resistant alternatives across blockchain networks.

However, the transition is expected to be complex and time-intensive. It will require coordinated upgrades, changes to wallet infrastructure, and new policies addressing dormant or vulnerable addresses. This is particularly applicable to those addresses linked to lost private keys.

“While viable solutions like post-quantum cryptography exist, they will take time to implement, increasing the urgency to act.”

Additional mitigation measures include discouraging address reuse and identifying exposed wallets before quantum systems reach critical capability.

Projects that fail to adapt could face both technical and market consequences. Beyond the risk of exploitation, delayed upgrades may trigger declining valuations and increased fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) among investors.

Data from Google Trends, at press time, indicates that Asian countries show the highest concern for “post-quantum cryptography,” with South Korea, China, and Singapore leading search interest.


Final Summary

  • Google warns that advances in quantum computing could impact cryptocurrencies.
  • The report suggests that digital assets may become vulnerable to hacks within minutes.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main security concern for cryptocurrencies according to Google's research?

AGoogle warns that advances in quantum computing could undermine the cryptographic foundations securing digital assets, potentially breaking widely used encryption standards.

QHow quickly could a quantum system compromise Bitcoin private keys based on the report?

AA sufficiently advanced quantum system could compromise Bitcoin private keys in under nine minutes, faster than the network's average block time.

QWhat is Google's target year for transitioning to post-quantum cryptographic standards?

AGoogle has set a 2029 target for transitioning toward post-quantum cryptographic standards to address quantum computing threats.

QWhich countries show the highest concern for 'post-quantum cryptography' according to Google Trends?

AAsian countries, particularly South Korea, China, and Singapore, show the highest search interest for 'post-quantum cryptography'.

QWhat are some mitigation measures mentioned to counter quantum threats?

AMitigation measures include discouraging address reuse, identifying exposed wallets, and transitioning to quantum-resistant encryption schemes.

Leituras Relacionadas

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbitHá 32m

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbitHá 32m

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbitHá 1h

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片