Iran Internet Shutdown Raises Question: Can Crypto Still Function?

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-01-09Última atualização em 2026-01-09

Resumo

The Iranian government has implemented a nationwide internet shutdown in response to widespread protests, raising questions about cryptocurrency's functionality under extreme connectivity restrictions. With approximately 7 million Iranians using crypto and $3.7 billion in tracked crypto flows linked to Iran in early 2025, the shutdown severely disrupts transactions. Potential solutions include satellite internet services like Starlink, which previously restored access during blackouts, and Blockstream's satellite network for broadcasting blockchain data. Decentralized tools like Bitchat enable Bluetooth-based messaging to relay Bitcoin transactions between nearby devices, though eventual internet connectivity is still required for on-chain confirmation. Other developing tools like Darkwire and Machankura use radio networks or basic mobile telecoms for offline Bitcoin transactions. While these technologies provide partial workarounds and financial lifelines, they cannot fully replace internet access, as a connected node is ultimately needed to finalize blockchain transactions. The situation underscores crypto's censorship-resistant value during turmoil, though it remains a complete substitute for traditional internet-dependent systems.

The Iranian government blocked all access to the internet across the country yesterday in response to the spread of protests throughout Iran, reigniting discussion over whether cryptocurrency is still possible amidst extreme levels of connectivity restriction. The move comes as a result of Iran’s deteriorating economy and its Iranian rial hitting all-time lows in value relative to the United States dollar.

Roughly seven million Iranians out of a population of 92 million use cryptocurrency, according to Statista. Blockchain analytics firm TRM Labs tracked approximately $3.7 billion in crypto flows linked to Iran between January and July 2025. That activity now faces severe friction as citizens lose access to traditional internet services.

Some global crypto advocates have already weighed in. Hunter Horsley, the CEO of Bitwise, proposed that Bitcoin purchasing can help Iranians conserve their wealth even in times of currency flux. With the absence of internet access, transacting cryptocurrencies becomes even more complicated.

How crypto works without the internet

Transacting using cryptocurrencies requires the internet to broadcast the information to the blockchain network. Despite that, there exist other technologies that can help fill the gap during shutdowns.

It might include satellite internet services provided by Starlink, a company headed by Elon Musk, which provides two-way, high-speed internet through satellite dishes that connect directly to satellite relays orbiting Earth. Starlink is known to have reinstated internet services for its customers during a previous blackout in June 2025, and now unpublished sources indicate Musk might personally have agreed to provide a similar service again.

Another solution comes from Blockstream, which operates a satellite network that broadcasts Bitcoin blockchain data worldwide. Users can receive transaction and block data without the internet. While this method supports one-way communication, users still need some form of outbound connectivity to submit transactions.

Mesh networks and peer-to-peer tools

Decentralized communication tools also offer workarounds. Bitchat, created by Jack Dorsey, uses Bluetooth mesh networking to pass messages directly between nearby phones. Clever users can encode Bitcoin transaction data into messages and relay them across devices.

Eventually, at least one device must connect to the internet to confirm transactions on-chain. Even so, Bitchat has seen rapid adoption. Analytics platform Chromestats shows over 1.4 million downloads since launch, including nearly 20,000 downloads in the last day and more than 460,000 in the past week.

Tools are still under development

There are a few offline crypto tools that continue to be actively developed. Darkwire was launched by the pseudonym “Cyb3r17” in May 2025 and relies on a range of radios to create a mesh of communication for the purpose of Bitcoin transaction information to be transmitted without the need for internet access. It is currently undergoing a massive rewrite on GitHub.

There is also another system that dates back to 2022. Machankura, developed by South African developer Kgothatso Ngako, enables users to transmit and receive payments in Bitcoin using simple mobile telecommunication networks as opposed to the internet. This was covered in a report published in Forbes in March 2023.

A partial solution, not a full escape

Even though these technologies make internet centralization less necessary, not one makes internet centralization irrelevant. Eventually, in any transaction, there must be a connected node for the transaction to finalize on the blockchain. Nevertheless, the Iranian blackout illustrates just how important the censorship-resistance aspect of crypto remains during times of turmoil.

As the protests are still ongoing and the availability of internet connectivity is still not certain, the use of crypto technologies may not be able to replace the internet at all, but at least provide a financial lifeline in situations when the traditional system does not work.

Highlighted Crypto News:

CoinDCX CEO Sumit Gupta Outlines Reset Chance for Indian Crypto Market

TagsBitcoinBlockchainCrypto AdoptionIranIran Government

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the Iranian government's response to the spread of protests, and how did it impact cryptocurrency activity?

AThe Iranian government blocked all internet access across the country. This shutdown created severe friction for cryptocurrency activity, as transacting cryptocurrencies requires internet access to broadcast information to the blockchain network.

QAccording to the article, what are two technologies that can help facilitate cryptocurrency transactions during an internet shutdown?

ATwo technologies mentioned are satellite internet services like Starlink, which provides two-way, high-speed internet via satellites, and Blockstream's satellite network, which broadcasts Bitcoin blockchain data worldwide for one-way reception without internet.

QWhat is Bitchat and how does it function in relation to Bitcoin transactions?

ABitchat is a decentralized communication tool created by Jack Dorsey that uses Bluetooth mesh networking to pass messages directly between nearby phones. Users can encode Bitcoin transaction data into these messages and relay them across devices, though a device eventually needs internet to confirm the transactions on-chain.

QWhat limitation do all the mentioned offline crypto tools share, despite their functionality?

AAll the tools still require at least one device to eventually connect to the internet to finalize and confirm transactions on the blockchain. They are partial solutions that reduce but do not eliminate the need for internet connectivity.

QWhat does the article conclude about the role of cryptocurrency technologies during the Iranian internet blackout?

AThe article concludes that while these technologies cannot fully replace the internet, they can provide a crucial financial lifeline and demonstrate the importance of crypto's censorship-resistance during times of turmoil when the traditional financial system is disrupted.

Leituras Relacionadas

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) kept its benchmark interest rate at 1% on July 31, as widely expected, following a June hike to a 31-year high. The decision passed with an 8-1 vote, with board member Hajime Takata again dissenting in favor of a hike to 1.25%. Despite holding rates steady, the BOJ signaled a hawkish tilt, warning that underlying inflation is likely to accelerate and exceed 2% from the latter half of the fiscal year. While it slightly lowered its core inflation forecast for FY2026, officials expressed stronger confidence that an overshoot will occur later, driven by yen weakness, corporate pricing behavior, and lingering energy shock effects. Markets were focused on the BOJ's forward guidance. Analysts noted the central bank appeared to balance short-term caution with a long-term warning of tighter policy. Governor Kazuo Ueda faces the challenge of reconciling a government reluctant to tighten further with bond markets already pricing in additional hikes, with the timing of the next move debated. Adding complexity, the BOJ reportedly intervened in currency markets hours before the rate decision, buying yen to support the currency which had fallen to 40-year lows against the dollar. Yen weakness stems from the wide U.S.-Japan interest rate gap, high fuel prices, and market skepticism about the pace of BOJ policy normalization. The yield on Japan's 10-year government bonds fell to 2.8%, indicating investor expectations for future monetary tightening.

cryptonews.ruHá 4m

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

cryptonews.ruHá 4m

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

This article argues that the SK H力士 2x Leveraged ETF (7709) is fundamentally a negative expected value (EV) product, rather than simply a "double SK H力士" investment. Its core issue stems from its daily rebalancing mechanism to maintain a 2x leverage target. After a price move, the fund must buy more after a rise or sell after a fall to readjust its leverage, creating a systematic pattern of buying high and selling low. This introduces a "delay loss": it always reacts to past price changes, missing potential gains from adjusting earlier during an uptrend and suffering greater losses from adjusting later during a downtrend. While more frequent intraday rebalancing would improve returns in strong, smooth trending markets by reinvesting profits or cutting losses sooner, it also dramatically increases volatility drag (frictional losses) during choppy, oscillating markets due to more frequent high-buy/low-sell trades. The author draws a parallel to an option seller who delta hedges (short gamma), which involves similar "buy high, sell low" dynamic hedging. However, unlike an option seller who receives upfront premium (IV and theta) as compensation for this risk, the leveraged ETF investor receives no such compensation. Instead, they bear all the path-dependent volatility decay, plus additional costs like swap/derivatives financing, management fees, and trading slippage. Thus, the product's return profile can be framed as: 2x directional return minus realized variance drag minus financing costs minus derivatives costs minus management fees minus transaction costs. For the investor to profit, SK H力士's price must not only rise significantly but do so in a strong, sustained, and smooth trend to overcome these inherent structural costs. High volatility and frequent price reversals are particularly damaging. The article also notes that while the ETF has no explicit liquidation line like perpetual futures, avoiding a sudden "blow-up," its net asset value can still decay towards zero over time through this combination of volatility drag and fees. For experienced traders, directly managing leverage via perpetual contracts may offer more control and potentially lower costs than this packaged, mechanistic product.

marsbitHá 11m

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

marsbitHá 11m

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

The article discusses the growing debate over whether TradeXYZ, which dominates Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market with over 90% of its volume, might break away to build its own independent trading platform. This possibility is fueled by TradeXYZ's immense market influence and the common industry trend of successful projects seeking more control and profit capture. Key arguments for a potential split include TradeXYZ's overwhelming contribution to Hyperliquid's metrics and the financial incentive to retain all transaction fees, as it currently splits them 50/50 with Hyperliquid. The piece draws parallels to other cases, like Anthropic's "Claude Code" competing with its former partner Cursor, suggesting "betrayal" can occur when business leverage shifts. However, strong counterarguments suggest a split is unlikely or would be detrimental. TradeXYZ relies on Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure and its platform as a primary user acquisition channel. Building a comparable system would be challenging. Furthermore, the founders of both projects share a history of trust and mutual admiration. The analysis concludes that a separation would likely be a lose-lose scenario: Hyperliquid would lose a major growth narrative and trading volume, while TradeXYZ would face technical hurdles, user migration issues, and reputational damage, potentially allowing competitors to seize market share. The most rational path is seen as continued collaboration, with TradeXYZ potentially negotiating better terms while leveraging Hyperliquid's established strengths.

marsbitHá 21m

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

marsbitHá 21m

Trading

Spot
活动图片