iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbitPublicado em 2026-04-21Última atualização em 2026-04-21

Resumo

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness...

By New Product Insight Finance, Author|Wu Wenwu

After iQiyi launched its AI artist library, multiple artists quickly denied signing any AI-related authorizations, sparking heated discussions. Behind this, iQiyi, which is frantically pushing its new AI narrative, is clearly too impatient.

01 “iQiyi Is Crazy” Trends on Hot Search

At the 2026 iQiyi World Conference held on April 20, iQiyi officially announced the launch of its "AI Artist Library," with over a hundred artists already onboard. Names like Zhang Ruoyun, Yu Hewei, Wang Churan, and Li Yitong appeared on the big screen list.

iQiyi founder and CEO Gong Yu, in his speech, made remarks such as "AI can help actors go from acting in 4 dramas a year to 14, giving everyone more time to rest" and "in the future, live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage," which further fueled the discussion.

Several topics related to iQiyi quickly trended on hot searches, with the topic "iQiyi Is Crazy" even reaching the number one spot on Weibo's hot search list that day, drawing widespread attention and discussion.

However, iQiyi was quickly contradicted. After the list was released, multiple artists including Zhang Ruoyun, Yu Hewei, and Wang Churan urgently issued statements clearly denying having signed any AI-related authorizations. For example, Zhang Ruoyun's studio was the first to state that they had not signed any AI-related authorization and that their legal team was handling the matter urgently.

iQiyi officials had to quickly respond, stating that joining the iQiyi Nado Pro Artist Library indicates the artist's willingness to engage in AI film and television projects, but participation in any specific project or role requires separate negotiation and authorization.

iQiyi wants to build an AI artist library to provide a standardized platform for AIGC creators, making it easier for them to select artists and efficiently communicate collaboration details through iQiyi with the artists' representatives.

From the artists' perspective, being aware of such a matter but not having signed an authorization agreement is something that artists, who highly value their portrait rights, IP value, and commercial value, clearly cannot accept. It even touches their bottom line.

From the netizens' point of view, iQiyi's move is somewhat excessive. Some netizens commented that this seems like releasing the list first to pressure the artists into compliance. Others said the platform is treating actors as "consumables" without even a heads-up.

The incident also sparked discussions about the legal issues surrounding AI artists. Some lawyers reminded that an actor authorizing their image does not mean AI entities can freely use their likeness; portrait license agreements should clearly define the scope, duration, and manner of use.

From the perspectives of iQiyi, artists, users, and netizens, the considerations, usage points, value points, and impacts of AI are entirely different.

02 iQiyi Is Too Impatient

In recent years, talking about the long-form video platform iQiyi always evokes different images and opinions from the outside world.

For instance, whenever a hit TV series or web drama airs on iQiyi, it sparks discussions about iQiyi's ability to create hit shows and the commercial returns it brings.

However, more of the discussion we hear about iQiyi concerns how short video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou have stolen users away, diverting user attention, especially with the popularity of micro-dramas, leading more people to abandon long-form video platforms.

According to the "China Network Audiovisual Development Research Report (2026)" released at the Network Audiovisual Conference in April 2026, the average daily time spent on micro-dramas was 129 minutes (December 2025).

iQiyi also faces competition from platforms like Bilibili and Xiaohongshu. "New Product Insight Finance" noted that many mid-to-long form videos on Bilibili now are not inferior to iQiyi in terms of category, quantity, and quality. Xiaohongshu is not just a content discovery platform; its short video content has also risen.

iQiyi's anxiety and pressure have long been directly reflected in its financial reports. According to iQiyi's financial report, for the full year 2025 ended December 31, 2025, the company's total revenue was 27.29 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 6.62%, marking the second consecutive year of negative growth after a 7.97% drop in 2024.

Notably, regarding profit calculations, the non-GAAP operating profit was 640 million yuan, a significant drop of about 73% compared to 2.36 billion yuan in 2024; calculated according to US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), iQiyi turned from profit to loss, with a net loss of 206 million yuan. In 2023, the company's net profit had peaked at 1.93 billion yuan.

In the fourth quarter, iQiyi's total revenue was 6.79 billion yuan, achieving both year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth. The non-GAAP operating profit was 140 million yuan.

Facing intense competitive pressure and realistic operational pressure, iQiyi urgently needs to tell a new story. As all internet companies are successively telling their AI stories, iQiyi, not wanting to be left behind, has begun to constantly push its new AI narrative.

In the second half of 2025, iQiyi targeted areas like AI micro-dramas, AI comic dramas, and AI children's animation. During the earnings conference call in February 2026, it introduced a C-end story: AI character interaction, the Tao Dou World where users and virtual stars/IP characters chat in real-time and co-create storylines, and personalized AI editing that automatically clips highlights, secondary creations, and mashup videos for users.

Then came iQiyi's latest release: the official launch of Nado Pro + 100 artists' AI digital avatars, which unexpectedly caused such a controversy.

iQiyi founder and CEO Gong Yu also stated that the goal is to have a commercial AI blockbuster by this summer, or at the latest, this autumn.

In the view of "New Product Insight Finance," AI has become iQiyi's current lowest-cost and fastest-acting storyline, hoping to tell a new story and find a new growth point to boost market confidence.

At the end of March this year, iQiyi announced it had submitted an application to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in a confidential manner to advance its listing in Hong Kong. iQiyi now needs to tell a new story to the capital market even more.

Clearly, for various reasons, iQiyi is frantically pushing its new AI narrative, but it is obviously being too impatient.

Senior media personality Hu Xijin commented on the iQiyi AI artist library incident, saying, "iQiyi高调宣布117位演员签约AI影视艺人库,并表示未来真人实拍可能将成非遗,我个人感觉很吃惊。" (iQiyi高调 announced that 117 actors signed with the AI film and television artist library and stated that live-action filming might become intangible cultural heritage in the future. Personally, I was very surprised.). Hu also clearly stated, "爱奇艺过于急功近利了。" (iQiyi is too impatient for quick success and instant benefit.).

03 iQiyi's AI Considerations

This release of the AI artist library by iQiyi was originally intended to be a major move, but it unexpectedly led to denial statements from multiple artists and sparked extensive discussions about iQiyi and the broader context of AI in film and television.

Every technological update and iteration profoundly impacts the video industry and long-form video platforms like iQiyi. For example, the last shift was from the PC era to the internet, followed by the popularity of short videos impacting long-form videos, forcing iQiyi to respond.

The latest wave of AI technology has an even greater impact on film, television, video, and video platforms. iQiyi can only embrace AI and continuously tell its new AI stories.

The application of AI in film and television is an inevitable trend, but its use in the industry has distinctly contrasting A and B sides; it is a double-edged sword.

On one hand, AI technology can significantly reduce costs, optimize creative processes, and improve production efficiency. In film shooting and post-production editing, AI is a magical tool.

On the other hand, although AI technology has advanced noticeably and reached a stage where the "fake" can seem real, AI creation has become data-driven, modular, and formulaic.

For example, the AI short dramas flooding short video platforms are full of plots like domineering CEOs and reincarnation reversals. The stories and tropes are highly similar, even with the same script generating different AI versions, making them very homogeneous and assembly-line like.

Therefore, iQiyi's first consideration is whether it should launch more AI tools, become an AI platform, or become the protagonist of AI? Yangtze Evening News commented on this, saying, "iQiyi, you were meant to embrace AI, not become AI."

At least for now, AI remains an辅助技术手段和工具 (auxiliary technological means and tool). AI stories will become more diverse in the future and will continue to progress.

The second consideration for iQiyi is: cold AI versus the sense of real people, who do audiences prefer?

For a long-form video platform like iQiyi, its core competitiveness still lies in high-quality IP, strong production capabilities, and the ability to produce hit web dramas and TV series. The key to these works is the script, the actors' performances, and the viewing experience they provide to the audience.

If there is too much AI in the works, even the main characters become AI, then the cold sense of AI will only intensify.

Viewers, especially iQiyi members, will always care more about the sense of real people in an excellent work, as the emotional expression and changes of a character can never be replaced by AI.

iQiyi should adopt different strategies. For instance, it can heavily promote AI in works like AI micro-dramas, AI comic dramas, and AI movies, but producing a high-quality work with AI is not necessarily low cost.

iQiyi's third consideration is to balance the interests of multiple parties: the platform, artists, and audiences.

As mentioned earlier, from the perspective of different participants in iQiyi's release of the AI artist library, there are indeed different starting points and considerations. Particularly, how to gain artist acceptance is a key point. Of course, the most important point is still the audience's acceptance of AI works.

In 2025, after the AI-generated "actor" Tilly Norwood emerged, the US Screen Actors Guild, followed by European and Canadian actors' unions,相继表态“坚决反对用合成角色替代真人演员” (successively stated they "resolutely oppose using synthetic characters to replace real actors"). Some international consensus suggests that AI can be a tool, but not the protagonist, especially not at the cost of sacrificing the livelihoods of real people and artistic dignity.

If we zoom out to the entire long-form video industry, the considerations brought by AI mentioned above are not just iQiyi's alone; they are shared considerations for everyone.

References:

[1] "iQiyi Is Crazy"? CEO Gong Yu Responds, Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei Issue Emergency Statements, Jiemian News

[2] "iQiyi Is Crazy", You Were Meant to Embrace AI, Not Become AI, Yangtze Evening News

[3] iQiyi Financial Report, iQiyi

(This article does not constitute any investment advice)

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the main controversy surrounding iQiyi's announcement of its 'AI Actor Library'?

AThe main controversy was that multiple actors, including Zhang Ruoyun, Yu Hewei, and Wang Churan, quickly issued statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements, despite being listed as participants. This led to accusations that iQiyi was trying to pressure actors into compliance and sparked a debate about the legal and ethical use of AI in the entertainment industry.

QAccording to the article, what are the two-sided (AB) impacts of AI on the film and television industry?

AThe two-sided impacts are: 1) Positive: AI technology can significantly reduce costs, optimize the creative process, and improve production efficiency in filming and post-production editing. 2) Negative: AI creation can become data-driven, modular, and formulaic, leading to highly similar, homogeneous, and assembly-line-like content, as seen in the proliferation of similar AI short dramas on platforms.

QWhat financial pressure does iQiyi face, as mentioned in the article, that is driving its push for AI stories?

AiQiyi faced financial pressure with its total revenue for 2025 falling 6.62% year-over-year to 27.29 billion yuan, marking the second consecutive year of negative growth. Its non-GAAP operating profit plummeted by about 73% to 640 million yuan, and it reported a net loss of 206 million yuan under GAAP standards, a significant drop from a net profit of 1.93 billion yuan in 2023.

QWhat three 'thinking questions' or challenges does the article pose for iQiyi regarding its AI strategy?

AThe three thinking questions are: 1) Should iQiyi focus on developing more AI tools and being an AI platform, or should it try to become the main protagonist of AI itself? 2) How does iQiyi balance the appeal of cold AI against the 'living human feeling' that audiences prefer? 3) How can iQiyi balance the interests of the platform, actors, and viewers regarding the use of AI?

QHow did iQiyi's CEO, Gong Yu, contribute to the controversy with his statements at the iQiyi World Conference?

AGong Yu sparked further discussion by stating that 'AI can help actors go from acting in 4 dramas a year to 14 dramas, giving them more time to rest' and that 'live-action filming may become a world cultural heritage in the future.' These comments, alongside the AI Actor Library announcement, contributed to topics like 'iQiyi is crazy' trending number one on Weibo and intensified the public debate.

Leituras Relacionadas

Vitalik: Building Index-Tracking Assets Based on Options Rather Than Debt

Vitalik Buterin proposes constructing index-tracking assets using synthetic options rather than debt-based mechanisms. The core problem is enabling exposure to a price index (T, e.g., USD/ETH) in a trust-minimized environment where only ETH is a trustless asset, relying solely on a decentralized oracle. Traditional approaches, like algorithmic stablecoins, use debt positions and require real-time, binding oracles for liquidations, which are difficult to secure. This article suggests a paradigm shift: eliminating liquidation and using options as the fundamental building block, requiring only a "slow" oracle. The design defines two synthetic assets, P and N, with parameters for the index T, a strike price S, and an expiry M. At any time, 1 ETH can be split to create a (P, N) pair or merged back. At expiry M, the oracle determines T's value x. P receives min(1, S/x) ETH, and N receives max(0, 1 - S/x) ETH. This structure inherently avoids insolvency risk (P+N=1) and can share an oracle with prediction markets. To gain stable exposure to T (e.g., USD), a user would hold deeply "in-the-money" P options (with S significantly below the current price) and periodically "roll" them to lower strikes as the price approaches the current strike, rebalancing their portfolio. This transfers the decision of *when* to act from a protocol-enforced liquidation (requiring a real-time oracle) to the user or an automated wrapper. Users can manage MEV risk and oracle dependency by choosing their rebalancing timing and data sources. A key trade-off is accepting some quadratic drift (deviation from perfect peg), estimated at 1-4% annualized volatility. Buterin argues this cost is reasonable compared to fiat currency volatility or equilibrium shifts in other stablecoins. The success of this model depends heavily on designing low-slippage market mechanisms for the rebalancing process, leveraging users' low time preference to execute trades patiently.

marsbitHá 42m

Vitalik: Building Index-Tracking Assets Based on Options Rather Than Debt

marsbitHá 42m

"Water Scarcity": The Hidden Fatal Flaw of AI Infrastructure

“Water Scarcity: The Hidden Vulnerability of AI Infrastructure” In June 2026, SpaceX revised its IPO prospectus to highlight a core resource constraint alongside power and processors: water. This move signals a pivotal shift where water scarcity has transformed from an operational cost to a major, uncontrollable investment risk, directly threatening AI data center expansion. The scale of the problem is immense. U.S. data centers consumed an estimated 17 billion gallons of water for direct cooling in 2023, with indirect water use for power generation exceeding 211 billion gallons. Giants like Google alone use billions of gallons annually, with single sites consuming volumes equivalent to a medium-sized city. This water is largely “consumptive,” evaporated into the atmosphere and lost. This massive demand is colliding with scarcity. Tech companies are building “water tigers” in arid regions, sparking community protests in places like Mexico and Arizona, where data centers can legally use millions of gallons daily—enough for tens of thousands of residents. These conflicts are not about illegality, but about a mismatch between historic water allocation frameworks and new, colossal demand. The consequences are real. Community opposition, largely centered on water, has reportedly stalled or canceled $64 billion in U.S. data center projects over two years. Simultaneously, investors are pressuring companies for greater water footprint transparency, viewing it as a financial risk, not just an ESG metric. Technological solutions like air or liquid cooling involve trade-offs between water and electricity use, with final choices dictated by local constraints. The irony is stark: while industry leaders envision AI as a utility “like water,” its physical infrastructure is straining real-world water supplies. The race for AI supremacy may ultimately be governed not by the fastest chip, but by the slowest water meter.

marsbitHá 1h

"Water Scarcity": The Hidden Fatal Flaw of AI Infrastructure

marsbitHá 1h

Global Card Issuance Enters a Compliance-Driven Era: WasabiCard is Building the Next-Generation Payment Infrastructure

Global card issuance is entering a compliance-driven era, with WasabiCard building next-generation payment infrastructure. The platform asserts that as stablecoins increasingly enter cross-border payments, corporate settlements, and global commerce, the industry is shifting focus from "availability" and "growth-driven" models to long-term, compliant operation under global frameworks. Competition will center on sustainable compliance and global infrastructure capabilities. Stablecoins are evolving from on-chain assets into key payment tools in global business, with card issuance acting as critical infrastructure connecting digital assets to traditional payment networks like Visa and Mastercard. This expansion has revealed structural issues, including cross-regional issuance, BIN resource management, and insufficient AML and risk controls. In response, the industry is moving away from reliance on "grey efficiency" towards prioritizing compliance, risk management, and long-term operational stability. WasabiCard outlines its strategy: collaborating with licensed principals and local partners for localized operations, building robust KYC/AML systems, strictly separating commercial and consumer BIN usage, and enhancing global issuance, payment, and cross-border fund flow infrastructure. The goal is to build stable, scalable payment infrastructure amid evolving global regulations, shifting industry competition from scale to infrastructure capability. As stablecoins integrate further with global commerce, payment infrastructure will become a fundamental, embedded component of internet business. WasabiCard will continue to develop capabilities in global card issuance, stablecoin payments, cross-border fund flows, and API-driven financial workflows.

marsbitHá 1h

Global Card Issuance Enters a Compliance-Driven Era: WasabiCard is Building the Next-Generation Payment Infrastructure

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar AR

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Arweave (AR) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Arweave (AR) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Arweave (AR)Depois de comprar o teu Arweave (AR), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Arweave (AR)Transaciona facilmente Arweave (AR) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

677 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar AR

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de AR (AR) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片