Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

marsbitPublicado em 2026-06-04Última atualização em 2026-06-04

Resumo

Invesco Great Wall Fund has released its "2026 China Corporate Globalization Report," titled "The 'Great Navigation Era' of Chinese Enterprises." The report analyzes the new trends and investment opportunities as Chinese companies expand globally, moving from simple product exports to comprehensive overseas operations involving services, branding, and local production. Driven by factors like trade friction, the pursuit of higher profit margins abroad, and policy support, globalization is becoming essential for Chinese companies. The report outlines an evolution: from early product export ("Globalization 1.0") to the current "Globalization 2.0," characterized by overseas capacity, capital goods investment, consumer brand expansion, and service exports. Chinese firms' competitive advantages are highlighted, including a vast engineer talent pool, low-cost and robust infrastructure, and complete industrial clusters. Specific sectors with significant出海 potential are identified: * **Capital Goods** (e.g., engineering machinery, power equipment): Benefiting from global demand, especially in Belt & Road markets and the AI-driven power grid upgrade cycle. * **Consumer Brands**: Transitioning from cost to brand advantage, leveraging供应链 efficiency. * **Technology & Innovation**: Including AI applications, optical modules within global tech supply chains, and new energy vehicles focusing on local production. * **Pharmaceuticals**: Chinese biotech firms are becoming preferred pa...

Author: Lanjing News

Throughout history, every time humanity stepped out from familiar lands and sailed into the open ocean, it has been an ode to courage. And the rewards of courage have never disappointed the pioneers.

As early as before the 15th century, Venetian merchants had extended their trade tentacles to every port in the Mediterranean. The arrival of the Age of Exploration saw countless adventurers, filled with ambition for conquest and a thirst for wealth, set sail for uncharted waters, expanding the web of trade to the New World. An era of great geographical discoveries thus redrew the world map.

Today, venturing overseas to tap new markets has become a new growth engine for leading Chinese companies. Moving from product export towards high-value creation, Chinese enterprises are continuously expanding their frontiers, ushering in their own "Age of Great Navigation."

Against this backdrop, Invesco Great Wall Fund officially released the report titled "The 'Age of Great Navigation' for Chinese Enterprises — Outlook on New Trends and Investment Opportunities for Chinese Enterprises Going Global in 2026" (hereinafter referred to as the "Report"). The Report provides an in-depth interpretation of the new trends in Chinese enterprises' global expansion under the new normal of global industrial chain restructuring, offering a panoramic view of investment opportunities in the new era of going global, ranging from consumer goods to capital goods.

Several fund managers from Invesco Great Wall — Ke Haidong, Zhou Hanying, Qiao Haiying, Guo Lin, Xu Yida, and Wang Kaizhan — systematically analyzed the investment opportunities hidden within the new trends of going global, focusing on core viewpoints of the Report. They addressed aspects such as the foundation of Chinese enterprises' global expansion, whether the logic of going global will become a long-term trend in A-share investment, and specific investment directions worthy of attention, helping investors understand the investment logic behind this wave of overseas expansion.

Publishing in-depth research reports has become one of the key formats for the investment research team at Invesco Great Wall Fund to deeply communicate with the market and investors. From the "New Energy Vehicle Insight Report" in 2022, to the "Technology Insight Series: Semiconductors" in 2023, and the "Reshape·Insight AI+" released in 2024, their investment research team has consistently captured industrial investment opportunities with a forward-looking vision, sending clear "strong call" signals to the market. This year, this overseas expansion report adopts a more macro perspective and broader vision, combining with the era's theme of "going global" to deeply analyze industrial trends and investment opportunities. It continues the consistent lineage of Invesco Great Wall's investment research while also standing at a new point in time, demonstrating insight and grasp of major trends of the era.

When Going Global Becomes the New Normal for Enterprises

Over the past two years, a magnificent wave of overseas expansion trends has swept through the Chinese capital market. From trendy consumer toys taking the world by storm to the explosive growth of innovative drug business development (BD), and the stunning tenfold performance of leading optical module companies — these industries vary greatly, but "going global" has become the common keyword.

More importantly, at the listed company level, going global has transitioned from past "storytelling" to tangible profits and positive valuation feedback. Overseas business brings higher gross profit margins, combined with vast overseas growth potential, collectively boosting ROE levels. Companies with a high proportion of overseas revenue on the A-share market enjoy significant valuation premiums.

All of this points to one conclusion: Going global is becoming the new normal for Chinese enterprises.

Why has going global become so crucial today? Ke Haidong, Fund Manager of the Equity Investment Department at Invesco Great Wall, analyzes from a macro perspective: Against the backdrop of major power rivalry, enterprises going global is an important lever for China to break through blockades and reshape the global landscape. At the national level, there is a strong push to jointly build the "Belt and Road" with many countries in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia, and enterprises are following this policy momentum to invest overseas.

From a micro perspective, going global is no longer an "option" for enterprises, but a "necessity." Zhou Hanying, Fund Manager of the International Investment Department at Invesco Great Wall, points out: "Going global is not a choice for enterprises, but an inevitability for survival and leapfrogging."

She summarizes three reasons:

  • First, realistic factors: Even after the U.S. launched tariff wars in 2018 and 2025, China's exports continued to grow, indicating that the world cannot do without Chinese manufacturing.
  • Second, profit migration: Overseas gross profit margins for A-share companies going global are as high as 28%, significantly higher than the 19.2% domestically. Going global means enhancing profitability and valuation.
  • Third, historical validation: Leading companies in U.S. and Japanese markets, like Toyota and Johnson & Johnson, derive 60% of their profits from overseas, driving their long-term bull markets. Currently, overseas revenue accounts for only 15% of A-shares, indicating immense room for growth.

Ke Haidong asserts: "The trend of going global is not a flash in the pan but can last a very long time and will permeate all aspects of A-share investment." For investors, understanding this new normal of going global is key to understanding the core narrative of the Chinese capital market in the coming decade.

The Version Iteration of Going Global: From "Product" to "Service"

Chinese enterprises' global expansion did not begin today. As early as after joining the WTO in 2001, Chinese enterprises began to go global in the form of "product export."

The model at that time was: enterprises shipped products from Chinese factories overseas, handing them over to importers or distributors. Subsequent brand building, channel management, and after-sales service were almost entirely out of Chinese enterprises' "hands." Under this model, Chinese companies played the role of pure "manufacturing factories," earning processing fees and occupying the mid-to-low end of the global value chain. Although the scale was large, profits were thin, and control over overseas markets was minimal.

After the U.S. initiated the first round of the tariff war in 2018, Chinese enterprises began to accelerate the first wave of going global. Companies faced a critical decision: either bear the cost increases from tariffs or set up factories overseas to circumvent them. After calculations, many chose the latter.

Ke Haidong analyzes that the first step in going global is production capacity layout. From listed companies' announcements, it is clear that after 2018, the number of capacity expansions overseas, in industries like construction, continued to grow significantly. This wave can be regarded as "Going Global 1.0": enterprises began to locate production capacity overseas, but more as a passive response to trade frictions.

The qualitative change occurred in 2025. With the U.S. escalating the tariff war again in 2025, and trade frictions emerging from Europe and other countries as well, Chinese enterprises entered the era of "Going Global 2.0" facing a more complex international trade environment.

The core feature of this version is: "Transforming from export towards going global; export is merely simple product export, while going global, besides products, includes the overseas layout of operational capabilities and production capacity."

Going Global 2.0 is specifically reflected in several changes:

  • First, high-speed growth in capital goods investment, particularly focused on "Belt and Road" markets, driven by Chinese enterprises' overseas production capacity backups.
  • Second, consumer goods going global, gradually expanding from online brand and momentum accumulation to offline channels.
  • Third, accelerated service industry globalization. On one hand, visa-exempt entries of foreigners grew by 50% in 2025; on the other hand, innovative drug BD and large model Token exports became new trends.
  • Fourth, supply chain globalization is deeply intertwined with the AI revolution, with Chinese enterprises embedding themselves into the core supply chains of global tech giants.

The Advantages of Chinese Enterprises in Going Global

The powerful global competitiveness displayed by Chinese enterprises in the Going Global 2.0 era is underpinned by a complete set of systematic advantages. Invesco Great Wall Fund expressed full confidence in the sustainability and growth potential of going global. These advantages for Chinese enterprises going global are not a single factor but an overlay of multiple dividends, forming a competitive moat that is difficult to replicate.

First, the engineer dividend is the core factor driving the development of China's manufacturing and technology industries. The number of science and engineering bachelor's graduates in China has continued to grow significantly since 2000, with over 3 million new graduates annually. These high-quality STEM talents drive the continuous improvement of Chinese enterprises' R&D capabilities.

Second, well-developed and low-cost infrastructure provides a solid foundation for manufacturing development. China's industrial electricity prices are far lower than those of developed countries in Europe and America, with extremely high power supply reliability. In logistics, China possesses the world's densest network of highways, high-speed railways, and ports, significantly reducing logistics costs for raw material input and product output. These infrastructure advantages result from decades of sustained investment and are difficult for other countries to catch up with in the short term.

Finally, the cluster effect of a complete industrial chain. China's manufacturing value-added leads the world by a wide margin, with exports of capital goods, intermediate goods, and consumer goods all occupying top global positions.

Guo Lin, Fund Manager of the Research Department at Invesco Great Wall, uses optical modules as an example. In the AI era, "speed is paramount." Once a technical solution emerges, Chinese enterprise engineers quickly advance yield ramp-up and capacity expansion, while overseas competitors are at a clear disadvantage in response speed. Simultaneously, leading optical module companies have established production bases overseas, achieving a transnational architecture of Chinese R&D, overseas manufacturing, and global delivery, perfectly circumventing certain trade barriers.

Qiao Haiying, Fund Manager of the Equity Investment Department at Invesco Great Wall, uses innovative drugs as an example: Chinese pharmaceutical companies are gradually replacing their overseas counterparts as the preferred choice for multinational pharmaceutical companies to introduce pipelines. Policy-wise, domestic drug regulatory agencies' approval efficiency is globally leading, laying a solid foundation for R&D. Talent-wise, leveraging the engineer dividend, China has the world's largest and most cost-effective group of biomedical engineers, with world-class speed in preclinical development and iteration. Industrial chain-wise, the vast disease population and concentrated medical resources enable clinical trial enrollment speeds to reach 30%–40% of the global average, with costs only one-third to one-quarter. The synergy of these three creates Chinese pharmaceutical companies' unparalleled capability for low-cost, rapid trial-and-error globally.

Selling Shovels to the World — Opportunities in Capital Goods Going Global

In the process of enterprises going global, "shovel sellers" become one of the biggest beneficiaries. Capital goods (construction machinery, heavy trucks, etc.) play precisely this "shovel seller" role. So, what opportunities do Chinese enterprises face in the capital goods sector?

Wang Kaizhan, Fund Manager of the Research Department at Invesco Great Wall, points out that over the past two to three decades, especially during the real estate boom cycle, demand for capital goods like construction machinery and heavy trucks was created. More importantly, China formed a complete industrial chain cluster from raw materials to components to finished products. Although the real estate cycle has subsided, overseas demand, particularly from the AI investment wave, has taken over the baton. Chinese enterprises are rapidly moving into "Belt and Road" emerging markets and developed countries in Europe and America, making solid progress in overseas localization operations.

Xu Yida, Fund Manager of the Equity Investment Department at Invesco Great Wall, adds that Chinese manufacturing has accumulated the world's most complete industrial supply chain, low-cost infrastructure and energy, and a rich engineer dividend. This high-quality supply highly matches the current round of global demand, giving rise to the prosperity of capital goods going global.

Wang Kaizhan observes that over the past few years, global mining companies have engaged in numerous mergers, acquisitions, and new project constructions, bringing the Chinese supply chain into previously hard-to-enter markets. The localization rate in areas like large mining trucks and large excavators has rapidly increased. The growth momentum for the domestic construction machinery industry largely comes from overseas, with new mining projects in resource-rich countries becoming the core driver.

Furthermore, the increase in market share for China's construction machinery relies not solely on technological generation gaps. Wang Kaizhan believes the real advantages lie in the cost side — the integrated cost advantage from full industrial chain integration — and the service side — the rapid response capability brought by the engineer dividend. Solving technical issues might take foreign brands weeks, whereas domestic brands require only days.

Xu Yida observes that in emerging economies like the "Belt and Road," Chinese capital goods are quickly capturing market share based on technical barriers and practical assistance. However, in traditional regions deeply cultivated by European and American giants like South America and Australia, entry still requires time.

Wang Kaizhan believes that as enterprises no longer just focus on manufacturing and processing but go global with their brands and sales systems, profitability naturally rises; simultaneously, the undervaluation of the RMB exchange rate provides a systemic dividend. Xu Yida adds that domestic high-quality leaders face a more relaxed competitive environment overseas, enabling them to gain higher pricing power while spreading R&D costs.

The journey of selling shovels to the world for Chinese capital goods has only just begun. Looking ahead 1-2 years, Wang Kaizhan believes the sectors with the highest growth momentum are LNG main engine manufacturers, power grid distribution equipment, energy storage projects, and transformers. With tight production capacity in Europe and America, Chinese enterprises are leveraging this opportunity to open up solidified market structures.

Xu Yida prioritizes power equipment and construction machinery. He believes, drawing from Japan's past experience in going global, priority should be given to areas where China possesses significant advantages. Chinese power equipment companies have global competitiveness in technology, cost, and delivery speed and are expected to deeply benefit from this round of overseas power grid upgrade cycles.

Regarding construction machinery, leading Chinese enterprises are already among the top globally, with clear long-term competitiveness. Currently, the global construction machinery industry is in an upward cycle, expected to last for a considerable period. However, the current global market share of Chinese enterprises remains relatively low, with significant room for future growth. With the acceleration of industrialization in "Belt and Road" countries and robust demand for resource extraction, the overseas expansion of construction machinery has stable demand support.

What Other Investment Opportunities Exist in Going Global?

Based on global competitive dynamics and China's industrial upgrade logic, Guo Lin points out that new energy vehicles, AI applications, and optical modules are becoming core tracks for "extreme globalization," containing non-linear growth opportunities.

Over the past five years, China's new energy vehicle industry developed rapidly, leveraging policy dividends, the three-electricity (battery, motor, electronic control) industry chain, and cost advantages. However, high tariffs in Europe and America are forcing industry transformation. The future key to success lies in overseas local factory construction and supply chain establishment. Leading automakers, leveraging hybrid technology, have seen their monthly export share exceed 40%, confirming the feasibility of localization.

Guo Lin is optimistic about AI application globalization and optical module companies, including large models/Tokens, cloud services, robotics, and vertical Agents. Overseas Coding applications have already replaced many programmers, reaching a critical point of explosion. China possesses a vast population base and application development experience, potentially replicating domestic success models to achieve overseas leaps. Optical module companies have demonstrated extreme competitiveness in this AI computing power explosion, with leading companies entering Nvidia's supply chain. This competitiveness can be replicated in areas like PCBs, consumer electronics, automobiles, and power equipment.

Zhou Hanying is optimistic about two major directions: AI-driven power and grid equipment globalization and consumer brand globalization, relying on the global power grid investment gap and Chinese brand upgrade dividends, respectively.

The endgame of AI is power. Energy storage and power electronics will become core components of AI infrastructure. As global power grid investment rises, the AI computing power cycle drives segments like high-voltage switches, HVDC, energy storage, and microgrids, which combine global gaps and entry barriers, resulting in a high probability of successful globalization. Consumer globalization is shifting from cost advantage to brand power. On one hand, Chinese supply chain efficiency brings "chain-to-price ratio" advantages. On the other hand, "branded quality-to-price ratio" with high perceived value achieves price increases in Europe and America through IP and design, such as trendy toy brands priced at $20-30, avoiding low-price competition.

Qiao Haiying believes that in the innovative drug field, investment opportunities for ten-bagger stocks have already emerged. Taking oncology drugs as an example, the previous generation "drug king" had global annual sales of around $30 billion. The next-generation drugs, after iteration, have reached the $100 billion level in annual sales, significantly expanding the market space. In this process, Chinese pharmaceutical companies in oncology have already produced three opportunities with near-tenfold growth potential.

More importantly, the treatment areas of innovative drugs are expanding from mere disease treatment to consumer healthcare. Large indications nurture large products, and large products create large companies. Taking the weight loss field as an example, this track already possesses the conditions to give birth to ten-bagger companies, potentially more than one. This continuous expansion of treatment boundaries brings us highly attractive investment opportunities, which we firmly believe in.

Of course, the path of going global is filled with both opportunities and challenges. Chinese enterprises face multiple obstacles such as geopolitical risks, local compliance, cultural barriers, exchange rate fluctuations, single channels, technology blockades, and trust barriers.

In response, Zhou Hanying proposes a framework of "pre-compliance, local production, local spokespersons." Qiao Haiying emphasizes the necessity of building overseas clinical and commercialization capabilities. Xu Yida believes that, given time, Chinese leaders will ultimately break through trust barriers. Only those enterprises that can identify risks, sustain investment, and respond effectively will ultimately emerge victorious in this new wave of globalization.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the report from Invesco Great Wall Fund, what are the key reasons why overseas expansion (Chuhai) has become a 'new normal' for Chinese companies?

AThe report outlines several reasons. Macroscopically, it's a crucial lever for China to break through blockades and reshape the global landscape amid great power rivalry. Microeconomically, it is no longer optional but a necessity for survival and leapfrogging. Three specific reasons are given: 1) Global reliance on Chinese manufacturing persists even post-tariff wars. 2) Overseas operations offer higher gross margins (28% vs. 19.2% domestically), boosting profits and valuations. 3) Historical precedent shows overseas profits drive long-term bull markets for leaders like Toyota and Johnson & Johnson, and Chinese A-share companies currently have low overseas revenue share (only 15%), indicating vast room for growth.

QHow does the report differentiate between the 'Chuhai 1.0' and 'Chuhai 2.0' phases of Chinese companies' overseas expansion?

AChuhai 1.0 began after the 2018 US tariff war. It was characterized by a passive response, primarily involving capacity relocation overseas (e.g., building factories) to circumvent tariffs. The core was 'exporting capacity.' Chuhai 2.0 emerged around 2025 in response to more complex global trade friction. Its core feature is the transformation from simple product export to a comprehensive 'overseas expansion,' encompassing not just products but also operational capabilities and production capacity. Key manifestations include: high growth in capital goods investment, consumer goods expanding from online to offline channels, accelerated service industry exports (e.g., innovation drug BD, AI model tokens), and supply chain integration with the AI revolution.

QWhat systematic advantages underpin the global competitiveness of Chinese companies in the 'Chuhai 2.0' era?

AChinese companies benefit from a multi-layered, systemic advantage: 1) Engineer Dividend: A massive and continuous supply of high-quality STEM graduates (over 3 million annually) fuels R&D and rapid iteration. 2) Superior Infrastructure: Low-cost and highly reliable industrial power, along with a world-class logistics network (highways, high-speed rail, ports), significantly reduces operational costs. 3) Complete Industrial Cluster: China possesses the world's leading manufacturing value-added and a deeply integrated supply chain ecosystem for capital, intermediate, and consumer goods, enabling efficient scaling and cost control.

QWhich specific investment opportunities in the capital goods sector are highlighted by the fund managers in the report?

AThe report highlights capital goods (the 'shovel sellers') as major beneficiaries. Specific opportunities mentioned include: LNG engine manufacturers, power grid distribution equipment, energy storage projects, and transformers, where demand is high globally and Chinese companies can disrupt entrenched markets. More broadly, Power Equipment and Engineering Machinery are prioritized. Chinese power equipment firms are competitive in technology, cost, and delivery speed, benefiting from global grid upgrades. Chinese engineering machinery leaders are gaining global market share due to integrated cost advantages and superior service responsiveness, supported by demand from 'Belt and Road' industrialization and resource extraction.

QBeyond capital goods, what are some other high-potential sectors identified for 'Chuhai' investment opportunities?

AThe report identifies several other high-potential sectors: 1) New Energy Vehicles (NEVs): Future success hinges on overseas localization of production and supply chains, with leading companies already achieving high export ratios. 2) AI Applications & Optical Modules: Includes AI models/tokens, cloud services, robotics, and vertical agents. Chinese firms have potential in application development and are core suppliers (e.g., optical modules for NVIDIA). 3) Consumer Brands: Evolving from cost advantage to brand power, leveraging supply chain efficiency and 'branded quality-to-price' strategies in Western markets. 4) Innovative Drugs: Significant opportunities, especially in large therapeutic areas like oncology and weight loss (GLP-1), where Chinese companies offer cost-effective, rapid R&D and clinical development.

Leituras Relacionadas

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbitHá 2h

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbitHá 2h

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbitHá 2h

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbitHá 2h

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbitHá 2h

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbitHá 2h

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbitHá 2h

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
活动图片