India’s Crypto Policy Under Scrutiny as Chadha Pushes for VDA Legal Recognition

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-10Última atualização em 2026-02-10

Resumo

Indian AAP MP Raghav Chadha urged the Indian government to legally recognize Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs) as a formal asset class during a Rajya Sabha address. He highlighted the inconsistency in the current approach where crypto profits are taxed—1% TDS and 30% flat tax—yet lack legal status. This ambiguity has eroded investor confidence, driven an estimated 12 crore Indian investors to offshore platforms, and caused 180 VDA startups to relocate abroad. Chadha noted that 73% of crypto trading volume has moved offshore in FY25, resulting in significant tax revenue loss. He proposed a new licensing law to enhance consumer protection, enforce AML measures, and potentially recover ₹15,000–20,000 crores in annual tax revenue through clear regulation.

AAP MP Raghav Chadha addressed the Rajya Sabha, urging the Indian government to legalise Virtual Digital Assets as a formal asset class. He noted that the government has already started taxing digital assets but has failed to accord them the requisite legal classification. Chadha noted that the tax structure requires investors to pay 1% as TDS and a 30% flat tax on their crypto profits without legal status. Chadha noted that the government needs to move beyond the half-baked system of asset classification.

The MP argued that such an inconsistency erodes investor confidence in digital assets. Chadha said 12 crore Indian investors are forced to use offshore platforms due to unclear laws. He added that 180 VDA startups have relocated operations to crypto-friendly jurisdictions abroad. The MP emphasised that India loses significant tax revenues under the current regulatory trend.

Offshore Trading and Regulatory Challenges

Chadha pointed out that 73% of the trading volume of crypto assets had left the country and gone offshore in the Financial Year 2025. This trend will continue and likely worsen unless authorities implement clear regulations. According to the MP, the current regulatory space is risky and does not encourage investors. The MP noted that other countries, such as Dubai, Singapore, and Malaysia, have attracted Indian investors due to clear regulatory mechanisms. These countries have clear legal frameworks that classify the services of crypto assets.

Chadha pointed out that the lack of a licensing law for India holds the key to comprehensive consumer protection and AML. He said that the ring-fencing approach could lower the risks of money laundering and enhance compliance. Chadha added that the digital trading assets, if brought onboard, could strengthen the domestic market.

Proposed Legislative Framework

Mr Chadha also proposed drafting a new law to enable licensing for digital asset exchanges and related service providers. The law should place investor protection at the center of its mandates and enforce stringent AML measures to bring the grey market into compliance. It will also help India to garner tax revenues of Rs.15,000 to Rs.20,000 crores annually as clarity is created.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Vitalik Buterin Outlines Ethereum’s AI Framework, Pushes Back Against Solana’s Acceleration Thesis

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main argument made by AAP MP Raghav Chadha regarding India's crypto policy?

ARaghav Chadha argues that India should legalize Virtual Digital Assets as a formal asset class, as the current system taxes crypto (1% TDS and 30% flat tax on profits) without providing legal status, which he calls a 'half-baked system'.

QAccording to the article, what are two major consequences of India's unclear crypto regulations?

ATwo major consequences are: 1) 12 crore Indian investors are forced to use offshore platforms, and 2) 180 VDA startups have relocated their operations to crypto-friendly jurisdictions abroad.

QWhat percentage of crypto trading volume has left India for offshore platforms in FY25, as cited by Chadha?

A73% of the trading volume of crypto assets had left the country and gone offshore in the Financial Year 2025.

QWhat key legislative measure did Chadha propose to address the regulatory challenges?

AChadha proposed drafting a new law to enable licensing for digital asset exchanges and related service providers, which would place investor protection at its center and enforce stringent Anti-Money Laundering (AML) measures.

QWhich countries were mentioned as having attracted Indian crypto investors due to their clear regulatory frameworks?

ADubai, Singapore, and Malaysia were mentioned as countries that have attracted Indian investors due to their clear regulatory mechanisms and legal frameworks for crypto assets.

Leituras Relacionadas

Behind Musk and Huang Jen-hsun's 'AI Factories', an Unseen Battle for Freshwater Has Begun

Behind the "AI factories" of Elon Musk and Jensen Huang lies a hidden battle for a critical resource: fresh water. As AI models like ChatGPT and Claude process billions of prompts daily, they consume vast amounts of water for cooling. By 2030, global AI infrastructure is projected to use 9.3 trillion liters annually—enough to meet the basic needs of 1.3 billion people. This "water grab" stems from the massive heat generated by high-powered GPUs. Over 70% of data centers use evaporative cooling systems, where water absorbs heat and evaporates into the atmosphere, depleting local groundwater. Training models like GPT-4 can consume over 600 million liters of water. Tech giants like Google and Microsoft report skyrocketing water usage, sparking conflicts with local communities over resources. A flashpoint occurred in Memphis, Tennessee, where Musk's xAI built the Colossus supercomputer. It draws nearly 3.8 million liters of drinking water daily from local aquifers, leading to public outrage and legal action. In response, xAI is building an $80 million water recycling plant to use treated wastewater instead. Facing pressure, companies like Microsoft promote "waterless" closed-loop cooling systems. However, these systems increase electricity consumption by 20-30%, shifting the water burden to power plants, which require immense cooling water themselves—a case of indirect water footprint transfer. For China's AI industry, this crisis offers a strategic warning and opportunity. Instead of replicating the West's resource-intensive model, China can leverage its "East Data, West Computing" policy to locate data centers in cooler, water-rich regions like Guizhou. Furthermore, developing lightweight edge computing for smart homes and embodied AI robots can drastically reduce the need for constant cloud queries, cutting both water and energy consumption at the source. The freshwater war underscores a fundamental question: Will AI be a tool for human advancement or a silicon-based monster competing for our planet's last drops of clean water? The answer is becoming clearer as the water vapor rises.

marsbitHá 21m

Behind Musk and Huang Jen-hsun's 'AI Factories', an Unseen Battle for Freshwater Has Begun

marsbitHá 21m

AGI is Just One Step Away

The article discusses Anthropic's release of the Fable 5 model, a heavily restricted version of its powerful Mythos model. Initially unveiled in April, Mythos reportedly identified over 10,000 high-risk vulnerabilities for 50 enterprise clients, causing significant concern. Due to its dangerous capabilities in areas like autonomous cyber-attacks and biochemical weapons design guidance (classified as CB-1 level), the unaltered Mythos 5 remains limited to about 200 vetted entities like government agencies. Fable 5, released with a safety classifier, demonstrates extraordinary performance, leading benchmarks in coding (SWE-Bench Pro), software engineering, and research. It exhibits true "long-horizon agency," autonomously planning and executing complex, multi-step tasks like migrating 50 million lines of code in a day, moving beyond simple question-answering. The article positions Fable 5 at OpenAI's Level 3 ("Agent") and progressing toward Level 4 ("Innovator"), suggesting AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is within reach, potentially 18-24 months away. To mitigate risks, Anthropic implemented a two-layer safety "cage": a silent routing system that redirects dangerous queries to a weaker model, and a mandatory 30-day data retention policy for all Mythos traffic to detect patterns of malicious use. Despite its high cost ($10/$50 per million input/output tokens), the model targets the enterprise market, where its unparalleled productivity and defensive capabilities against AI-powered cyber threats justify the premium. This signals a market maturation where top-tier AI becomes a strategic, high-value tool for businesses, potentially widening the gap with consumer-focused models and accelerating the rise of "one-person companies" while disrupting labor markets.

marsbitHá 33m

marsbitHá 33m

Restoring Crypto Privacy: ZCASH (ZEC) Makes A Move After 50% Crash

Following a severe price crash of over 50% triggered by the discovery of a critical counterfeiting vulnerability in its Orchard privacy pool, Zcash (ZEC) is taking steps to restore confidence. The bug, found by a security researcher using AI, could have allowed undetected creation of fake ZEC tokens. Developers from the Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL) and others quickly patched the flaw, helping the price rebound over 70%. However, Orchard's privacy features make it impossible to verify if any counterfeit tokens were actually created before the fix. To address this, key ecosystem groups including Shielded Labs and The Zcash Foundation have proposed a new system called Ironwood. Its primary goal is to restore users' ability to independently verify Zcash's total circulating supply. Once activated, node operators could confirm the supply hasn't been tampered with. The Ironwood proposal would also block any new coin minting in the Orchard pool and restrict fund movement through a controlled mechanism. This system could provide evidence on whether the vulnerability was ever exploited. If no excess ZEC attempts to leave the pool, it suggests no counterfeiting occurred. Any attempted exit of fake coins would be blocked and destroyed, publicly revealing any attack while protecting the legitimate supply.

bitcoinistHá 42m

Restoring Crypto Privacy: ZCASH (ZEC) Makes A Move After 50% Crash

bitcoinistHá 42m

Solana Real-World Assets Gain Momentum With Significant Spike In Transfer Activity

Solana's price has declined recently, breaking key support levels. However, the network's activity, especially in the Real-World Assets (RWA) sector, shows strong momentum. The ecosystem recorded its largest daily transfer volume ever, surpassing $1.49 billion—a more than 2x increase, led significantly by preSPAX. This signals growing adoption of tokenized assets on Solana. Analyst Zensei highlights Solana as the leading platform for spot trading, noting the SOL/USDC pair's 24-hour volume of over $4.9 billion far exceeds other major markets. Another analyst, Crypto Patel, points out that SOL is trading within a key Fibonacci Retracement Zone, similar to a past pattern that preceded a major rally. While an "Altcoin Season" is seen as necessary for a potential push toward $1,000, the current accumulation zone is between $40 and $60.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Solana Real-World Assets Gain Momentum With Significant Spike In Transfer Activity

bitcoinistHá 1h

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

In 2026, a wave of investor anxiety questions the defensibility of AI startups as models improve, fearing that most companies are just "thin wrappers" destined to be absorbed by foundation models or chipmakers. The author argues against this despair, positing that true moats lie not in benchmark performance but in areas models cannot easily reach. The logic of despair is that if models excel at all measurable tasks, only compute and cutting-edge model weights hold lasting value. However, the essay contends that the most valuable work is inherently "untrainable." Benchmarks measure what can be measured and thus optimized for, but real-world correctness often resides in private, complex systems. Examples include legacy codebases, intricate legal transactions, or hospital workflows. This kind of correctness is proprietary, costly to establish, and cannot be validated quickly—it requires time and trust within an organization. As models commodify visible, measurable tasks from both above (labs absorbing scaffolding) and below (saturation by cheaper models), value shifts to "untrainable ground." This encompasses work where correctness is a private truth, locked behind integration barriers, licenses, liability frameworks, and entrenched user habits. Trust and adoption are slow, human-centric processes that smarter models cannot accelerate. Successful companies defend their position by embedding deeply into client operations, owning the definition of "good" within a specific domain (e.g., Harvey in law, OpenEvidence in medicine), and pricing on outcomes rather than tokens. While labs compete fiercely, they are incentivized to keep the application layer vibrant. The future belongs not to those competing on generic benchmarks but to those navigating unscoreable terrain, doing the "unsexy work" of translation between models and messy human realities. The most cited benchmark scores are thus maps of territory about to become worthless, signaling who will lose the right to define what counts as good.

marsbitHá 2h

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?