Hyperliquid’s market share surges to 33% – Can HYPE target $36 next?

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-01-31Última atualização em 2026-01-31

Resumo

Hyperliquid's market share surged from 18% in December to 33% by the end of January, driven by the introduction and success of its equity and commodity perpetuals (perps). Non-crypto assets, such as silver and gold, now account for 30% of the platform's trading volume, positioning it as a key cross-asset trading platform. This growth has positively impacted the native token HYPE, with increased trading volume generating higher fees, which fuel token buybacks and burns. Weekly revenue rose from $11 million to $15.5 million, and HYPE's price increased by 70%. Maintaining support above $28 could lead to a breakout toward $36, while a drop below may push it back to the $20-$28 range.

Hyperliquid [HYPE] has regained a portion of the market share it lost in 2025 following heated competition from Aster [ASTER], Lighter [LIT], and other rivals.

According to Dune data, the platform’s market dominance rose from a recent low of 18% seen in December to over 33% at the end of January.

That’s a 15% jump in market share, thanks to booming equity perpetuals (perps) that have positioned it as a key cross-asset platform.

How equity perps fueled Hyperliquid’s growth

Hyperliquid was initially focused on crypto perps or derivatives that allow traders to speculate on prices with leverage.

They are called perpetuals because they don’t expire with strict deadlines like Options, so one can hold them indefinitely, provided they pay fees to keep the positions open.

The platform unveiled a similar offering for equity and commodities via an upgrade, HIP-3, enabled by third-party integrations.

Interestingly, the recently volatile precious metals market has cemented Hyperliquid as a crucial cross-asset trading platform.

On Friday, silver and gold ranked among the top five assets by trading volume on Hyperliquid. Silver traded $3 billion in volume, while gold closed at nearly $700 million. The other top assets were Bitcoin, Ethereum, and HYPE, while Solana [SOL] ranked sixth.

According to crypto VC partner and trader McKenna, 30% of Hyperliquid’s overall trading volume is driven by non-crypto assets. He added,

“Let me repeat, Hyperliquid will bring in more daily volume from TradFi perpetuals than digital asset perpetuals.”

Impact of the equity perps boom on HYPE

The equity perps boom was expected to be net positive for the native token, HYPE.

It is a bullish catalyst because the higher the equity perps’ trading volume climbs, the more fees are generated, which drives HYPE buybacks and burns.

In fact, DeFiLlama data showed the positive correlation between the recent rebound in generated revenue, perps volume, and HYPE price.

The average weekly revenue has increased from $11 million to $15.5 million, and the HYPE price has mooned by 70% over the same period.

On the price charts, the altcoin had given back some of the gains amid bearish pressure on Bitcoin. But defending $28 zone as support could reinforce a potential breakout above $36 if the equity perps’ traction extends.

However, breaking below $28 support would invalidate the bullish outlook and trap HYPE back in the December price range of $20-$28.

Final Thoughts

Hyperliquid’s market share has increased from 18% to 33% amid equity and commodity perps trading surge
Non-crypto assets now account for 32% of Hyperliquid’s overall trading volumes

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was Hyperliquid's market share at the end of January, and what was this a significant increase from?

AHyperliquid's market share rose to over 33% at the end of January, which was a significant increase from a recent low of 18% seen in December.

QWhat new type of perpetuals, introduced via HIP-3, was a key driver behind Hyperliquid's recent growth?

AThe introduction of equity and commodities perpetuals (perps) via the HIP-3 upgrade was a key driver behind Hyperliquid's recent growth.

QAccording to the data, what percentage of Hyperliquid's overall trading volume is now driven by non-crypto assets?

AAccording to the data, 30% of Hyperliquid's overall trading volume is now driven by non-crypto assets.

QHow does the increase in trading volume from equity perps directly benefit the native token, HYPE?

AThe increase in trading volume generates more fees, which are used to drive HYPE token buybacks and burns, making it a bullish catalyst for the token's price.

QWhat is the critical price level for HYPE that, if broken, would invalidate the bullish outlook and trap it in its December price range?

AThe critical price level is $28. Breaking below this support would invalidate the bullish outlook and could trap HYPE back in the December price range of $20-$28.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

**Summary:** A growing "anti-college" movement is gaining traction among elite circles in Silicon Valley, challenging the traditional value of a four-year university degree. Proponents argue that college has become an expensive, slow, and increasingly irrelevant waste of time, especially in the fast-paced tech world where opportunities pass by quickly. The movement is led by figures like billionaire Peter Thiel, who criticizes universities for high costs, ideological indoctrination, and stifling true innovation. His "Thiel Fellowship" pays young people to drop out and pursue ventures. Companies like Palantir Technologies (co-founded by Thiel) fuel this trend with programs like the "Meritocracy Fellowship," which offers high school graduates paid internships as an alternative to immediate college enrollment, promising a practical "Palantir Degree." Key drivers include: 1. **Economics:** Skyrocketing student debt versus the allure of immediate, high-paying tech jobs or startup funding. 2. **Technology:** AI and online tools lowering barriers to self-education and product development, making formal instruction seem inefficient. 3. **Culture:** A backlash against perceived "woke" ideology and DEI policies in universities, coupled with a belief that these institutions suppress meritocracy and masculine drive. The movement is notably male-dominated. Critics, like economist David Deming, warn against overgeneralizing from dropout success stories (survivorship bias). He emphasizes that genuine autodidacts are rare, corporate training is narrowly focused, and the "college wage premium" remains high for most people. University liberal arts education, he argues, builds adaptable problem-solving skills and broad perspectives. The debate highlights a deeper crisis in education. The core model of the modern university appears increasingly mismatched with the speed of the information age. The movement signals a shift in the locus of learning from institutional "education" to personal, active "learning" powered by the internet and AI. Ultimately, this may not mean the end of university, but rather a painful evolution. The future likely holds more hybrid, personalized, and lifelong learning pathways. The central question becomes: in a world changing faster than any curriculum, how do we best learn?

marsbitHá 3m

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

marsbitHá 3m

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

The commercialization of generative AI is facing a critical inflection point as a potential price war looms. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is considering a significant cut to its token fees to compete with rival Anthropic, signaling a shift from a growth-at-all-costs model focused on token consumption. This move comes as both companies, reportedly losing billions on compute, prepare for IPOs, and as enterprise customers face "bill shock" from switching to usage-based token billing. Reports indicate poor ROI, with one analysis finding only 18 cents of every dollar spent on AI tokens generates user-facing value. The industry's initial phases—from flat-rate subscriptions to aggressive subsidies—have given way to a reckoning with real costs. Analysts debate the future: some predict a bifurcation between premium, high-cost models for complex tasks and cheaper alternatives for routine work, while others believe overall spending will still rise as agentic AI increases tokens per task. Notably, Chinese model DeepSeek's low-cost API is gaining traction with U.S. enterprises, adding competitive pressure. The core challenge is redefining value beyond token volume ("tokenmaxxing") toward measurable productivity ("valuemaxxing"), as the entire AI value chain, from cloud providers to chipmakers, feels the ripple effects of unsustainable pricing.

marsbitHá 7m

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

marsbitHá 7m

The Bitcoin 400-Day Cycle: Historical Performance Shows How Low The Bottom Goes

A crypto analyst forecasts a continued Bitcoin bear market, predicting a potential price bottom around October 2026 based on a historical 400-day cycle pattern. The analysis suggests Bitcoin is currently 252 days into a bear phase that typically lasts 364-400 days, indicating another 112-148 days of downward pressure. The projected cycle low could be around $30,000, representing a more than 75% decline from recent all-time highs near $126,000. The analyst dismisses arguments that current market factors like ETFs make this cycle different, noting the pattern has held for over a decade. Another expert aligns, forecasting a bottom between $30,000-$40,000 by late Q3 or early Q4 2026 and rejecting the possibility of Bitcoin reaching $100,000 this year.

bitcoinistHá 26m

The Bitcoin 400-Day Cycle: Historical Performance Shows How Low The Bottom Goes

bitcoinistHá 26m

Hedgeye’s New Bitcoin ETF Filing Targets One Of BTC’s Biggest Problems

Hedgeye has filed for a "Hedged Bitcoin" ETF, ticker HBIT, designed to offer Bitcoin exposure with reduced volatility. The fund would hold spot Bitcoin ETFs while using an options strategy, guided by Hedgeye's proprietary "Risk Range" signals, to manage downside risk. This approach aims to provide a smoother investment experience, particularly during market downturns, but the filing notes it may also limit upside potential during strong rallies. The strategy involves buying and writing both standardized and customizable FLEX options. The registration with the SEC is pending, and the proposal represents a growing trend of crypto products focused on altering Bitcoin's risk/return profile rather than simply tracking its price.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Hedgeye’s New Bitcoin ETF Filing Targets One Of BTC’s Biggest Problems

bitcoinistHá 1h

Is Dogecoin Dead Or Could The SpaceX IPO Lead To A Revival?

Dogecoin is facing doubts about its future as its price hovers near multi-year lows and investor enthusiasm wanes. Lacking its previous narrative momentum and with modest institutional ETF inflows, it has struggled alongside the broader meme-coin downturn. However, the upcoming SpaceX IPO, seeking a massive $1.75 trillion valuation, is generating discussion as a potential catalyst. While the IPO has no direct link to Dogecoin, the event will refocus global attention on Elon Musk, whose past endorsements have significantly boosted the cryptocurrency. Some investors see this renewed spotlight as a chance for revived interest, though it remains uncertain if attention alone can drive a sustained recovery amid ongoing market challenges.

bitcoinistHá 3h

Is Dogecoin Dead Or Could The SpaceX IPO Lead To A Revival?