Hyperliquid Surpasses Coinbase with Twice Its 2025 Notional Trading Volume

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-10Última atualização em 2026-02-10

Resumo

Hyperliquid, a decentralized perpetual futures exchange, has surpassed Coinbase in 2025 notional trading volume, handling $2.6 trillion compared to Coinbase's $1.4 trillion. This highlights a significant shift towards decentralized trading platforms. The exchange's native token, HYPE, has also seen a 31.7% price increase this year, while Coinbase shares declined 27%. Despite a recent 7% drop in HYPE's value to $29.99, largely long-position liquidations of $4.41 million, the platform continues to demonstrate strong performance with high volume and open interest. The growing discussion around Hyperliquid underscores the rising prominence of decentralized exchanges in the crypto derivatives market.

As a major step in the growth of on-chain trading activity, Hyperliquid, a decentralized perpetual futures exchange built on its own blockchain, has outperformed Coinbase in total notional trading volume for 2025, showing the increasing trend of traders toward decentralized finance.

Hyperliquid has handled almost $2.6 trillion in trade volume so far in 2025, far more than Coinbase’s $1.4 trillion, according to Artemis post on February 10, as Hyperliquid posted almost twice Coinbase’s notional volume, and is gradually surpassing the popular centralized exchange in the crypto trading space.

Even Hyperliquid’s native token HYPE price has increased 31.7%, over the year so far, while Coinbase’s shares (COIN) have decreased 27.0%, which reflects a roughly 59% difference; the contrast in price performance is also evident, as per the post.

As Hyperliquid’s momentum continues to draw attention, on February 9, Coinglass shared data that among the top perpetual DEXs, Hyperliquid posted $3.76 billion in volume, $4.05 billion in open interest, and $122.96M in liquidations, and mentioned that Hyperliquid shows much stronger consistency when compared to Aster and Lighter, which have moved to a debate later.

Earlier that day, Arthur Hayes, co-founder of BitMEX, turned a public criticism over the project’s fundamentals from Multicoin Capital co-founder Kyle Samani into a challenge by making a $100,000 price bet that would track HYPE’s price performance for the coming six months against any crypto with a market cap above $1 billion.

Altogether, Hyperliquid continues to be a recurring point of discussion in the crypto derivatives area, highlighting that trading in decentralized exchanges is rising over the centralized ones.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) Price Update

The HYPE token has been down over 7% for the past 24 hours and is trading at $29.99. As the price fall coincided with liquidations totalling $4.41 million for the past 24 hours, the majority of which were from long positions by more than $4 million. As this price movement is largely due to the border crypto downturn, the market as a whole is down about 1.75%, and the market cap stands at $2.35 trillion.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Ethereum Foundation Backs SEAL to Combat Crypto Drainers and Phishing Attacks

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is Hyperliquid and how has it performed compared to Coinbase in 2025?

AHyperliquid is a decentralized perpetual futures exchange built on its own blockchain. It has outperformed Coinbase in total notional trading volume for 2025, handling approximately $2.6 trillion compared to Coinbase's $1.4 trillion.

QWhat was the price difference between Hyperliquid's native token (HYPE) and Coinbase's shares (COIN) so far in the year?

AHyperliquid's native token HYPE has increased 31.7% in price so far in the year, while Coinbase's shares (COIN) have decreased 27.0%, reflecting a roughly 59% difference in performance.

QWhat data did Coinglass share about Hyperliquid on February 9th among the top perpetual DEXs?

AOn February 9, Coinglass shared that Hyperliquid posted $3.76 billion in volume, $4.05 billion in open interest, and $122.96 million in liquidations among the top perpetual DEXs.

QWhat bet did Arthur Hayes make regarding the HYPE token's performance?

AArthur Hayes, co-founder of BitMEX, made a $100,000 price bet that would track HYPE's price performance for the coming six months against any cryptocurrency with a market capitalization above $1 billion.

QWhat is the current trading price of the HYPE token and what was its 24-hour performance?

AThe HYPE token is currently priced at $29.99 and is down over 7% for the past 24 hours. This price fall coincided with liquidations totaling $4.41 million, the majority of which were from long positions.

Leituras Relacionadas

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHá 23m

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHá 23m

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHá 33m

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHá 33m

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinistHá 42m

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinistHá 42m

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHá 1h

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHá 1h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHá 2h