Hyperliquid Policy Center Fires Off CFTC Letter On Prediction Markets—Here’s What It Wants

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-05-01Última atualização em 2026-05-01

The newly launched Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC) has entered the US prediction market debate with a fresh submission to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

The Washington, D.C.-based non-profit, led by Jake Chervinsky, said it responded to the CFTC’s request for public input following an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Prediction Markets (the “ANPRM”).

Hyperliquid Policy Center Lays Out Its Case To CFTC

In its comment letter, filed on Thursday, HPC urges the CFTC to adopt a flexible, function-based approach so the regulatory framework can account for decentralized market designs.

HPC also asked for an explicit path for US participants to access decentralized prediction markets, while emphasizing the importance of encouraging American leadership in decentralized financial innovation.

The policy center framed prediction markets as part of a broader US derivatives tradition. It noted that federal derivatives laws exist to support price discovery across commodities and to help producers and consumers plan and hedge risk.

In that context, HPC argued that public, market-based prices function as “a public good” because they aggregate scattered information, produce signals that can support decisions in economic and political settings, and can outperform less structured approaches.

The group added that prediction market pricing already influences prediction platforms, saying its data is integrated into major trading terminals, financial and news outlets, and social media.

In its view, decentralized prediction markets bring advantages rooted in design choices rather than operator discretion. The center described decentralized markets as transparent and non-custodial, with built-in operational resilience.

Finally, HPC pointed to the idea that market data and collateral can be composed directly with other on-chain components, including smart contract environments and trading and risk management protocols.

HIP-4 Testing Meets Washington Push

According to the letter, those characteristics help advance regulatory objectives that the CFTC has discussed in relation to centralized prediction markets, including impartial access, settlement integrity, customer protection, and effective market surveillance.

HPC emphasized, however, that rulemaking aimed at centralized structures should not inadvertently lock in assumptions that only a single exchange operator can exist at the center of the system, or that surveillance and settlement mechanics must be structured around a traditional operator model.

The policy center said enabling access to decentralized prediction markets in the United States will require additional steps beyond the ANPRM process, but it argued the CFTC still has an opportunity to shape that access pathway.

The Hyperliquid Policy Center’s move comes amid broader industry activity around Hyperliquid. The policy center’s letter follows a new proposal reported by NewsBTC on Wednesday, describing Hyperliquid testing a system upgrade called HIP-4.

The reported upgrade is intended to enable traders to bet on real-world outcomes on a platform that has drawn attention for rapid and aggressive expansion.

The daily chart shows HYPE’s attempt to consolidate just below the key $40 mark. Source: HYPEUSDT on TradingView.com

As of this writing, Hyperliquid’s native token, HYPE, was trading at $39, marking a 6% loss over the past week.

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Leituras Relacionadas

No Sales Team, $20 Million in Revenue: How Did AI Employee Viktor Win Over 30,000 Companies?

The AI employee Viktor, developed by a team with DeepMind background, has achieved $20 million in annual revenue without a traditional sales team, serving over 30,000 companies. Its core innovation lies in positioning itself as a "Tier 3 AI Coworker" capable of "end-to-end execution and delivery of results," moving beyond the "draft and wait for human completion" model of typical AI assistants. Users can simply mention Viktor in Slack or Microsoft Teams using natural language commands, and it autonomously performs tasks like pulling sales data from a CRM, generating reports, or even cross-tool operations like creating board meeting PPTs by aggregating data from six different sources. Key to its growth is a pure Product-Led Growth (PLG) model, eliminating complex implementation cycles and per-seat licensing. Instead, it charges based on task credits or consumption, lowering the trial barrier with a $100 free credit offer and no credit card required. This enabled viral, bottom-up adoption within organizations. Viktor's interaction paradigm removes the barrier of prompt engineering, allowing non-technical employees to delegate complex workflows seamlessly. It also features proactive, automated task execution (e.g., overnight bookkeeping, scheduled reports) based on triggers, effectively embedding AI as an automated "process layer" within business operations. However, its expansion into Microsoft Teams—a platform with 320 million users—highlights challenges. Large enterprises require stringent IT compliance, security reviews (e.g., SOC 2), and governance, potentially hindering the frictionless, user-driven adoption that succeeded in Slack. Additionally, the "black box" nature of its autonomous decision-making raises concerns about operational risks, data integrity, and the need for robust audit logs and permission controls. Balancing efficiency gains with security and trust remains a critical hurdle for Viktor and similar AI agents aiming to become core enterprise infrastructure.

marsbitHá 1h

No Sales Team, $20 Million in Revenue: How Did AI Employee Viktor Win Over 30,000 Companies?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片