Hyperliquid becomes ‘most liquid venue for crypto price discovery’- What does it mean?

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-01-27Última atualização em 2026-01-27

Resumo

Hyperliquid has achieved significant traction, becoming a leading venue for crypto price discovery with deeper liquidity than Binance, according to its founder. The platform has seen over $1 billion in trading volume for its equity perpetuals and near-record open interest of $800 billion. Its native token, HYPE, surged 24% to $28, though it faces a key resistance level. Analysts suggest the recovery is supported by eased selling pressure from monthly unlocks and whales, as well as substantial accumulation by top buyers. However, sustained price growth depends on increased platform revenue driving token buybacks.

Hyperliquid has recorded remarkable traction in equity and crypto perpetuals (perps). Perps are contracts that allow traders to speculate on price movements without a fixed maturity.

The recently deployed equity perps (HIP-3), which allow traders to bet on traditional stocks with leverage, have crossed $1 billion in trading volume.

Additionally, the daily Open Interest (OI) was nearing a record high of $800 billion. This further underscored strong demand despite an overall lull in the crypto market.

On Bitcoin perps, Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan said,

“Hyperliquid has quietly achieved an important milestone of becoming the most liquid venue for crypto price discovery in the world.”

He cited the platform’s liquidity depth, which showed thicker order books than Binance. But will this boost the native token’s recovery?

Will HYPE extend its 24% recovery?

Following the update on the massive traction, HYPE posted a 24% jump in the past 24 hours. It rose from $22 to $28. But it also reached an overhead hurdle that may derail further recovery if bulls fail to clear it.

The $28 price area (red zone) has been a key short-term supply pressure since mid-December and may block bulls again if momentum falters at the level. If they clear it and top $30, then a clear run to $35 may be feasible.

What could drive HYPE’s recovery?

Overall, HYPE was still down 52% from its record high of $59 hit in September 2025. But according to analyst Ericonomic, some of the bearish catalysts that drove the downtrend have significantly eased.

The feared monthly unlocks (9.92 million HYPE), for example, saw only 10% of the supply sold off in the past two months. For Ericonometric, this was a ‘trickle’ rather than a ‘cliff’ that was priced in during the late 2025 dump.

The only problem, the analyst added, was that Hyperliquid Strategies was accumulating these team unlocks. This could limit the treasury firm’s ability to buy more HYPE off the spot market directly.

Besides, several whales, including Fasanara Capital, Tornado Cash player, and Continue Capital, have been persistent sellers, but the pressure had eased, the analyst noted.

The top 10 buyers had accumulated nearly $200 million in HYPE in the past 30 days, further helping stabilize prices above $20.

Finally, a significant portion of long leveraged positions have been wiped out and have presented a structural setup for a bullish recovery. However, the platform’s revenue was still muted despite growing traction.

For a sustained price recovery to be possible, Hyperliquid’s revenue neeeds to reverse higher to drive more HYPE buybacks.


Final Thoughts

  • Hyperliquid’s founder said the platform now rivals Binance as the most liquid venue for crypto price discovery.
  • Analysts believe HYPE’s recovery was likely amid overblown monthly unlock fears and easing selling pressure from whales.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat milestone did Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan claim the platform has achieved?

AHyperliquid has become the most liquid venue for crypto price discovery in the world.

QWhat type of contracts, specifically mentioned in the article, have seen over $1 billion in trading volume on Hyperliquid?

AEquity perpetuals (perps), which allow traders to bet on traditional stocks with leverage.

QWhat was the key overhead price hurdle for the HYPE token that could block further recovery?

AThe $28 price area, which has been a key short-term supply pressure since mid-December.

QAccording to analyst Ericonometric, what was the feared monthly token unlocks actually like, and how much was sold?

AThe unlocks were a 'trickle' rather than a 'cliff,' with only 10% of the supply sold off in the past two months.

QWhat does the article state is necessary for a sustained price recovery of the HYPE token?

AHyperliquid's revenue needs to reverse higher to drive more HYPE buybacks.

Leituras Relacionadas

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbitHá 32m

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbitHá 32m

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片