Hyperbeat: Launching a 'Bank' on Hyperliquid

marsbitPublicado em 2026-04-09Última atualização em 2026-04-09

Resumo

Hyperbeat, a protocol built on Hyperliquid, has launched "Liquid Banking," a self-custodial banking solution deployed on HyperEVM. It integrates stablecoin deposits, VISA card spending, perpetual trading, and multi-currency fiat on/off ramps into a single on-chain smart wallet. The core feature is "Credit Mode," powered by Morpho's lending engine. Users deposit assets like BTC or ETH as collateral. When spending with the VISA card, the system instantly borrows stablecoins via Morpho to complete payments, while the collateral remains on-chain earning yield. There is no grace period—interest accrues immediately upon spending. Hyperbeat uses its native stablecoin, beatUSD, issued in partnership with Paxos. Deposit yields come from real borrowing interest generated by consumer spending. Fiat services are provided by Noah, supporting multiple currencies, and the VISA card is issued by Third National via infrastructure from Rain. As a self-custodial system, user assets stay in their smart wallet. To prevent fraud, withdrawals require a cooling period and operator approval for collateral removal. The system emphasizes transparency and on-chain security but places responsibility on users to manage their account health, with no customer support to reverse errors.

On April 8, Hyperliquid's native protocol Hyperbeat launched Liquid Banking, a self-custodied 'bank' deployed on HyperEVM, integrating stablecoin deposits, VISA card spending, perpetual contract trading, and multi-currency fiat on/off ramps into a single on-chain smart wallet.

The Hyperbeat team transitioned from being among the first validators on the Hyperliquid testnet. Initially just 5 people, they self-funded a start with approximately $200,000. The two co-founders, Kilian Boshoff(@Fundi_Crypto) and 800.HL(@degennQuant), maintain a low profile; the former has a background from Stellenbosch University in South Africa. The company is registered in the Cayman Islands.

In August 2025, it completed a $5.2 million seed round co-led by ether.fi Ventures and Electric Capital, with participation from Coinbase Ventures, Maelstrom, Anchorage Digital, and others, valuing the company at approximately $40 million.

Morpho Provides the Engine, Building a 'Bank' in Ten Months

The core selling point of Liquid Banking is Credit Mode.

Users deposit assets like BTC, ETH, HYPE, etc., as collateral. When swiping the VISA card, the system instantly borrows stablecoins through the Morpho Blue market to complete the payment, while the collateral remains on-chain, continuing to generate yield. The user never interacts with a borrowing interface; the act of swiping the card is itself an on-chain loan.

The underlying lending engine comes from Morpho. Hyperbeat integrates Morpho into the user's smart wallet through an on-chain whitelist mechanism. Currently, Credit Mode operates on six isolated markets, with collateral covering HYPE, UBTC, UETH, USOL, and even the gold token XAUT.

Hyperbeat does not touch the core lending logic; Morpho does not touch the user interface. The former builds the 'bank frontend,' the latter supplies the 'credit engine.'

Stablecoin deposits for Liquid Banking center around beatUSD, a native stablecoin issued in partnership with Paxos Labs. Paxos provides the stablecoin infrastructure (underpinned by USDG0). The yield from the reserves flows directly back into Hyperbeat's rewards program and is ultimately distributed to users, rather than remaining with the issuer.

The deposit-side USD+ vault automatically allocates user funds to protocols like Morpho, Hypuur, Hyperlend, Felix, etc., offering 3%-8% APY.

The yield comes from the real borrowing interest paid by Credit Mode consumers. The more spending, the higher the deposit yield. But the sustainability of this cycle depends on the volume of real consumption.

Spend Without Selling Crypto, But Interest Accrues Immediately on Swipe

Fiat on/off ramps for Liquid Banking are provided by Noah, supporting USD (ACH, FedWire) and EUR (SEPA) deposits, with a unique IBAN bound to each account.

In March 2026, direct top-ups and withdrawals for Vietnamese Dong and Malaysian Ringgit were added. Withdrawals also cover over ten currencies including British Pounds, Dirhams, and Thai Baht.

The VISA card is issued by Third National, with underlying infrastructure from Rain, a Visa Principal Member. By early January 2026, Rain's financing round valued it at $1.95 billion, with an annualized processing volume exceeding $3 billion, covering over a hundred countries.

The card tier is Visa Signature,附带机场贵宾厅等权益 (includes benefits like airport lounge access). Foreign currency transactions incur a 1% FX fee (based on Visa's official exchange rate), with no annual fee and no transaction fees; ATM withdrawals cost $1 + 0.65%; the default monthly spending limit is $100,000.

The borrowing利率 (interest rate) for Credit Mode fluctuates with the utilization rate of the Morpho market, but there is no grace period. Every instance of 'spending without selling crypto' starts accruing interest the second the card is swiped.

Hyperbeat's official 'no hidden fees' refers to the transparency of the yield strategy, not the card's fee pricing. The Credit Mode borrowing rate is dynamically determined by the Morpho market. The lack of a grace period means the real-time cost of the convenience of 'spending without selling crypto' exists and is not low.

The Cost of Self-Custody is a One-Day Cooling Period

Unlike all centralized crypto cards, user assets always remain in their self-controlled ManagementAccount smart wallet. The Hyperbeat backend only has a restricted Operator role, able to execute settlements only within user-set limits and unable to transfer assets to unauthorized addresses.

But self-custody must solve one problem: what if a user withdraws funds right after swiping the card? Hyperbeat introduces an on-chain timelock mechanism.

Withdrawing settlement tokens requires a cooling period and a confirmation process. Withdrawing collateral requires Operator approval to prevent bad debt. Switching modes also has a delay. The contracts were audited by Zellic and Nethermind, with key management provided by Turnkey.

These frictions are not a bug; they are a feature. They acknowledge the speed difference between on-chain settlement and offline consumption, filling the gap with contract rules rather than 'please believe us.' But users must monitor their health factor themselves; there is no customer service to undo operational mistakes.

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core feature of Hyperbeat's Liquid Banking product launched on Hyperliquid?

AThe core feature is Credit Mode, which allows users to spend stablecoins borrowed instantly via Morpho Blue markets using their crypto assets as collateral, all within a single on-chain smart wallet without manually interacting with a lending interface.

QWhich companies were the lead investors in Hyperbeat's $5.2 million seed round and what was the valuation?

AThe seed round was co-led by ether.fi Ventures and Electric Capital, with participation from CoinBase Ventures, Maelstrom, and Anchorage Digital, valuing the company at approximately $40 million.

QHow does Hyperbeat's Credit Mode generate yield for stablecoin depositors?

AYield is generated from the real borrowing interest paid by consumers using Credit Mode. User deposits are automatically allocated to protocols like Morpho, Hypuur, Hyperlend, and Felix, with the interest from spending/borrowing flowing back to the reward program and ultimately to depositors.

QWhat is a key operational difference and potential cost for users of the Hyperbeat VISA card compared to traditional credit cards?

AA key difference is that there is no interest-free grace period. Borrowing interest starts accruing from the very second a transaction is made, and the rate is dynamically determined by the Morpho market's utilization.

QWhat is a key security feature and its associated user trade-off in Hyperbeat's self-custody model?

AA key security feature is the on-chain timelock and cooldown period for withdrawing settled tokens or collateral, which prevents bad debt but introduces a delay (e.g., a one-day cooldown) and requires users to actively manage their health factor without the ability for customer support to reverse mistakes.

Leituras Relacionadas

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight NewsHá 11m

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight NewsHá 11m

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbitHá 28m

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbitHá 28m

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手Há 40m

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手Há 40m

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbitHá 54m

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbitHá 54m

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

O que é $BANK

Bank AI: Um Passo Revolucionário no Futuro da Banca Introdução Em uma era marcada por avanços rápidos na tecnologia, o Bank AI está na interseção da inteligência artificial (IA) e dos serviços bancários. Este projeto inovador visa redefinir o panorama financeiro, melhorando a eficiência operacional, as medidas de segurança e as experiências dos clientes através do poder da IA. Ao embarcarmos nesta exploração do Bank AI, iremos aprofundar no que o projeto implica, suas dinâmicas operacionais, seu contexto histórico e marcos significativos. O que é o Bank AI? No seu cerne, o Bank AI representa uma iniciativa transformadora com o objetivo de integrar a inteligência artificial em várias operações bancárias. Este projeto aproveita as capacidades da IA para automatizar processos, melhorar os protocolos de gestão de risco e melhorar a interação com os clientes através de serviços personalizados. Os principais objetivos do Bank AI incluem: Automatização das Funções Bancárias: Ao aproveitar as tecnologias de IA, o Bank AI visa automatizar tarefas rotineiras, reduzindo o peso sobre os recursos humanos e aumentando a eficiência. Gestão de Risco Melhorada: O projeto utiliza algoritmos de IA para prever e identificar riscos, fortalecendo assim as medidas de segurança contra fraudes e outras ameaças. Personalização dos Serviços Bancários: O Bank AI foca em oferecer produtos e serviços financeiros ajustados, analisando dados e comportamentos dos clientes. Melhoria da Experiência do Cliente: A implementação de soluções impulsionadas por IA, como chatbots e assistentes virtuais, visa proporcionar aos usuários interações mais humanizadas, revolucionando a forma como os clientes se envolvem com os bancos. Com esses objetivos, o Bank AI posiciona-se como um ator crucial para tornar a banca mais eficiente, segura e centrada no usuário. Quem é o Criador do Bank AI? Os detalhes sobre o criador do Bank AI permanecem desconhecidos. Assim, nenhuma pessoa ou organização específica foi identificada nas informações disponíveis. O anonimato que cerca a origem do projeto levanta questões, mas não diminui a sua ambiciosa visão e objetivos. Quem são os Investidores do Bank AI? Semelhante ao criador do projeto, informações específicas sobre os investidores ou organizações que apoiam o Bank AI não foram divulgadas. Sem essas informações, é difícil delinear o apoio financeiro e institucional que pode estar impulsionando o projeto para frente. No entanto, a importância de ter uma sólida base de investimento é fundamental para sustentar o desenvolvimento em um campo tão inovador. Como Funciona o Bank AI? O Bank AI opera em várias frentes inovadoras, focando em fatores únicos que o diferenciam das estruturas bancárias tradicionais. Abaixo estão as principais características operacionais: Automatização: Ao aplicar algoritmos de aprendizado de máquina, o Bank AI automatiza vários processos manuais dentro dos bancos. Isso resulta na redução dos custos operacionais e permite que os trabalhadores humanos redirecionem os seus esforços para atividades mais estratégicas. Gestão de Risco Avançada: A integração da IA nas práticas de gestão de risco equipa os bancos com ferramentas para prever com precisão potenciais ameaças, como fraudes, garantindo que as informações e ativos dos clientes permaneçam seguros. Recomendações Financeiras Personalizadas: Através do aprendizado contínuo a partir das interações com os clientes, os sistemas de IA desenvolvem uma compreensão sutil das necessidades dos usuários, permitindo oferecer conselhos adaptados sobre decisões financeiras. Interações Melhoradas com os Clientes: Utilizando chatbots e assistentes virtuais alimentados por IA, o Bank AI permite uma experiência de cliente mais envolvente, permitindo que os usuários tenham suas dúvidas resolvidas rapidamente, reduzindo assim os tempos de espera e melhorando os níveis de satisfação. Juntas, estas características operacionais posicionam o Bank AI como um pioneiro no setor bancário, estabelecendo novos padrões para a prestação de serviços e a excelência operacional. Cronologia do Bank AI Compreender a trajetória do Bank AI requer uma análise do seu contexto histórico. Abaixo está uma cronologia que destaca marcos e desenvolvimentos importantes: Início de 2010: A conceituação da integração da IA nos serviços bancários começou a ganhar atenção à medida que instituições bancárias reconheciam os potenciais benefícios. 2018: Ocorreu um aumento significativo na implementação de tecnologias de IA, quando os bancos começaram a usar ferramentas de IA como chatbots para atendimento ao cliente básico e sistemas de gestão de risco para melhorar o tratamento de segurança. 2023: A sofisticação da IA continuou a avançar, com a introdução de IA generativa para tarefas mais complexas, como processamento de documentos e análise de investimentos em tempo real. Este ano marcou um salto significativo nas capacidades proporcionadas aos bancos pela tecnologia de IA. 2024-Estado Atual: Neste ano, o Bank AI está em uma trajetória ascendente, com pesquisas e desenvolvimentos em andamento prontos para aprimorar ainda mais as capacidades nas operações bancárias. A exploração contínua das aplicações de IA sugere desenvolvimentos emocionantes por vir. Pontos Chave Sobre o Bank AI Integração da IA na Banca: O Bank AI foca na adoção da inteligência artificial para simplificar os processos bancários e melhorar as experiências dos usuários. Automatização e Foco em Gestão de Risco: O projeto enfatiza fortemente essas áreas, visando transferir o peso das tarefas rotineiras enquanto melhora as estruturas de segurança através de análises preditivas. Soluções Bancárias Personalizadas: Ao aproveitar os dados dos clientes, o Bank AI possibilita serviços bancários ajustados que atendem às necessidades individuais dos usuários. Compromisso com o Desenvolvimento: O Bank AI permanece comprometido com contínuas pesquisas e esforços de desenvolvimento, garantindo a sua adaptabilidade e relevância contínua à medida que a tecnologia continua a evoluir. Conclusão Em resumo, o Bank AI exemplifica um passo crucial em frente na indústria bancária, aproveitando a inteligência artificial para remodelar paradigmas operacionais, melhorar a segurança e promover a satisfação do cliente. Apesar das lacunas de informação em torno do criador e dos investidores, os objetivos claros e os mecanismos funcionais do Bank AI fornecem uma base sólida para sua evolução contínua. À medida que a tecnologia de IA continua a avançar e se fundir com o setor bancário, o Bank AI está bem posicionado para impactar significativamente o futuro dos serviços financeiros, aprimorando a maneira como entendemos e interagimos com a banca.

75 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2024.12.03

O que é $BANK

Como comprar BANK

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)Depois de comprar o teu Lorenzo Protocol (BANK), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)Transaciona facilmente Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

429 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar BANK

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de BANK (BANK) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片