Hot Interaction Collection | Robinhood Testnet Interaction; Earn Early Points on Canopy (February 27)

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2026-02-27Última atualização em 2026-02-27

Resumo

Hot Interaction Compilation: Robinhood Testnet Interaction; Canopy Early Points (February 27) Original by Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina) Author: Asher (@Asher_0210) Robinhood Chain: An L2 focused on full-chain tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) On February 11, Robinhood announced the launch of the Robinhood Chain public testnet on Arbitrum. It will support tokenized real-world assets, including stocks, ETFs, private assets, and other financial instruments. The testnet allows developers to explore potential applications and prepare for the mainnet launch, promoting RWA tokenization and DeFi liquidity access. The chain will enable 24/7 trading, cross-chain bridging, and self-custody, supporting use cases like tokenized asset platforms, lending protocols, and perpetual exchanges. Interaction Tutorial: 1. Add the test network and claim test tokens. 2. Complete the testnet badge quest. 3. Mint NFTs on platforms like NFTs2Me to enrich interaction data (requires a small amount of ETH for gas fees). Canopy: An AI-powered L1 blockchain Canopy is currently in its testnet phase and has launched a points incentive program. In late January 2025, it announced a $1.2 million seed round led by Mechanism Capital and CitizenX, with participation from Primitive, GSR, and Side Door Ventures. Interaction Tutorial: 1. Visit the rewards page and connect your wallet and X account. 2. Complete four initial tasks and three daily tasks to earn points. 3. Fulfill addition...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Asher (@Asher_ 0210)

Robinhood Chain: L2 Focused on Full On-Chain RWA Assets

Project Introduction

On February 11, Robinhood announced the launch of the Robinhood Chain public testnet based on Arbitrum, which will support tokenized real-world assets, including stocks, ETFs, private assets, and other financial instruments (Read more: Robinhood boldly enters L2, focusing on RWA tokenization).

Robinhood stated that the public testnet lays the foundation for developers to explore potential and validate applications in advance, preparing for the mainnet launch, and promoting the tokenization of real-world assets and DeFi liquidity access. It is reported that Robinhood Chain will support 24/7 trading, cross-chain bridging, and self-custody, covering application scenarios such as tokenized asset platforms, lending protocols, and perpetual contract exchanges.

Interaction Tutorial

STEP 1. Add the test network and claim test coins (Link: https://faucet.testnet.chain.robinhood.com/).

STEP 2. Participate in the testnet badge (Link: https://onchaingm.com/badge-robinhood).

STEP 3. Some platforms, such as NFTs2Me, have launched Robinhood testnet NFTs, which can enrich Robinhood testnet interaction data. However, minting NFTs requires a small amount of ETH, so consider the cost (Links: https://bold-robinhood-gold.testnet.nfts2.me/ and https://robinhood-penta.testnet.nfts2.me/).

Canopy: AI-Powered L1 Public Chain

Project Introduction

Canopy is an AI-powered L1 public chain. The project is currently in the testnet phase and has launched a points incentive activity. At the end of January 2025, Canopy announced the completion of a $1.2 million seed round led by Mechanism Capital and CitizenX, with participation from Primitive, GSR, and Side Door Ventures.

Interaction Tutorial

STEP 1. Enter the activity interface (Link: https://rewards.canopynetwork.org/), and connect your wallet and personal X account.

STEP 2. After linking your X account, you can unlock 4 tasks to earn points. The other 3 tasks are daily tasks.

STEP 3. There are more point tasks below. Reach the corresponding requirements to claim them.

TBD: Prediction Market Platform Based on Solana

Project Introduction

TBD is a prediction market platform based on Solana, focusing on public opinion poll events. The platform opened for use on February 25. On the same day, it announced the completion of a $3 million seed round co-led by CMT Digital and ParaFi.

Interaction Tutorial

Currently, register with X or use TBD on Solana Seeker to receive up to $100 in risk-free betting credits.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main focus of Robinhood Chain as described in the article?

ARobinhood Chain is an L2 solution built on Arbitrum that focuses on supporting tokenized real-world assets (RWA), including stocks, ETFs, private assets, and other financial instruments, enabling 24/7 trading, cross-chain bridging, and self-custody.

QWhat are the key steps to interact with Robinhood Chain's testnet?

AThe key steps are: 1. Add the test network and claim test tokens from the faucet. 2. Complete the testnet badge task on the OnChainGM platform. 3. Optionally, mint NFTs on platforms like NFTs2Me to enrich interaction data (requires paying a small amount of ETH).

QWhat is Canopy and what recent achievement did it announce?

ACanopy is an AI-driven Layer 1 blockchain. It recently announced the completion of a $1.2 million seed round funding led by Mechanism Capital and CitizenX, with participation from Primitive, GSR, and Side Door Ventures.

QHow can users earn points in the Canopy rewards program?

AUsers can earn points by connecting their wallet and X account to unlock 4 initial tasks, completing 3 daily tasks, and fulfilling additional tasks listed in the rewards section for meeting specific requirements.

QWhat is TBD and what incentive does it offer to new users?

ATBD is a prediction market platform built on Solana that focuses on poll-based events. It offers new users up to $100 in risk-free betting credits for registering with X or using TBD on Solana Seeker.

Leituras Relacionadas

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbitHá 2m

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbitHá 2m

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbitHá 3m

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbitHá 3m

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight NewsHá 13m

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight NewsHá 13m

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbitHá 30m

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbitHá 30m

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手Há 42m

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手Há 42m

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow